Connect with us

Colorado

Glendale rejects Colorado Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit plan; CDOT data shows some commute times could double

Published

on

Glendale rejects Colorado Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit plan; CDOT data shows some commute times could double


Glendale city leaders are forcefully opposing Colorado’s proposed Bus Rapid Transit project on Colorado Boulevard, warning the plan could dramatically worsen traffic for drivers while delivering only modest transit gains.

Last week, Glendale City Council voted unanimously in favor of a resolution recommending “no build” for the Colorado Department of Transportation’s proposed Bus Rapid Transit, or BRT, project along a seven-mile stretch of Colorado Boulevard.

“Hell no,” Glendale City Manager Chuck Line said in an interview with CBS Colorado.

Glendale City Manager Chuck Line

Advertisement

CBS


“The juice is not worth the squeeze, not by a little, but by a long shot,” Line said.

The resolution cites concerns about increased congestion and what Glendale leaders described as negative impacts that outweigh the project’s forecasted increases in bus ridership and reductions in transit travel times.

And some of CDOT’s own projections appear to support at least part of Glendale’s concerns.

Advertisement

According to agency data reviewed by CBS Colorado, one proposed configuration featuring center- and side-running bus lanes would double southbound commute times for drivers traveling the full 7-mile corridor — from about 25 minutes to roughly 50 minutes.

Another option using side-running lanes would increase travel times by about 40%, according to CDOT projections.

colorado-boulevard2.jpg

Colorado Boulevard runs north-south in the eastern part of the Denver metro area.

CBS


 Drivers traveling shorter distances would likely experience smaller delays.

Advertisement

CDOT spokesperson Tamara Rollison suggested for people not wanting to spend more time stuck in Colorado Boulevard traffic, “Busses could be a viable option to take instead of your vehicle.”

“The plans they are offering,” said Line, “are so extreme and have such a big impact on millions of residents of this area that I don’t think they should be considering any of these three plans and should go back to the drawing board.”

CDOT is studying the BRT project as a way to improve transit service and safety along Colorado Boulevard between 40th Avenue and Hampden Avenue. About 1 mile of the corridor runs through Glendale.

The agency is considering several alternatives, including side-running bus lanes, center-running bus lanes, and mixed-flow traffic. No final decision has been made, and the project does not yet have a finalized cost estimate. CDOT hopes the eventual design will reduce crashes, improve traffic flow, and speed up bus service.

“A critical goal of this project is to improve safety as Colorado Boulevard is on the High Injury Network and has one of the highest crash rates and road-related fatalities in the region,” said Rollison.

Advertisement

tamara-rollison.jpg

CDOT spokesperson Tamara Rollison

CBS


CDOT data shows all of the proposed options would increase bus speeds along the corridor by roughly 20% to 30%.

Part of that improvement would come from simply reducing the number of bus stops. There are currently about 50 stops along the 7-mile corridor. Under the proposed BRT plans, that number would be cut to approximately 20.

State data also shows roughly 2,800 people currently ride buses along the Colorado Boulevard corridor each day. CDOT forecasts that number could rise to about 6,000 daily riders under a BRT system.

Advertisement

But Line argues the tradeoff could create ripple effects far beyond Colorado Boulevard itself.

He said prioritizing north-south traffic flow would likely require longer green lights on Colorado Boulevard, leading to longer red lights — and backups — on east-west streets.

“If that convenience is disrupted,” said Line, “it could have a significant impact on our business community.”

Glendale is not alone in its concerns. The Hilltop Neighborhood Association recently met with CDOT representatives to discuss the proposed changes.

“The success of this project should not be measured only by bus ridership,” said association president Courtney Mamuscia. “It should also be measured by whether nearby neighborhoods remain safe, livable, and protected from cut-through traffic.”

Advertisement

Residents worry that reducing lanes on Colorado Boulevard could divert more traffic onto neighborhood streets.

“Most residents,” said Mamuscia, “are skeptical of the current direction.”

She said many Hilltop residents share Glendale’s concerns that increasing bus ridership may not justify disruptions for tens of thousands of daily drivers.

CDOT has scheduled an open house on the Colorado Boulevard BRT project for Wednesday, May 13, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Clayton Early Learning Center, 3801 M.L.K. Jr. Blvd. in Denver. People who are interested but can’t attend can take an online survey on a special section of CDOT’s website.

“We are still in the planning process, figuring out what is the best solution for Colorado Boulevard,” said Rollison, “and we haven’t gotten there yet.”

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Colorado governor vetoes bill that would have allowed lawsuits against federal immigration officers, signs another to regulate detention centers 

Published

on

Colorado governor vetoes bill that would have allowed lawsuits against federal immigration officers, signs another to regulate detention centers 


Two immigration protection bills passed by Democrats in the state legislature met different fates this week, with Gov. Jared Polis vetoing one and signing the other into law. 

Polis vetoed Senate Bill 5 on Wednesday, June 3, a measure that would have allowed people to sue federal immigration officers in Colorado civil court if those officers violated their constitutional rights. 

It was sponsored by Sens. Mike Weissman, D-Aurora, and Julie Gonzales, D-Denver, and Reps. Javier Mabrey, D-Denver, and Yara Zokaie, D-Fort Collins. 



Supporters of the bill said it was aimed at holding federal agents, like Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, accountable. The measure was passed following national backlash to the January shootings and deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minnesota, which involved federal agents. 

Advertisement

In a letter describing his reasons for the veto, Polis said the bill was too narrow and could weaken other civil rights protections if it were to be struck down by a court. Polis said the bill only applies to violations during immigration enforcement, and does not provide an avenue to sue the federal government for violating rights during protests, elections, prisons or in the workplace.



“It’s that narrow focus that unfortunately creates legal jeopardy,” Polis wrote. “I believe Colorado has a chance to get this right — and we must pass a broader version of this bill that protects all constitutional rights, including in the immigration context, that will serve to truly hold public officials accountable.”

The same Democrats who sponsored SB 5 tried to pass a broader version of the legislation that would have allowed lawsuits against any government employee, including local, state and federal officials, for any civil rights violations. 

That measure, Senate Bill 176, dubbed the “No Kings Act,” was killed during a committee hearing in May after two Democrats — Sens. Dylan Roberts of Frisco and Lindsey Daugherty of Arvada — joined the committee’s two Republicans in voting it down. The bill faced pushback from local governments, police groups and district attorneys, as well as from Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, who criticized the legislation for being overly broad and said it would lead to a flood of lawsuits against local and state officials. 

Advertisement

Polis, in his veto letter, wrote that he supported that bill and that his office worked with sponsors on the legislation, which he believed “would withstand legal scrutiny.” Polis blamed “overly intense and misleading lobbying from local governments and public entities” for the bill’s failure. 

Polis, who is term-limited after this year, urged lawmakers and groups involved with that bill to continue working toward a solution. He also acknowledged the need to hold federal officials to the same standards as state and local ones, writing that “we have seen too many examples of senseless deaths and constitutional rights violations during immigration enforcement operations and raids in recent years, and there is an urgent need for federal immigration agents to be held accountable for these lawless actions.”

So far this year, Polis has vetoed 12 bills, the most of his tenure as governor

Alex Sanchez, president and CEO for the Western Slope-based immigrant advocacy group Voces Unidas, said in a text message that he is “deeply disappointed” in the governor’s veto. 

“This veto caps one of the most disappointing legislative sessions for Latinos and immigrants in recent Colorado history — and Democrats, who control state government, are responsible,” Sanchez said. 

Advertisement

Sanchez criticized a bill passed by Republicans and some Democrats that raises the hourly threshold for overtime pay for agricultural workers from 48 hours to 56 hours, which Polis signed last month. He also blasted Democrats for killing a bill earlier this year that would have required state and local law enforcement to arrest federal immigration officers who violate state law and prohibited state and local law enforcement from concealing their identity.

“Colorado’s Latino communities deserved strong leadership,” Sanchez said. “We got excuses instead.”

Polis signs bill on immigration detention facilities 

Polis did sign another immigration-related measure on Thursday. 

House Bill 1276 expands the state’s ability to inspect and regulate immigration detention centers. The measure allows the state to inspect detention centers’ food, water quality and other conditions, and requires those centers to pay for the inspections. Detention centers will also need to submit data annually to the state on the health outcomes of detainees and pass an environmental impact study.

Additionally, the measure bans local and state transit services from transporting immigrants for detention and requires state agencies to publicly disclose when they have received a subpoena from federal immigration officers. 

Advertisement

A previous version of the bill would have held state agencies, not just their employees, liable for violating state laws on immigration information sharing, but that provision was removed after bill sponsors said they heard concerns from Polis.

“We won’t let the federal government operate dangerous and inhumane detention centers without oversight, and our bill ensures facilities are regularly inspected,” said bill sponsor Rep. Elizabeth Velasco, D-Glenwood Springs, in a statement. “All Coloradans deserve to be treated with respect and dignity, and this law establishes some important guardrails for detention centers and safeguards Coloradans’ privacy.”  

The bill’s other sponsors were Weissman, Sen. Iman Jodeh, D-Aurora, and Rep. Lorena Garcia, D-Adams County. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Anyone can fish for free — without buying a license — this weekend in Colorado

Published

on

Anyone can fish for free — without buying a license — this weekend in Colorado


Colorado will host its annual Free Fishing Weekend on Saturday and Sunday, June 6-7.

This weekend, the state is waiving its usual fishing license and habitat requirements, allowing residents, non-residents and anglers of all ages to fish for free, according to a news release from Colorado Parks and Wildlife.

“Fishing is a great activity to share with family and friends, and the perfect chance to get outside and enjoy Colorado’s natural resources,” said Colorado Parks and Wildlife Angler Education Coordinator Andre Egli in a statement.



Colorado has more than 6,000 miles of streams and over 1,300 lakes, including spots that the agency’s biologists have rated as Gold Medal and Quality Waters for anglers due to their abundance of fishing opportunities. The state offers a diverse range of fish for anglers to catch, including over 35 species, according to Parks and Wildlife.

Advertisement

All Colorado fishing regulations still apply this weekend, so anyone who is planning to fish for free should review the 2026 Colorado Fishing Brochure. Anglers can find out more about Colorado fishing locations, classes, events, tournaments and regulations by visiting CPW.State.co.us/fishing.





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Farming in Colorado’s vast Uncompahgre Valley

Published

on

Farming in Colorado’s vast Uncompahgre Valley


Farming in the Uncompahgre Valley

CBS


CBS Colorado’s Alan Gionet, right, interviews farmer Mike Ahlberg.

Advertisement

Farming in the Uncompahgre Valley

interview.jpg

CBS


CBS Colorado’s Alan Gionet, left, interviews farmer Brent Hines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending