Oregon
Oregon public defenders warn of ongoing crisis as defendants remain without representation
The exterior of Deschutes Defenders office at 215 NW Greenwood Ave., in Bend, Ore., on Sept. 2, 2024. This week, Oregon’s state court administrator warns of the statewide shortage of public defenders that has left many defendants without legal representation.
Winston Szeto / OPB
The number of people who have been accused of a crime and are without an attorney — a constitutional right — has reached an all-time high in Oregon.
In the last month alone, the number of unrepresented individuals increased by 11%, Nancy Cozine, the state’s top court administrator, told state lawmakers this week.
Oregon’s shortage of public defenders has been a high-profile problem for several years. But the latest numbers illustrate the disheartening reality that even after lawmakers funneled more than $90 million more into the system in 2023 and dedicated brain power to fixing the problem. It’s not been enough.
As of the end of January, there were 4,178 individuals who didn’t have an attorney statewide. The highest number of individuals in this situation are in Multnomah (1,172), Marion (756), Jackson (754), Washington (628), Douglas (253) and Coos counties (99).
Another eyebrow-raising statistic: 731 people who have been without representation for more than six months. Most of the people are currently not incarcerated; 191 are in custody.
The bulk of the charges are driving under the influence of intoxication, which is nearly 17% of the cases. For out-of-custody felony cases, the average wait time to get an attorney has increased to an average of 110 days.
Oregon lawmakers consider bill to overhaul public defense system
Amanda Dalton, a lobbyist with the Oregon District Attorneys Association, told lawmakers this week, it’s not just misdemeanor crimes that are going unchecked. There are worse crimes where people are being let out of custody because there are no attorneys. Like a case in Douglas County, where a person is being accused of raping a minor and spent 22 months without counsel. The person was released because no attorney was present.
The problems in the system were identified years ago. In 2018, a report found that Oregon’s system of state public defense is so bureaucratic and structurally flawed it couldn’t guarantee clients were getting the legal defense they are owed — a requirement of the U.S. Constitution. The constitution requires a defendant who cannot afford to hire their own attorney to be provided counsel at public expense.
In 2023, lawmakers made substantive changes to the system; although even then there were calls from public defenders that they didn’t go far enough. The public defense commission, the independent body that is appointed by the chief justice of the state’s Supreme Court, said they are in the midst of trying to fix a complicated system that has been broken for years and it’s a long process. The commission hired a new leader in late 2022, after the head of the commission was ousted.
The head of Oregon’s public defense system is fired, after months of tumult
Most recently, there has been some high-profile disagreements over how to frame the crisis. During an interview with OPB last month, Multnomah County District Attorney Nathan Vasquez offered a sharp critique of many of the county’s public defenders.
“I call it the work stoppage,” said Vasquez, who took office last month.. “I hear it referred to as a defense attorney crisis. I don’t accept that. I don’t agree with that terminology. I see it much differently.”
Following the comments, many public defenders have expressed concern and anger over Vasquez’s remarks.
Stacey Reding, executive director of Metropolitan Defenders Inc., said “calling it a work stoppage is insulting.”
Multnomah County’s new top prosecutor will push for more jail beds to curb substance use, calls out public defenders
Reding said she’s had high turnover in her office. New attorneys often have less experience, she said, and can’t take as many cases as the lawyers they’re replacing.
“Our district attorney’s office could take actions that would help with the public defense crisis,” Reding said. “In Multnomah County, our attorneys prepare a lot of cases for trial that turn into dismissals on the eve of trial. If our district attorney’s office could identify those cases that are dismissals much earlier in the process and dismiss them, that would save many hours of defense attorney time that we could then turn around and focus on taking new cases.”
Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court to hear $1B PacificCorp wildfire case
2020 Labor Day wildfire survivor talks blaze’s five-year anniversary
Hear from 2020 wildfire victim Christine Grom as she talks about the results of a class action lawsuit against PacifiCorp.
The Oregon Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in the billion dollar class action lawsuit between survivors of four 2020 Labor Day Fires and PacifiCorp.
The state’s high court will hear arguments at 1:30 p.m. on Nov. 3 in Salem, in a case with billions on the line for thousands of victims impacted by one of the worst disasters in state history.
The review represents a win for wildfire survivors, many of whom live in the Santiam Canyon and lost everything in the fires, and who stood to lose billions in jury awards following an April decision by the Oregon Court of Appeals.
How did we get here?
In June 2023, a Multnomah County jury found PacifiCorp at fault for causing the Santiam, Echo Mountain, 242 and South Obenchain fires and liable to a class of roughly 2,000 victims.
In the years since the verdict, juries have awarded more than $1.2 billion to 189 wildfire survivors, over the course of 18 “mini trials” designed to determine awards to fire victims.
On April 8, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled the 2023 verdict was flawed, writing that instructions to the jury were “prejudicial to PacifiCorp.”
The appeals court reversed and remanded the case, which would have wiped out all awards and previous legal decisions.
Lawyers for the wildfire victims filed an appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court, also in April, and the high court granted certiorari on June 25.
The timeline for Oregon’s high court hearing the case appears swifter than normal, perhaps representing the need to bring some resolution for a case that’s been ongoing for five years.
“The thousands of Oregonians whose homes PacifiCorp burned are grateful that the Oregon Supreme Court will hear their case quickly,” lead council for the wildfire victims said in a statement.
PacifiCorp issued a statement saying they expected the court of appeals decision to be upheld.
“We respect the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision to review the case and will continue to participate fully in the process, presenting our position through the Court’s established briefing schedule,” a statement from PacifiCorp said. “We look forward to the Court’s consideration of the key issues and to the Court affirming the unanimous Oregon Court of Appeals decision.”
What will the court decide?
In reversing the original verdict, the Court of Appeals ruled that a set of instructions given to the jury, in the 2023 case, was in error and prejudicial to PacifiCorp.
The offending instruction, the ruling said, centered on the trial court telling the jury that it could “assume that the evidence at the trial applies to all class members.”
“We conclude … that instruction was legally erroneous, because certain evidence at trial, particularly related to causation, did not necessarily apply to every class member,” the appeals court wrote.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that “the challenged instruction was appropriate” and that the Court of Appeals ruling “rests on a misinterpretation that no party held at trial and no juror adopted,” they wrote in their appeal to the Supreme Court.
In a news release announcing it would take up the case, the Supreme Court said it would examine the jury instructions and ruling by the appeals court.
Zach Urness has been an outdoors reporter in Oregon for 18 years and is host of the Explore Oregon Podcast. He can be reached at zurness@StatesmanJournal.com or 503-399-6801. Find him on X at @ZachsORoutdoors and BlueSky at oregonoutdoors.bsky.social
Oregon
National Weather Service says no tsunami threat after 5.5 quake off Oregon coast
The National Weather Service says there is no tsunami threat following a magnitude 5.5 earthquake off the Oregon coast.
The U.S. Geological Survey says the quake struck at 4:35 a.m. about 175 miles southwest of Eugene, Oregon, at a depth of about 6 miles in the Pacific Ocean.
National Weather Service says no tsunami threat after 5.5 quake off Oregon coast (KVAL/SBG)
The earthquake occurred in the Blanco Fracture Zone, a seismically active area where hundreds of earthquakes occur each year.
There have been no reports of residents along the southern Oregon coast feeling the quake.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
This is a developing story.
Oregon
Missing, endangered 2-year-old last seen in Portland area
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — The Oregon Department of Human Services is asking for help finding a 2-year-old boy who is believed to be in danger.
Armani Andrews disappeared on June 17 and is thought to be with someone in the Portland area, officials said.
He’s about two feet tall with brown hair and brown eyes and African American/mixed race, ODHS said.
Locations around Portland that the child may have frequented include the Rose Haven shelter on Northwest Glisan Street, the Multnomah County Central Library on Southwest 10th Avenue and Southeast Portland between 82nd and 103rd avenues.
People who have any information about Andrews’ whereabouts are asked to call 911.
-
Massachusetts1 minute agoMillions of gallons of wastewater discharged into Merrimack River due to broken pipe
-
Minnesota6 minutes agoDriver in fatal crash near Belview, Minnesota, was fleeing law enforcement
-
Mississippi13 minutes agoMississippi gas prices drop ahead of Fourth of July weekend
-
Missouri16 minutes agoGas prices falling in Missouri despite U.S. conflict with Iran
-
Montana21 minutes agoJune 29 recap: Missoula and Western Montana news you may have missed today
-
Nebraska28 minutes agoNebraska running back arrested in Florida on aggravated battery charge
-
Nevada31 minutes agoAn ‘orchestrated dance’: Nevada moves bighorn sheep to help restore northern herd
-
New Hampshire36 minutes agoNashua Man Indicted On 8 Child First-Degree Assault Charges: Hillsborough County Superior Court Indictments

