Arizona
Criminal investigation into campaign donations for Arizona governor underway
(The Center Square) – There is now a criminal investigation underway by Attorney General Kris Mayes’ office into a group home company’s donations to Gov. Katie Hobbs and the state Democratic Party.
The Arizona Republic reported that Sunshine Residential Homes donated roughly $400,000 to Hobbs, including to her campaign and inauguration, as well as to the state Democratic Party, but questions arose when the Department of Child Safety raised their daily pay rate per child by around 60%, which is $149 to $195. This came as other homes were getting their asks for more funds rejected. According to the outlet, the company will be complying with the investigation.
After the story broke, Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope sent a letter to Mayes and Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell saying that the situation can “only be described as a pay-to-play scheme” involving the company, DCS, and Hobbs’ office. He said that it could involve violations of several laws ranging from bribery, fraud schemes, conflict of interest, and illegally spending state dollars.
In a statement, Shope referred to the allegations as a “disgusting abuse of taxpayer dollars to further her political career.” ABC15 Arizona reported that the company is already under scrutiny for the death of a 9-year-old boy with diabetes who was in their care.
“Knowing Arizona’s Governor and the Arizona Democratic Party are providing preferential treatment to a facility alleged to have engaged in negligence leading to the death of a child is unconscionable,” the senator stated.
Both Mayes and Mitchell’s office issued responses on Thursday, as Mitchell also received a letter from Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, on the matter. Mitchell said there will be a meeting between her office and the Arizona Auditor General to “serve as the procession office” while the Auditor General investigates.
“My chief deputy is scheduling a meeting between the Auditor General’s staff members who will conduct the investigation and assigned staff from my office,” Mitchell wrote.
Meanwhile, Mayes’ office Chief Counsel of the Criminal Division, Nick Klingerman, said they are obligated to investigate.
“The Criminal Division of the Attorney General’s Office is statutorily authorized to investigate the allegations and offenses outlined in your letter. To that end, the Attorney General’s Office will be opening an investigation,” he wrote.
Meanwhile, Senate President Warren Petersen said the story raises numerous concerns with Hobbs, a former social worker.
“Arizonans deserve to know how their elected officials are spending their money, and this case raises a major red flag with what’s happening behind closed doors on the ninth floor,” Petersen said in a statement. “With the state in the middle of a budget shortfall, and with what appears to be a pay-to-play scheme now exposed, the Legislature has a lot of questions we will be seeking answers to from both the Governor’s office and DCS. Our citizens deserve better. Rest assured, we will continue to serve Arizonans as the check and balance against any abuse of power displayed by our Executive and the agencies under her administration.”
The governor’s office said they are confident that the administration will be cleared.
“Just like past investigations instigated by radical and partisan legislators, the administration will be cleared of wrongdoing,” they told The Center Square in a statement on Friday afternoon. “Governor Hobbs is a social worker who has been a champion for Arizona families and kids. It is outrageous to suggest her administration would not do what’s right for children in foster care.”
Arizona
Sydney Stewart gets her pitch to lift Arizona softball to rivalry series win over ASU
Winning two out of three conference series to start the Big 12 season is a big deal. Winning a rivalry series as one of them is even bigger. The No. 13 Arizona Wildcats (23-8, 6-3) did that on a brutally hot Sunday afternoon as they took down the No. 20 Arizona State Sun Devils* (23-9, 3-6) by the score of 6-4 to win the series 2-1.
“The goal is win the series every weekend,” said Arizona senior Jalen Adams. “Obviously want to sweep whatever, but winning that series is really big, and we want to do that every weekend.”
Catcher Sydney Stewart came up big in the bottom of the sixth with a two-run home run. It was one of very few strikes Stewart saw in the weekend’s three games. She was walked six times to go along with her four hits. This one was a no-doubter to the south end of Candrea’s Corner, and it wasn’t even a hitter’s pitch.
“Even though the pitch was elevated, I knew I could get my hands to it,” Stewart said.
Arizona head coach Caitlin Lowe was just impressed that it came at the end of a weekend when ASU tried to avoid Stewart.
“It takes a special person to get walked all weekend and then be ready for her moment,” Lowe said.
Unlike Friday night, there were no real surprises in the Wildcats’ starting lineup for the rubber game, but that didn’t mean there weren’t surprises during the game. Once again, they didn’t work out quite as planned.
Adams started for the second straight game. Emma Kavanagh was the starting designated player. Everything else was the same as on Friday.
Adams threw 7.0 innings, but there was a surprise in the sixth inning. Adams left the game for two at-bats. At that point, Adams had given up just three hits and was throwing a shutout. She had also hit two batters and walked one, allowing six baserunners in 5.1 innings.
Still, Adams wasn’t surprised when she was lifted. It was something pitching coach Christian Conrad had discussed with her ahead of time.
“That was just part of Christians plan,” Adams said. “We talk about all the possibilities before games. And I fully trust in his plan, trust in all the other pitchers on the staff. So we were just going with the game plan.”
Adams gave way to freshman Rylie Holder with two on and one out in the top of the sixth. Both inherited runners scored without another out being recorded.
The runs were charged to Adams, who was immediately brought back in with a worse situation than she the one she left. Now, she had runners on the corners with one out and her team’s lead had been cut in half.
It might not have worked out, but Lowe said the plan was built with an eye to weather conditions. She noted that ASU also removed and re-inserted its starter during the game.
“It’s 100 degrees outside, and we wanted to get Jalen a little relief too, just like they did Kenzie Brown,” Lowe said. “But, at the same time, we knew Rylie could roll a double play and she’s gonna come into those games all the time, and I trust her to come into those games all the time. So it was the right decision. We didn’t execute.”
Lowe’s confidence in Holder and the rest of the team comes down to their perseverance.
“Rylie was phenomenal yesterday,” Lowe said. “I mean, I watched her get better yesterday. I watched her work through tough moments, breathe through pressure, and we talked a lot about the tough stuff. We’re going to have to go right through. We’re not going around it. So I saw her in bases loaded situations, lots of runners on, and absolutely executing our game plan.”
Because she left during the inning, Adams wasn’t given any warm-up pitches when she returned to the circle in the top of the sixth. The first batter she faced had a controversial at-bat.
Pinch hitter Ryan Brown came in for ASU. She got into a 1-2 count then hit a ball far to centerfield over the outstretched glove of Regan Shockey. During the live play, it looked like it bounced off the top of the wall and back onto the field. That was how it was ruled by the officials, as well, making it a 2-RBI double that tied the game 4-4 with one out.
The question was whether the ball hit the batter’s eye behind the centerfield wall. ASU’s coaches and ESPN+ color commentator (and former Wildcat pitcher) Kenzie Fowler Quinn thought it did, but Sun Devil head coach Megan Bartlett didn’t challenge the call for an extended time period. The rule book gives her 30 seconds to challenge. Well after that time, she asked the home plate umpire for a challenge but was told it was too late. The call stood.
ASU staff members were under the impression that the call should be automatically reviewed by the officiating crew beginning in the sixth inning, but the NCAA’s explanation of the challenge rule doesn’t indicate that. When the review rule was passed in 2021, it allowed (but did not require) the crew chief to initiate a review beginning in the sixth inning. A head coach could challenge at any point in the game.
The video review rules were changed in 2024. One of the changes allowed any official to initiate a review at any point in the game. Once again, there’s no indication that the officials are required to do so; they are allowed to do so when it is not “properly covered.” The coach can use a challenge at any point in the game but must do it within the 30-second time limit after the play in question.
In the end, Stewart’s 2-run home run in the bottom of the inning made the lost run a moot point. The 2-run shot would have given Arizona a 1-run advantage even if the ASU call had been overturned in the top of the inning.
ASU tried to get something going again in the top of the seventh. Kaylee Pond had a leadoff double and got to third with one out on a flyout. The next two batters went down easily with popups. Game and series over.
Arizona’s head coach was impressed by her team’s ability to find different ways to win when the usual way wasn’t working. Sereniti Trice came into the weekend hitting .523 even after facing the phenomenal pitching staff at Texas Tech. She was 1 for 11 in three games against ASU. Shockey was great on Sunday, but she was 2 for 8 in Friday and Saturday’s games.
“Jenna Sniffen swung the bat,” Lowe said. “I thought Kez [Lucas] had a great weekend. Grace [Jenkins] had a great weekend, In a weekend, honestly, where you don’t see Biddy and Regan get on as much, we stepped up, and that hasn’t happened quite yet. So that feels really good that it doesn’t matter if it’s my turn or somebody else’s.”
Adams ended with the win to improve to 13-4 on the season. She gave up two earned runs on five hits, two walks, and two hit batters. She struck out two. She dropped her ERA back down to 3.22 after seeing it climb over the previous two days.
Holder gave up two earned runs on two hits without recording an out.
Six of Arizona’s nine starting hitters got at least one hit. Seven reached base at least once. The four through seven hitters all had at least one RBI with Stewart’s three leading the way.
Both leadoff hitter Shockey and cleanup hitter Stewart reached base safely every time they stepped into the batter’s box. Shockey was 3 for 3 with a walk. Stewart was 2 for 2 with two walks.
Meika Lauppe took the loss for the Sun Devils despite giving up just one of the six Arizona runs. She threw 1.1 inning and surrendered the one earned run on two hits and one walk.
Kenzie Brown started the game and re-entered later. She gave up four runs (two earned) on seven hits and three walks in 4.0 IP. She struck out four.
Former Wildcat Aissa Silva also made an appearance for the Sun Devils. She allowed one earned run on two hits and two walks in 0.2 IP.
Arizona will have its fourth straight game against an in-state opponent when GCU comes to town on Tuesday. The Lopes were the last unbeaten team in Division I this season. They finally lost a game to No. 23 Oklahoma State on Tuesday, Mar. 17. They are now 33-1 overall and 6-0 in the Mountain West.
“They’re fantastic, and they’ve been good for a while, and they’re always a competitive game for us,” Lowe said. “They pitch well, they execute offensively well. So it’s going to be really important to take a day off, get rest on our bodies, but then be ready.”
*This website uses the NFCA poll as the official softball poll. Arizona State was ranked in two polls this week, including the NFCA. It was not ranked by USA Softball.
Arizona
New water rules could put the squeeze on southern Arizona vineyards
The winners of the 2026 azcentral wine contest
The Arizona Republic’s Richard Ruelas announces the winners of the 2026 azcentral wine contest.
Arizona’s wine industry has seen exponential growth in the past three decades, going from a couple of wine producers in the early 1990s to about 168 today. Now, winemakers, viticulturists and their allies fear that new groundwater rules in southeastern Arizona could stunt that growth.
To make wine, you need wine grapes, and nearly 80% of all the fruit used by Arizona winemakers is grown in the Willcox groundwater basin.
But since December 2024, no new acres of land can be farmed around Willcox due to an “active management area” designation by the Arizona Department of Water Resources. Plans and conservation goals are still in draft but farms will be expected to cut their water use in coming years.
The region has been the center of water controversies: A Midwest-based mega dairy and other outside investors expanded operations in the last decade and drilled deeper wells. Some local wells lost capacity or went dry. And a citizen-ballot measure to create groundwater rules created tension between neighbors.
In Willcox, a majority of residents voted against the regulations, but based on the rate of aquifer depletion and land sinking, the state stepped in a year later.
Willcox vineyards are among the lowest water-users in the area, but they have put all expansion plans on hold.
Jesse Noble, vineyard manager of Merkin Vineyards, planned to grow 40 acres more of wine grapes at the Buhl Memorial farm. His neighbor, Arizona Wine Growers Association President Barbara Pierce, wanted to add 20 acres, and south of her, Zarpara Vineyard hopes future owners can plant the remaining 6 acres.
Like other farmers in the area, they asked the state water agency to grant water rights to their property based on the substantial capital investment they’ve made to farm new ground. The agency will make determinations and begin issuing certificates of water rights sometime in October. Land that doesn’t have a certificate cannot be irrigated.
“A freeze in Willcox ripples across the whole state,” said Lauren King, who is lobbying for the Arizona Wine Growers Association, looking for flexibility on the new rules and a path to growth. They haven’t introduced any legislative proposals yet that would directly address the industry concerns.
The AMA could mean farmers in the southeast corner of the state can’t grow their business, said King, but communities in northern Arizona would feel the impacts, too.
Many Willcox growers send a portion of their grape harvest to wine makers in the Verde Valley and other parts of the state, who then crush, press, ferment, filter and age the fruit to get wine bottles. Those wineries and tasting rooms in turn attract wine tourists who also leave money at local restaurants, hotels, grocery stores and gas stations, spending some $241 million annually. Advocates say there is still much room to grow but there are few places with the right conditions.
Willcox is one of Arizona’s three designated wine-growing regions and the one with the best prospects for growth, considering the threat of hail and frost in Sonoita and the pricey farmland in the Verde Valley. Noble, overseeing grape-growing for Caduceus Cellars’ wine, said that while Merkin Vineyard has five farms in northern Arizona, two-thirds of all their grapes come from southeastern Arizona. They have 67 acres of vineyard in the Willcox basin.
“We can’t expand past that,” said Noble about the effect of the AMA. “More importantly, the industry can’t.”
Pioneers and newcomers
Arizona’s winemaking history spans over two centuries — from settlers’ orchards to pre-prohibition wineries to university research experiments to ventures from modern-day wine pioneers, chronicled by Southwest historian Erik Berg.
The state offered ideal growing conditions for wine grapes, but it wasn’t until the early 1990s when Arizona’s young wine industry had its start.
By the turn of the century, entrepreneurs were experimenting with unique varietals for the Arizona climate, a vineyard-to-bottle college degree was created to support the growing industry, and Arizona-made wines began stalking awards.
Some of the biggest growth came from the number of bonded wineries, facilities authorized to produce wine. There were 10 wine producers at the start of the century and today there are 168, according to government records. The number of wine growers didn’t match that growth. Today some 74 commercial vineyards produce grapes in Arizona.
Willcox, because of its milder winter and available farmland, became the most prolific grape producing region and, by some accounts, the “heart of the state’s wine country.” A report from the University of Arizona shows that nearly 60% of all acres of wine grapes in Arizona are in the basin, now under AMA designation.
There is a varied mix among the wine growers in Cochise County, with wine enthusiasts, entrepreneurs and retirees making the most of it. Most operations across Arizona are 10 acres or fewer in size, but some are as big as 400 acres.
Growing wine grapes in a relatively new viticulture area was “an interesting challenge,” said Noble, who harvested his first vintage in Willcox in 2014 and lived in town for nearly a decade.
The Sulphur Springs Valley, a historical agricultural region with deep, well-drained soils, an abundance of sunshine and few winter frosts, is ideal for many crops, but many wine grape varieties were being tried in that soil and climate for the very first time.
“It was something to figure out,” Noble said. “There wasn’t a recipe, there wasn’t a playbook.”
His neighbors to the east, the family running Bodega Pierce, studied enology and viticulture in California and Washington and worked in wineries all around before purchasing farmland east of the Willcox Playa to start their own vineyard.
“(Arizona) was our best bet to be successful because it was small and growing,” said Barbara Pierce, who runs the taste room and handles administration, finances and marketing. They kept some of the varieties already on the farm, like a pinot noir ill-suited for the high desert climate that they’ve managed to turn productive, and added new ones like Graziano, a Spanish varietal that works great for the area and one that visitors love, Pierce said.
Since the Pierces’ first vintage in 2010, they’ve been experimenting with some 18 varietals of wine grapes and fine-tuned their selection and farming to make wine that resembles the “terroir,” as the French would say, or the unique mix of physical and environmental conditions where and how grapes are grown.
Arizona wine growers would have failed if they simply followed lessons from California, Noble suggested. “Grape vines are very hard to kill but they’re also very hard to make good wine from.”
Today, there are some 400 acres of wine grape crops in the Willcox area — the equivalent of about 363 football fields — yielding 650 tons per year, according to University of Arizona surveys.
Sonoita and the Verde Valley provide the right conditions for wine growing and both have successful vineyards, but the fact that nearly two-thirds of all acres are in Willcox is telling, said Michael Pierce, the winemaker at Bodega Pierce and a commercial horticulture agent with the University of Arizona, who co-authored the UA report.
The Verde Valley has ideal climate but land prices are “prohibitive” and a pending court case makes future water access uncertain, Pierce explained. Sonoita sits at a higher elevation and has more threats of spring and fall frosts. It has some “successful growing locations” in high slopes, but those locations are limited.
The Willcox valley, on the other hand, has an ideal climate and an established agricultural history, he added: “There are axillary components to an ag community that support the wine growers. Everything from agricultural zoning, labor, well/irrigation supplies, tractor repair, etc.”
That kind of agricultural history and infrastructure is not easily found in the other viticulture areas, and new growers would need to make bigger investments.
“I anticipate that we will continue to see small plantings in the Verde Valley,” he added. “But nothing in comparison to the size that is possible in Willcox.”
Different water users, uncertain cuts
By 2000 there were only a couple of vineyards in the Sulphur Springs Valley; now there are over 40.
For a valley with a multi-generational farming and ranching history, wine growers are newcomers, but a decade after them came Riverview, one of the biggest dairy companies in the United States with operations in five states, and other outside investors. Eventually, Riverview became the biggest landowner in the valley.
Groundwater levels in the valley have been dropping for a long time, with ups and downs depending on the farmland expansion and contraction and the dry and wet years. At this point, the prolonged drought and an increase in pumping from agriculture have created a situation that, the water agency concluded, requires active management.
Across the valley, there are cases of wells losing capacity or going dry.
Mark Jorve and Rhona MacMillan moved to the valley, or more specifically the “Willcox Bench” growing region, in 2009. After leaving their corporate work in Phoenix behind, the couple semi-retired and planted the Zarpara Vineyard, which fittingly comes from the Spanish verb for “set sail.”
It didn’t take long before they learned from neighbors that groundwater levels were going down. MacMillan said they started putting money aside. In 2021, their neighbor told them his pump was pulling air and losing capacity.
“We knew that we would have to drill deeper at some point looking at what everyone else was doing,” Jorve said.
In 2022 they drilled a new $120,000 well, 800 feet deep, with their savings and a loan. Just a year later, their old well started pulling dirt and silts, and then the state designated an AMA. Since moving in, water levels in their property went from 320 feet below ground to 420 feet.
“Go find a 10-story building,” Jorve said. “That’s how much water is gone.”
The couple were concerned about the imbalance in the aquifer and saw the regulation as a necessary step forward. They are also concerned about how it will impact small-scale farms and low water users.
“You stopped the wine industry at this point,” said Macmillan of the effect of the AMA. They want to sell Zarpara Vineyards and fully retire but the AMA means the next owner wouldn’t be able to plant the 6 acres still in the property. Like other farmers, they asked for water rights based on “substantial capital investment” but won’t hear from the water agency until the end of the year, when they begin to issue certificates.
Vineyards in the Willcox Bench are neighbors to Coronado Dairy, one of Riverview’s operations. Pierce and Noble told The Republic they haven’t had groundwater issues or seen a big decline in their well’s water levels. Noble has seen a 32 feet decrease in the last decade.
For decades there were no requirements to measure groundwater use or well depth around the Willcox basin, so the state only had consistent data from 52 index wells it monitors regularly. The index well closest to the vineyards, located to the southwest between crop circles of alfalfa, showed a drop of 130 feet between 2010 and 2024. The AMA will require all water users with a well that pumps more than 35 gallons per minute to report their annual water use.
Growing grapes can take as little as the 12 inches of rain the region gets every year. In the high range, wine growers use less than 1.5 acre-feet of water a year per acre, while growing alfalfa with center pivot irrigation takes up to 5 acre-feet per year. An acre-foot of water can supply about 3.5 family homes in Arizona for a year.
One of the criticisms of the AMA regulations is that they cap water rights for each farm at the volume they’ve historically used: The dairy would keep its right to use many acre-feet of water, while farms growing hardy vines or watermelons would be locked in at a low water use. It’s still not clear how future water cuts would be distributed among growers.
Effect of water rules felt miles away
The Arizona Wine Growers Association opposed the creation of an AMA. King, lobbying for the group, said that opposing regulation is far from opposing water conservation.
“Wine growers are really the poster child of water efficiency,” she said, adding the economic return for the water used is also higher than other crops.
The laws governing AMAs were written nearly half a century ago for urban and suburban growing areas, not rural communities, and they didn’t consider some low-water use crops like wine grapes, yucca-like plants or lavender.
Growers are also concerned the water agency could mandate water cuts for growers with perennial crops, like vineyards and tree farms, as they already use highly efficient irrigation. The only way to lower their water use would be to rip plants out.
On Feb. 18, about two dozen wine growers met with Arizona Department of Water Resources staff, ahead of a public agricultural workshop, to present their unique situation and explore flexibility within the AMA law statutes. Growers say the high-value, low-water use crop should be treated differently. Noble said discussions are still “vague.”
The association is not actively running legislation proposals but they have been in conversation with the water agency, the governor’s office and lawmakers, King said.
“What happens as a result of this AMA, and whether or not there is flexibility for wine growers, is going to be critical to the growth of the industry for decades to come,” King said.
“Decisions made today could have direct impact 20-30 years down the line.”
Clara Migoya covers agriculture and water issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to clara.migoya@arizonarepublic.com.
Arizona
NFL mock draft: Arizona Cardinals fill biggest needs in 4-round mock
The 2026 NFL draft is still more than a month away, and we are beginning to get more multi-round mock drafts. We have a four-round mock draft from NFL.com’s Chad Reuter.
What does that mean for the Arizona Cardinals, who have one pick in each round? In this case, it means hitting their four biggest needs with their first four picks.
Advertisement
Let’s see.
Round 1, pick No. 3: Miami OT Francis Mauigoa
The Cardinals don’t overthink this pick. Mauigoa’s a strong, hard-nosed run blocker who fills a major need in Arizona and should be an NFL starter for a decade.
This pick appears to be destined for one of two routes — a tackle or a pass rusher. The question is whether they value Mauigoa over David Bailey, who goes with the very next pick of this mock draft, or another pass rusher.
The Cardinals have not done anything on the defensive edge this offseason. They have made some minor moves at right tackle.
Round 2, pick No. 34: Clemson EDGE T.J. Parker
If they don’t get a pass rusher in Round 1, it makes sense to go with one in Round 2. Parker looks the part at 6-4, 263 pounds with long 33 1/8-inch arms.
Advertisement
He had 11 sacks and 19.5 tackles for loss in 2024 but saw his production dip to five sacks and 9.5 tackles for loss last season.
Round 3, pick No. 65: LSU QB Garrett Nussmeier
Yes, it makes sense for the Cardinals to draft a quarterback, one they can develop a bit. Nussmeier has the tools but was very inconsistent.
Round 4, pick No. 104: Alabama DT Tim Keenan
The Cardinals have thrown bodies on the defensive line this offseason, signing three and re-signing one. Getting one on Day 3 who is more of a space-eater than playmaker would continue with this trend.
Get more Cardinals and NFL coverage from Cards Wire’s Jess Root and others by listening to the latest on the Rise Up, See Red podcast. Subscribe on Spotify, YouTube or Apple podcasts.
Advertisement
This article originally appeared on Cards Wire: NFL mock draft: Arizona Cardinals fill biggest needs in 4-round mock
-
Detroit, MI4 days agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Oklahoma1 week agoFamily rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
-
Nebraska1 week agoWildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents
-
Georgia7 days agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Alaska1 week agoPolice looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
-
Science1 week agoFederal EPA moves to roll back recent limits on ethylene oxide, a carcinogen
-
Science1 week agoH5N1 bird flu spreads to sea otters and sea lions along San Mateo coast, wildlife experts say
-
Movie Reviews4 days ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India

