Connect with us

California

How much water is in Lake Shasta, California reservoirs in 2026?

Published

on

How much water is in Lake Shasta, California reservoirs in 2026?


play

Lake Shasta and California’s other lakes and reservoirs got a big boost from wet holiday storms. Nearly two weeks into 2026, all of the state’s 17 major reservoirs are brimming above their 30-year average after atmospheric rivers dumped heavy rain on much of the state starting the week before Christmas, lasting into Wednesday, Jan. 7.

Both the rain and the rainwater draining from the ground into lakes helped raise reservoir levels, the National Weather Service said.

Advertisement

Lake Shasta waters lapped just short of 29 feet from the top on Jan. 11, after rising about 45 feet since Dec. 18 — the day before the first heavy winter storm of the season rolled over Shasta County, according to the California Department of Water Resources.

Two other major Southern California supply reservoirs were full or near full as of Jan. 11, according to state data.

  • Lake Cachuma is 101% full. The reservoir contained 58% more water than its 30-year historic average.
  • Lake Casitas is 98% full, 27% more than its average.

Lakes continue to fill for days after storms pass as the heavily saturated soil continues to drain into waterways, said meteorologist Bill Rasch at the weather service’s Sacramento branch.

Based on state water resources department reports, here’s how much water other major reservoirs held on Jan. 11, starting with the three biggest.

Advertisement

How full is Lake Shasta?

Lake Shasta, the biggest state-owned reservoir, was 82% full, according to the state’s latest data. With several months left to go in the area’s rainy season, the lake was 35% more full than its historic average over the past 30 years.

However, Lake Shasta started the water year 4% higher than average on Oct. 1, 2025, after Northern California’s super wet spring.

How full is Lake Oroville?

The state’s second-largest reservoir, Lake Oroville — located 80 miles north of Sacramento in the Sierra Nevada foothills — was 78% full and held 39% more water than usual on Jan. 11.

Advertisement

Oroville also started the water year with an advantage: It was 7% more full than usual on Oct. 1.

How full is Trinity Lake?

Another far Northern California reservoir and the state’s third largest, Trinity Lake, was 84% full and held 38% more water than usual.

It’s the second year in a row that the lake has shown healthy water levels. Trinity’s waters plummeted over several years of drought, dropping to to 40% of its historic average in January 2023.

While only about 25 miles northwest of Lake Shasta, Trinity fills more slowly over the calendar year and requires more time to recover after drought than its counterpart, the Bureau of Reclamation has said.

How much water is in 12 other California lakes and reservoirs

Here’s how much water is in 12 other major state reservoirs a week into 2026, according to water resources department data, and how much more water they contain compared to their historical average on Jan. 11.

Advertisement
  • New Bullards Bar (40 miles northeast of Marysville in Yuba County): 82% full, 29% more than average
  • Folsom Lake (25 miles east of Sacramento): 60% full, 41% more than average
  • Camanche Reservoir (45 miles southeast of Sacramento): 73% full, 22% more than average
  • Lake Sonoma (30 miles north of Santa Rosa): 70% full, 21% more than average
  • San Luis Reservoir (70 miles east of Santa Cruz): 73% full, 9% more than average
  • New Melones Reservoir (55 miles east of Stockton on the Stanislaus River): 73% full, 29% more than average
  • Don Pedro Reservoir (45 miles east of Modesto): 80% full, 17% more than average
  • Castaic Lake (45 miles north of Pasadena): 78% full, where it stands on average
  • Lake McClure (50 miles east of Modesto): 69% full, 52% more than average
  • Diamond Valley Lake (40 miles southeast of downtown Riverside): 94% full, 30% more than average
  • Millerton Lake (20 miles north of Fresno): 77% full, 40% more than average
  • Pine Flat Lake (35 miles east of Fresno): 45% full, 24% more than average

Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook.





Source link

California

Steve Hilton on His Surprisingly Strong Bid for California Governor

Published

on

Steve Hilton on His Surprisingly Strong Bid for California Governor


It’s been quite the unexpected slog through a field of candidates so numerous that all of their names don’t even fit on a single page of the ballot. Democrats in California have held the governor’s mansion, state House, and state Senate for almost two decades and unrest about that trifecta out West is real. The traditional political alliances are frayed, at best, with socialists backing a billionaire and Trump supporting an immigrant. A sex scandal tanked the hopes of a leading candidate, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and Trump’s endorsement of Hilton all but sidelined tough-on-crime Riverside Sheriff Chad Bianco. It’s why Hilton, who moved to California in 2012, is in the mix in a race that is set to test assumptions about party loyalty, candidate partisanship, and money’s power. And it carries massive consequences about who will be the de facto CEO of the fourth-largest economy on the planet, between Germany and Japan, and a major player on the national political stage. This is not some backwater local election.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California just handed oil companies billions in free pollution permits

Published

on

California just handed oil companies billions in free pollution permits


By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

California air regulators on Friday approved a contentious overhaul of the state’s carbon market, creating a program that could steer billions of dollars in free pollution permits to oil refineries and other major polluters over the objections of environmental groups, key lawmakers and three of the board’s own members.

Advertisement

Ten members of the California Air Resources Board voted to adopt the changes to its cap-and-invest program after two days of lengthy hearings, including a full day dedicated to hundreds of public comments.

The overhaul followed intensive lobbying by the oil industry as well as pressure from Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration to help keep refineries operating in the state amid rising gas prices.

The approval sets up a potential budget fight in Sacramento. The Legislative Analyst’s Office projects that quarterly auction revenue for state climate programs will drop from roughly $4 billion a year to about $2 billion under the new overhaul.

Such a shortfall would effectively zero out programs lawmakers spent last year fighting to fund: affordable housing, public transit, drinking water in low-income communities and pollution monitoring in California’s most polluted neighborhoods.

The governor’s office praised the measure as a compromise that balanced economic uncertainty with the state’s climate goals. Refinery closures and the Iran-Israel war have driven average California gas prices above $6 a gallon. 

Advertisement

Newsom, in a statement, used the moment to draw a contrast with President Donald Trump.

“While Trump sows ongoing chaos and uncertainty, California is staying focused by protecting our economy, safeguarding public health, and doubling down on the clean energy future all Californians deserve,” he said. 

Environmentalists warned the changes to the program amount to a giveaway to the fossil fuel industry that weakens California’s only program setting a firm cap on greenhouse gas emissions.

Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California senior director for the Environmental Defense Fund, called the decision “deeply misguided” for prioritizing polluters over communities.

“Newsom’s air regulators are handing billions to oil executives at the expense of our climate, health, and affordability for working families in a rushed process that has shortchanged meaningful public participation,” said Bahram Fazeli, policy director at Communities for a Better Environment. 

Advertisement

How the program works — and what changes

California’s 13-year-old carbon market forces major polluters to buy permits while the state lowers the overall cap each year. Friday’s vote will reduce those permits – and creates a new subsidy program carved out of the market.

The program, which may still see changes, could make available a new pool of free pollution permits available to industry valued at as much as $4 billion. Companies that pledge to invest in clean energy and efficiency may qualify for the permits in exchange for investments in clean energy. 

The pool will be capped at 118.3 million permits — the same number the air board has said must come off the market for California to hit its 2030 climate target. Environmentalists say the proposal risks wiping out those reductions. 

Half are reserved for the fossil fuel sector. A recent Berkeley analysis, by the chair of an independent committee that oversees the carbon market, found refineries could end up with more free permits than they need to cover their emissions.

The air board has defended the design. Officials say the credits will go only to companies undertaking decarbonization projects, will be limited and temporary and can be clawed back if companies misuse them. The plan, they say, is meant to keep California refineries operating at a time of mounting closures and global market pressure. According to air regulators, the amended program will spur clean-energy investment as Trump cuts federal support.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Man charged with murder, kidnapping their 5-year-old child before fleeing to Mexico

Published

on

Man charged with murder, kidnapping their 5-year-old child before fleeing to Mexico


A 40-year-old Los Angeles man was charged with murder after allegedly killing his girlfriend and kidnapping their young child before fleeing to Mexico, according to authorities.

Ruben Fregosojuarez has been charged one count of murder and one misdemeanor count of child abuse under circumstance or conditions other than great bodily injury or death, according to a Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office news release. Authorities first identified him as Ruben Fregoso but Los Angeles County prosecutors listed him as Ruben Fregosojuarez.

On Monday around 12:39 p.m., the Los Angeles Police Department conducted a welfare check in the 2600 block of South Alsace Avenue in West Adams, police said in a news release.

Officers found a woman dead inside the home “as a result of violence” and the woman’s daughter missing, police said. On Monday night, the California Highway Patrol issued an Amber Alert for the child, Daleza.

Advertisement

Photos obtained by NBC4 appear to show Fregosojuarez in a parking garage in San Ysidro with the girl on Sunday. The California Highway Patrol has listed her age as 4 years old but Los Angeles police say the girl is 5. She is also described as the suspect’s daughter.

The alert said that the girl was last seen with Fregosojuarez, who allegedly abducted her in a 2019 Land Rover Discovery, on Sunday at about 4 a.m.

The CHP posted in an update that the vehicle was found but that the child and man were still missing. The girl is described as 3 feet tall, 45 pounds, and having black hair and brown eyes.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending