Connect with us

California

Newsom Issues Warning as Trump Administration Sues California

Published

on

Newsom Issues Warning as Trump Administration Sues California


California’s Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a warning to the Trump Administration after the Justice Department joined a Republican-led lawsuit on Thursday in an attempt to block the Golden State’s redrawing of congressional district lines. The Trump Administration is arguing that the new districts, which were approved by voters on Nov. 4, violate the Constitution.

In response to the legal action, Newsom’s press office said “these losers lost at the ballot box” and “soon they will also lose in court.”

On last week’s Election Day, California voters approved the Proposition 50 legislation to redraw California’s congressional districts, giving Democrats a stronger chance of taking five House seats from Republicans during next year’s midterm elections. The action was spearheaded by Newsom and other prominent California Democrats in response to similar recent redistricting efforts in Texas, which served to reshape several congressional districts to favor Republicans.

The battle of redistricting across the country has seen criticism from both Democrats and Republicans, with California Republicans suing in their state immediately after Prop. 50 was approved.

Advertisement

Now that the Justice Department has joined the lawsuit, here’s what to know about the latest legal tussle between the Trump Administration and the State of California.

What has the Trump Administration said in the lawsuit against California’s redistricting?

The DOJ describes Prop. 50 as “a rush-job rejiggering of California’s congressional district lines” in the lawsuit, arguing that “race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did with Proposition 50.”

Regarding race demographics, the DOJ says in a statement that it has “substantial evidence” to support its claim that ”the legislature created a new map in which Latino demographics and racial considerations predominated, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause,” which comes under the 14th Amendment.

“Race was a predominant factor in drawing at least District 13 in the Proposition 50 map,” the lawsuit claims.

“The race-based gerrymandered maps passed by the California legislature are unlawful and unconstitutional,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli of the Central District of California in a statement Thursday, adding that “California is free to draw congressional maps, but they may not be drawn based on race.”

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, DOJ attorneys say that Democrat lawmakers “sold a plan to promote the interests of Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections. But amongst themselves and on the debate floor, the focus was not partisanship, but race.”

The legal challenge also alleges that amongst Democrats, discussions were had about the Texas redraw, and that “Proposition 50 would serve as a “shield” against “racist maps,” to counter the Texas map. “The end result is a map that manipulates district lines in the name of bolstering the voting power of Hispanic Californians because of their race,” the lawsuit claims. 

TIME has reached out to the DOJ and Newsom’s press office for comment on the lawsuit. 

How has Newsom responded to the lawsuit and its claims?

Newsom’s press office has commented on what has been highlighted as an error in the lawsuit’s language, whereby the California’s State Assembly is referred to as a “General Assembly.”

“When Trump’s hand-picked hacks at DOJ can’t tell California from North Carolina, you know the lawsuit is about as credible as Trump’s ‘I don’t know Epstein’ line,” said Newsom’ press office, referencing the newly-released emails from the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which allege President Donald Trump knew of his conduct. Trump has long denied having had any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.

Advertisement

“The Democrats are trying to bring up the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax again because they’ll do anything at all to deflect on how badly they’ve done on the Shutdown, and so many other subjects. Only a very bad, or stupid, Republican would fall into that trap,” said Trump on Truth Social, in response to the emails being released.

North Carolina, which has a General Assembly, passed approval for a new congressional map in late October, giving further advantage to Republicans in the state that was tightly contested. 

It is not yet known how Newsom or the State of California will officially respond to the DOJ lawsuit. 

The California Governor has previously won in court against Trump, notably in regard to the President’s deployment of the California National Guard earlier this year in response to immigration raid-related protests in Los Angeles. The deployment was made without the consent—or approval—of Newsom and other L.A. leaders.

A federal judge ruled in September that such deployment went against Federal law. In October, Newsom saw victory once again in court against the Trump Administration, after a federal judge blocked the President from sending any National Guard troops, including ones from California, to police Portland, Oregon.

Advertisement

Understanding the wider battle over redistricting

The redistricting rift between Democrats and Republicans was reawakened Texas announced plans to redraw its congressional districts in August. The move led Texas House Democrats to leave the state in an attempt to prevent the redraw’s approval.

But their efforts proved unsuccessful, as the new Texas congressional map was signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott on Aug. 29. “This map ensures fairer representation in Congress. Texas will be more RED in Congress,” said Abbott. 

