California
Gavin Newsom wants nations to exempt California goods from tariffs. That’s unlikely, experts say
As President Donald Trump blasts American allies and adversaries alike for “unfair trade” and sets steep tariffs, California Governor Gavin Newsom has a different message for the nations of the world.
“Donald Trump’s tariffs do not represent all Americans,” the Democrat said in a video posted on social media last week, as the stock market took a nosedive and investors coped with steep losses. “Our state of mind is around supporting stable trading relationships around the globe.”
The governor took a step further last week when he asked nations to exempt California-made products from retaliatory tariffs, which have already been announced by China and Canada, two of the state’s top trading partners.
Newsom then directed his administration, including an international trade and affairs team housed in the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, to seek out “new opportunities to expand trade” such as “strategic partnerships” to blunt the rising prices and supply-chain disruptions that he and many economists expect from Trump’s “America first” approach to trade.
Sean Randolph, senior director of the Bay Area Council Economic Institute, a San Francisco think tank, said Newsom is right to take that approach for California, a state heavily reliant on international trade.
“Other countries do have a friend in California,” he said.
But as a mere governor, Newsom doesn’t have the power to make trade pacts or set tariffs, which are “the heart of the issue,” Randolph and other experts said. The governor can partner with nations to promote tourism and education and forge closer personal ties with leaders overseas, but trade policy is solely the territory of the federal government.
“What he can actually do, I think, is pretty limited,” Randolph said.
Randolph, who was California’s top trade official in the 1990s, isn’t alone in bracing for inflation and disruptions as Trump’s tariffs set in. According to Newsom’s office, the import taxes will “have an outsized impact on California businesses.”
The Golden state is the top importer of foreign goods in the U.S., $491.5 billion worth, chiefly for computer and electronic products, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. California exports totaled $183 billion last year, second to Texas’ $455 billion, with most goods destined for Mexico, Canada and China as well as other Asian markets. California shipped nearly $50 billion worth of computers and electronics, its top export, last year, the commerce agency’s data shows.
California has close trade ties with Mexico, and two-way trade reached $98 billion last year, according to the Commerce department. Mexico is a major source of agricultural products such as avocados and berries to California residents. It’s also common for goods like cars to flow back-and-forth repeatedly between Southern California and Mexico during production, Randolph said.
On Friday, a week since Newson first made his overtures to foreign nations, a spokesperson did not respond when asked if the governor’s office had made progress toward tariff carve-outs or partnerships with other nations.
Nor did a representative of the governor’s economic development office provide more detail about the kind of strategic partnerships that staff are now pursuing with international diplomats behind the scenes, or how those might soothe economic pain.
“The administration is actively engaging with our international partners and exploring opportunities to strengthen our shared economic interests,” Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in an email.
In public appearances and statements, Newsom is quick to remind audiences that California’s roughly $4.1 trillion economy is the largest in the nation and a powerhouse for tech, agriculture and manufacturing.
Even so, as a governor, Newsom can’t sign a binding trade pact with any foreign nation, per the U.S. Constitution, said Maurice Obstfeld, a fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington D.C. and an economics professor at at UC Berkeley. The Commerce Clause grants Congress power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States.”
Despite his overtures, Newsom’s hands are tied on trade, he said.
“No country makes trade agreements with subnational regions,” Obstfeld said in an email. “The U.S. federal government has not made California a free-trade enclave.”
He called Newsom’s proclamations “grandstanding without substance.”
California is already in dozens of partnerships with foreign nations from China and Mexico to Armenia in the last decade. Many are agreements to coordinate on climate action. These partnerships can be useful, but they don’t carry the weight of law, said Russell Hancock, president of Joint Venture Silicon Valley, a Bay Area think tank.
Nonetheless, Hancock applauded Newsom for reaching out to trade partners.
“Good for him, he’s making a play,” he said. “And let’s be real, he’s also positioning himself. But that’s how you do things.”
Newsom has tried to toe the line between appeasing Trump and standing apart since the Republican took office in January. The Marin County Democrat is also famously ambitious and is widely rumored to be planning a run for president in 2028.
Some of these partnerships focus on trade, including a 2019 agreement with the Mexican Ministry of Economy in 2019 “to expand trade and investment cooperation.”
