The U.S. Department of Education is expected to award $41.3 million in grant funding through the Alaska Native Education Program to 26 Alaska grantees after some delay, according to an announcement from Alaska Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

The grant funding was expected July 1 but has been delayed more than a month. Grantees alerted Murkowski’s office that they had not yet received the funding, prompting Murkowski to press U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon to release the awarded funding, according to the statement on Aug. 5.

“Last week, I raised this issue with Secretary McMahon, and I’m pleased she agreed to expedite the obligation of the funds for the Alaska Native Education Program grants that Congress appropriated earlier this year,” Sen. Murkowski wrote.

The Alaska Native Education Program provides federal funding to “meet the unique education needs of Alaska Natives” and to support education programs to benefit Alaska Native people, according to the program website.

Officials with the U.S. Department of Education’s grant office for the program did not give a reason for the delay or specify when the funds will be disbursed after a query on Friday.

The grants are awarded to tribes, tribal organizations and school districts with a majority of Alaska Native students to support a variety of initiatives across a three-year grant period.

“Grants provide, for example, culturally relevant curriculum, tutoring and other academic supports, indigenous language revitalization, workforce development opportunities, teacher professional development, postsecondary planning and support, and success, early childhood education, and afterschool programming,” Murkowski said in the statement.

“I will continue to champion this program and work with the Department to ensure this funding is administered more expeditiously going forward,” she said.

Grantees include several early learning and literacy programs. Millions are slated for Indigenous language, art, science and medicine programs, including $2.1 million for the Baby Raven Reads project by Sealaska Heritage Institute and $1.4 million for tutoring and college readiness programs through the Rural Indigenous Students College Readiness Alliance launched by the Bering Strait and Lower Kuskokwim School Districts, two of Alaska’s largest rural districts.

Rosita Kaaháni Worl, president of the Sealaska Heritage Institute, a Native nonprofit corporation focused on Tlingit, Haida and Tsimshian cultures, said her organization was one of the grantees that alerted Murkowski’s office to the delay. Sealaska has not received its grant funds yet.

Worl said in an interview Friday that federal funds and support for Alaska Native communities is critical, given Alaska’s history of suppressing Native education and language.

“So these programs have helped us overcome the effects of that kind of suppression,” she said. “Our data shows definitely that it promotes and enhances Native education, and we show that through all of our evaluations … it’s led to higher academic performance.”

She said Sealaska Heritage Institute has seen success in early childhood programs like the Baby Raven Reads project and initiatives to support students continuing education, which reduces drop out rates. “We’re still behind non-Natives, but we’re gaining ground,” she said.

Worl said the federal support helps Sealaska Heritage Institute provide annual funding for education across Southeast Alaska where state funding has fallen short. The institute provides $1 million each year to the Juneau School District and $2 million annually to the University of Alaska Southeast, as well as funding to support school districts across the region for teacher training, arts and language programs.

“It’s a program that has proven benefits,” she said. “There, there’s no doubt about it.”

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.

SEATTLE — Alaska Airlines (AS) has the strongest year-over-year scheduled-frequency growth among the North American carriers in OAG’s global top 20 for August, but the 19.4% increase says more about Hawaiian Airlines’ (HA) integration than an industry-leading expansion of flying.

OAG’s August 2026 schedule analysis keeps the top of the U.S. hierarchy unchanged. American Airlines (AA) remains the world’s largest carrier by scheduled departures, with 198,550 flights during the month. Delta Air Lines (DL) follows with 160,599, and United Airlines (UA) with 158,108.

Alaska’s growth rate, however, is the outlier. OAG says the other North American carriers in its top 20 are up between 1% and 4% from August 2025, except JetBlue (B6), which is up 9.8%. Alaska is up 19.4%, which OAG explicitly attributes to the recent integration of Hawaiian.

That makes the headline accurate within OAG’s frequency table, but it does not mean Alaska organically added almost one-fifth more flying in a year. The distinction is central to understanding whether the Hawaiian acquisition is already changing the hierarchy of U.S. airline networks.

Why 19.4% Is Not Organic Growth

Alaska and Hawaiian moved to a shared passenger service system on April 22. From that date, all flights began carrying Alaska’s AS code, including services that retain the Hawaiian Airlines brand and are displayed to passengers as operated by Alaska as Hawaiian Airlines.

Airways covered how the single booking platform and AS flight code brought the two schedules together. In August 2025, those operations were still split between AS- and HA-coded flights. In August 2026, the consolidated schedule appears under Alaska.

The year-over-year result therefore captures a real increase in the network reported under the Alaska code, but much of that network was already flying under Hawaiian a year earlier. OAG does not disclose on its public page how many percentage points came from recoding Hawaiian flights and how many came from additional departures.

Alaska’s own capacity outlook shows the difference. In its second-quarter results, Air Group forecast third-quarter capacity growth of approximately 2% to 3%, with nearly all of that increase coming from long-haul international flying out of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA). Capacity within North America is expected to be essentially flat.

Frequency and capacity are not interchangeable. Frequency counts each scheduled flight once, whether it is a short Neighbor Island sector or a transatlantic widebody departure. Capacity measures such as available seat miles also reflect the number of seats and distance flown. Neither metric, by itself, measures passengers carried, revenue, or profit.

Hawaiʻi Gives Alaska a Much Denser Schedule

The acquisition, completed on September 18, 2024, gave Alaska an immediate position in markets that its legacy network did not replicate: high-frequency Neighbor Island flying, a Honolulu hub, transpacific routes, and a widebody fleet. Airways’ coverage of the completed transaction detailed the initial combined network and fleet.

Alaska and Hawaiian now offer more than 250 daily flights to, from, and within Hawaiʻi. That schedule includes short flights among the islands as well as longer services linking Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL) with the continental United States and international destinations.

Those flights make Alaska a more frequent operator in global schedule rankings, but they also do something more strategically important: they connect Hawaiian’s local and transpacific network with Alaska’s broad West Coast and Pacific Northwest footprint. A frequency count cannot show the quality of those connections, yet the ability to sell them through one reservation system and one loyalty platform is one of the acquisition’s clearest network effects.

The combined scale also comes with limits. The U.S. Department of Transportation required Alaska and Hawaiian to preserve critical interisland and continental service when it allowed the merger to proceed. Alaska can optimize the network, but some Hawaiʻi services carry public-interest obligations as well as commercial value.

Seattle Is Where the Merger Changes Alaska’s Reach

Hawaiʻi adds frequency. Seattle shows how the acquisition can change the kind of airline Alaska is becoming.

Hawaiian’s long-haul aircraft and operating experience gave Alaska capabilities it did not previously have at its home hub. The group used that platform to launch Seattle-Tokyo Narita service in May 2025, followed by a broader international buildout.

Alaska said its second-quarter 2026 network included transatlantic service from Seattle to Rome, London, and Reykjavík. Its longer-term Alaska Accelerate plan calls for at least 12 international widebody destinations from Seattle by 2030.

This is more consequential than the 19.4% frequency figure alone. When the Tokyo route launched in May 2025, Alaska said its Seattle hub served 104 nonstop destinations across North America. Pairing that domestic feed with long-haul aircraft acquired through Hawaiian allows the airline to compete for passengers whose journeys extend beyond North America.

Delta Is Not Yielding Seattle

The strategy also places Alaska more directly against Delta. Delta described nearly 180 peak-day Seattle departures to more than 60 destinations in June 2025 and has continued investing in international routes and premium facilities at SEA.

Delta added Seattle service to Rome and Barcelona in May 2026, putting the two carriers into a broader contest for international passengers, connecting traffic, corporate accounts, loyalty members, and premium demand. Airways previously examined how Delta’s European additions intensified competition at Alaska’s home hub.

Alaska retains the advantage of a larger hometown domestic network, while Delta brings the scale and international depth of one of the three largest U.S. airlines. The Hawaiian acquisition narrows Alaska’s capability gap by adding widebody aircraft, long-haul expertise, Hawaiʻi relevance, and another hub. It does not erase Delta’s advantages or move Alaska into the top three by flight volume.

Is the U.S. Airline Hierarchy Changing?

Yes, but not in the simplest interpretation of the OAG ranking.

American, Delta, and United still occupy the top three positions by August flight frequency, and Alaska’s 19.4% increase does not show that it has displaced them. The growth rate is also inflated by the migration of Hawaiian flights into the AS-coded schedule.

What has changed is Alaska’s network scope. It now combines high-frequency Hawaiʻi flying, a substantial West Coast domestic system, two major Pacific hubs, and a developing intercontinental gateway in Seattle. That is a material strategic shift even if the underlying Air Group capacity increase remains modest.

The next test will not be whether Alaska repeats a merger-driven double-digit frequency comparison. It will be whether the integrated network produces durable connecting traffic, supports profitable long-haul growth from Seattle, strengthens Hawaiʻi service, and competes effectively with Delta without diluting performance elsewhere.

OAG’s August table is therefore an early sign that the acquisition has changed how Alaska appears in the U.S. airline landscape. The more important hierarchy—network relevance, financial returns, and competitive strength—will take longer to settle.

The Alaska Division of Elections may have violated state and federal law when it removed thousands of suspected noncitizens from the state’s active voter list, according to attorneys working for the state Legislature.

The Division of Elections took an unusual step when it moved more than 3,000 Alaskans off the state’s active voter list last month.

Elections officials removed the voters after comparing its full list with Division of Motor Vehicles data that officials later said contained outdated information. The comparison flagged thousands of voters whose DMV records did not indicate they were citizens. Several of them later said they were naturalized citizens who had applied for their driver’s license before becoming citizens.

Since the removal of the voters, around 685 of them have contacted the division to state that they are, in fact, U.S. citizens and are eligible to vote. Around 100 people have confirmed that they are not citizens, according to the division.

But more than 2,200 of those removed have yet to contact the Division of Elections after being removed from the voter list, including 350 whose notices were returned undeliverable. It is not clear how many of those voters are eligible citizens who were erroneously moved to inactive status.

Officials say those voters can still vote in the Aug. 18 primary election by casting a questioned ballot, which requires additional paperwork and is reviewed in a separate process. But 23 lawmakers earlier this month asked for the voters to be restored to the active voter list, given evidence that the data used by the division was flawed and outdated.

The Division of Elections has refused to restore the voters to the state’s active voter rolls.

Anchorage independent Rep. Ky Holland requested that the Legislature’s nonpartisan attorneys review the Division of Elections’ actions.

In a memo dated Friday, legislative attorney Andrew Dunmire wrote that he could not identify a specific Alaska statute or regulation authorizing Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher to move suspected noncitizens to inactive status.

“While the statutes tell the director to remove dead voters and give the director a method to cancel the registration of people who move to another state, there is no statute or regulation that explicitly grants the director authority to inactivate a voter’s registration based on a question about U.S. citizenship,” the memo states.

Beecher did not respond to questions on Monday, including about the legal basis for the removal of voters.

Additionally, the Legislature’s attorney indicated that the division’s actions may violate the National Voter Registration Act, a federal law that generally restricts states from conducting the systematic removal of voters from their lists within 90 days of a federal election.

The Division of Elections removed the Alaska voters from the rolls less than two months before the state’s Aug. 18 primary, according to election officials, who also declined to answer questions about the timing of the removal.

The question of whether the federal law allows for the systematic removal of suspected noncitizen voters within 90 days of an election has been considered several times by federal courts across the country. The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case involving Arizona’s effort to remove suspected noncitizens from its voter rolls before a federal election.

President Donald Trump and other Republican leaders have claimed without evidence that noncitizens are participating in U.S. elections in large numbers. Noncitizen voting across the country, including in Alaska, is in fact extremely rare, according to national reviews and studies.

In a letter to lawmakers sent last week, Beecher, herself a registered Republican, again said that she would not restore the removed voters to Alaska’s voter list, though she conceded that the removal affected hundreds of voters who later attested that they are citizens.

“The division has paused additional DMV comparisons while it evaluates this initial effort and incorporates lessons learned,” Beecher said.