Newsom initially told Trump to “stand down” on the redistricting efforts in Texas, but as the Texas Republicans moved forward with their efforts, he started to make his own counter-action plans.

“Today is liberation day in the state of California,” said Newsom, announcing his own redistricting effort. “Donald Trump, you have poked the bear and we will punch back.”

(The mention of “Liberation Day” was widely seen to be a nod to Trump referring to his tariff announcement in April as “Liberation Day” for America.)

Advertisement

The measures in Texas have also been accused of being motivated by racial demographics. 

Democratic Rep. Vince Perez of the state’s 77th district said in August that, in his view, “Texas Republicans have used racial engineering to make sure Texans of color cannot meaningfully influence elections for Congress or the state legislature.”

Later that month, Democrats in Illinois, New York, and Maryland proposed new congressional maps to counter Democrat seats expected to be lost in Republican-led states. Republicans also pushed further to strengthen their numbers in other states including Florida, Indiana, and Missouri.

California’s redraw was ultimately left for the public to decide on, as voters headed to the polls on Nov. 4 to decide on Proposition 50. Over 64% of Californians voted in favor of the redraw.



Source link

Advertisement

California

Democrat Aisha Wahab advances in California special election to replace former US Rep. Eric Swalwell

Published

on

Democrat Aisha Wahab advances in California special election to replace former US Rep. Eric Swalwell


Democratic state lawmaker Aisha Wahab advanced Tuesday to the special general election in California for the U.S. House seat vacated by Rep. Eric Swalwell after he resigned from Congress amid allegations of sexual assault.  
 

Headed to runoff 

Wahab, a state senator who focused her campaign message on reducing housing costs, goes on to the Aug. 18 runoff, which will determine who will fill the remainder of Swalwell’s term through January. 

Advertisement

The 14th District includes East Bay cities such as Fremont, Hayward and Livermore. It heavily favors Democrats, and Swalwell typically beat Republican challengers by wide vote margins. 

Also among the 11 names on the ballot was fellow Democrat Melissa Hernandez, a Bay Area Rapid Transit director and former mayor of the East Bay city of Dublin.

Advertisement

Branded as progressive

She and Wahab represent different wings of the party that have been battling in numerous states this primary season. The more progressive Wahab proposed combating high costs by expanding the social safety net and taking on “corporate profiteering.” Hernandez, considered more moderate, emphasized job growth and supporting small businesses.

Others in the race were Democratic businessperson Rakhi Israni Singh and Republicans Wendy Huang, a real estate investor, and Dena Maldonado, who runs a small flower business. 

Advertisement

Separate from the special election, a regular primary was held June 2 for a full term in the seat beginning in January, with many of the same candidates who were on Tuesday’s ballot.

Multiple elections

Wahab and Hernandez were the top two vote-getters June 2 and advanced to the general election in November. If one of them comes out on top in the special election, their hope is that serving in the office for a few months this summer and fall could provide a boost in visibility and some job experience they can tout as they campaign for the full term.

Advertisement

Swalwell held the seat for seven terms before resigning in April – and also  dropping out of this year’s governor’s race – after the San Francisco Chronicle reported allegations that he sexually assaulted a woman twice, including when she worked for him. 

CNN later reported that other women accused him of sending inappropriate messages and nude photos.

Advertisement

Swalwell has repeatedly denied the accusations, but he said it would be unfair to his constituents to remain in Congress. 

California PoliticsElectionEric Swalwell



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

One of the 8 people killed in B-52 crash at California base had just welcomed new baby

Published

on

One of the 8 people killed in B-52 crash at California base had just welcomed new baby


One of the eight people who died in the crash of an Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber in California on Monday had recently welcomed a new son, his wife said.

“My husband just went back to work. He was there for just a week,” Lauren Smith said about her husband, Jeromy Smith.

The Department of Defense and Edwards Air Force Base have not released the names of those killed in Monday’s crash, which happened shortly after the plane took off around 11:20 a.m.

Members of the military, military civilians and government contractors were on board, officials have said. Boeing confirmed that two of its employees had been killed.

The cause of the crash remains under investigation. The aircraft was on a routine test mission supporting a “radar modernization program,” Air Force Col. James Hayes told reporters Monday.

An initial gathering of facts can take up to 30 days, and then an accident investigation board will review the crash, Hayes said. It can take six months before the information is gathered and released to next-of-kin and the public, he said.

Advertisement
Jeromy Smith.
Jeromy Smith.via LinkedIn

Jeromy Smith was a civilian flight test engineer for the Department of Defense and worked on projects at Edwards Air Force Base for 10 years, Lauren Smith said.

The Smiths have two children: Fletcher, 2 years old, and Fallon, who was born four months ago.

“We did not see this coming,” she said.

Jeromy Smith had received the Aerial Achievement Medal for flying medium- to high-risk sorties, and he was proud of that, Lauren Smith said.

But for the six years that Lauren Smith has been with her husband, she said she never felt like things were not safe.

Monday’s flight had originally been scheduled for Friday but had been pushed back, she said.

Advertisement

“They go through tons of safety things before they even take off. And I know specifically on Friday they had — they were gonna fly on Friday, and they just kept pushing it back and pushing it back,” she said.

“And I don’t think that plane was ready to take off, and I’m so sad it did,” she said.

The Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

Lauren Smith said that the last text she sent her husband was “I love you.”

She became aware of the crash through social media and learned that Jeromy Smith had died when people from his work showed up at her door at 6 p.m. Monday, she said.

Advertisement

“He worked really hard for this country, and he loved this country so much,” she said. “I know he is just a speck in this world of people, but he truly, truly loved this country, and he would do anything for this country.”

“And he left a legacy with his kids,” she said. “And I hope that they — they know that their father was a hero, and that he loved them very much.”



Source link

Continue Reading

California

CalMatters journalism honored as ‘impeccable,’ ‘beautifully-written’ and ‘the definition of public service’ in Golden State Journalism Awards

Published

on

CalMatters journalism honored as ‘impeccable,’ ‘beautifully-written’ and ‘the definition of public service’ in Golden State Journalism Awards


By Sonya Quick, CalMatters

Graphic by the CalMatters Visuals Team

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

CalMatters won five of this year’s Golden State Journalism Awards, for public health reporting, criminal justice reporting, education reporting, courage in journalism and impact in journalism.

Advertisement

The awards are given by the Sacramento Press Club for politics and public policy reporting across the state.

Byrhonda Lyons won for impact in journalism.

The award recognizes “exceptional journalism that holds powerful institutions and/or people accountable for their actions and, by doing so, leads to demonstrable change that benefits Californians.”

Lyons is recognized for her reporting on how the California Department of Motor Vehicles has made millions from auctioned car sales, and kept the money without notifying owners that they were entitled to proceeds. After CalMatters journalism engineer Mohamed Al Elew created an interactive tool for towed vehicle owners to see if their car was sold for a profit, the DMV decided to do the same. According to a CalMatters analysis of DMV data, between 2016 and 2024, the DMV collected more than $8 million in surplus proceeds from nearly 5,300 vehicle auctions. In March, Sen. Kelly Seyarto, a Republican from Murrieta, cited Lyons’ reporting when introducing SB 1029, which would require the California Department of Motor Vehicles to “notify vehicle owners when surplus funds from a lien sale may be owed to them.”

“Thanks to CalMatters, Californians are getting their money back. This is the definition of public service journalism.”

Judges for the Golden State Journalism Awards

Judges wrote, “CalMatters’ Byrhonda Lyons followed the money — or perhaps more accurately followed the state keeping the money — to root out the fact the state’s DMV was keeping funds raised from cars sold at auction beyond the cost of towing. Thanks to good old-fashioned reporting and the Public Records Act, Lyons found out DMV had pocketed more than $8 million that belonged to the cars’ former owners from 2016 to 2024. But CalMatters didn’t stop there. It created a searchable database that the public could use to look up whether they were owed money. As reported, DMV thought it such a good idea that it copied it. Thanks to CalMatters, Californians are getting their money back. This is the definition of public service journalism.”

Advertisement

Sergio Olmos was one of the journalists honored for courage in journalism.

The Press Club judges said this year’s award for “exceptional courage to bring necessary coverage to the public” is presented to “journalists who continued reporting despite being struck, detained, or otherwise targeted while covering protests against federal immigration enforcement actions in Los Angeles in 2025.”

The club honored all journalists whose experiences were cited in legal action brought by the Los Angeles Press Club and Status Coup against the Los Angeles Police Department. The lawsuit alleged journalists were targeted despite clearly identifying themselves as members of the press. A court later granted an injunction ordering law enforcement not to interfere with journalists performing their duties.

“This award recognizes the journalists who kept reporting the news with great bravery,” Sacramento Press Club President Ashley Zavala said during the ceremony. “Please join me in honoring their courage — and the role of a free press.”

Olmos, a CalMatters investigative reporter, was included after he was struck in the chest by a crowd-control munition fired by police officers while covering an immigration protest in downtown Los Angeles, California, on June 8, 2025. Olmos told The Washington Post that he was wearing a press pass and shooting video of a protest a few blocks from a complex of federal buildings when Los Angeles Police Department officers shot crowd-control munitions at demonstrators. Olmos believes he was hit with a 40 mm sponge grenade.

In the past year, Olmos relentlessly pursued the on-the-ground realities of immigration raids across California. His investigative series shows that immigration agents engaged in a pattern of force and questionable detention, aggressive tactics that courts have said likely violated the constitution, as they moved from Bakersfield to Los Angeles, and then Chicago and Minneapolis.

Advertisement

Anat Rubin won for criminal justice reporting.

Rubin was honored for her investigation, “The Man Who Unsolved a Murder.” The project found that poor people accused of crimes, who account for at least 80% of criminal defendants, are routinely convicted in California without anyone investigating the charges against them. Close to half of California’s 58 counties do not employ any full-time public defense investigators. Among the remaining counties, defendants’ access to investigators fluctuates wildly, but it’s almost always inadequate.

Judges wrote, “This CalMatters package provided a sharp, well-reported and beautifully-written look at the dearth of investigators at public defender’s offices and the consequences for defendants. The package also included a well-reported look at the perils of using flat-fee defense attorneys in lieu of public defenders.”

Joe Garcia was also a finalist in this category for his reporting inside California’s prison system: on the realities of shared cells, and how rehabilitative programming is increasing while the success rate of prisoners found suitable for parole is gradually declining.

Judges wrote, “This CalMatters package offered insightful reporting and writing about problems with California’s parole system, as well as the physical risks of housing people in shared cells.”

Jocelyn Wiener, Marisa Kendall and Erica Yee won for public health reporting.

These CalMatters journalists joined together for an 8-part series examining the realities of California’s CARE Court program – a program to allow families or first responders to petition courts for care on behalf of someone with severe mental illness and empowers judges to order treatment in some cases.

Advertisement

Judges wrote: “CalMatters’ reporters Jocelyn Wiener, Marisa Kendall and Erica Yee left no stone unturned in Courting Disappointment, an 8-part series that both explains and viscerally demonstrates why Governor Newsom’s ambitious CARE Court program has failed to deliver. Through rigorous data collection, point-by-point analysis of the legislative process and deep interviews with affected individuals, family members, court, state and county officials, the reporters captured the exhausting and heartwrenching experiences of parents trying to get their mentally ill family members off the streets and into psychiatric treatment, as well as the courts’ legal limitations to follow through on these petitions. Most compelling was the explanatory work illustrating how a well-intentioned law was watered down to the point of being largely ineffective. The breadth of this series, along with its impeccable writing and editing, merits first place in the Golden State Journalism Awards Public Health category.”

Adam Echelman won for education reporting.

Echelman was honored for his reporting, which found that community colleges were seeing unprecedented reports of fraud, with scammers stealing millions more dollars of student aid than in any previous period, according to reports submitted by colleges to California’s Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office.

After CalMatters reported on the rise in fraud last year, Republican U.S. Congress members called for a federal investigation, a Democratic state legislator launched a state audit and later, California’s Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office approved a new ID verification policy for students. Colleges now are more vigilant about policing fraud, said Jory Hadsell, an executive in technology initiatives for the chancellor’s office, who pointed to better filtering practices and new software to detect fraud.

Judges wrote: “Adam Echelman’s reporting on financial fraud in California’s community college system highlights a critical issue for faculty and students with deep reporting, statistical evidence, crisp writing and, importantly, voices from those most affected. The articles aren’t just a collection of important information, they’re engaging narratives that underscore what’s at stake – not just for students, faculty and staff, but for taxpayers as well.”

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending