Connect with us

Nevada

NEVADA VIEWS: Rent control will hurt average Nevadans

Published

on

NEVADA VIEWS: Rent control will hurt average Nevadans


As the owner of a property management company and a real estate investor, I adamantly oppose rent control. Those in favor might say, “Of course you do.” They might accuse me of seeking to get rich off the backs of blue-collar, middle- and lower-class working people. But they’d be wrong.

I immigrated to this country from Sri Lanka when I was 22. My determination and work ethic are what got me where I am today. It is the same determination I see in the landlords who hire my company to manage their properties. And to continue the unmasking, I’m also a Democrat. Rent control is not a partisan issue. It is an economic one.

Rent-control policies, often promoted as a remedy for rising housing costs, produce unintended consequences, including squeezing the very backbone of local real estate — mom-and-pop landlords, many of whom are in blue-collar, middle-class families.

For countless small-property owners, a modest rental home is more than just an investment. It is built over years of hard work and careful financial planning. These landlords often own fewer than five properties — and sometimes just one. According to a recent JP Morgan Chase report, there are 50 million residential rental units across the country, and more than 40 percent belong to mom-and-pop landlords. The goal of these landlords is supplemental income. Yet rental income must first be used to cover maintenance costs and property taxes as well as repairs and maintenance. When government policies impose strict rent controls, these families not only find their potential revenue streams capped but also struggle to cover costs.

Advertisement

As a property manager, I have a front-row view to the good, the bad and the ugly of being a small landlord. One recent “bad” was the impact of the rent moratorium implemented during the pandemic. This moratorium was designed to protect tenants during that challenging economic time — and for some it was much needed. But this measure inadvertently hurt middle-class real estate investors.

With rental income frozen or significantly reduced, many small landlords struggled to meet their financial obligations. The result was foreclosures, deferred maintenance, deteriorating property conditions and — in some cases — the forced sale or abandonment of cherished family assets. This not only undermined the financial stability of these landlords but also contributed to a decline in the overall quality and availability of rental housing.

I could tell story after story, but here are just a few examples:

A local woman who works at a Strip casino as a Culinary union housekeeper went months without receiving rent. A 67-year-old electrician nearly faced bankruptcy without rental reimbursements. A city bus driver had to postpone retirement. A terminally ill property owner who relied on rental income to support his family went 10 months without payments. And a young nurse from the Philippines who purchased her first investment home endured more than a year without rent. These are regular, everyday Nevadans, who don’t have huge nest eggs.

These and other landlords have worked hard to recover. As a community, we should applaud this and be grateful for the needed housing they provide.

Advertisement

My worry, though, is that their hard work will be in vain and that things could turn ugly. Last legislative session, rent control was proposed. Thankfully it was vetoed and never enacted, but I’ve heard rumors that it potentially could again be proposed.

Rent control benefits very few — and not necessarily those with the greatest need. When landlords cannot adjust rents to match market rates, the entire rental ecosystem suffers. Properties fall into disrepair, vacancies rise and the promise of a vibrant, sustainable rental market dims. Ultimately, some tenants may enjoy lower rents in the short term. But more will not, and Nevadans as a whole will witness a future with fewer available, well-maintained rental homes.

Sanje Sedera is president at Las Vegas Integrative Medicine, a broker/owner of Zenith Realty Group and a former commissioner of the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority.



Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

Court OK’s counting late-arriving mail ballots in Nevada, 29 other states

Published

on

Court OK’s counting late-arriving mail ballots in Nevada, 29 other states


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Nevada’s laws allowing the counting of mail-in ballots that arrive up to four days after Election Day — so long as they are postmarked by that date — is constitutional under a Monday ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 ruling, justices upheld a challenge to a Mississippi law that’s similar to Nevada’s statute. Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the court’s three liberal members, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Katanji Brown Jackson, to uphold the law.

Conservatives Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

The ruling affects 30 states, all of which allow some ballots received after Election Day to be counted. That includes Nevada, which allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be received and counted up to four days later, and ballots without a postmark to be received and counted up to three days later.

Advertisement

Plaintiffs in the case — including the Republican National Committee and the Mississippi Republican Party — had contended that federal laws referring to “elections” mean both the casting and counting of ballots, which they said must occur on Election Day.

“The federal election-day statutes do not preempt Mississippi’s law because the defining element of an ‘election’ has always been the electorate’s choice of candidate,” the case summary reads. “And a related federal statute — the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act — confirms that while federal law dictates when ballots must be cast, state law governs when they must be received.”

In Nevada, critics have contended that late-arriving ballots erode confidence in elections, because they delay learning final election results for days and, in some close races, can change the outcome.

Gov. Joe Lombardo has called the weeklong wait for final, unofficial results “a national embarrassment.”

Plaintiffs in the case made similar arguments, but were turned away by the court: “Finally, plaintiffs policy arguments about election integrity and voter confidence are properly addressed to legislatures, not courts,” the case summary reads.

Advertisement

Several attempts to require ballots to be received by Election Day have been introduced in Nevada’s Legislature, but none have been successful in the Democratically controlled body.

Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar has argued that the overwhelming majority of ballots are in and counted by Election Day, and only the closest races may be changed by late-arriving ballots. He’s advocated for more resources for county clerks and voter registrars to be able to count mail ballots more quickly.

Under the ruling, nothing will change for Nevada voters going to the polls in four months to vote in the November election. But officials still encourage voters to send in their mail ballots early, or to put them in drop boxes at voting centers during early voting or on Election Day.

Supreme Court upholds late-arriving mail ballots in Mississippi

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

One dead, four hospitalized after head-on crash on I-15 in Clark County

Published

on

One dead, four hospitalized after head-on crash on I-15 in Clark County


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Nevada Highway Patrol responded to a two-vehicle crash on Interstate 15 near mile marker 94 Sunday evening.

The crash was reported at 6:43 p.m. on June 28.

MORE ON FOX5: Driver sustains life-threatening injuries in Las Vegas multi-vehicle crash

A passenger sedan and a pickup truck were involved in the crash. One vehicle was traveling southbound, lost control, crossed through the median, and struck the other vehicle head-on in the northbound travel lane.

Advertisement

One adult male died at the scene. Two people were transported by ground ambulance, and two others were transported by life flight to a local hospital.

Road closures

All northbound I-15 travel lanes were closed at mile marker 94, but have since opened as of Sunday night.

Nevada Highway Patrol said further information will be provided following the preliminary investigation.

Copyright 2026 KVVU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires

Published

on

Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires












Advertisement





Officials elevate response efforts to combat eastern Nevada wildfires | Local Nevada | Local























Advertisement





Advertisement