California
California electric vehicle ballot measure pits Newsom against Lyft
A poll modification up for consideration in
California
would tax excessive earners in an effort to streamline the transition to
electrical autos
, though it faces some sudden opposition.
Proposition 30 is considered one of a number of questions being posed to voters within the Golden State throughout this yr’s
midterm elections
. If accredited, it could levy a 1.75% tax on private revenue of greater than $2 million, funds that will be used to subsidize zero-emission automobile purchases, construct out electrical automobile charging infrastructure, and add to wildfire prevention efforts.
RIVAL SPORTS BETTING PROPOSALS ON CALIFORNIA BALLOT
The measure is predicted to internet between $3 billion and $5 billion yearly, drawn from
fewer than
43,000 of California’s 39 million residents, in response to CBS Information.
Whereas the measure would appear like a slam dunk for Democrats in one of the crucial liberal states within the nation, it has a really notable opponent — Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. The governor, bucking his occasion, has accused the measure of being positioned on the poll solely to counterpoint multibillion-dollar rideshare firm Lyft, which has closely funded help for the measure.
“Prop 30 is being marketed as a local weather initiative,” Newsom mentioned in an commercial in opposition to the poll measure. “However in actuality, it was devised by a single company to funnel state revenue taxes to profit their firm. Put merely, Prop 30 is a Computer virus that places company welfare above the fiscal welfare of our total state.”
Newsom has backed a plan to ban the in-state sale of all gasoline-powered autos by 2035 to spur the usage of electrical autos and minimize down on environment-harming emissions. Backers of Proposition 30 contend that the measure would assist velocity up the proliferation of electrical autos.
The governor has argued that the rationale why Lyft is funneling a lot cash into supporting the proposition is that state regulators have mandated that each one rideshare journeys be zero emission by 2030 and that the measure would assist rideshare drivers buy electrical autos and due to this fact profit the corporate.
Lyft, although, mentioned it backs the initiative as a result of it helps serving to the local weather relatively than doing so merely out of blind self-interest.
“Proposition 30 funds this by a tax on people who earn greater than $2 million a yr. I am lucky sufficient to be impacted by this tax and completely happy to pay it to assist flip again the clock on this existential risk,” mentioned Logan Inexperienced, the corporate’s CEO, in a weblog publish.
Transfer LA, a public transit advocacy group that helped create the poll measure, has additionally pushed again on the assertion that the proposition is a “Computer virus” organized by Lyft. Denny Zane, the founding father of the group, instructed the Guardian that Lyft was not behind the creation of the proposition and joined after the concept was already devised.
“It’s simply false,” Zane mentioned of the notion.
Invoice Magavern, the coverage director for the Coalition for Clear Air, has accused Newsom of caving to his rich donors. Republicans have pushed again on the measure as nicely.
“You’ve obtained billionaires and their allies who don’t wish to pay their justifiable share of taxes,” he mentioned.
A lot cash has been thrown into help and opposition to Proposition 30. Sure on 30, which helps the tax proposal, has raised $47 million, with the overwhelming majority of that cash coming immediately from Lyft. In the meantime, No on 30 has raised almost $15 million in opposition to the measure.
Polling signifies that whereas the vote on Proposition 30 can be shut, extra individuals help the measure than oppose it — though greater than 1 in 10 voters are nonetheless undecided. A
ballot
carried out by the Institute of Governmental Research on the College of California, Berkeley discovered that 49% help the proposition whereas simply 31% oppose it.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
The electrical automobile proposal isn’t the one massive situation on the poll for California voters. They will even weigh a duo of competing provisions to legalize sports activities betting — which have turn into the most costly poll provisions within the state’s historical past.
Proposition 26 would allow in-person sports activities wagers at horse racing tracks and in casinos on tribal land. Proposition 27 would enable California residents to wager by accredited sportsbooks on-line anyplace within the state.
California
Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal
LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road.
It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday.
“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.”
Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal.
“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.”
It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans.
“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.”
Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived.
“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.”
The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson.
“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.”
Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.
I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.
“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said.
It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life.
“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson.
Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving.
“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said.
Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital.
“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said.
California
California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program
California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.
Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.
“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.
NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH
They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.
“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.
BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035
Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.
Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature.
Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA | TESLA INC. | 338.59 | -13.97 | -3.96% |
“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”
Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.
Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.
California
STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.
For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”
In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.
CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996
The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.
Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.
This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.
GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN
In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.
Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected.
You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.
What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.”
Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.
Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:
1. People want results, not lectures
Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.
2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism
“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
3. Who cares about Hollywood?
This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.
4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech
Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.
5. Working class beats the elite
Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening.
They just don’t get it.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health4 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
Health1 day ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World