It is day 13 of America’s surprise war with Iran — by sheer coincidence, it’s Friday the 13th — and I am delirious. I haven’t had a coffee since I woke up at 5AM, because I’m not allowed to bring outside beverages into the Pentagon (the security screening cutoff was at 7AM for the 8AM), and ever since Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth changed the rules last year, journalists are not allowed to go anywhere in the building without an escort, especially to wherever coffee is available. Also, I am struggling to comprehend why I, a reporter who has never covered a war, was assigned to sit in one of the good seats in the briefing room, watching Hegseth take the podium and immediately start berating the veteran journalists assigned to the bad seats.
Technology
I went to the Pentagon to watch Pete Hegseth scold war reporters
“We will keep pushing. Keep advancing. No quarter, no mercy for our enemies. Yet some of this crew in the press just can’t stop,” Hegseth glowers, speaking in perfect cable-news cadence. He was speaking to the pissed-off defense reporters from NBC, ABC, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and Fox News — the people who’d covered conflicts in the Middle East for decades, knew the intricacies of the Pentagon, and knew what needed to be asked for the sake of accountability. It was the first time many of them had been back since last October, when the entire Pentagon press corps resigned in protest after Hegseth told them that they could not report on any information, classified or otherwise, that he did not approve for release.
In the front row and middle aisles, right at Hegseth’s eyeline, were their replacements from what Hegseth called the “patriotic press” — One America News, ZeroHedge, The Gateway Pundit, Real America’s Voice, The Daily Wire, and Lindell TV — many of whom looked startlingly young. It’s not a good look to have a half-full briefing room of starstruck reporters during a controversial war, so this week, the Pentagon press team announced that they would hold an open press conference, allowing the old defense reporters back in for the first time in months. But as long as they asked too many questions, Hegseth would continue to disrespect them.
”What should the banner read instead? How about ‘Iran increasingly desperate’?”
“Allow me to make a few suggestions,” Hegseth told the media. “People look up at the TV and they see banners. They see headlines. I used to be in that business. And I know that everything is written intentionally. For example, a banner or headline [like] ‘Mideast war intensified,’ splashing on the screen the last couple of days, alongside visuals of civilian or energy targets that Iran has hit, because that’s what they do. What should the banner read instead? How about ‘Iran increasingly desperate’?”
Were they, though? Since his last press conference on Tuesday, two US planes crashed into each other last night (which Hegseth did not mention during his tirade). The Iranians had fired missiles at Bahrain, sent attack drones into Lebanon, and threatened to target American cities next. Now the misadventure was hitting American wallets and making Americans angry. Iran had begun placing mines and assaulting ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz — a crucial energy shipping lane they were literally right next to — and sent the price of oil skyrocketing. Even with price controls, oil was roughly $100 a barrel that morning, up 40 percent since the war started two weeks ago.
“More fake news from CNN: reports that the Trump administration underestimated the Iran War’s impact on the Strait of Hormuz,” Hegseth continued. “Patently ridiculous, of course. For decades, Iran has threatened shipping in the strait before. This is always what they do. Hold the strait hostage. CNN doesn’t think we thought of that. It’s a fundamentally unserious report. The sooner David Ellison takes over that network…” He trailed off. A murmur rippled through the room. Everyone knew what had happened to CBS News after Ellison bought it.
As Hegseth swung back and forth between abusing the press and glazing the military, followed by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine giving actual relevant information about the war, my personal curiosity turned to why I had been invited to this briefing. Yes, invited. The Pentagon press team knew that I wasn’t the nicest reporter to them and yet had offered me a seat. And what journalist wouldn’t attend a press conference at the Pentagon during a war? Every time I’d ever watched a press conference at the Pentagon — especially whenever the military was involved in active conflict — I’d see the room packed with as many reporters as they could possibly fit. But this time, they’d only accepted 60 reporters.
Despite my grogginess, I could tell that the first question, from a woman at One America News in the front row, who later bragged on Instagram that she’d gotten to ask the first question for the last three press briefings, was a softball. (“Can you tell us a little bit more about the Strait of Hormuz and when it might be fully operational again?”) And I could tell that the second question, from a woman at The Daily Wire — who also, apparently, frequently got the second question — was meant to give Hegseth an opportunity to attack the media. (“ABC News has updated its story from yesterday, clarifying that the FBI report on Iran possibly striking California was unverified. I just want to ask you, what impact did that original reporting have on the public?”)
Finally Hegseth pointed at someone that was not a young woman, opting for an older gentleman in a red tie sitting behind me. He announced himself as Michael Gordon of The Wall Street Journal, before asking, “Iran is thought to have 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium in at least two locations and several thousand kilograms of lower purity material. Can you conclude this mission successfully without physically taking control of that material or are you counting on diplomatic negotiations to provide some measure of control leading to its removal? You’ve mentioned missiles, you’ve mentioned drones, [the] military, industry. You haven’t stipulated that taking care of that material is a mission priority.”
Judging from his face, Pete Hegseth and I appeared to have something in common: We had no idea that this was a serious issue. Thankfully, Hegseth was the one responsible for tap dancing around an answer (“We have a range of options, up to and including Iran deciding that they will give those up, which of course we would welcome”), and I looked up Gordon’s background in the meantime. Suffice to say, he’d been covering nuclear weapons and Middle Eastern wars since long before I was even born.
Once Hegseth managed to get out of that, however, he immediately regained his composure — as in, he began fighting with any mainstream outlet who asked him a tough question:
Q (NBC): Is Iran placing new mines?
Hegseth: We’ve heard them talk about it, just like you’ve reported recklessly and wildly about it—
Q: I haven’t reported on it, actually, but have they placed any mines?
Q (NYT): Mr. Secretary, you have said that the US military has essentially aerial superiority, naval superiority over Iran, yet we’re not escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Why? How did you not plan for this?
Hegseth: We planned for it. We recognize it. Because ultimately, we want to do it sequentially in a way that makes the most sense for what we want to achieve and ensure that we’re sending the right signals to the world when we do so. … It’s like this whole idea of the war widening. That’s what the press wants to make it look like, like it’s widening and chaos is ensuing. No, we’re actually closing in on, grabbing hold of, and controlling what objectives we want to achieve and how we want to achieve them, shape — it’s called shaping operations and setting the conditions.
By now, Hegseth’s petulance about the media is so well known that it’s a running Saturday Night Live bit. But this time, it wasn’t just the mainstream press assailing him with harsh questions. The Trump administration had fumbled into the kind of forever war that was broadly unpopular — particularly among the neocon-hating MAGA voters who’d never wanted to revisit the failures of Afghanistan and Iraq. But the friendlies in the front rows wouldn’t give him an opportunity to gloat. True, some of the outlets kept the questions elementary, though I couldn’t see whether it was a MAGA outlet or a foreign outlet. (Said one man: “Given everything the US has accomplished in the last 24 hours, as of today, how do you define success in this military option?”) But a reporter from the front row (I couldn’t tell whom) was ready to lob politically toxic questions that Hegseth had to dodge:
Q: Polls show over 80 percent of Republicans support the president’s military action in Iran, but there’s some consternation in parts of the party, particularly from your fellow Fox News alum Tucker Carlson. He called the war “disgusting and evil” and then said of unconditional surrender, which the president has called for, means “foreign troops get to rape your wives and daughters.” Have you heard these comments and what’s your reaction to them?
I instantly knew this was from a MAGA outlet, because if someone from the mainstream media world had asked about Carlson, a powerful commentator and loose cannon in Trumpworld, Hegseth would have immediately attacked them for trying to sow division. Instead, he demurred. “We’re busy executing on behalf of great patriotic Americans with a clear mission that’s 47 years overdue. And we’re going to execute on that regardless of what people say about it.”
The final question, from Lindell TV reporter Heather Mullins, flicked at two subjects of the right wing’s increasing skepticism: China, which was offering limited support to Iran, and Israel, which had arguably egged Trump into launching the attack on Tehran that killed the Ayatollah, and whose intelligence on the possibility of regime change was horribly, horribly wrong. “I know President Trump is calling for an unconditional surrender from Iran. Given that the US is working in partnership with Israel on this whole operation, is Iran expected to meet demands of both countries or just the US? And what are those demands?”
Hegesth gave an answer that would not appease the Israel skeptics: “Our objectives are our objectives. So when those are met, as we meet those, we’ll set the — we’ll set the tempo of when those are met.” The conference quickly wrapped and we were soon ushered out, all somewhat bewildered. If I had to describe the general reaction purely on vibes, I’d say everyone left feeling more frustrated than they had coming in — the “patriot” reporters who suspected that Hegseth was dodging and wondered why he hadn’t answered more questions, and the natsec reporters with decades of experience who knew what Hegseth was dodging.
The friendlies in the front rows wouldn’t give him an opportunity to gloat
I was frustrated, too, because I was one of the other people in the room who, by design, could not ask a good question about the war. I’ve never seen active combat or visited a war zone. I’ve never even traveled to the Middle East. Even if I’d spent significant time crafting a good question in advance, I wouldn’t have the knowledge base to ask any follow-up questions, much less verbally spar with Hegseth if and when he’d claim I was a liar. I have, however, covered Trumpworld and the MAGA media for over a decade, and a hard rule in both worlds is that the performance is always more important than the substance.
That’s pretty obvious to anyone watching from home. But what you don’t see, and what is a new phenomenon in this administration, is all the production behind the camera: the reality television instincts and psychological tactics meant to trigger genuine anger, conflict, and (most importantly) drama among the participants who are trying to take it seriously. It can be done by simply depriving them of caffeine, shuffling the seating arrangements, and filling a spot with someone inclined to write about the media drama — instead of someone capable of interrogating Pete Hegseth about the actual war.
If you’re looking for a relatively affordable way to cut down on cooling costs, Google’s Nest Thermostat can help. It’s packed with smart controls and energy-saving features, and right now it’s on sale in white for $79 ($50 off), which is its best price of the year, at Amazon.
The smart thermostat is quick to install and makes it easy to adjust your home’s temperature whether you’re relaxing in bed or on your way home thanks to the Google Home app. You can also create schedules and control it with your voice using Google Assistant, Alexa, or another Matter-compatible voice assistant.
Once it’s set up, the Nest Thermostat can automatically turn the temperature down when you’re away to help reduce unnecessary energy use, while Google’s Savings Finder feature suggests additional ways to save over time. It also monitors your HVAC system and can alert you if something doesn’t seem right, making it easier to stay on top of maintenance before small issues become bigger, more expensive ones. If you’re eligible, Nest Renew can also automatically shift some of your heating and cooling to times when electricity is cleaner or cheaper.
That said, this is Google’s entry-level model from 2020, so you do miss out on some of the premium features found on the latest Nest Learning Thermostat. Unlike the flagship version, it won’t learn your schedule automatically over time, for example, and lacks support for Nest Temperature Sensors that let you prioritize the temperature in a specific room. Even so, if all you want is an easy way to adjust your home’s temperature remotely and potentially lower your energy bills, the Nest Thermostat is still a solid investment at this price.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Justice Department recently charged 455 people in its annual National Health Care Fraud Takedown. The cases involve more than $6.5 billion in alleged false claims. More state Medicaid units took part than in any prior year. Ninety of the accused are doctors or other licensed medical professionals. The DOJ says prosecutors still must prove the charges in court.
Many schemes used other people’s medical identities. Prosecutors also added aggravated identity theft charges in cases across dozens of states. In one case, the co-owner of a Virginia mental health company allegedly paid homeless people with hotel stays. Prosecutors say the company used their Medicaid numbers, then billed Medicaid for crisis services the patients never got.
For the people whose numbers got used, the case file may eventually close. Their medical records may not be so easy to fix. Once someone else’s treatment shows up under your name, it can add wrong information to your chart. It can also use up insurance benefits you may need later. That is harder to undo than canceling a credit card.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
DR OZ WARNS MEDICARE SCAMMERS ARE STEALING BILLIONS — AND YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION COULD BE NEXT
Medical identity theft can put someone else’s claims, prescriptions or diagnoses into your health records, creating problems that can follow you into a doctor’s office. (iStock)
The identity thief’s treatment gets written into your file
Medical identity theft happens when someone uses your name, Social Security number (SSN), health insurance account number, or Medicare number to see a doctor, fill a prescription, buy medical equipment, or submit a claim, according to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
When care is billed under your name, the thief’s health information can blend into yours. The FTC warns that mixed records can affect the care you’re able to get and the benefits you are able to use. A blood type, a drug allergy, a diagnosis, or a prescription that belongs to a stranger can sit in the file a physician reads before treating you.
Data breaches can feed the market for medical identity theft
Hospitals and insurers hold the exact records that make the fraud work, and those records are stolen often. This does not mean every healthcare breach leads to fraud. However, it explains why your insurance number, Medicare number, SSN and medical records can become valuable long after a breach notice arrives.
This spring, NYC Health + Hospitals reported that an intruder had copied files that may have included health insurance information, medical information, biometric data, billing data and other personal information. The breach was later reported to affect roughly 1.8 million current and former patients and employees.
Once a name, SSN, insurance number, Medicare number or medical record reaches a criminal marketplace, it can be resold to operators who bill under someone else’s identity.
Treat your insurance card like a credit card
Your health insurance and Medicare numbers are what these operations need, so the FTC recommends guarding them the way you would a payment card.
- Keep enrollment forms, benefit statements, and prescription labels somewhere secure, and shred them before throwing them out.
- When a doctor’s office asks for your SSN, ask whether it can use another identifier or the last four digits instead.
- Be wary of anyone who calls, texts, or emails offering free braces, genetic tests, or medical supplies in exchange for your Medicare number; several of the schemes in the June takedown billed Medicare for exactly those items.
- If you are on Medicare, create or log in to your secure Medicare account and review your claims. You can also check your Medicare Summary Notice for services, supplies or equipment you do not recognize. If something looks wrong, call 1-800-MEDICARE.
HOSPICE FRAUD USES STOLEN IDENTITIES FOR FAKE PATIENTS
Experts urge patients to treat insurance cards like credit cards and quickly challenge unfamiliar medical bills, claims or benefits notices. (iStock)
Your credit report may never flag this fraud
Because a fraudulent medical claim runs through insurance and provider systems instead of a credit check, it skips the alerts most people rely on.
Here’s what the FTC says you should look out for:
- A bill or an Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statement for care you never received
- A call from a debt collector about a medical debt you do not owe
- A medical collection you do not recognize on your credit report
- A notice from your insurer that you have reached your benefit limit
- A Medicare Summary Notice that lists services, supplies or equipment you never received
What to do first if a medical claim looks wrong
If a bill, EOB or Medicare notice shows care you never received, move quickly and keep everything in writing.
1) Call your insurer or Medicare directly
Call your insurer or Medicare using the number on your card, not a number from a random text, email or voicemail.
2) Get the claim details
Ask for the provider name, date of service, claim number and service details.
3) Request the records in writing
Contact the provider in writing and request the medical or billing records tied to that claim.
4) Report the error
Report the error to your insurer’s fraud department.
5) File an identity theft report
File a report at IdentityTheft.gov if your medical identity was used. That gives you a recovery plan and documentation you may need if fraudulent bills or collections show up later.
6) Save every document
Keep copies of every bill, EOB, letter, portal message, police report and case number.
Correcting a medical file is slower than disputing a charge
Request your records from every provider, clinic, pharmacy, lab and insurer the thief may have used, then report each error in writing. Under HIPAA, a provider generally has 30 days to give you access to your records after a written request, with a possible 30-day extension.
Fixing the record itself can take longer. HHS says a covered provider or health plan usually has up to 60 days to act on a request to amend a medical record, with a possible 30-day extension in certain cases. If the provider or plan created the wrong information, it must amend inaccurate or incomplete information.
There’s one catch, though: a provider may refuse to release records that now contain a stranger’s information, citing that person’s privacy. If that happens, ask for the provider’s privacy officer or patient advocate. You can also file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights if you do not get your records or an explanation within the required window.
TEXAS DATA BREACH HITS 3M LICENSE CUSTOMERS
Stolen Medicare, Medicaid or insurance numbers can be used to bill for care, medical equipment or prescriptions patients never received. (kali9/Getty Images)
A credit freeze alone won’t stop a claim under your insurance
A freeze blocks new accounts, but it does nothing about a claim filed with your insurance number. Because medical identity theft can move without touching your credit file, monitoring where your personal information appears is the earliest way to act on it.
An identity theft protection service can monitor the dark web, data broker sites and people-search sites for exposed SSNs, driver’s license numbers, medical ID numbers and email addresses. It can also track all three credit bureaus for medical collections that may follow and flag public-record changes tied to your name.
If misuse happens, some services include fraud resolution support to help you request records, dispute fraudulent claims and work with providers, insurers and credit bureaus. Some plans also include identity theft insurance for eligible recovery costs.
No service can prevent every misuse of your medical identity. However, ongoing monitoring may flag exposed information before another person’s treatment reaches your records and your insurance.
See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at CyberGuy.com.
Kurt’s key takeaways
Medical identity theft hits in a place most of us rarely check: our health records. A stolen credit card can usually be canceled quickly. A stolen Medicare or insurance number can create fake claims, wrong diagnoses and benefit headaches that follow you long after the fraud case ends. I would not wait for a credit alert here. Check your EOBs, Medicare Summary Notices and insurer portals for visits, prescriptions or equipment you never received. Also, treat your insurance card like a payment card. Do not give the number to anyone who calls, texts or emails out of nowhere with a free offer. The most important thing is to act fast. Call your insurer or Medicare, ask for the claim details and request your medical records in writing. Then file at IdentityTheft.gov, so you have the paperwork you need if fraudulent bills or collections show up later.
Have you ever spotted a medical bill, insurance claim or EOB for care you never received? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Meta might be the next company to make an always-on AI wearable. The company is working on prototype “super sensing” always-aware smart glasses that could continuously record audio and snap photos “every few seconds,” according to the Financial Times. The wearer could then ask Meta AI about the captured audio and images.
However, the images and audio might not be directly available to the user. Here’s how the FT describes one way the glasses could use the data:
In one proposed system, raw footage and audio would not be stored by Meta or made available to the user, several people said. Instead, the metadata from that audio and images would be extracted and uploaded to the server for Meta’s AI to query, which proponents argue would have fewer privacy implications.
But currently, Meta is planning for the LED recording indicator to remain off in “super sensing” mode, the FT reports. In a July 2025 whitepaper, the company said that it would reserve the LED indicator for “active capture” scenarios where the user is saving photos or videos, and leave it off during “AI Feature” use — such as scanning a menu — to avoid users becoming too used to the indicator. (If the indicator was on during the “super sensing” mode, it might also be harder to know when the glasses are actually recording video.)
Meta is also discussing if it would use the captured data for training its AI models. It may also bring the “super sensing” features to glasses it has already released, the FT says.
“While we don’t comment on internal prototypes, we’re committed to getting our glasses right because they need to be loved by both people wearing them and those around them,” Meta spokesperson Dave Arnold says in a statement to The Verge. Arnold also notes that “Our approach has been to develop new technologies that will help people throughout their day, with privacy built in from the ground up.”
Meta hasn’t been shy about some type of always-aware glasses being a possibility. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, in the company’s Q1 2026 earnings call, said that he was “really excited to see the glasses evolve from being able to answer questions to being able to be a personal agent that’s with you all day long, helping you remember things and achieve your goals.” In a March blog post about new Ray-Ban Meta glasses, the company wrote that “with ongoing software updates, Meta AI on glasses will transition from something you have to prompt with a question each time, to a more continuous, in-the-moment assistant that can help throughout the day.”
-
Washington3 minutes agoWashington Commanders are retiring Hall of Famer John Riggins’ No. 44
-
Wisconsin6 minutes agoWisconsin State Patrol rides with truck and bus drivers to spot violations in five areas
-
West Virginia11 minutes agoWest Virginia town fires entire police force after chief resigns, sergeant alleges evidence room break-in
-
Wyoming18 minutes agoWHP: July 5 single-vehicle rollover north of Riverton resulted in one death, one injury
-
Crypto21 minutes agoBritish Airline Jet2 Shares Jump 9% After $536M Fuel Hedge Gain Offsets Middle East Travel Fears
-
Finance26 minutes agoTreasury Pick Queried on Iran War Fallout to Face Senate Finance
-
Fitness33 minutes agoQuote of the day by Cher: ‘Nothing lifts me out of a bad mood better than a hard workout on my…’ – motivating life lessons by Oscar-winning actress of Moonstruck and singer of Believe on exercise, mental health, fitness and how this daily habit can transform your mood and mindset
-
Movie Reviews41 minutes ago‘Night Nurse’ Review: A Caretaker Explores Her Kink for Elder Abuse in the Year’s Strangest Erotic Thriller
