Arizona
Arizona State puts its trust in new AD Graham Rossini in uncertain time for college sports
TEMPE, Ariz. – Per The Athletic’s research, 25 percent of power-conference athletic directors received undergraduate degrees from the institution they represent. This includes BYU’s Tom Holmoe, Indiana’s Scott Dolson and Vanderbilt’s Candice Storey Lee.
Arizona State’s Graham Rossini joined this group last week, but his association with the Sun Devils goes far beyond his college days. Rossini, 44, says he’s thought about Arizona State every day since he was 11 years old. An exaggeration, perhaps, but not far off the mark.
Growing up on the Gulf Coast in Mobile, Ala., Rossini learned about Arizona State while collecting baseball cards. An Atlanta Braves fan, he came across the card of first-round draft pick Mike Kelly. On the back of Kelly’s card, Rossini read that Kelly had starred at Arizona State, winning the Golden Spikes Award, given annually to college baseball’s top player.
A seed took root.
From 1,736 miles away, Rossini started following the Sun Devils. He watched Paul Lo Duca and Antone Williamson in the 1993 College World Series. He watched Jake Plummer and Pat Tillman in the 1997 Rose Bowl. One day a high school English teacher asked students to write letters to universities requesting info for admission. Rossini’s first letter went to Arizona State. The school sent back a poster of Sparky, its maroon-and-gold mascot. Rossini hung it on his bedroom wall.
Rossini’s father worked at Chevron. His mother first worked in software and later became a teacher. Rossini was a baseball player. He wanted to play at Arizona State but then-coach Pat Murphy didn’t offer a scholarship. Rossini flew out to the desert and tried to walk on, but at 6-foot-5, he was awkward for his position. “The tallest, skinniest catcher of all time,” recalled former Arizona State catcher Tuffy Gosewisch.
Murphy, today the manager of the Milwaukee Brewers, was honest with Rossini. “You’re good enough to make the team,” he told him, “but you may never play.” He asked if Rossini might want to work as a student assistant instead.
This is where former Arizona State players say Rossini differs from other ADs. “It’s a special kind of story for me because he’s literally washed laundry for that program,” said Dennis Wyrick, who played for Arizona State from 2000 to 2003. Asked about this last week, Rossini recalled a trip to USC, driving around Compton looking for a place to wash uniforms. “And it was like, ‘Hey, whatever it takes,’” he said.
Murphy eventually made Rossini the program’s director of operations, or as Gosewisch put it, “he was like a front office by himself.” Today, friends and former co-workers describe Rossini as approachable, humble, trustworthy, passionate, genuine, thoughtful and intentional but the word that gets repeated is “detailed.”
“He literally had his hands on everything from recruiting to scheduling, to what the uniforms look like, to anything,” Murphy said before the Brewers left for a recent trip to Houston to play the Astros. “Anyone who was part of the program at this time, call one of those players. They all knew Graham had it under control.”
Indeed, when Rossini left Arizona State to take a position with the Arizona Diamondbacks in 2008, Brendan Cunningham, a former student manager and ops director, said it felt like the head coach had left. The void was that big. Everyone was like, “What are we going to do without Graham?” he said.
Per The Athletic’s research, 40 percent of power-conference athletic directors were first-time ADs when they were hired. This includes Syracuse’s John Wildhack, who spent the bulk of his career at ESPN, and Colorado’s Rick George, who worked in Major League Baseball and with the PGA Tour.
Rossini joined this group of first-timers last week, and it sparked local criticism, even though for the last three years he had held senior positions and participated in major Arizona State projects, such as securing naming rights for Mountain America Stadium.
This is an interesting time for Arizona State. With the Sun Devils slow to embrace NIL and the football program handcuffed because of an NCAA investigation, many fans turned on previous AD Ray Anderson, who resigned under pressure in November. Despite Rossini’s background and experience, fans favored an outside candidate, one who had worked as an AD, to lead the university’s transition into the Big 12, where it will compete this fall.
During Rossini’s introductory news conference, school president Michael Crow said the school considered everyone imaginable for the position but throughout a six-month process promoting Rossini emerged as the best choice. Asked how many others he had formally interviewed, Crow replied: “Zero.”
Friends and colleagues of Rossini did not understand the initial negative reaction. One said anyone who disagreed with the AD choice simply did not know Rossini. Another called it a byproduct of Rossini himself, an executive who’s always worked in the shadows, more concerned about performance than publicity. (Indeed, a Google search of Rossini does not produce much beyond his work bios.)
New Beginnings 🔱#ForksUp /// #TogetherWeWin pic.twitter.com/oJahwWXYgq
— Arizona State Sun Devils (@TheSunDevils) May 24, 2024
Diamondbacks president and CEO Derrick Hall, an Arizona State product himself, got to know Rossini during Rossini’s time with Arizona State baseball. When the Sun Devils traveled to Los Angeles, Rossini and Hall, then with the Dodgers, always hooked up and Rossini would bring the team to Dodger Stadium. Once Hall moved to the Diamondbacks in 2005, he created a position for Rossini that dealt with customer experience.
Hall said it didn’t take long for Rossini to show he was capable of more. One big assignment led to another. Over 13 years, Rossini became Hall’s “go-to guy,” a vice president who handled some of the organization’s biggest projects. Rossini played major roles in bringing the 2011 All-Star Game and 2013 World Baseball Classic to Phoenix. He also became Hall’s project manager in the construction of Salt River Fields, the organization’s spring-training complex.
“He … does … not … miss … a .. detail,” Hall said, emphasizing each word.
In 2020, when the pandemic placed the world on hold, Rossini talked with Jim Phillips, commissioner of the Atlantic Coast Conference. The two had met when Rossini was a student manager with the baseball team and Phillips was finishing up his master’s degree at Arizona State. They had since stayed in touch, Phillips serving as a mentor. During their conversation, Rossini asked Phillips about the state of college athletics.
Phillips told Rossini not to dismiss it. There was something special about working with college athletes, he told Rossini. And the environment was perfect for raising a family. If your children are into sports, they have access to it. If they’re into arts and culture, they have access. Whatever it is, it’s there, Phillips said.
The talk stuck with Rossini, who returned to Arizona State as a senior administrator.
“It’s amazing how things kind of work themselves out,” Phillips said this week, noting how Rossini always struck him as an “old soul,” someone who listened and tried to learn. “Graham found himself exactly where he should be.”
Per The Athletic’s research, 43 percent of power-conference schools have changed athletic directors over the last three years. Some of this stems from ADs leaving for better opportunities, but it also reflects the need for institutions to find leaders who can navigate a changing landscape.
In addition to NIL and the transfer portal, the NCAA recently agreed to allow schools for the first time to pay athletes directly through revenue sharing. Although the deal is not final, it could be in place as soon as next year. The old collegiate model is dead. The next is still taking shape.
Crow said Arizona State worked six months to create a financial structure in athletics that can “weather any hurricane going forward, any tumult that we might encounter.” This, the president said, will allow Rossini and his staff to focus on ticket sales, NIL fund-raising, corporate sponsorships and winning.
Arizona State for years has been known as a “sleeping giant,” a label folks here have heard so much it makes their eyes roll. The alignment between administration and athletics has often been off, leaving fans wanting more, particularly from the school’s anchor programs. As athletic director, Rossini’s biggest task will be to mend relationships and convince fans and donors that Arizona State will not be left behind.
When Rossini left the Diamondbacks, Hall told him he hoped one day Rossini would become Arizona State’s athletic director. Rossini downplayed the idea, telling Hall that he simply intended to focus on his responsibilities. On a recent drive to Scottsdale for the Pac-12 baseball tournament, Rossini said becoming Arizona State’s AD may have been in the back of his mind, but it was never a driving force. It was more about purpose, less about title.
Friends, however, insist they saw this coming. Harvey Jabara, a longtime Arizona State supporter who owns a minority stake in the San Diego Padres, said he would have loved for Rossini to come to San Diego, but in the back of his mind he always knew Rossini’s heart was with the Sun Devils.
“This is the dream job for him,” Jabara said. “I think that’s unique in this day and age where so many people approach — not just in athletics, but in all parts of society — it’s always the next job that they’re pursuing. That’s not happening here as I know Graham Rossini.”
Said Murphy, strongly: “He will never leave ASU for another college job — that’s a guarantee.”
Throughout his career, Rossini has joked that he is a “professional problem solver,” someone who has done his best work when stakes are highest. That’s the environment he steps into at Arizona State, whose reality has seldom matched external hopes. He welcomes this challenge.
“There’s change around all of us,” Rossini said. “We’re prepared to be relevant in the areas that we need to today but also agile enough to react to the changes that happen around us. It’s a cliche — I don’t like using it — but I don’t see it as changes or challenges, just new opportunities.”
GO DEEPER
College football confidential: How NIL is used to keep players out of the transfer portal
(Photo of Graham Rossini at his introductory press conference as Arizona State’s athletic director: Michelle Gardner / The Republic / USA Today Network)
Stunning places every Arizonan should visit at least once
From the Grand Canyon to Sedona’s red rocks to dramatic views of Havasupai Falls, here are some must-see places every Arizonan should check out.
Arizona is always making headlines for its breathtaking scenery, top travel destinations and highly ranked cities. Now, another Arizona gem is earning national recognition, with this famous city ranking No. 14 on Y Travel’s list of the 23 small towns in the USA to visit.
Y Travel, also known as Y Travel Blog, is an independent travel publication. The site has built a reputation for publishing firsthand destination guides, road-trip itineraries and family travel advice based on places the couple behind it has personally visited.
The ranking celebrates small towns that offer memorable travel experiences. According to Y Travel, the towns were selected based on their unique character, scenic beauty, walkable downtowns, local culture, history, outdoor recreation, food and the authentic experiences they provide to visitors rather than simply their popularity.
Here’s which city ranked top in Arizona.
Sedona named a small town to visit by Y Travel
Coming in at No. 14, Sedona stood out for its colorful blend of desert landscape, luxury resorts and spas, red rock formations, Bell Rock and Cathedral Rock
The website mentioned how the city has natural vortices and 300+ miles of hiking and biking trails nearby, with lots of outdoor activities to explore.
Got a story you want to share? Reach out at Tiffany.Acosta@gannett.com. Follow @tiffsario on Instagram.
Looking for the best things to do in Arizona? Sign up for our newsletter.
Arizona
Judge weighs whether Arizona anti-DEI measure can be on November ballot | Arizona Capitol Times
Key Points:
-
Judge considers ballot qualification challenge to anti-DEI ballot measure
-
Plaintiffs claim measure illegally combines disjointed constitutional provisions
-
Supporters claim stronger anti-discrimination, foes fear free speech violations
A Maricopa County judge is considering whether a measure that would broadly ban diversity, equity, and inclusion in government is legally eligible to appear on the November ballot.
House Concurrent Resolution 2044, sponsored by House Speaker Steve Montenegro, R-Godyear, and referred to voters by the Republican majority this past session, follows the federal government’s efforts to eliminate state-sanctioned DEI programs.
The measure would amend the state Constitution and cement the existing ban on preferential treatment and discrimination based on race or ethnicity in public employment, education and contracting.
But it would take a step further in banning institutions from requiring or asking for support of, providing training on, or mandating any courses that teach DEI or the belief that “colorblind” law, policy or institution contributes to racial oppression, injustice or privilege.
It would also bar all K-12 schools and universities from using public monies to influence the composition of the faculty or student body, and generally bar any public bodies from enacting policy, providing special benefit or mandating training referencing race, ethnicity, sex or sexual orientation.
In a lawsuit filed June 22, the progressive political action committee Will of the People and an elector sued the state, claiming HCR2044 violates the separate amendment rule, which bars ballot measures from “logrolling” unrelated provisions in the same act.
Josh Barro, attorney for Will of the People, claims HCR2044 presents a noncontroversial provision already enacted in Arizona – the ban on practicing and spending public money on discriminatory or preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity – but “smuggles in” anti-diversity, equity and inclusion provisions.
“You have a popular, established right paired with a distinct, controversial policy,” Barro said.
Barro argued the remaining provisions targeting employee training on race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity or sexual orientation contradict the initial intent of the measure.
“If you can’t mention race, or you can’t train your employees to be mindful of diversity, or pursue equity in the workplace, you are literally promoting discrimination,” Barro said.
He told the court the provisions stand directly at odds with each other, rendering the measure insufficiently connected as required by law.
“On one hand, HCR 2044 aims to prohibit discrimination,” Barro said. “On the other hand, HCR 2044 uses the smuggled content to restrict programs that aim to accomplish the same goal.”
Both the attorney general and secretary of state declined to defend the law. But Kory Langhofer, attorney for the Legislature, claims the provisions in HCR2044 do not replace or continue the original language in the state Constitution as Barro claims.
He contends that the measure closes a loophole and “builds out specific examples of types of invidious discrimination that are prohibited in state institutions in Arizona.”
Langhofer contended all components of the measure are aimed at and connected in ending discrimination and governmental bias.
“It’s all going in the same direction,” Langhofer said.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Julie Mata took the matter under advisement.
If the measure does ultimately end up on the ballot, groups are already lined up to offer support and prod opposition.
The Goldwater Institute, a primary backer of HCR2044, celebrated the measure’s intent to shut down DEI-related offices and training and prohibit the use of diversity statements in employment and education.
Coursework at public universities would fall under fire under the new policy, too.
In April, the Goldwater Institute released a report claiming that Arizona’s public universities were requiring DEI in a long list of classes but failing to meet academic standards set by the Arizona Board of Regents.
Classes flagged by the organization included: “Anthropology of American Democracy,” “Surveillance and Society,” “Introduction to Military Studies,” and “Current Issues in National Politics.”
Though HCR2044 may survive litigation challenging its qualification for the ballot, legal challenges to the measure’s substance could come down the line.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona already claims HCR2044 restricts academic freedom in colleges and universities, violates the First Amendment rights of students, teachers and administrators, and targets viewpoints based on race, sex and discrimination.
“Ideas are not illegal, and there is no ‘government-approved’ speech exception to the First Amendment,” Darrell Hill, policy director for the ACLU of Arizona, said in a statement. “The state cannot adopt a policy or rule that punishes faculty, administrators, or students for expressing their beliefs or prohibits wide scopes of ideas from being debated at universities.”
-
Movie Reviews10 minutes ago“The Odyssey” is Christopher Nolan’s Most Singular Film Yet (Movie Review)
-
World22 minutes ago
Iran War Updates: Bridges and Water Plants Hit as Strikes Stretch to 7th Straight Day
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoSpain could make World Cup history: The first to win men’s and women’s trophies back-to-back
-
Technology1 hour agoTaylor Farms pulls iceberg lettuce from the US market after cyclosporiasis outbreak
-
World1 hour agoWho is Andy Burnham? The Trump critic set to become the UK’s next prime minister
-
Politics2 hours agoMajor appeals court declares New Jersey AR-15 ban unconstitutional in landmark Second Amendment ruling
-
Health2 hours agoFirst death reported in Upper East Side Legionnaires’ disease outbreak as cases rise to 67
-
Sports2 hours agoRaising Cane’s owner Todd Graves on how viral Tom Brady-Rob Gronkowski dunk tank came to be at Fanatics Fest
