Arizona
Dozens charged under Preston’s Law in Arizona
Two men were arrested and two other suspects remain at large after a train burglary in northern Arizona last week, authorities said. On Monday, May 29, local and federal detectives investigating ongoing cargo thefts received a report of a train burglary in progress near Interstate 40 and Meteor Crater, west of Winslow, the Coconino County Sheriff’s Office said.
Arizona
Arizona lacrosse leaders believe sport is poised to grow
Arizona
This Arizona city named among top 23 small US towns to visit
Stunning places every Arizonan should visit at least once
From the Grand Canyon to Sedona’s red rocks to dramatic views of Havasupai Falls, here are some must-see places every Arizonan should check out.
Arizona is always making headlines for its breathtaking scenery, top travel destinations and highly ranked cities. Now, another Arizona gem is earning national recognition, with this famous city ranking No. 14 on Y Travel’s list of the 23 small towns in the USA to visit.
Y Travel, also known as Y Travel Blog, is an independent travel publication. The site has built a reputation for publishing firsthand destination guides, road-trip itineraries and family travel advice based on places the couple behind it has personally visited.
The ranking celebrates small towns that offer memorable travel experiences. According to Y Travel, the towns were selected based on their unique character, scenic beauty, walkable downtowns, local culture, history, outdoor recreation, food and the authentic experiences they provide to visitors rather than simply their popularity.
Here’s which city ranked top in Arizona.
Sedona named a small town to visit by Y Travel
Coming in at No. 14, Sedona stood out for its colorful blend of desert landscape, luxury resorts and spas, red rock formations, Bell Rock and Cathedral Rock
The website mentioned how the city has natural vortices and 300+ miles of hiking and biking trails nearby, with lots of outdoor activities to explore.
Got a story you want to share? Reach out at Tiffany.Acosta@gannett.com. Follow @tiffsario on Instagram.
Looking for the best things to do in Arizona? Sign up for our newsletter.
Arizona
Judge weighs whether Arizona anti-DEI measure can be on November ballot | Arizona Capitol Times
Key Points:
-
Judge considers ballot qualification challenge to anti-DEI ballot measure
-
Plaintiffs claim measure illegally combines disjointed constitutional provisions
-
Supporters claim stronger anti-discrimination, foes fear free speech violations
A Maricopa County judge is considering whether a measure that would broadly ban diversity, equity, and inclusion in government is legally eligible to appear on the November ballot.
House Concurrent Resolution 2044, sponsored by House Speaker Steve Montenegro, R-Godyear, and referred to voters by the Republican majority this past session, follows the federal government’s efforts to eliminate state-sanctioned DEI programs.
The measure would amend the state Constitution and cement the existing ban on preferential treatment and discrimination based on race or ethnicity in public employment, education and contracting.
But it would take a step further in banning institutions from requiring or asking for support of, providing training on, or mandating any courses that teach DEI or the belief that “colorblind” law, policy or institution contributes to racial oppression, injustice or privilege.
It would also bar all K-12 schools and universities from using public monies to influence the composition of the faculty or student body, and generally bar any public bodies from enacting policy, providing special benefit or mandating training referencing race, ethnicity, sex or sexual orientation.
In a lawsuit filed June 22, the progressive political action committee Will of the People and an elector sued the state, claiming HCR2044 violates the separate amendment rule, which bars ballot measures from “logrolling” unrelated provisions in the same act.
Josh Barro, attorney for Will of the People, claims HCR2044 presents a noncontroversial provision already enacted in Arizona – the ban on practicing and spending public money on discriminatory or preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity – but “smuggles in” anti-diversity, equity and inclusion provisions.
“You have a popular, established right paired with a distinct, controversial policy,” Barro said.
Barro argued the remaining provisions targeting employee training on race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity or sexual orientation contradict the initial intent of the measure.
“If you can’t mention race, or you can’t train your employees to be mindful of diversity, or pursue equity in the workplace, you are literally promoting discrimination,” Barro said.
He told the court the provisions stand directly at odds with each other, rendering the measure insufficiently connected as required by law.
“On one hand, HCR 2044 aims to prohibit discrimination,” Barro said. “On the other hand, HCR 2044 uses the smuggled content to restrict programs that aim to accomplish the same goal.”
Both the attorney general and secretary of state declined to defend the law. But Kory Langhofer, attorney for the Legislature, claims the provisions in HCR2044 do not replace or continue the original language in the state Constitution as Barro claims.
He contends that the measure closes a loophole and “builds out specific examples of types of invidious discrimination that are prohibited in state institutions in Arizona.”
Langhofer contended all components of the measure are aimed at and connected in ending discrimination and governmental bias.
“It’s all going in the same direction,” Langhofer said.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Julie Mata took the matter under advisement.
If the measure does ultimately end up on the ballot, groups are already lined up to offer support and prod opposition.
The Goldwater Institute, a primary backer of HCR2044, celebrated the measure’s intent to shut down DEI-related offices and training and prohibit the use of diversity statements in employment and education.
Coursework at public universities would fall under fire under the new policy, too.
In April, the Goldwater Institute released a report claiming that Arizona’s public universities were requiring DEI in a long list of classes but failing to meet academic standards set by the Arizona Board of Regents.
Classes flagged by the organization included: “Anthropology of American Democracy,” “Surveillance and Society,” “Introduction to Military Studies,” and “Current Issues in National Politics.”
Though HCR2044 may survive litigation challenging its qualification for the ballot, legal challenges to the measure’s substance could come down the line.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona already claims HCR2044 restricts academic freedom in colleges and universities, violates the First Amendment rights of students, teachers and administrators, and targets viewpoints based on race, sex and discrimination.
“Ideas are not illegal, and there is no ‘government-approved’ speech exception to the First Amendment,” Darrell Hill, policy director for the ACLU of Arizona, said in a statement. “The state cannot adopt a policy or rule that punishes faculty, administrators, or students for expressing their beliefs or prohibits wide scopes of ideas from being debated at universities.”
-
Lifestyle3 minutes agoSpain could make World Cup history: The first to win men’s and women’s trophies back-to-back
-
Technology15 minutes agoTaylor Farms pulls iceberg lettuce from the US market after cyclosporiasis outbreak
-
World21 minutes agoWho is Andy Burnham? The Trump critic set to become the UK’s next prime minister
-
Politics27 minutes agoMajor appeals court declares New Jersey AR-15 ban unconstitutional in landmark Second Amendment ruling
-
Health33 minutes agoFirst death reported in Upper East Side Legionnaires’ disease outbreak as cases rise to 67
-
Sports39 minutes agoRaising Cane’s owner Todd Graves on how viral Tom Brady-Rob Gronkowski dunk tank came to be at Fanatics Fest
-
Technology45 minutes agoFox News AI Newsletter: IBM’s AI warning sends ‘shockwave’
-
Business51 minutes agoNetflix is the king of streaming. So why is its stock down this year?