But going beyond a loose agreement and actually exempting California products from tariffs, as Newsom has pleaded, is probably riskier for countries, experts said. China, for instance, is now facing total import taxes of 145%, the Trump administration said Thursday, and has responded in kind with its own steep tariffs on U.S. products.
Granting California a carve-out would probably draw the ire of Trump — risking even bigger import taxes — Obstfeld said.
“What would they even gain? Other than drawing enmity and higher tariffs from the president,” he said.
Gallegos, the spokesperson for Newsom, did not comment on this critique when asked to respond.
Economists nationally are expecting Trump’s tariffs to drive up prices on everything from homes, cars, iPhones, running shoes and coffee. With the import taxes, Trump is intending to reverse a 50-year trend of American companies off-shoring manufacturing overseas and bring more factories back home.
Beyond the tough tariffs on Chinese imports, which are critical to the U.S. tech and clean energy sectors as well as a slew of others, the Trump administration imposed a blanket 10% tariff on most nations. Trump said he rolled back even stricter tariffs this week because of stock market turmoil and anxiety.
His administration also set a 25% tariff on imported car parts — hitting the U.S. auto industry that depends on a deeply integrated supply chain with other nations — as well as steel and aluminum. Canada and Mexico are also subject to a new tariff on goods imported outside of the scope of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, signed by Trump in his first term, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that eliminated tariffs on most goods in 1994.
In response, Canada has set a 25% tax on American cars and trucks. Mexican officials have said they do not want to set tariffs in retaliation but may do so.
The Bay Area Council institute’s Randolph said it’ll take a few months at the soonest for the full effects of Trump’s toughened trade policies to materialize. But one thing looks clear already.
“We’re all going to live with higher prices,” he said.
Originally Published:
California
Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say
Newsom slams Trump amid U.S. military action in Iran
Newsom criticized Trump for spending little time acknowledging four U.S. service members killed in the conflict with Iran during recent remarks.
California Democrats running for governor, your party has a message for you. Think carefully about your candidacy and campaign ahead of the swiftly approaching filing deadline.
California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks urged candidates looking to assume the state’s highest office to “honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign” as March 6, the final day to declare candidacy, nears. Hicks said that concerns about the crowded field of Democrat candidates “persist” in an open letter on Tuesday, March 3.
It comes as five leading candidates, several of which are Democrats — Katie Porter, Eric Swalwell, and Tom Steyer — are in a “virtual tie” per a recent poll, the Desert Sun reported, which is part of the USA TODAY Network.
Two Republican candidates pushing out California democrats in the gubernatorial bid may be “implausible,” but “it is not impossible,” Hicks said of the reasoning behind his latest message. Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both Republicans, lead in RealClear Polling’s average of various polls.
The party chair spotlighted the need for California Democrats’ leadership, particularly over Proposition 50, the voter-approved measure that will temporarily implement new congressional district maps, paving the way for Democrats to secure more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.
“If in the unlikely event a Democrat failed to proceed to the general election for governor, there could be the potential for depressed Democratic turnout in California in November,” Hicks said. “The result would present a real risk to winning the congressional seats required and imperil Democrats’ chances to retake the House, cut Donald Trump’s term in half, and spare our nation from the pain many have endured since January 2025.”
During a press conference on March 2, Gov. Gavin Newsom said that when he is out in communities, people aren’t talking about the governor’s race. It’s an observation he called “interesting,” considering voting in the primary election starts in May.
“It’s been hard, I think, to focus on that race,” Newsom said, pointing to the attention on President Donald Trump, redistricting, and other matters.
What exactly is California Democratic Party asking of candidates?
In his open letter, Hicks gave directions to candidates.
First, assess your candidacy and campaign. If you don’t have a viable path to the general election, don’t file to get your name on the ballot for the primary election in June. Also, be prepared to suspend your campaign and endorse another candidate by April 15 if you decide to file but can’t show “meaningful progress towards winning the primary election.”
When is the next California election? Primary election in 2026
California voters will trim the field of candidates for governor on June 2. Only the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party preference, will move on to the November election.
Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at pbarraza@usatodayco.com.
California
Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students
BAKERSFIELD, Calif.(KBAK/KBFX) — The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a California law that limited when schools could require staff to disclose a student’s gender identity, clearing the way for schools to tell parents if their children identify as transgender without getting the students’ approval.
Rear view of multiracial students with hands raised in classroom at high school
The decision came after religious parents and educators, represented by the Thomas More Society, challenged California school policies aimed at preventing staff from disclosing a student’s gender identity.
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean and professor of law at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, said the ruling favors parents’ ability to be informed. “The Supreme Court today rules in favor of the claim of parents to be able to know the gender identity and gender pronoun of the children,” Chemerinsky said.
FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)
The decision temporarily blocks a state law that bans automatic parental notification requirements if students change their pronouns or gender expression at school. The Thomas More Society called the decision a major victory for parents, saying the court found California’s policy likely violates constitutional rights.
Chemerinsky said the Supreme Court’s action is an emergency ruling. “This law is now put on hold. So what this means is that schools can require that teachers and other staff inform parents of the gender identity or gender pronouns of children,” he said.
Kathie Moehlig, founder and executive director of Trans Family Support Services, said she is concerned about how the ruling could affect students who do not have supportive families.
“I am really concerned about our kids that do come from these non affirming homes, that they know that they’re going to get in trouble, that they’re going to possibly have violence brought against them possibly kicked out of their homes,” Moehlig said.
Moehlig said parents should eventually know, but that the conversation should happen when a student feels safe. “Our students are going to be less inclined to confide in any adults that might be able to help to get them access to mental healthcare, to a support system. They may still tell their peers but they’re certainly not going to tell any other adult,” she said.
Equality California, a LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, shared a statement:
Equality California, the nation’s largest statewide LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, released the following statement from Executive Director Tony Hoang in response to today’s U.S. Supreme Court shadow docket ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta regarding California’s student privacy protections for transgender youth. Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in this case is deeply disturbing. By stepping in on an emergency basis, the Court has effectively upended California’s student privacy protections without hearing full arguments and before the judicial process has run its course. While not surprising, this move reflects a dangerous willingness to short-circuit the established judicial process to dismantle protections for transgender youth. While this case continues to be litigated, the ruling revives Judge Benitez’s prior decision, which broadly targets numerous California laws protecting transgender and gender-nonconforming students — threatening critical safeguards that prevent forced outing and allow educators to respect a student’s affirmed name and pronouns at school. These protections exist for one reason: to keep students safe and ensure schools remain places where young people can learn and thrive without fear. To be clear: today’s decision does not impact California’s SAFETY Act, which prohibits school districts from adopting policies that forcibly out transgender students. The SAFETY Act remains in full effect, and we will continue defending it. Transgender youth deserve dignity, safety, and the freedom to learn without fear. We will never stop fighting for transgender youth and their families. Equality California will continue working with parents, educators, and advocates to ensure schools remain safe, welcoming, and focused on the success and well-being of every student.
The case now returns to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which will decide whether the California law is constitutional.
California
Rep. Kevin Kiley announces run in California’s redrawn 6th Congressional District
Congressman Kevin Kiley has announced his plan to run in California’s newly redrawn 6th district.
In a statement on Monday, Rep. Kiley revealed he had considered running in the 5th District – which could have set up a possible showdown between two current Republican officeholders.
“It’s true that I was fully prepared to run in the new 5th, having tested the waters and with polls showing a favorable outlook in a “safe” district. But doing what’s easy and what’s right are often not the same,” Kiley stated.
Kiley currently represents California’s 3rd district, which originally comprised counties making up much of the back spine of the state.
As of the Prop. 50 redistricting push, the 3rd district was redrawn for the 2026 midterm election to lean toward the Democratic Party – with those eastern spine of California counties lopped off and more of Sacramento County, including Rancho Cordova, added.
California’s new 6th district is now comprised of Rocklin, Roseville, Citrus Heights, much of North and East Sacramento, and the city of West Sacramento. Democratic Rep. Ami Bera currently represents the district, but will be running for the new 3rd district in 2026.
Other declared candidates for the 6th district include Democrats Lauren Babb Thomlinson, Thien Ho, Richard Pan, Kindra Pring, Tyler Vandenberg, and Republicans Christine Bish, Craig DeLuz, and Raymond Riehle.
Kiley was first elected to the House in 2022 and was reelected in 2024.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO6 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon4 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies