Idaho
From Idaho roots to the national spotlight: The story behind Judge Justin Beresky’s journey – East Idaho News
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Justin Beresky spoke with EastIdahoNews.com reporter Nate Eaton in an exclusive interview. Watch the 55-minute conversation in the video player above | Jordan Wood, EastIdahoNews.com
PHOENIX — It’s not common for a judge to speak on the record with a reporter, so when I emailed Judge Justin Beresky requesting an interview, I knew there would be some conditions.
For one, I was aware he would likely not answer questions about the two Lori Vallow Daybell trials he presided over earlier this year. If he wanted to discuss them, I’d be more than happy to listen, but the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct prohibits judges from making public statements about cases in their courtrooms.
However, it was the Daybell trials that made Beresky known worldwide. For a few weeks in April and then again in June, an untold number of people watched him conduct court as Daybell represented herself in the highest-profile trials Arizona has seen since the Jodi Arias murder case in 2013.
Memes featuring Beresky’s photo were shared on social media and phrases he said in court were printed on t-shirts and badges. Online commenters frequently wrote about Beresky’s good looks, giving him nicknames such as “Judge McSteamy,” “Judge McDreamy,” “The Court’s Finest” and “The Honorable Hottie.”
As Beresky sat day after day in a Maricopa County courtroom presiding over a case with Idaho ties, few knew that he himself has deep roots in the Gem State. That’s the story I wanted to tell, and after some time, Beresky agreed to sit down with me for his first-ever media interview.
Childhood in Grangeville
Justin Beresky was born in Oregon and when he was in kindergarten, his family moved to Grangeville, Idaho, a rural farming town of about 3,500 people located 75 miles southeast of Lewiston. His father was a chiropractor and his mother was a homemaker.
“She got a Realtor’s license and did a little bit of that. She had a side business and would go into other people’s homes and give women consultations on what colors were good for them to wear,” Beresky recalls. “She actually put on a fashion show in Grangeville when I was in sixth or seventh grade with the local JCPenney providing all the clothes. … I think she has a picture in her living room where I have my sister on one arm and my sister’s best friend on the other, and we’re all dressed up going down the runway.”

Justin Beresky participated in a fashion show organized by her mother during his childhood in Grangeville, Idaho. | Courtesy Justin Beresky
Beresky’s small-town childhood was idyllic. He’d ride his bike with friends to the pool, play hide-and-seek on summer nights, ski in the winter, camp, visit the rivers and explore nearby forests.
In the fifth grade, a boy named Chad Hill moved to town, and he and Beresky became friends.
“He was very funny and active in sports. His best sport was probably baseball and he was our ace pitcher,” Hill tells EastIdahoNews.com. “He had a pitch with a curveball that we called the ‘hoop of fire.’ When he threw it, our whole team was excited.”
Hill says Beresky, who is now in his early 50s, was outgoing and “the girls seemed to like him.” The two of them, along with six other boys, formed a tight-knit friendship that still endures today. They keep up a running group text, and most of them recently took a fishing trip together.
Beresky excelled in school and, as a teenager, thought he might become a teacher.
“When I was in third or fourth grade, I took some sort of basic aptitude test, and it said I should either be a teacher, a lawyer or a garbage man,” Beresky says with a smile.
Beresky didn’t take much interest in the law until sixth grade, when brothers Mark Henry Lankford and Bryan Stuart Lankford — later known as the “Grangeville brothers” — were charged with the 1983 murders of Robert and Cheryl Bravence, a Texas couple vacationing near Grangeville. The case, which ultimately resulted in death sentences, caught his attention.
College and law school
Beresky’s parents divorced when he was in high school, and his father moved to New Mexico.
“I felt like I needed to get out of town and find some new, exciting adventure. So I went to the University of New Mexico,” Beresky says. “I really liked New Mexico, and for me, growing up in Grangeville and then moving to Albuquerque, it was like this big adventure being in a big city for the first time in my life.”
Beresky worked toward a degree in secondary education and planned to become a teacher. In his senior year, he student taught in high school classes and enjoyed it. But as graduation approached, he wondered if there might be something else in store for him.
“I was about to graduate and was only 21. I thought it was a little early to get tied into a teaching career, so why not go to law school and just see what happens? So I took the LSAT and applied to some law schools,” Beresky says.
He was accepted into the University of Idaho College of Law in Moscow, which worked in his favor because he qualified for in-state tuition. He moved back to Idaho and embraced the challenges of law school.
“I really liked the trial week that we did before our final year, where you get together with other students in your class and you’re trained on how to do a trial,” Beresky recalls. “You learn the different aspects, cross-examination, direct examination, and at the end of the week, you put on a trial. That week, I think, really galvanized for me that I’d like to be in the courtroom when I became a lawyer.”
Beresky admits he was naïve when he graduated from law school. Unsure how to find a job, he moved to Arizona, took the bar exam and began walking into law firms to ask if they needed help.
“I had connections in Arizona and knew that I liked the climate. I was naïve in a sense, too, because I thought I’d come to Phoenix and be here for a year or two and then maybe take a bar somewhere else and move there,” he explains. “I had no plan to stay here, and then it just sort of happened. I got into this career here and plan on staying until my career is over.”
In the courtroom
Beresky knew he wanted to be in the courtroom on a regular basis, so his best option was practicing criminal or family law. After spending a few months working for a civil practitioner, he applied for and was offered a job with the Maricopa County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office.
“The great thing about here in Phoenix, whether you’re at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office or the public defender’s office, if you get a job there, you’re gonna be in the courtroom right away,” Beresky says.
He recalls his first jury trial, which occurred after he had been on the job for two or three months. It was a DUI case, and the defense attorney was a well-known trial attorney “who would have absolutely mopped the floor with me.”
Beresky’s mentor, who was helping with the case, took over halfway through the trial, and they ended up getting a conviction.
After two years in the prosecutor’s office, Beresky decided it was time to move on. He and Geoffrey Fish, a friend he had worked with in the prosecutor’s office, decided to open up a defense practice together in June 2001.
“When we opened, we took a variety of cases – civil, some family, bankruptcies and small claims. We ultimately ended up doing mostly criminal defense work,” Fish, who is now a Maricopa County Superior Court judge, tells EastIdahoNews.com.
Beresky says opening a firm was “kind of scary,” and shifting from prosecution to defense work demanded a different set of skills.
“You have to have a certain bedside manner and build a rapport with your client … because sometimes you have to tell them things they don’t want to hear, or you have to tell them things that maybe are probably bad news for them,” Beresky says. “I also think when you’re a prosecutor, you have a little bit of built-in credibility and gravitas with a jury, just from the nature of being a prosecutor. So you have to work a little more as a defense attorney to get that sort of consideration with the jury.”
Gregg Woodnick, an attorney in Phoenix, met Beresky and Fish in the mid-2000s.
“Justin was just a nice guy. As a defense attorney, you might be termed a little aggressive and get the moniker of being a jerk, but he was just a nice guy,” Woodnick tells EastIdahoNews.com. “People really liked him as a defense attorney because he was approachable, kind and helpful.”
As a defense attorney, Beresky was often asked how he could represent clients accused of terrible crimes. He says he always saw them first as people with constitutional rights that deserved to be protected.
“At the end of the day, you’re just trying to make sure the process works,” Beresky says. “So people say, ‘Oh, that person got off on a technicality or whatever.’ Well, I don’t think constitutional rights are a technicality. I’ve also had people who were truly innocent of what they’ve been charged with, and those are the difficult cases too. So I don’t go into a case thinking you’re guilty or you’re innocent. I just go and try to get the best result that I can for my client.”
One day, when Beresky was in court, he had a bad experience with a judge who was being “unnecessarily rude” to everyone in the courtroom. Beresky was irritated and had an idea.
“This thought just popped into my head that I could do better than that. I had never really thought about being a judge or anything at any point,” Beresky says. “That thought kind of took seed and it developed. After a while, the more I thought about it, the more I thought I really could do a good job as a judge.”
Becoming a judge
Maricopa County uses a thorough application and vetting process to select judges. A governor-appointed committee reviews applications, checks references and chooses whom to interview. The panel then forwards its recommendations to the governor, who ultimately appoints the new judges.
Beresky applied a few times before being selected as a Maricopa County court commissioner, which is a similar position to a magistrate judge in Idaho.
“I started out in the probation violation court, and then after that, I was assigned as a special assignment commissioner, which kind of means ‘have legal pad, will travel.’ You get plugged in to fill different spots,” Beresky says. “I did that for several years too, which I think helped my application process (to be a judge) because it showed that I could handle all these different calendars.”
Maricopa County has roughly 100 judges and 80 court commissioners, and each year a few positions open as judges retire. In January 2018, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey appointed Beresky to one of those seats on the bench.
The judges rotate assignments every few years between criminal, civil, family, juvenile, and probate divisions. They don’t choose their departments, and they don’t choose their cases.
“I spent a total of four years in family court, which is a lot of custody cases and divorced people fighting over visitation with their children, child support, splitting up assets and debts, those sorts of things,” Beresky says.
He was then reassigned to criminal court, which he says became his favorite since he had previously practiced criminal law as a prosecutor and defense attorney.
“I felt like I did a good job in criminal, as far as doing settlement conferences and trials and those sorts of things,” Beresky says. “The good thing about our rotations, though, is that it helps keep things from getting stale and gives you something new. You have to learn a whole new area of law that you haven’t practiced before.”
Beresky runs an efficient courtroom and is respected among his colleagues.
Izzy Contreras, his judicial assistant, has spent 29 years working for Maricopa County Superior Court. He knows all the judges and has spent time in their courtrooms.
“I was very selective in choosing which judge I wanted to work for,” Contreras tells EastIdahoNews.com. “When his position came up, I knew it would be a good fit. He lets me be me, he lets me do my job without micromanaging me, he lets me run the office and is there for any guidance that I need. He’s very calm, very level-headed, very neutral, everything you would want a judge to be.”
Several attorneys who spoke with EastIdahoNews.com feel the same way.
“We like appearing in front of him because he runs an efficient courtroom,” says Woodnick, who has won and lost cases in front of Beresky. “He doesn’t dillydally. He doesn’t go down the drama rabbit hole that sometimes happens in court. He has an effective way of controlling that. You saw that in the Vallow Daybell case. When things started to get off track, he had a really good way of kind of recentering it and keeping it efficient in a really respectful way.”
Christine Whalin, a criminal defense attorney who has known Beresky for nearly two decades, has appeared in front of Beresky over the years.
“He’s a very well-reasoned, fair judge. He will listen to each side’s argument and I think he does everything in his power to do the right thing and follow the law,” Whalin says. “He’s very easy to get along with and I think that translates onto the bench. He rarely gets upset. I think he keeps what I’ll call ‘judicial temper’ in check and that helps him when he’s on the bench tremendously.”
Hill, Beresky’s childhood friend from Grangeville, visited him in Arizona a few years ago and watched him in court for a day. He described it as “surreal” to see his childhood buddy now presiding seriously from the bench.
“I think the only reason he wanted me to come here was so I had to stand up when he entered the room,” Hill says with a laugh. “He waited for me to get into the courtroom and then, when the bailiff said all rise, he looked at me and grinned. I knew I had been duped.”
Personal life
Beresky and his wife, Beth, are very private and live in a quiet neighborhood in Phoenix. They were married on a beach in Mexico in February 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic was beginning to sweep the globe.
Both had been married before. Beth brought a daughter, now a teenager, into the family, and Beresky brought a son, who is in his 20s. Parenthood, he says, has taught him the patience often needed in the courtroom — and he’s never without a well-timed dad joke at home.
“I have all sorts of dad jokes. They’re terrible, though. Like, ‘When does a joke become a dad joke?’ When it becomes a parent,” he says with a smile. “I’ve always loved kids. If you had asked me where I saw myself when I was in high school, I would have told you I’d probably have six kids or something like that. That never worked out for me, but I love being a dad. I wish I had time to have more, but I’m getting too old.”
