Oregon
Audit: Oregon’s drug decriminalization Measure 110 shows $33 million in grants drew scant evidence of effectiveness
Setbacks and delays hindered the rollout of Measure 110, which Oregon voters permitted in 2020 to decriminalize drug possession for private use and enhance funding for therapy providers.
That’s the message from Oregon Secretary of State Shemia Fagan, who launched an audit Thursday of the $150-million-per-year initiative funded largely with hashish tax income. It arrived towards a stark backdrop: Oregon has the second highest charge of substance use dysfunction in the US and is fiftieth within the nation for therapy entry, Fagan famous, citing 2020 figures from the Substance Abuse and Psychological Well being Providers Administration.
Among the many findings: The state’s well being authority inadequately supported the volunteer council convened to distribute grants to suppliers in all 36 Oregon counties; council members lacked experience, which slowed funding approval; and the state and repair suppliers inconsistently collected knowledge, making it troublesome to trace the measure’s effectiveness.
That sparse knowledge assortment left auditors not sure of how grant recipients spent $33 million — or how the cash improved folks’s lives.
Fagan, who referred to as Measure 110 “a matter of life and loss of life,” skilled her mom battle with dependancy. Now her brother is present process therapy. “Oregonians handed this with the expectation that folks would get higher – that they’d have entry to therapy,” Fagan stated. “These providers have to be there.”
Right here’s a have a look at 4 main takeaways from the audit:
Council struggling
The audit is the primary of three and centered on how the Oregon Well being Authority and the Oversight and Accountability Council, the volunteer physique with about 20 members from the restoration group, have carried out the measure so far. The council, whose members are eligible for stipends if their employers don’t pay for his or her participation, is answerable for allocating about $300 million in grant funding over two years.
A lack of understanding amongst Oversight and Accountability Council members and their heavy, generally complicated workload brought about delays and strained relations with the Oregon Well being Authority, auditors stated.
Whereas council members are required to have expertise in substance use restoration providers, auditors discovered they typically lack expertise in finishing up their major duty: overseeing and awarding authorities grants. And the Oregon Well being Authority, which confronted excessive employees turnover and unclear expectations about who was answerable for what, failed to supply the council with the assistance it wanted, the audit states.
Council members – a lot of whom have full-time jobs – informed auditors they spend as many as 40 hours per week finishing evaluations and attending council conferences. Their work has additionally been delayed by “unclear, inefficient, and troublesome to make use of” grant analysis rubrics.
Frustrations on the council ran excessive.
One council member reported spending over 100 hours on grant evaluations, solely to have the work returned and marked “incomplete” by reviewers with the Oregon Well being Authority. Two members eliminated themself from the analysis committee out of frustration, and 19 conferences had been canceled between February and April 2022.
To resolve these points, auditors stated the Oregon Well being Authority – not the council – must shoulder extra of the executive work, together with reviewing grant purposes and offering monetary analyses. Council members additionally want extra coaching from the well being authority on easy methods to perform their work. However each entities must collaborate on a greater system for evaluating grants that may be rolled out sooner or later, the audit stated.
Council dealing with turnover
All members of the Oversight and Accountability Council had been appointed in February 2021 and have the identical time period restrict, which ends this yr. Except state legislators revise and stagger these appointments, the complete council may flip over this yr – placing the work of the council and Measure 110 in danger, the audit stated.
Knowledge lacking
Gaps in amassing, reporting and analyzing knowledge made it troublesome for auditors to gauge Measure 110′s effectiveness.
Auditors discovered the Oregon Well being Authority awarded $33 million in grants throughout the preliminary implementation of Measure 110, however collected virtually no knowledge exhibiting how the funds had been spent or how they improved entry to substance use therapy and providers.
Well being authority officers stated most of the suppliers funded underneath Measure 110 are new to the state well being care system and might’t deal with conducting rigorous knowledge assortment. The character of some therapy providers additionally makes knowledge assortment troublesome. For instance, a supplier could supply needle exchanges however battle to get demographic knowledge from somebody employees encounter on the road.
However till constant knowledge is captured, auditors say it will likely be troublesome for coverage makers and the general public to inform whether or not Measure 110 is working, or to counsel enhancements to this system.
Providers supplied statewide
It took longer than anticipated, however each county and tribal space in Oregon now has not less than one Behavioral Well being Useful resource Community, a corporation that gives free providers by means of grants permitted by the Oversight and Accountability Council. Providers embody substance use dysfunction screening, case administration, low-barrier therapy, peer mentoring and housing.
The Oversight and Accountability Council was alleged to approve funding for networks statewide by January 2022, however failed to take action till August. Funding approval was held again by delays and “public friction” among the many council that auditors stated may have been prevented with extra assist from the Oregon Well being Authority, in accordance with the audit.
What did the audit suggest?
The audit made eight suggestions. 4 are directed to the Oregon Well being Authority and 4 to the Legislature.
The Oregon Well being Authority agreed to:
- Publish its first iteration of a strategic plan for the way it will combine Measure 110 into the state’s total behavioral well being system by the tip of September.
- Determine and doc methods to shut gaps in knowledge assortment and reporting by the tip of 2024.
- Present higher assist to the Oversight and Accountability Council, together with conducting trainings on grant funding and figuring out conflicts of curiosity earlier than voting on funding choices.
- Increase collaborations with the Division of Corrections to handle substance use problems among the many state’s jail inhabitants, together with state housing and substance abuse therapy providers.
Auditors advisable the Legislature:
- Direct the Oregon Well being Authority and Oversight and Accountability Council to gather sufficient knowledge to evaluate Measure 110′s effectiveness.
- Replace statutes to eradicate overlaps in necessities for a statewide substance use restoration hotline, particular person Behavioral Well being Useful resource Networks hotlines and the Drug and Alcohol Prevention Hotline.
- Direct the Oregon Well being Authority to supply extra assist, help and coaching to the Oversight and Accountability Council.
- Revise and stagger appointment phrases on the Oversight and Accountability Council to stop all council members from leaving on the similar time this yr.
James Schroeder, OHA’s interim director, agreed to implement the audit suggestions by the tip of 2024. Two extra audits centered on the measure’s funds and efficiency will likely be launched by the tip of 2024.
— Catalina Gaitán, cgaitan@oregonian.com, @catalingaitan_
Our journalism wants your assist. Please turn out to be a subscriber at present at OregonLive.com/subscribe.