Oregon
Oregon businesses face uncertainty amid changing trade moves from the Trump administration
South Korea-based container carrier SM Line made its inaugural vessel call at the Port of Portland’s Terminal 6 in Portland, Ore., Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2020. Oregon businesses face uncertainty amid changing trade moves from the second Trump administration in 2025.
Donald Orr / OPB
Oregon companies are trying to make sense of rapidly changing tariff policies that could raise the cost of doing business and strain the state’s relationship with key international trading partners.
President Donald Trump has continued to signal support for widespread tariffs on imported goods. Over the weekend, he announced tariffs on countries he said are fueling fentanyl deaths in the U.S.: Mexico, China and Canada. But almost as quickly as the tariffs were announced, some of them were shelved.
Mexico and Canada both reached a deal to pause impending tariffs until at least early March. On Tuesday morning, a 10% import tax on all items from China is expected to go into effect.
“Businesses do not like uncertainty,” Carl Riccadonna, Oregon’s Chief Economist, told OPB. “They do not like to be playing a game where the rules of the game are in flux, and they have to make these adjustments to supply chains and investment patterns, et cetera.”
Riccadonna said the financial markets can indicate how companies and investors feel about future profitability and earnings. U.S. stocks and global markets both took a dive Monday as trade tensions simmered.
In Oregon, industries like agriculture, construction technology and computer chip manufacturing rely on international trade. In 2023, the state exported more than $25 billion worth of goods to the global market and imported nearly $20 billion, according to the trade group Oregon Business & Industry.
“The escalation of a tariff or trade war — particularly with major trading partners like China — could negatively impact Oregon’s key exports, such as timber, wheat, wine, and hazelnuts,” Riccadonna and the economists at Oregon’s Office of Economic Analysis wrote in their most recent quarterly outlook. “These products rely heavily on international demand, and tariffs or restrictions could reduce export volumes, drive down prices, and harm associated industries like transportation and warehousing.”
President Trump has said tariffs will increase domestic manufacturing, lower prices, and spur economic development in the country. But economists say widespread tariffs will likely do the opposite while spurring retaliation from other countries.
“While it’s too soon to predict accurately the effects of any tariffs, generally speaking, we are most concerned about the impact on job opportunities for Oregonians, costs to consumers, and the effects of economic shifts on state and local tax revenue,” Angela Wilhelms, CEO of Oregon Business & Industry, said in an email. “We appreciate the desire to take action to fight the scourge of fentanyl and other substances, which have wreaked havoc on communities across Oregon, but we are concerned about any steps that could further erode Oregon’s competitiveness or deepen its manufacturing recession.”
State numbers show the manufacturing sector in Oregon lost 2,500 jobs over the last year. Manufacturers in Oregon and across the country rely on parts from overseas.
Oregon Business & Industry represents more than 1,600 companies of different sizes in a number of sectors. OBI director Wilhelms said the organization “will continue to talk to businesses across the state in a variety of industries” regarding what she called “a rapidly evolving situation.”
One of Oregon’s biggest trading hubs is the Port of Portland’s Terminal 6, where large shipping containers full of goods from overseas are unloaded. Empty containers are then filled with Oregon products and shipped back out to the global market.
Longtime longshoreman Leal Sundet said people working at the terminal took the changing news about tariffs in stride.
“I don’t think they see it’s going to have any detrimental impact on the amount of work that we’re going to have,” Sundet, who is also the secretary for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 8, told OPB.
Still, Sundet said the union supports trade free of restrictions.
“It’s in our interest that we have open trade,” Sundet said. “We’ve always been free traders, the position of the ILWU has been free trade. We make a living off of free trade.”
Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court to hear $1B PacificCorp wildfire case
2020 Labor Day wildfire survivor talks blaze’s five-year anniversary
Hear from 2020 wildfire victim Christine Grom as she talks about the results of a class action lawsuit against PacifiCorp.
The Oregon Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in the billion dollar class action lawsuit between survivors of four 2020 Labor Day Fires and PacifiCorp.
The state’s high court will hear arguments at 1:30 p.m. on Nov. 3 in Salem, in a case with billions on the line for thousands of victims impacted by one of the worst disasters in state history.
The review represents a win for wildfire survivors, many of whom live in the Santiam Canyon and lost everything in the fires, and who stood to lose billions in jury awards following an April decision by the Oregon Court of Appeals.
How did we get here?
In June 2023, a Multnomah County jury found PacifiCorp at fault for causing the Santiam, Echo Mountain, 242 and South Obenchain fires and liable to a class of roughly 2,000 victims.
In the years since the verdict, juries have awarded more than $1.2 billion to 189 wildfire survivors, over the course of 18 “mini trials” designed to determine awards to fire victims.
On April 8, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled the 2023 verdict was flawed, writing that instructions to the jury were “prejudicial to PacifiCorp.”
The appeals court reversed and remanded the case, which would have wiped out all awards and previous legal decisions.
Lawyers for the wildfire victims filed an appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court, also in April, and the high court granted certiorari on June 25.
The timeline for Oregon’s high court hearing the case appears swifter than normal, perhaps representing the need to bring some resolution for a case that’s been ongoing for five years.
“The thousands of Oregonians whose homes PacifiCorp burned are grateful that the Oregon Supreme Court will hear their case quickly,” lead council for the wildfire victims said in a statement.
PacifiCorp issued a statement saying they expected the court of appeals decision to be upheld.
“We respect the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision to review the case and will continue to participate fully in the process, presenting our position through the Court’s established briefing schedule,” a statement from PacifiCorp said. “We look forward to the Court’s consideration of the key issues and to the Court affirming the unanimous Oregon Court of Appeals decision.”
What will the court decide?
In reversing the original verdict, the Court of Appeals ruled that a set of instructions given to the jury, in the 2023 case, was in error and prejudicial to PacifiCorp.
The offending instruction, the ruling said, centered on the trial court telling the jury that it could “assume that the evidence at the trial applies to all class members.”
“We conclude … that instruction was legally erroneous, because certain evidence at trial, particularly related to causation, did not necessarily apply to every class member,” the appeals court wrote.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that “the challenged instruction was appropriate” and that the Court of Appeals ruling “rests on a misinterpretation that no party held at trial and no juror adopted,” they wrote in their appeal to the Supreme Court.
In a news release announcing it would take up the case, the Supreme Court said it would examine the jury instructions and ruling by the appeals court.
Zach Urness has been an outdoors reporter in Oregon for 18 years and is host of the Explore Oregon Podcast. He can be reached at zurness@StatesmanJournal.com or 503-399-6801. Find him on X at @ZachsORoutdoors and BlueSky at oregonoutdoors.bsky.social
Oregon
National Weather Service says no tsunami threat after 5.5 quake off Oregon coast
The National Weather Service says there is no tsunami threat following a magnitude 5.5 earthquake off the Oregon coast.
The U.S. Geological Survey says the quake struck at 4:35 a.m. about 175 miles southwest of Eugene, Oregon, at a depth of about 6 miles in the Pacific Ocean.
National Weather Service says no tsunami threat after 5.5 quake off Oregon coast (KVAL/SBG)
The earthquake occurred in the Blanco Fracture Zone, a seismically active area where hundreds of earthquakes occur each year.
There have been no reports of residents along the southern Oregon coast feeling the quake.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
This is a developing story.
Oregon
Missing, endangered 2-year-old last seen in Portland area
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — The Oregon Department of Human Services is asking for help finding a 2-year-old boy who is believed to be in danger.
Armani Andrews disappeared on June 17 and is thought to be with someone in the Portland area, officials said.
He’s about two feet tall with brown hair and brown eyes and African American/mixed race, ODHS said.
Locations around Portland that the child may have frequented include the Rose Haven shelter on Northwest Glisan Street, the Multnomah County Central Library on Southwest 10th Avenue and Southeast Portland between 82nd and 103rd avenues.
People who have any information about Andrews’ whereabouts are asked to call 911.
-
Mississippi49 seconds agoMississippi gas prices drop ahead of Fourth of July weekend
-
Missouri4 minutes agoGas prices falling in Missouri despite U.S. conflict with Iran
-
Montana9 minutes agoJune 29 recap: Missoula and Western Montana news you may have missed today
-
Nebraska16 minutes agoNebraska running back arrested in Florida on aggravated battery charge
-
Nevada19 minutes agoAn ‘orchestrated dance’: Nevada moves bighorn sheep to help restore northern herd
-
New Hampshire24 minutes agoNashua Man Indicted On 8 Child First-Degree Assault Charges: Hillsborough County Superior Court Indictments
-
New Jersey31 minutes agoJersey City, N.J. revises proposed property tax increase to 15%. Here’s why.
-
New Mexico34 minutes agoGila National Forest: Sacaton Fire in Gila Wilderness Remains Active