The Bereskys like to swim in their backyard pool, have Sunday game nights, paddleboard and kayak in nearby rivers and go on hikes. Beth watches true crime shows, while Beresky prefers cheering on the San Francisco Giants.
To unwind, he goes to the gym, takes his dog on walks and spends time outdoors.
The future
The Daybell trials came at the tail end of Beresky’s rotation in the criminal division. He began his new assignment in juvenile courts this summer and now presides over cases involving parental rights, adoptions and kids in foster care.
“It can be very heavy. Some days you’re reading reports and talking to lawyers and parents (about) these kids with serious mental health issues who are living in a lockdown facility,” Beresky says.
He will remain in juvenile court for the next several years and may have one or two final division assignments before retiring in about 10 years. At that point, he says he might put his teaching degree in law classes at local universities.
Over the summer, he returned to Idaho to help with the University of Idaho Law Week. He found it invigorating to be back on campus, reflecting on the fact that he once stood in the same place as the students he was now guiding.
Despite a career that has placed him in a high-profile, visible role this year, Beresky says he isn’t focused on fame or accolades; instead, he says he wants to be remembered simply as a good person who tried to do right by others.
“I don’t know that I care how I am remembered. What I mean by that is I think so many people chase fame or glory or whatever,” he says. “You could be the most famous person in the world, and 50 years after you die, no one’s going to remember who you are. It’s not that I want to be remembered as a scoundrel or a terrible person, but at the same time, I’m not out seeking some sort of fame to be remembered a certain way. I think you should just be a good person in life and things will work out.”
Watch our entire interview with Judge Justin Beresky in the video player above and hear his views on what makes a good judge, cameras in the courtroom, the hardest part about being a judge and whether he watches true crime programs.
=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>
Idaho
Court Clears Path For Idaho’s Critical Stibnite Antimony Mine
Mckinsey Lyon, vice president of external affairs for Perpetua Resources, points out the layout of some of the mining companyís environmental restoration plans at its proposed Stibnite Gold Project. The company hopes to begin mining operations for gold and antimony by 2029. (Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
TNS
The U.S. District Court for Idaho last week denied an injunction sought by climate activist groups, ruling that construction may proceed on the Stibnite Gold Project in central Idaho. This decision, secured with the active involvement of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, represents a significant win not just for the project’s developer, Perpetua Resources, but for the Pentagon, which covets the large volumes of antimony the Stibnite mine can produce.
The Stibnite project, as I’ve written here in the past, is a carefully vetted initiative following years of environmental reviews, culminating in U.S. Forest Service approval in January 2025. The project will produce substantial quantities of gold (about 4.2 million ounces) and silver (1.7 million ounces) over its life, but its real strategic value lies in antimony reserves, an estimated 115 million pounds. Antimony is a critical mineral essential for munitions, military-grade antimony trisulfide, lead-acid batteries, advanced sensors, radar materials, and flame retardants. For too long, the U.S. has depended on foreign sources via supply chains dominated by China, which has repeatedly restricted exports and left our National Defense Stockpile dangerously depleted.
Between 2020 and 2023, China accounted for 70% of U.S. rare earth imports. This chart shows where the U.S. gets its rare earths from. Data Source: USGS. (Graphic by Visual Capitalist via Getty Images) Getty Images The Pentagon says this vulnerability cannot be allowed to linger. As Michael Cadenazzi, Assistant Secretary of War for Industrial Base Policy, emphasized in a briefing to the Court: “The urgent construction of the Stibnite Gold Project and commencement of antimony production from the Project is of paramount importance to national security. The Stibnite Gold Project is the only opportunity known to the Department which is projected to produce sufficient antimony quantities to meet defense requirements by 2029 and supply substantial quality to the U.S. commercial market, as evidenced and de-risked by a feasibility study conducted in accordance with SK 1300 or equivalent standards.”
This is the core of the issue. As Cadenazzi notes, further delays here don’t just stall a mine; they prolong “the nation’s currently unacceptable supply chain risk for antimony.” Without domestic production, America remains exposed to supply shocks from adversarial nations. The sooner Stibnite ramps up, the sooner resiliency for both defense needs and essential civilian applications can be built.
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department put it well: “Antimony is among the minerals most vital to our national defense, and for too long the United States has relied on foreign adversaries to supply it. This decision allows construction to move forward on the most significant domestic source of antimony, and it reflects the Department’s commitment to defending projects critical to America’s national security.”
The court’s ruling hinged on the plaintiffs’ failure to demonstrate “imminent, irreparable harm.” That’s a high bar, and rightly so. Activist groups have long used litigation as a tool to delay or derail resource projects, often prioritizing ideology over practical trade-offs. Stibnite isn’t a pristine wilderness being bulldozed for profit: It’s a historically disturbed site from over a century of prior mining. The project includes robust reclamation efforts: removing legacy tailings, restoring fish passage on the East Fork of the South Fork Salmon River, and commitment to overall environmental restoration.
Perpetua Resources, a Canadian mining company with offices in Idaho, has spent more than $17 million on some cleanup and restoration work at the site of its proposed Stibnite Gold Project in the Payette National Forest. (Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/Tribune News Service via Getty Images) TNS There is near-universal acceptance now of the reality that any true energy transition will of necessity require a major increase in mining for an array of critical energy minerals, including antimony. If the U.S. is to get back into the mining business in a meaningful way after almost half a century of relative dormancy, this project presents a clear example of responsible mining in action, balancing extraction with stewardship while meeting a compelling national security need.
The same climate activist groups who favor such a transition seem to knee-jerk to oppose development in national forests; but context matters, and they raise issues which have been litigated repeatedly for more than a decade now. Defense officials have identified Stibnite as the only near-term domestic source capable of meeting major portion of the country’s antimony needs. Historically, the site supplied 90% of America’s antimony during WWII and the Korean War. Reviving it now aligns with the Trump administration’s broader push to onshore critical mineral supply chains to reduce reliance on China and bolster the Pentagon’s defense industrial base.
This latest win in court fits the established initiative by the Trump administration of prioritizing energy and mineral security. It should be noted here that this same initiative was at least nominally favored by the Biden administration. In a major speech delivered in June 2021, President Joe Biden promised to mount a “whole of government” effort to reshore supply chains for critical energy minerals like antimony. It was a commitment which was unfortunately was left largely unaddressed over the final 3 years of his presidency.
But that commitment has been revived and amplified over the last 17 months. Permitting reform, executive actions on domestic production, and judicial pushback against reflexive injunctions are chipping away at the regulatory and litigation thicket that has stifled investment. For rural Idaho, Stibnite means jobs, economic vitality, and infrastructure improvements. Nationally, it means less vulnerability in an era when adversaries weaponize supply chains.
Of course, litigation will no doubt continue: No one should expect the anti-development activists to relent. But the court’s denial of this injunction sends the clear message that national security interests still carry weight. The repeated environmental reviews to which this project has been subjected have been not just thorough, but exhaustive. The project is fully vetted. Now, it’s time to build. America’s competitors don’t tie themselves into bureaucratic and legalistic knots over every project. China dominates antimony production and has not been at all shy about deploying that dominance strategically.
The Stibnite mine is an answer to that aggression: It clearly exemplifies the “all-of-the-above” approach needed, not just for energy, but for the array of other minerals like antimony which help power modern defense and industry. Environmental reviews and protections to truly endangered species are important and must remain in place, but at some point, America simply must be able to say “go” on vital projects like this one.
An “Urgent” Antimony Resource
Antimony is “Vital To Our National Defense”
A Key Near-Term Antimony Resource
America Must Be Able To Eventually Get To “Go”
Idaho
Idaho State Police: Driver runs stop sign, hits hay-stacker truck in Twin Falls
TWIN FALLS, Idaho (CBS2) — A two-vehicle crash involving a hay-stacker truck sent two men to the hospital Wednesday afternoon in Twin Falls County, with one later flown to another facility.
Idaho State Police said the crash happened Wednesday, June 3, at about 12:19 p.m. at the intersection of N 2500 E and E 3400 N.
A 28-year-old man from Jerome was driving southbound on N 2500 E in a 2006 Ford Taurus, and a 59-year-old man from Twin Falls was driving westbound on E 3400 N in a New Holland hay-stacker truck, according to ISP.
Police said the driver of the Ford Taurus failed to obey the stop sign and collided with the hay-stacker.
Neither driver was wearing a seatbelt, and both were taken by ground ambulance to a nearby hospital. The driver of the hay-stacker was later transported by air ambulance to a different hospital, according to ISP.
The roadway was blocked for about two-and-a-half hours while crews worked to clear the scene. The crash remains under investigation.
Idaho
Secretary of State: Idaho’s rapid growth is reshaping state politics
Rapid population growth is reshaping Idaho’s politics and creating new tensions across the state, Idaho Secretary of State Phil McGrane said Wednesday to the Boise business community.
“If there’s anything to reflect on, it’s just how much Idaho is changing, the rate of growth that we are seeing, and the rate of growth we’re going to continue to see,” McGrane said at an event hosted by the Boise Metro Chamber.
According to data by the U.S. Census Bureau, Idaho had the second-highest population growth in 2025, which was the largest nationwide in the past five years. With a 10.4% increase comes people from all walks of life.
McGrane pointed to Boise’s evolving skyline and with that comes new business. Idaho business filings have increased from 425,000 in 2020 to roughly 650,000 in 2025 — a 50% increase.
But it isn’t just the economy driving these newcomers. Natural disasters and people exhausted from their home state’s politics are also a force.
Look no further than California: the largest group of migrants to Idaho. McGrane noted that northern Idaho farmers picture them as “blue-haired hippies from the Bay Area.” In fact, it’s the exact opposite.
Seventy-seven percent of Californians moving to the Gem State are registered Republicans.
“When you see the fires in LA, what I see is people moving to Idaho,” McGrane said. “Your home burned down, you’re probably not going to build it where you’ve just burned down, you’re going to find someplace else to move.”
It isn’t just California refugees contributing to the significant increase in Idaho’s Republican makeup. Migrants from all across the country are sharing similar sentiments, highlighting the 58% to 62% increase of registered Republicans since McGrane first took office in 2023.
Migration patterns are creating more of a divide within the Republican Party of Idaho, he said. Multi-generational Idahoans are concerned with agriculture and water rights, while newer residents are fixated on social and policy debates.
Voter turnout has been an issue nationwide, spilling into the Gem State. According to data from Idaho.gov, about 73% of its voting-age population is registered to vote. That means over a quarter of Idahoans who are eligible to vote aren’t registered.
To emphasize the importance of voter participation, McGrane pointed to a phrase often expressed by Gov. Brad Little: “If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.”
Just 12% of Idaho’s voting-age population participated in the primary election to select a party nominee for governor. That figure underscores how primaries carry lots of weight in Idaho.
“The overwhelming majority of decisions were just made on the May 19 election,” McGrane said.
Consequences of low voter turnout are often visible in tight-knit elections, he added. In 2020, there was a race for the Ada County Highway District commission, featuring Rebecca Arnold vs. Alexis Pickering.
The contest ultimately came down to two votes out of roughly 40,000 ballots cast. Around 10,000 voters skipped the race entirely, which illustrates how a small number of ballots can determine elections.
McGrane said those dynamics will continue shaping the fast-growing state’s political sphere.
“One of the biggest decisions that we have as a state is just who gets engaged, who participates and who votes in our elections,” McGrane said.
-
Lifestyle24 minutes ago‘How to Rule the World’ explores education and power at Stanford University
-
Technology36 minutes agoCyberdecks used to look like little laptops, but now they’re getting more personal
-
World39 minutes agoPete Hegseth warns narco-terrorists as U.S. backs Bolivia’s government amid coup warnings
-
Politics44 minutes agoDemocrats split over Tlaib’s Lebanon measure as Republicans seize on Hezbollah omission
-
Health51 minutes agoPopular weight-loss diet shows surprising impact on serious mental health condition
-
Sports54 minutes agoNBA bans two fans for life after court invasion during Knicks-Spurs Game 1
-
Technology59 minutes agoCharter breach warning: What customers should know
-
Business1 hour agoTrump announces new coal export terminal in Oakland




