Connect with us

Idaho

Supreme Court ruling allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for now

Published

on

Supreme Court ruling allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for now


WASHINGTON (Gray DC) – The Supreme Court dismissed a pair of cases on Thursday about emergency abortions in Idaho, temporarily clearing the way for hospitals in the state to perform the procedure despite the state’s near-total abortion ban.

A majority of the court agreed that Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States were granted “improvidently,” meaning mistakenly, and punted them back to the lower courts for further litigation.

The cases began nearly two years ago in the wake of the landmark Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which overturned the constitutional right to an abortion. The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion ban, which bars the procedure in nearly all cases except “when necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman” and in cases of rape or incest.

The administration argued that the ban conflicts with a federal law called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA. The law requires nearly all hospitals, those that receive Medicare, to provide emergency services to anyone, regardless of their ability to pay.

Advertisement

The administration said in its brief that the Idaho ban’s exception was narrower than the federal law, “which by its terms protects patients not only from imminent death but also from emergencies that seriously threaten their health.”

But Thursday, the high court did not address the core issue of the case, whether federal law preempts state abortion bans. While the litigation continues, the Supreme Court reinstated a lower court’s ruling, allowing for emergency abortions in Idaho for the time being.

The court decided that it got involved too early, with Justice Amy Cooney Barrett writing in her opinion it “was a miscalculation in these cases, because the parties’ positions are still evolving.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in her opinion that the decision “is not a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho. It is delay. While this Court dawdles and the country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position, as their doctors are kept in the dark about what the law requires. This Court had a chance to bring clarity and certainty to this tragic situation, and we have squandered it.”

Justice Samuel Alito also wrote in his opinion that court should not have sidestepped the issue.

Advertisement

“Apparently, the Court has simply lost the will to decide the easy but emotional and highly politicized question that the case presents. That is regrettable,” Alito wrote.

Attorney General Merrick Garland said after the ruling that the Justice Department will continue to push to use every tool it can to ensure that women have access to essential emergency care that is provided under EMTALA.

“Today’s order means that while we continue to litigate our case, women in Idaho will once again have access to the emergency care guaranteed to them under federal law,” he said.

Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador wrote after the ruling that as the case proceeds, the state will be able to enforce its law.

In a statement, he said in part:

Advertisement

“The Supreme Court sent the case back to the 9th Circuit today after my office won significant concessions from the United States that Justice Barrett described as ‘important’ and ‘critical.’ Today, the Court said that Idaho will be able to enforce its law to save lives in the vast majority of circumstances while the case proceeds. The Biden administration’s concession that EMTALA will rarely override Idaho’s law caused the Supreme Court to ask the 9th Circuit for review in light of the federal government’s change in position… We look forward to ending this Administration’s relentless overreach into Idahoans’ right to protect and defend life.”

Executive Director of the Chicago Abortion Fund Megan Jeyifo said the decision offers a reprieve but does not see the decision positively, and said it creates chaos and confusion.

“The court did not rule on whether EMTALA preempts state bans. So this is not a win. This means that this case will likely come again,” she said.



Source link

Advertisement

Idaho

All lanes blocked on I-84 in Payette County due to multiple brush fires, officials say

Published

on

All lanes blocked on I-84 in Payette County due to multiple brush fires, officials say


UPDATE – 8:30 p.m. 7/7/26- IDL has mapped the fire at 4 acres. It has been ruled human-caused.

ORIGINAL STORY

The Idaho Department of Transportation says all lanes are blocked on I-84 south of New Plymouth due to multiple nearby brush fires.

ITD says all lanes of travel have been blocked from US-30 to Black Canyon Road. The brush fires are located between milepost 9 and milepost 12, officials say.

Advertisement

Drivers are being advised of travel danger and asked to consider an alternate route.

Idaho Department of Lands has mapped the fire at 0.10 acres. The cause is undetermined.





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Falls man charged with first-degree arson, allegedly placed rag into toaster prior to fire

Published

on

Idaho Falls man charged with first-degree arson, allegedly placed rag into toaster prior to fire


IDAHO FALLS — A 37-year-old Idaho Falls man is facing felony arson charges after he allegedly set a toaster on fire that caused damage to a home. According to court documents, an officer with the Idaho Falls Police Department was dispatched to a home on June 9 due to a man making suicidal threats after […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho mother who said her toddlers died after vaccinations accused of suffocating them, charged with murder | CNN

Published

on

Idaho mother who said her toddlers died after vaccinations accused of suffocating them, charged with murder | CNN



AP — 

An Idaho woman who said her toddler twins died last year after being vaccinated faces murder charges connected to their deaths, authorities said.

A grand jury indicted Andrea Shaw, who is accused of suffocating her 18-month-old twins in May 2025, on two counts of first-degree murder on June 29, according to court records and a statement from the Payette Police Department.

While appearing last year on an internet show produced by Children’s Health Defense — an anti-vaccine group founded by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — Shaw said her twins died after getting vaccinated. Kennedy has not been affiliated with the group since December 2024, when he formally resigned as chairman to join President Donald Trump’s administration.

Advertisement

Shaw, 23, was arrested by Boise police officers Tuesday and arraigned Thursday. She is being held on a $2 million bond and could face life in prison or the death penalty if convicted or if she pleads guilty to first-degree murder. Her next court appearance is July 14.

Joe Filicetti, an attorney representing Shaw, wrote in a text message that she “denies anything and everything” and that the state “cannot prove” the criminal charges.

“We will defend her with wholeheartedness,” Filicetti added.

The Payette Police Department and the Payette County prosecutor’s office declined to comment Monday.

During her May 2025 appearance on the Children’s Health Defense show, Shaw said she found her twins dead in their room days after they got vaccinated for the flu and other diseases.

Advertisement

“They had got their shots at the same time by two nurses at the same time,” Shaw said. “And they got sick.”

Medical experts point out that the childhood vaccines at issue — hepatitis A, influenza and DTaP — are safe and effective for kids and recommended by various medical groups.

Shaw is also a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit brought by Children’s Health Defense and others against the American Academy of Pediatrics. The lawsuit, which was filed in January in federal court in Washington, accuses the American Academy of Pediatrics of racketeering for its “central role in an enterprise that has defrauded American families about the safety of the childhood vaccine schedule for several decades.” In the lawsuit, Shaw is described as a mother “whose children died following routine vaccinations administered according to AAP guidelines.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics has asked the court to dismiss the suit, asserting in an April court filing that it is the “latest missive in a campaign targeting” the academy and its “use of science-backed evidence in vaccine policy.”

In January, pediatricians and other experts became alarmed when US health officials made broad changes to childhood vaccine guidance, dropping several universal recommendations. Kennedy, who helped lead the anti-vaccine movement for years, said the changes better align the US with peer nations “while strengthening transparency and informed consent.”

Advertisement

In March, a federal judge blocked the changes and said Kennedy likely violated federal procedures in revamping a key vaccine advisory committee. But the judge’s order is not the final word; the blocks are temporary, pending either a trial or a decision for summary judgment.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending