Connect with us

Alaska

Medley of Errors Causes Alaska Pilot’s Downfall

Published

on

Medley of Errors Causes Alaska Pilot’s Downfall


It was the last day of the hunting season. Tanks of fuel stashed at a remote Alaskan airstrip had to be retrieved. Time was short since a storm was approaching. A Cessna 206 landed on a gravel bar in the Porcupine River, and the pilot began loading 15-gallon fuel containers into the plane. To save time, she asked two hunters, who were waiting there for a different airplane, to empty two of the containers into her wing tanks. The whole operation lasted 12 minutes.  

Seconds after the 206 became airborne, its engine sputtered. It banked steeply, and its right wingtip struck the surface of the river. The airplane cartwheeled before coming to rest, partially submerged. The powerful current and icy water of the river prevented the two hunters from getting to it. By the time a raft had been brought from the nearest base, 60 miles away, an hour and a half had passed. The pilot, 28, was dead.

Accident investigators minutely examined the 206’s engine and found nothing wrong with it. What was wrong was that there was water—in some places more water than avgas—in the fuel system, including parts that river water had not been able to enter.

Advertisement

A pilot who later inspected one of the smaller fuel containers found about a cupful of water in 8 gallons of fuel. Since the plane had arrived without any trouble, it was pretty clear that the water in the fuel system had been added along with the fuel during the hasty stopover on the sandbar and caused the engine to lose power soon after it went to full throttle.

What looked like one cause, however, was really several.

The fuel cache, which had been set up two months earlier, consisted of 55-gallon metal drums from which fuel was pumped into 15-gallon plastic containers that were easier for the pilot to handle. Fuel would be transferred from those containers into the airplane’s wing tanks by a battery-operated pump. 

When the cache was originally established, the pump had a filter to trap debris. In addition, a Mr. Funnel was provided. It contained both a screening filter and hydrophobic membrane that allowed fuel to pass through but not water. 

Advertisement

During the course of the hunting season, the pump’s filter became clogged and was removed. It was not replaced, even though the fact that it had gotten clogged seems to suggest that a filter was needed. The water-excluding funnel also was “lost”—whatever that means on an unfrequented sandbar—and it too was not replaced. Thus, nothing remained to ensure that fuel pumped into planes would be clean and free of water. 

In principle, a final line of defense existed in the form of the airplane’s fuel drains. In this 1975 206 those were four in number (later Cessnas, whose integral fuel tanks can hide water behind ribs, have as many as 13). Two were, as you would expect, on the undersides of the wings at the inboard ends of the tanks. One was on the fuel strainer, or “gascolator,” at the firewall. The fourth drained a small collector tank located in the bottom of the fuselage. 

The accident pilot, and other pilots who worked for the same flying service, were aware of the lack of filtration at the remote site and had “numerous conversations” about the danger of water contamination in fuel and the need to check the sumps after refueling. The 206 was equipped, however, with a belly pod that covered the fuselage sump drain, so that it might be necessary to shift or remove cargo in order to get at the drain. The accident pilot had repeatedly complained about the difficulty of draining the fuselage sump, and she was said to habitually skip that step despite “talks at great length” urging her not to.

Since the fuel pickup in each wing tank is located slightly above the bottom of the tank, small amounts of water could be taken from the quick-drains without any of that water having found its way to the fuselage tank. But if sufficient water got into a wing tank, some of it could run down into the fuselage tank, water being heavier than fuel. The fact that the engine ran for some time before stumbling suggests, however, that the fatal water came from the wings, not the fuselage tank.

According to the pilot’s colleagues, it was “company policy” that only the pilots themselves do the refueling at remote sites and not delegate it to anyone else. The hunters who pumped fuel into the 206 for the pilot recalled that she did not check the sumps before taking off and that there was no mention of the possibility of water in the fuel.

Advertisement

So, one by one, the conditions for the accident had been put into place. The mere fact that there had been “numerous conversations” about the danger of fuel contamination suggests that the company’s pilots knew that a potentially serious problem existed. The clogged fuel filter had not been replaced. The fuel storage tanks, even if they were impervious to rain, were likely to accumulate water from repeated cycles of condensation, and yet the water-filtering funnel was gone too. Why a replacement was not obtained is unclear. Amazon offers Mr. Funnel filters for around $40, delivered tomorrow (or, in the bush, maybe a few days later).

The National Transportation Safety Board blamed the accident on the pilot’s “inadequate preflight inspection,” with the company’s failure to replace the fuel filters a contributing circumstance.

The NTSB’s report omitted mention of a third factor.

The accident occurred on a meander in the river. The sandbar from which the 206 took off was oriented directly toward a broad gravel bank on the opposite shore. The immediate cause of the crash seems to have been the pilot’s decision to turn back, which led to the right wingtip hitting the water. If she had continued straight ahead, she might have made the far shore or at least ditched under control in the river. She might have lost the airplane in the process but saved her life.

A retired fighter pilot, who at one point during his career in the Air Force had the job of test-flying F-100s after they emerged from maintenance, told me that he wouldn’t hesitate to punch out of an airplane that failed of its own accord but would be very reluctant to abandon one whose problems he himself had caused.

Advertisement

In her haste, the pilot had not checked for water in the fuel, even though it had been a topic of much discussion. When the engine stumbled, she probably guessed the reason instantly. She switched on the fuel pump in hope that the engine would come back to life. Trying to save the airplane, she banked back toward the runway. But then…


This column first appeared in the December Issue 965 of the FLYING print edition.



Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Coast Guard eyes up to 4 new icebreakers for Alaska

Published

on

Coast Guard eyes up to 4 new icebreakers for Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The U.S. Coast Guard is considering homeporting up to four additional icebreakers in Alaska as part of a major expansion of its Arctic presence, Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Kevin Lunday told lawmakers during a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday.

Lunday made the comments while testifying before the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Coast Guard, Maritime, and Fisheries, chaired by Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, who has pushed for increased federal investment in Arctic security and maritime infrastructure.

“One of the first ones that I want them to present, among a range of options for consideration [and] decision, [to] me in consultation with Secretary Noem is for homeporting up to four icebreakers in Alaska,” Lunday said, adding that the Coast Guard is developing options for consideration as part of its long-term planning.

The potential expansion would draw from a fleet of 11 Arctic Security Cutters announced under the U.S.-Finland Icebreaker Agreement and the ICE Pact, and international framework aimed at strengthening icebreaking capacity among allied nations.

Advertisement

Funding for at least three Arctic Security Cutters, along with the infrastructure to support them, was approved through the Working Families Tax Cut Act, a sweeping budget reconciliation measure that includes roughly $25 billion for Coast Guard modernization, the largest investment in the service’s history.

The funding package also includes money for the new cutters, aircraft and helicopters, as well as billions of dollars to repair and replace aging shore facilities nationwide.

Sullivan said the investments are critical as the Coast Guard faces growing demands across multiple regions while operating an aging fleet.

“The Coast Guard is being asked to do more across every theater,” Sullivan said, pointing to counter-drug operations enforcement against sanctioned vessels, Indo-Pacific missions, search-and-rescue operations, and efforts to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.

The Coast Guard currently operates a limited number of icebreakers, one of which has experienced prolonged mechanical issues. Sullivan cited a growing capability gap with other Arctic nations, including Russia, which operates dozens of ice-capable vessels.

Advertisement

In addition to potential new icebreakers, Alaska is set to receive a range of Coast Guard assets and infrastructure upgrades, including funding for cutters, helicopters, aircraft, housing and shore facilities. A new Coast Guard pier in Juneau is already under development to support expanded Arctic and Pacific operations, and the polar icebreaker Storis is expected to homeport there.

Lunday voiced support for expanding Alaska’s shipbuilding and maintenance capabilities, particularly in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska, saying partnerships with private industry could improve efficiency and readiness.

The Coast Guard’s expanded presence is intended to strengthen maritime safety, national security, maritime safety and environmental response capabilities across Alaska’s vast coastline, according to Sullivan.

No final decision has been made of the homeporting of additional icebreakers, but Lunday said Alaska is under active consideration as the Coast Guard evaluated its future Arctic posture and presence.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Judge green-lights ConocoPhillips Alaska oil drilling program

Published

on

Judge green-lights ConocoPhillips Alaska oil drilling program


A federal judge has allowed ConocoPhillips to proceed with its winter exploration program in Alaska’s North Slope, over the objections of environmental and Indigenous groups.

On Tuesday, Chief Judge Sharon Gleason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska said mitigation measures put in place by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management were sufficient to address potential harms from the oil company’s exploration and seismic program in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A).

Gleason, an Obama appointee, found that BLM had done a “reasonably thorough analysis” of effects from the program, which includes four exploration wells and a seismic survey over 300 miles in the reserve.

Advertisement

She noted that the agency included measures such as prohibiting off-road travel when the soil isn’t sufficiently frozen and when there is less than 6 inches of snow. ConocoPhillips is also prohibited from bulldozing tundra mat and vegetation to make seismic lines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska high school basketball teams welcome long-anticipated adoption of shot clock

Published

on

Alaska high school basketball teams welcome long-anticipated adoption of shot clock


A 35-second shot clock has been instituted at Alask’a 4A level for 2025-26 season. Many coaches believe it’s a positive move to increase pace of play and keep up with trends nationally. (Photo by Stephanie Burgoon)

After years of speculation and experimentation, the shot clock has officially become woven into the fabric of 4A basketball in Alaska, the highest level of high school competition.

Most teams got their first taste of what it’s like to play with a 35-second limit to get the ball to the rim during in-season tournaments in and out of the state over the past few years. Now it’s here to stay.

All boys and girls varsity games between 4A teams are required to use the shot clock, and coaches of some of the top teams in the state believe it’s long overdue.

“The shot clock has been good for us,” said Thomas Berg, head coach of the reigning 4A state champion Colony girls team. “I think there’s another layer of coaching that goes into the shot clock.”

Advertisement

He specifically cited late-clock defense and offense as the two biggest challenges that require strategic adjustments.

“I’ve been a big fan of that this year,” Berg said. “That’s been fun for us. It doesn’t come up a lot. Most teams play fast enough, but down the stretch in quarters and in games, I think it’s a fun part that adds to the excitement of the basketball game.”

In his eyes, there was a lot of holding and moving the ball without any real offensive attempts at the prep basketball level for years. Berg said now in late-game situations, coaches don’t have to instruct their players to intentionally foul as often.

“If you get a stop and then stack those stops, you got a chance,” he said.

Although the idea of a shot clock has been considered in Alaska basketball circles for years, the Alaska School Activities Association officially instituted the shot clock rule at its Board of Directors meeting in December 2024. The motion passed in a 5-3 vote.

Advertisement

Teams at the 1A, 2A and 3A levels are not required to use a shot clock but can utilize it in tournaments during the regular season or if both schools provide written consent to officials before a non-tournament game.

Chuck Martin is the head coach of the Bettye Davis East Anchorage boys team, the three-time defending 4A state champion, and has been a pillar in the Alaska high school basketball scene for decades. He has long been a proponent of the shot clock and is glad that it’s finally being implemented.

“Even though it’s new, it’s not hard for us to get used to it,” Martin said.

Some of his assistant coaches are still adjusting to it from a strategic standpoint during games, with one example being telling players to hold the ball for longer than the shot clock permits in the final minute of quarters.

“You can’t say ‘one shot’ with 41 seconds left, there’s a (35-second) shot clock,” Martin said. “I tell the players to go play.”

Advertisement
Forest Wildcats senior forward Trey Chisolm from Ocala, Florida drives to the basket during a 56-38 victory over the West Valley Wolfpack in the opening round of the Alaska Airlines Classic at West Anchorage High School on Thursday, Jan. 22, 2026. (Bill Roth / ADN)

Unlike some of his coaching contemporaries around the state, he has extensive experience with the shot clock during other stretches of his career in different states and levels of competition.

In practice, his staff coaches situational basketball often, so this adaptation is just another wrinkle they have to review.

“The reality is the shot clock doesn’t really come into effect until later in the game,” Martin said.

So far this season, his team has done a good job of getting the ball out before the buzzer sounds, and their late-game operation when games are tight has just become an area of more focus.

He tells his players that the clock is irrelevant most of the time and that they’re going to run what they want to run because a shot-clock violation is not as detrimental of a penalty as others can be at times.

“It’s a dead-ball violation,” Martin said. “It’s better than throwing the ball to them and letting them make a layup, so we don’t sweat it. Our philosophy is that we’re not going to pay attention to the clock because we’re trying to score.”

Advertisement

This year’s edition of the East boys team doesn’t have the post presence it has had in recent seasons. The Thunderbirds are relying more on speed and efficient shooting, so in Martin’s mind, the last thing they have to worry about is the shot clock.

“We’re going to shoot the 3 and we’re going to play the full court and we’re going to take the first shot we get,” he said. “The last couple years when we haven’t been a great shooting team … With this group, you got to let them shoot because that’s probably the best shot we’re going to get (at winning).”

Outsider’s perspective

During last week’s Alaska Airlines Classic tournament at West Anchorage High School, head coaches of two of three boys teams from out of state that participated shared their thoughts on playing with a shot clock.

For Shelby Lewis and his Central High School team from Little Rock, Arkansas, it was “nothing new” and business as usual.

“We’ve been doing the shot clock for the last six years,” he said.

Advertisement

That wasn’t the case for Forest High School head coach Michael Hoffmann and his Wildcats from Ocala, Florida, who won the tournament.

Florida is one of the 18 states that does not mandate the use of a shot clock at the high school level. That won’t be the case for much longer, though, as it’s slated to join the other 32 states and the District of Columbia starting in the 2026-27 season.

“We love the shot clock,” Hoffmann said. “We’ve done it before because we travel a lot or try to.”

His team competed in a tournament in Tennessee last year that utilized the shot clock, and they experienced it on a couple different occasions this season prior to coming to Alaska.

“We want it because we’re a little bit of a quicker team and we’re hoping it gets installed next year,” Hoffmann said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending