Connect with us

Idaho

Idaho judge receives death threats following controversial sentencing

Published

on

Idaho judge receives death threats following controversial sentencing


ST. ANTHONY, Idaho — Almost immediately following an EastIdahoNews.com story about the sentencing of 22-year-old Candon Dahle, misinformation about the ruling, the charges, and even the judge began to spread online like wildfire.

Similar to a game of telephone, online “crime influencers” and others began making posts about the case. They were outraged that Dahle was given a 180-day jail sentence and eight years of probation following a plea agreement between the prosecution and defense that convicted Dahle on two counts of felony injury to a child.

Many of these posts included false details about the case that spread across multiple platforms.

Misinformation was shared about the location of the case, the charges Dahle was convicted of, and the basic details of the sentencing for the crime. What stood out most to many was how little these posts seemed to understand the court process that resulted in Dahle’s sentencing.

Advertisement

According to a news release from the Idaho Supreme Court, District Judge Steven Boyce, who ruled on Dahle’s sentencing, and his family have received death threats due to the case.

“In one instance, people thought they saw the judge at a local fair and encouraged others to track him down. Court staff have been told to expect a group that is coming to ‘get’ the judge,” says the release. “In messages and posts, people have urged the judge and his children to be sexually assaulted themselves. The volume and detail of the threats have required additional security precautions at public expense.”

Candon Dean Dahle during his sentencing, Aug. 29. Misinformation about his case and recent sentencing have been spreading online. (Photo: Kaitlyn Hart, EastIdahoNews.com via YouTube)

Many of the online posts have claimed that Boyce sentenced a “convicted rapist” to probation and 180 days of local jail time. This is false.

Dahle is not a convicted rapist and has never been charged with rape, though many online commenters have wondered why he wasn’t. The crimes in Dahle’s case do not fit the legal description.

Dahle was initially charged in two counties, Fremont and Bingham, both on one count of felony lewd conduct with a child.

Advertisement

According to Idaho statute, lewd conduct with a child is defined as “any person who shall commit any lewd or lascivious act or acts upon or with the body or any part or member thereof of a minor child under the age of sixteen (16) years.”

To resolve the case without going to trial, Dahle and his defense team, along with the prosecution and the victim and her family, decided to try mediation.

What is mediation?

According to the Idaho Supreme Court, mediation is “the process by which a neutral mediator assists the parties (defined as the prosecuting attorney on behalf of the state and the defendant) in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement as to issues in the case. The issues may include sentencing options, restitution awards, admissibility of evidence and any other issues which will facilitate the resolution of the case.”

Essentially, both sides meet with a judge to argue for what they think justice should be. In this case, District Judge Dane Watkins Jr. was assigned to conduct mediation.

If both parties can reach an agreement, the defendant will sign a plea agreement, and they will offer this resolution to the judge.

Advertisement

In Dahle’s case, the mediation process was longer than usual, according to multiple victim impact statements at the sentencing hearing.

“Immediately following an emotional mediation, anger was expressed (by the defendant) that misdemeanor charges weren’t offered,” the victim’s mother said. “I had just watched my daughter express the devastation she would feel if the charges were reduced. After hours of mediation, and Candon refusing a sex offender registry, she was told that she would face trial. She made a painful sacrifice, but hoped it would heal the family.”

Fremont County prosecutor Lindsey Blake even stated that the mediation process was extremely lengthy.

“Given that we held mediation, I’ll say it’s probably the longest mediation that I’ve been involved in. We mediated for hours to try and reach a resolution,” Blake said. “All parties are involved in mediation, in coming up with a resolution that would result in something short of ending up in trial.”

At the end of the mediation, seemingly partially due to exhaustion by both sides, a plea agreement was written – that Dahle would agree to plead guilty in Fremont County to amended charges of two counts of felony injury to a child. In return, the prosecution agreed to drop the case in Bingham County and not require Dahle to register as a sex offender while recommending a term of probation at sentencing.

Advertisement

The case then advanced to Boyce’s courtroom for sentencing.

According to Idaho statute, injury to a child is defined as, “Any person who, under circumstances or conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or death, willfully causes or permits any child to suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering, or having the care or custody of any child, willfully causes or permits the person or health of such child to be injured, or willfully causes or permits such child to be placed in such situation that its person or health is endangered.”

Idaho Code 18-8304 shows that injury to a child is not a charge that requires the defendant to register as a sex offender.

Here is a list of charges that do require defendants to register, although this does not mean they will have to, for instance, if the plea agreement does not require them to.

The ruling

If a plea agreement is offered during a sentencing, a judge does not have to accept it.

Advertisement

There are two types of plea agreements that the parties can decide on – binding or nonbinding.

A nonbinding plea agreement means the judge does not have to agree to either party’s recommendations for sentencing and can issue a sentencing of his own creation.

A binding plea agreement means the judge either has to accept the entire plea agreement or reject it fully. If the judge rejects it, the defendant can withdraw their guilty plea, and the parties must try to come up with a resolution. If they can’t, the case goes to trial.

Dahle’s case included a binding plea agreement, which meant Boyce did not have to accept it. If he rejected it, the resolution process would start over, potentially retraumatizing the victim by forcing her to go through the case, mediation and hearings for a second time.


All parties are involved in mediation, in coming up with a resolution that would result in something short of ending up in trial.

Advertisement

–Lindsey Blake, Fremont County prosecutor


During her victim impact statement, the victim asked Boyce to reject the plea agreement, stating that she did not believe that it serves justice.

“I can’t ever recall a sentencing where a victim asked me to reject the binding plea agreement,” Boyce said following her statement. “And after listening to the statements, I sat here and considered, should I do that? Should I just unwind the deal you reached? I determined not to do that, and I’m still not going to do that.”

Boyce acknowledged the difficulty of the case and stressed that it’s important for victims to come forward so abusers can face some kind of consequence, even if it’s not what they hope for.

“It’s a tough system, it’s certainly not a perfect system,” Boyce said. “It puts people in all kinds of difficult positions.”

Threatening a judge is a crime

As for the backlash Boyce received, state of Idaho statutes are clear that threats against a judge will end in prosecution.

Advertisement

Multiple felonies and misdemeanors can be charged if you attempt to threaten a judge, court staff, or elected official. You could be charged with:

  • Threats against state officials of the executive, legislative or judicial branch or elected officials of a county or city.
  • Contempt
  • Criminal conspiracy

All of these could potentially end with sentences between months in jail, life in prison, or the death penalty.

“It is never acceptable to threaten harm to a judge or to intervene in the independent, impartial handling of a case. If courts decided matters based on public opinion instead of evidence and legal standards, the consequences would reach far beyond this case — affecting business disputes, criminal prosecutions, and even the ability of citizens to challenge government actions in court,” the Idaho Supreme Court news release states.

“The Idaho judicial branch urges an immediate end to these threats and calls on everyone discussing the case to pause and become acquainted with its facts. Idaho judges are accountable in multiple ways to their government and their public. Criticism of judicial decisions is fair and expected in a free society. Promising violence is never acceptable.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement

Idaho

Penny Lee Brown Obituary March 25, 2026 – Eckersell Funeral Home

Published

on

Penny Lee Brown Obituary March 25, 2026 – Eckersell Funeral Home


Penny Lee Brown, age 72, of Idaho Falls, formerly of Ririe, passed away Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center in Idaho Falls.

Penny was born October 18, 1953, in Fort St. John, British Columbia, Canada, a daughter to William and Luella Cooper Artemenko. She attended schools in Fort St. John, British Columbia, Canada. She earned her Certified Nursing Assistant Certificate from Eastern Idaho Technical College.

She married Donal A. Brown in Fort St. John, British Columbia. Their marriage was later solemnized in the Idaho Falls Temple. She was a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

She enjoyed attending her children’s sporting events, puzzles, collecting cat memorabilia, crafting, baking, and caring for others.

Advertisement

She is survived by her husband Donal A. Brown, children: Jared Brown (Krystal) of Boise, Marcus Brown (Misty) of Weippe, Idaho, Scott Brown of Idaho Falls, Douglas Brown of Idaho Falls, Jamie Brown of Williston, North Dakota, Steven Brown (Claire) of Idaho Falls. A brother Kenneth Artemenko (Nancy) of White Horse, YK, four grandchildren and one great grandchild.

She was preceded in death by her Father William Artemenko and her mother Luela Cooper and a brother Levern Artemenko.

Funeral services will be held Monday March 30, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Perry Ward Chapel 285 2nd West, Ririe, Idaho. The family will visit with friends on Monday from 9:30 to 10:45 a.m. at the church. Interment will be in the Ririe-Shelton Cemetery.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho bill aims to criminalize transgender bathroom use in private businesses

Published

on

Idaho bill aims to criminalize transgender bathroom use in private businesses


BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Idaho lawmakers are considering a bill that would make it a crime for transgender people to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity — even inside privately owned businesses.

At least 19 states, including Idaho, already have laws barring transgender people from using bathrooms and changing rooms that align with their gender in schools and, in some cases, other public places. The LGBTQ+ advocacy organization Movement Advancement Project’s tracking of the laws shows that three other states — Florida, Kansas and Utah — have made it a criminal offense in some circumstances to violate the bathroom laws.

READ MORE: Ohio Gov. DeWine signs bill restricting transgender students’ use of bathrooms

But none of the others apply as broadly to private businesses as the Idaho bill, which covers any “place of public accommodation,” meaning any business or facility that serves the public. The state’s Republican supermajority Senate is expected to vote on the bill this week, deciding whether to send it to Gov. Brad Little’s desk.

Advertisement

Felony bathroom use?

If the law is passed, anyone who enters a public facility like a bathroom or locker room designated for the opposite sex could be sentenced to a year in jail for a misdemeanor first offense, or up to five years in prison for a felony second offense. That’s a longer sentence than Idaho imposes for a first drunken driving conviction or for displaying offensive sexual material in public.

Protecting those spaces is a “matter of safety” and “decency,” said Republican Sen. Ben Toews told a Senate committee last week.

“Private spaces such as restrooms, changing areas and showers are sex-separated for a reason,” Toews said. “Individuals in these vulnerable settings have a reasonable expectation of privacy and security.”

The bill does carve out several exceptions. Athletic coaches, people responding to emergencies, people supervising inmates, custodians, and people helping children who need bathroom assistance get a pass. So does someone who is “in dire need” of a bathroom, if the bathroom they use is the only one that is reasonably available at the time.

Law enforcement groups say it’s a bad bill

Law enforcement groups including the Idaho Fraternal Order of Police and the Idaho Chiefs of Police Association oppose the bill, which they say would place officers in impossible positions, tasking them with visually determining someone’s biological sex or their level of “dire need.” The Idaho Sheriff’s Association asked lawmakers to require that people first ask any suspected violator to leave the bathroom before calling authorities, but lawmakers refused.

Advertisement

Heron Greenesmith, deputy policy director at Transgender Law Center, said the “dire need” exception could be especially hard to assert — and that the idea that a person can use a public restroom only in an emergency is dehumanizing.

“How does one prove that one was going to poop on the floor?” they asked.

Opponents fear vigilantism

John Bueno, a transgender student at the University of Idaho and a member of the student group Queer Inclusion Society, said the school has lots of single-use restrooms, which helps mitigate the logistical impacts of the bill. But the legislation would likely lead to more unwanted “profiling” of people, whether they are transgender or not, she said.

“It’s this cultural attitude of getting other Americans to habitually be narcing on one other and doing this sort of ‘transvestigating’ — that is what these kinds of bills promote,” Bueno said.

It all comes down to an effort to disenfranchise transgender people, Bueno said.

Advertisement

“This will increasingly deter queer individuals from Idaho universities and the state as a whole,” she said. “Which to be fair, is probably the primary purpose.”

Bill could impact employment opportunities

Nikson Matthews, a transgender man with a beard, told a panel of lawmakers last week that the bill would force him into the women’s restroom, where his masculine appearance puts him at risk of aggression from people who think he’s intruding.

“It creates a crime — but that is not based on conduct or harm,” Matthews said. “It is based on presence, and to justify that you have to accept that someone’s presence alone is traumatizing and harmful enough to criminalize.”

It could also make it difficult for transgender people to work, said Boise resident Laura Volgert.

“People might be able to hold it for an hour if they’re at a restaurant for lunch or at a grocery store,” she told lawmakers during a committee hearing. “They can’t be expected to hold it for a full eight-hour shift.”

Advertisement

That’s the point of these types of laws, said Greenesmith, to “make it untenable to go to the movies, to go to the doctor, to go to the bank.”

Proponents say that isn’t the case.

Proponents say safety and privacy is key

Suzanne Tabert, a Sandpoint resident, said the bill is about “maintaining, clear, enforceable boundaries” so that women and children can feel safe.

“If we lose the ability to protect based on biological sex, we lose our most effective tool for preventing harassment, voyeurism and other sex crimes before they occur,” she said.

She later continued, “This legislation is not about how an individual identifies, nor does it seek to target or malign the transgender community. Rather it upholds a universal standard of privacy.”

Advertisement

Bathrooms are not the only place where lawmakers have been placing restrictions on transgender people in the name of protecting women and girls. At least 25 states bar transgender women and girls from some women’s and girl’s sports competitions. And at least 27 states have laws restricting or banning gender-affirming care for minors.

Expanding all of these policies are priorities for President Donald Trump, too.

The only widely reported arrest of someone on charges of violating transgender bathroom restrictions was part of a protest in Florida last year.

Mulvihill reported from Haddonfield, New Jersey.

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Advertisement

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

Governor Brad Little signs Isaiah’s Law, expanding child protections in Idaho

Published

on

Governor Brad Little signs Isaiah’s Law, expanding child protections in Idaho


CANYON COUNTY, Idaho — Two new laws aimed at expanding protections for Idaho children were signed Wednesday morning at the Statehouse, a milestone for families who have turned heartbreak into advocacy.

Back in January, adoptive mother Monique Peyre came to Idaho News 6 heartbroken after a 12-day-old baby boy, Benji, died in Nampa. Peyre, who had previously adopted Benji’s siblings, became a driving force behind legislation designed to better protect vulnerable children across the state.

RELATED | ‘Please put eyes on this baby’: Adoptive and foster mothers’ warnings before Nampa baby’s death

On Wednesday, Governor Brad Little signed Isaiah’s Law and the Foster Child Safety Act into law. Peyre’s advocacy was central to both bills, which aim to strengthen child welfare protections and provide clearer guidance to courts and caseworkers.

Advertisement

“It feels very, very surreal to get to this day just because I adopted them [Benji’s siblings] about a year ago, April 3rd, and I just never thought it would happen this quickly,” Peyre said.

Isaiah’s Law, or Senate Bill 1257, inspired by Peyre’s adopted son, Isaiah, strengthens protections for foster children during parental visitations.

“Today’s bills reflect a continued commitment to strengthening the system from multiple angles, protecting children and clearly defining their rights,” Governor Little said.

WATCH: Families come together for child protection law signings

Advertisement

Governor Brad Little signs Isaiah’s Law, expanding child protections in Idaho

For Peyre, seeing the bill signed was a way to turn personal tragedy into hope for others.

“It makes their pain and what they went through and the hardship of all of it worth something,” she said. “It kind of brings closure to their story.”

For Isaiah, the day brought a sense of comfort and security. “I feel… comfortable and safe,” Isaiah said.

Advertisement

Peyre also emphasized the importance of persistence in advocacy, encouraging others to take action.

RELATED | Nampa remembers Benji as legislation protecting vulnerable children advances

“I wanna say like the biggest thing was just to start emailing and reaching out to people, and you never know. It really does go a long way,” she said.

The Foster Child Safety Act also received the governor’s signature today. This bill updates Idaho’s child welfare policies, giving caseworkers and courts clearer guidance to keep children safe and ensure their well-being remains the top priority.

The last bill in Peyre’s legislative push, Benji’s Law (House Bill 776), is still awaiting a hearing in the Senate. The legislation aims to ensure quicker responses from authorities and remove judgment calls that could delay child safety interventions.

Advertisement

“All we’re asking for is a quicker response and no judgment call—just look and see if those are the guidelines that this baby falls under and go check on that baby sooner rather than later,” Peyre said.

For Isaiah, the moment was an accomplishment, but he hopes for a day when he can meet his baby brother Benji in heaven.

“I really want to achieve… a day that I get to see… seeing my little, I mean my baby brother that is… is in heaven,” Isaiah said.

RELATED | Idaho lawmakers advance bill requiring faster checks on at-risk babies

Benji’s Law is still making its way through the Statehouse, but supporters are hopeful it will also be signed into law by the end of the session.

Advertisement

For Canyon County happenings, news, and more— join our Facebook Group: 2C Neighborhood News – Nampa, Caldwell, Middleton

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been, in part, converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Send tips to Canyon County neighborhood reporter Victoria Rodriguez

Have a story idea from Canyon County? Share it with Victoria below —





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending