Sports
Why didn’t Arsenal or Man Utd sign a forward? Have Spurs done enough? Key transfer window questions answered
The transfer window might have closed on Monday night, but the question marks remain.
As you sit here on Tuesday morning, you might be left wondering about the business your team did — or in a lot of cases, didn’t do. Why have they not brought in that extra player? Why did they let one of their key men go? And is the squad in a stronger place than it was?
Here, The Athletic has assembled its club experts to run through the key questions — and answers — after deadline day.
Why didn’t Arsenal sign a striker?
Ultimately, Arsenal couldn’t find the right player at the right price in this window.
Long-term targets such as Alexander Isak and Benjamin Sesko were unavailable this month. The club did look to capitalise on a PSR situation at Aston Villa with a move for Ollie Watkins, but Villa chose to sell Jhon Duran to Al Nassr instead.
Manager Mikel Arteta and the club were aligned in the view that they didn’t want to simply bring in a “body”. They wanted a No 9 who could make an immediate impact in the remainder of the season.
Isak was not available this month (Molly Darlington/Getty Images)
Watkins fit the bill. When that deal died, there was no obvious alternative that didn’t compromise Arsenal’s summer plans in some way. Even in the case of Watkins, Arsenal showed they were not simply prepared to pay Villa’s £60million ($74.4m) asking price.
It leaves Arsenal looking very light up front, with Kai Havertz the only fit recognised centre-forward in the squad. Arsenal have taken a calculated gamble that Havertz can carry them through to the end of the season when they will return to pursuing their primary attacking targets.
James McNicholas
What were Manchester United thinking?
United’s decision to step back from signing a replacement for Marcus Rashford, who remains the team’s third-highest scorer in the Premier League on four goals, ahead of Joshua Zirkzee and Rasmus Hojlund, has been met with severe concerns among the fanbase. United have lost 11 times in the Premier League to sit 13th and have failed to score in a third of their 24 games so far.
From United’s perspective, the January plan was to lose players deemed at odds with the culture, add a left wing-back, and stay financially restrained ahead of the summer, when a long-term centre-forward can be recruited. The £5m loan fee demanded by Bayern Munich for Mathys Tel, with no buy option, was deemed too expensive by United.
Tel’s loan fee was deemed too much for Manchester United (Sebastian Widmann/Getty Images)
Critics argue United would have had more budgetary flexibility had the multi-million-pound cost of sacking Erik ten Hag, hiring Amorim, and dismissing Dan Ashworth not gone on this season’s accounts.
Though Amorim said United were “trying everything to improve the team” during a press conference after the Crystal Palace match, he also showed he understood the financial picture by adding: “Without doing mistakes of the past, trying to balance the urgency of the moment.” United’s consistent loss-making is the result of decisions made by the previous regime.
Instead, United chose to primarily invest in Patrick Dorgu, the 20-year-old wing-back who arrived in a deal judged fair value, potentially worth €35million, and in a position needing strengthening.
Laurie Whitwell
Chelsea are usually so active in windows — why was it different this time?
Before the window opened, Chelsea fans were hoping to see a lot of recruitment in some key positions, but the club never intended to spend lavishly.
The window shut with not much business done to show for all the noise surrounding the club. Chelsea bought defender Mamadou Sarr from sister club Strasbourg with the summer in mind. A deal for 19-year-old midfielder Mathis Amougou was finalised on deadline day and Trevoh Chalobah was recalled from a season-long loan at Crystal Palace. Amougou has arrived more for his potential than as an immediate starter.
This is not the kind of activity that will get many pulses raised in the stands. However, like 12 months ago when no one arrived apart from Cesare Casadei coming back from a loan at Leicester City, Chelsea did not expect to be that active.
A deal was agreed for Amougou on deadline day (Euan Cherry/Getty Images)
Chelsea’s thinking about where they were looking to strengthen solidified the longer the window went on, but it always had to be the right deal for the right price.
A left-sided winger, due to Mykhailo Mudryk’s suspension for failing a drugs test, striker and midfielder were on the agenda.
The complication of getting players off the books also played a role in what took place. For example, despite interest from Bayern Munich and Manchester United, Christopher Nkunku has stayed at Stamford Bridge because neither club were prepared to meet their £65million asking price.
Joao Felix, Renato Veiga, Carney Chukwuemeka, Ben Chilwell and Axel Disasi all leaving on loan deals ended up summarising more about where Chelsea’s main priorities lay. However, all of these negotiations were not concluded until the end of the month.
Simon Johnson
Did Spurs do enough to fix their season?
The arrival of Antonin Kinsky from Slavia Prague solved Tottenham’s biggest problem at the start of the window. Guglielmo Vicario suffered a fractured ankle in November and Fraser Forster was deputising for him. However, Forster is clumsy in possession. This makes him an awkward fit for Ange Postecoglou, who likes his goalkeepers to be brave on the ball. Kinsky made an instant impression with his performance in the Carabao Cup semi-final first-leg victory over Liverpool and has played every game in the Premier League since.
The other areas Spurs desperately needed to reinforce were defence and upfront. Austrian centre-back Kevin Danso has arrived on loan with an obligation to buy from French side Lens. It is not enough, though, as Radu Dragusin has suffered an anterior cruciate ligament injury that will keep him out for the rest of the season, while Cristian Romero’s recovery from a quad issue has been described as a “slow burner” by Postecoglou.
Spurs made an offer for Guehi (Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)
Acquiring Crystal Palace’s captain Marc Guehi would have been a statement signing, but they failed to pull it off — which leaves them still short of options in defence.
The most eye-catching deal was Mathys Tel, who joined on deadline day from Bayern Munich on loan with a €55million (£45.7m; $56.9m) option to buy. The 19-year-old forward is talented but raw. Ideally, they would have signed an older and more experienced player.
The new additions should help Spurs progress deep in the Europa League and FA Cup, while all three of them might have important roles to play against Liverpool at Anfield on Thursday in Tottenham’s biggest game of the season — the Carabao Cup semi-final second-leg.
Jay Harris
Is Liverpool buying no one a sign they might keep Van Dijk, Salah and/or Alexander-Arnold?
Liverpool’s inactivity in the January window is more a reflection of their satisfaction with the current depth of Arne Slot’s squad. The Dutch head coach had made it clear that he was happy with the options available to him for the rest of the season as they continue to challenge on four fronts.
Federico Chiesa and Joe Gomez didn’t even make the bench for Saturday’s hard-fought 2-0 win at Bournemouth that kept them on course for Premier League title glory. As for the futures of Van Dijk, Salah and Alexander-Arnold, who are all out of contract this summer, the trio have been made contract offers in recent months, with Liverpool keen to retain their services.
Liverpool want to keep Van Dijk (Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)
Talks remain ongoing and until there is clarity, the club won’t know the extent of the business that needs to be done this summer in terms of recruiting replacements. That process was never going to start in January.
Real Madrid wanted to buy Alexander-Arnold during the winter window, but their approach was instantly rebuffed by Liverpool, who made it clear he was going nowhere midway through the season. The Spanish giants are now hoping to convince the England right-back to join them on a free transfer this summer.
The uncertainty over key personnel hasn’t proved a distraction for Slot’s side, who find themselves six points clear at the top of the Premier League with a game in hand.
James Pearce
Have City got the players they need?
Only time will tell!
It appears obvious with young centre-backs Abdukodir Khusanov and Vitor Reis that City are happy to give them time to get to grips with life in England and Premier League football so they can fulfil their potential and contribute to Pep Guardiola’s first team later down the line.
They hope that Omar Marmoush will inject more quality straight away and at the age of 25 and with his recent record in the Bundesliga, that appears a fair ask for a player with obvious quality. In his two outings so far, he has added more energy than much substance in possession, but it is early days and he has hardly been dropped into the most stable of teams.
The especially interesting one is Nico Gonzalez given City did not intend to pay the release clause before the weekend but did agree a deal that will total €60million. This figure is the same as his release clause, but the deal is structured differently. It suggests a degree of panic after the defeat at Arsenal and the glaringly obvious need to strengthen the centre of midfield. As long as they have the right man, then they will not mind too much about overpaying — they normally walk away in these scenarios. But after trying and failing with Kalvin Phillips and Matheus Nunes, they really need to get a midfield signing right.
Sam Lee
Are Villa stronger after selling Duran and signing Rashford and Asensio?
Aston Villa’s window was frenetic and fast-paced and best-laid plans routinely changed. They missed out on several targets but ultimately ended with a flourish after the high-profile signings of Marcus Rashford from Manchester United, Marco Asensio from Paris Saint-Germain and Axel Disasi from Chelsea.
In total, Villa signed five players with eight departing. They were linked to far more. They failed to sign Loic Bade (Sevilla), Oscar Mingueza (Celta Vigo) and Joao Felix (Chelsea) — there were more — and made good money on Jaden Philogene joining Ipswich Town and Jhon Duran heading for Saudi Arabia, receiving around £85m in fees overall.
Rashford has joined Aston Villa on loan (Ben Roberts Photo/Getty Images)
They spent carefully on incomings, with Donyell Malen being negotiated for two weeks before striking a €18m (£14.9m, $18.6m) deal with Borussia Dortmund. Villa recruited young right-back Andres Garcia from Levante for €7m. As for two of the other signings, Rashford and Asensio, they are on significant salaries and Villa are paying for most of it.
Villa also did manage to bring Disasi in late on deadline day, dealing with a serious gap in defence.
Jacob Tanswell
Why did Newcastle let Lloyd Kelly join Juventus (and not sign anyone)?
Put simply because, from a financial outlook, the deal just became appealing.
Heading into the window, unlike Miguel Almiron, Kelly was not necessarily viewed as a likely candidate to leave. The 26-year-old only joined from Bournemouth in July and with Newcastle keen to reduce the age profile of their defence and Kelly able to play both centre-half and left-back, he was viewed as a long-term addition.
Even early underwhelming performances did not change Eddie Howe’s view that Kelly could be a success, even if that turned out to be as a squad player who could cover two positions.
But when Sven Botman immediately usurped Kelly in the pecking order upon returning last month and with the former Bournemouth player last starting a Premier League match in November, once interest was shown, Newcastle’s hierarchy felt they had to at least explore deals for PSR reasons.
Kelly last started a Premier League game in November (Stu Forster/Getty Images)
Although Fenerbahce were not capable of tempting Newcastle to sell, and despite Juventus’ initial loan and low-ball enquiries falling short of the club’s valuation, eventually Paul Mitchell, the sporting director, negotiated an initial loan with an obligation to buy, potentially worth £20million.
For a player who has started only four league games and played just 302 top-flight minutes this season, the fee is borderline remarkable. Newcastle can bank it for the 2025-26 accounts, too, so it bolsters their PSR position heading into the summer, while Kelly’s wages are also off the books and he can potentially be replaced in the summer by a player on a lower salary.
Ideally, from a footballing outlook, Howe would not have lost a squad member of Kelly’s age and Premier League experience who can cover two positions. But from a purely business standpoint, it makes sense.
Newcastle have been adamant that they did not have the PSR capacity to recruit first-team signings this month and that Kelly’s sale is part of their financial housekeeping ahead of what is expected to be a busy summer.
Chris Waugh
Why haven’t Napoli spent any of the Kvaratskhelia money?
Napoli haven’t sat on their hands since the sale of Khvicha Kvaratskhelia.
The club’s sporting director, Giovanni Manna, has worked a number of angles to further reinforce a position covered ably by summer signings David Neres and Leonardo Spinazzola. Napoli flew out to Barcelona to talk to Alejandro Garnacho’s agents, however, their valuation of the young Argentine differed from the one held by Manchester United.
Karim Adeyemi, the rapid Borussia Dortmund forward, was another option Manna explored without success. While coach Antonio Conte hammered home what a loss Kvaratskhelia represented on the pitch, attention turned to more feasible alternatives than Garnacho and Adeyemi.
Napoli spent the last days of the window pursuing Allan Saint-Maximin, the ex-Newcastle entertainer now of Fenerbache. Even that was, to use Manna’s phrase, “a bit complicated”. On deadline day, they did add Noah Okafor on loan from Milan and they will have an option to buy the 24-year-old.
James Horncastle
Why did Brighton let Evan Ferguson join West Ham?
Evan Ferguson’s goals and appearances have fallen off a cliff since a hat-trick for Brighton against Newcastle in a 3-1 home win in September last season and another goal in a 3-2 victory at Nottingham Forest two months later. That took his tally to six goals in the opening 12 league games of the 2023-24 campaign under former head coach Roberto De Zerbi.
The talk at that stage was that the Republic of Ireland’s golden boy was a £90m No 9 in the making. A succession of injuries and irregular appearances since then have sapped Ferguson’s form and confidence. He went 33 appearances in all competitions without scoring over a period of 11 months before finding the net as a substitute in a 2-2 home draw against Wolves in October under De Zerbi’s successor Fabian Hurzeler.
Ferguson has struggled for goalscoring form (Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)
Ferguson has dropped behind Danny Welbeck, Joao Pedro and Georginio Rutter in the pecking order for the centre of Hurzeler’s attack. Widespread interest in loaning or buying him from top-flight clubs at home and abroad illustrated sustained faith in his potential.
West Ham were always the frontrunners once Graham Potter became head coach. Potter gave Ferguson his debut as a 16-year-old at Brighton before leaving for Chelsea in September 2022. Also, given both clubs are off the pace in the fight for European qualification, there is little prospect of West Ham achieving that goal at Brighton’s embarrassing expense.
Indeed, returning to goalscoring form under Potter, with the prospect of regular game time lacking at Brighton for the rest of the season, is what his parent club want to enhance his development and restore value before a fresh look at the situation in the summer.
Andy Naylor
Why did Al Nassr start bidding big at the end of their window?
Al Nassr were one of the four clubs taken over by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) in June 2023, which puts them in a position of having the means to splash the cash in a way many other clubs are unable to.
Their winter transfer window began with the appointment of a new chief executive, Majed Al-Jamaan, one of their former players, to replace Guido Fienga. It ended with a £64.5m plus add-ons deal to sign Jhon Duran from Aston Villa and two failed bids, with the second one worth £61m, for Brighton & Hove Albion’s Kaoru Mitoma.
Ronaldo’s side Al Nassr spent big on Duran (Abdullah Ahmed/Getty Images)
Sources close to Al Nassr, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect relationships, noted the arrival of Al-Jamaan as one of the factors for making a splash in January, while also pointing out that midfielder Seko Fofana and Cristiano Ronaldo’s strike partner, Anderson Talisca, both left the club in January, which meant replacements were needed.
Supporters have become frustrated at their side’s inability to compete for the Saudi Pro League title — Al Nassr are third, eight points behind joint leaders Al Hilal and Al Ittihad (also owned by PIF). There is a sense of Al-Jamaan wanting to inject some energy back into the stadium with attendances falling and give themselves a better chance of winning the AFC Champions League.
Dan Sheldon
Madrid wanted a defender — can they cope without one?
As always at Real Madrid since Carlo Ancelotti returned in 2021, it depends on who you ask.
For the board, there is no doubt they can. They share a belief with Ancelotti that the ideal scenario would be to have some reinforcements. But for them, it is more important to take maximum care of their accounts and they traditionally do not believe in the options available in this winter window. They also believe that there are solutions within the squad to deal with the numerous injuries and highlight the role that academy players can have.
Ancelotti’s side have not added a defender this window (Damien Meyer/AFP via Getty Images)
Ancelotti thinks differently, as happened in the past. In the summer of 2023, he asked for the signing of Harry Kane to cover the departure to Saudi Arabia of Karim Benzema and the club only made superficial moves for the Englishman, who joined Bayern Munich. In January 2024, after serious knee injuries to Eder Militao and David Alaba, Ancelotti asked for a centre-back, which never arrived. The same happened after they failed to sign Leny Yoro in the summer.
A training ground source told The Athletic weeks ago that: “Without a right-back, it is impossible to win the Champions League.” Dani Carvajal picked up a serious knee injury in October, so the only right-back available since then has been Lucas Vazquez. Real Madrid tried to bring forward the signing of Trent Alexander-Arnold to this window, but Liverpool rejected their attempt in December.
Mario Cortegana
Barcelona did not make any signings, but was this a successful window for them?
Yes, it was a successful one.
The name most commonly mentioned at Barcelona’s senior offices as a potential reinforcement was Manchester United’s Marcus Rashford, but he was seen as a non-priority player given how prolific Flick’s front line with Raphinha, Robert Lewandowski and Lamine Yamal has been this season.
But Deco’s biggest success has been, by far, securing key pieces in the squad for the foreseeable future.
Barcelona’s priority was to solve the contract situation of every player with 18 months left in their current contract. Pedri and Gavi were the two stand-out names in that department and both signed five-year extensions up until 2030.
Araujo has signed a new contract (David Ramos/Getty Images)
Captain Ronald Araujo also signed a new deal, despite having his future in doubt amid interest from Juventus this month. The centre-back’s long-term future at the club is not assured, though.
Barcelona and the player’s camp agreed to sign a new contract up until 2031, but with a low release clause to allow Araujo to find a way out in the summer if his situation at the club is not what he expects. Meanwhile, the club have shielded themselves from a rushed sale.
There is still more work to be done in that regard, as Frenkie de Jong, Andreas Christensen and Eric Garcia all have contracts expiring in the summer of 2026.
If, on top of that, you add the sell-on clause that Barcelona are going to cash in for Porto’s sale of Nico Gonzalez, a La Masia product, to Manchester City — expected to be worth around €20million — this was a decent window for the club.
Pol Ballus
Who moved on deadline day?
- Mathis Amougou (St-Etienne to Chelsea)*
- Marco Asensio (Paris Saint-Germain to Aston Villa, loan)
- Tyler Bindon (Reading to Nottingham Forest)
- Lewis Carrol (Aberdeen to Nottingham Forest)
- Ben Chilwell (Chelsea to Crystal Palace, loan)
- Carney Chukwuemeka (Chelsea to Borussia Dortmund, loan)
- Axel Disasi (Chelsea to Aston Villa, loan)*
- Marcus Edwards (Sporting CP to Burnley)
- Joao Felix (Chelsea to AC Milan, loan)*
- Evan Ferguson (Brighton to West Ham, loan)
- Santiago Gimenez (Feyenoord to AC Milan)
- Nico Gonzalez (Porto to Manchester City)
- Lloyd Kelly (Newcastle to Juventus, loan with £20m obligation to buy)
- Alvaro Morata (AC Milan to Galatasaray, loan)
- Mathys Tel (Bayern Munich to Tottenham Hotspur, loan)
*not confirmed as of 12am on February 4
(Top photos: Getty Images)
Sports
Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The attorneys general from Missouri and Florida have reacted strongly to the controversy stirred when Major League Baseball warned three San Francisco Giants players about inscribing a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps, and that reaction includes MLB being served with a subpoena that signals the launch of an official investigation.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched his investigation on Friday by serving MLB with a subpoena to investigate whether it is violating the civil rights of players based on their religious beliefs.
The general purpose and scope of Florida’s investigation “extend(s) to possible civil rights and deceptive and unfair trade practices violations in matters of employment concerning the business practices, policies, and procedures of Major League Baseball,” per the subpoena obtained by Fox News Digital.
In a letter from Uthmeier to MLB Commissioner Robert Manfred, the AG warns that “a pattern or practice of selectively enforcing its rules to benefit favored secular beliefs over disfavored religious beliefs would not only potentially violate Florida civil rights law, but it would also violate the League’s own policies.
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL FACES BACKLASH FOR ITS STANCE ON CHRISTIANS WRITING BIBLE VERSES ON PRIDE CAPS
“And a practice of claiming not to discriminate based on religion while discriminating based on religion could further amount to an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier speaks at a news conference in Orlando on July 15, 2025, where he said U.S. Masters Swimming should not allow transgender athletes to compete against women swimmers or face legal action. Advocates Cassidy Carlisle and Lainey Armistead also attended. (Rich Pope/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service)
Uthmeier is particularly troubled by the fact MLB said its warning had nothing to do with the players’ religious beliefs but rather was strictly because of a violation of the league’s uniform code.
It should be noted MLB said in a follow-up statement to its initial warning to the players that it was merely enforcing its uniform codes and the warning had nothing to do with Giants pitchers Landen Roupp, JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker writing a Bible verse on the team’s Pride Night Cap most of the other players wore.
MLB ACCUSED OF ‘DOUBLE STANDARD’ AFTER CALLING OUT PLAYERS’ BIBLE MESSAGES DESPITE BACKING BLM IN 2020
Uthmeier noted that doesn’t ring true and presented in his letter a handful of examples where MLB has been absolutely fine with players adding to their uniform.
“In 2019, for example, a Cincinnati Reds player wrote on his cap in tribute to a nearby mass shooting,” Uthmeier wrote to Manfred. “And in 2020, MLB evidently added new, sweeping exceptions to its uniform rules by allowing players to ‘support social justice and diversity and inclusion.’ These policy changes included permitting players to add Black Lives Matter patches to their sleeves.
“MLB therefore appears to applaud — even change its rules for — the ideological beliefs it prefers, but targets players who express religious views the League doesn’t like.”
Commissioner of Major League Baseball Robert D. Manfred Jr. speaks at the 2024 MLB Draft presented by Nike at Cowtown Coliseum in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 14, 2024. (Daniel Shirey/MLB Photos via Getty Images)
The Florida subpoena, issued under the Florida Civil Rights Act, demands action from MLB on July 23, 2026, at 9 a.m.. At that time, MLB must deliver to the AG’s office documents including:
- All documents concerning how MLB characterized or classified the June 2026 cap writing, including, for example, whether MLB treated it as religious expression, political messaging, protest, or a violation unrelated to its content.
- All documents concerning what prompted MLB’s review of and warning regarding the June 2026 cap writing, including any complaint, media inquiry, internal escalation, or third-party communication received before the warning issued, and the timing of each relative to the warning.
- All documents concerning the actual June 2026 warnings issued by the MLB to any club.
- All documents, including drafts and internal deliberations, concerning MLB’s decision to issue and publicly announce the June 2026 warnings, and any analysis of whether doing so adhered to the Code or with MLB’s treatment of comparable non-religious expression.
San Francisco Giants pitcher Landen Roupp wrote “Genesis 9:12-16” on his Pride-Night themed hat. (Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)
Uthmeier is thus joining Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, who recently wrote a letter to Manfred asking the commissioner to confirm that no player who has chosen to refrain from “wearing Pride Month paraphernalia or included Bible verses on Pride Month hats” will not be disciplined in any way.
Hanaway’s letter states that if Manfred fails to answer by June 25 or does not confirm that no discipline will be levied, she too will open an investigation of MLB.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The two attorneys general have authority over their individual states. But it affects four MLB teams.
Florida is home to two MLB teams — the Tampa Bay Rays and Miami Marlins — while Missouri is home to the St. Louis Cardinals and Kansas City Royals.
FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO
Sports
Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim
Amid the first days of grief after Alex Vesia and his wife lost their newborn daughter last fall, Vesia noticed something as he watched the World Series on television. He paused the broadcast, then checked the video, then texted another player to make sure.
51.
Dodgers teammates wore his number on their caps. So did players from the Toronto Blue Jays.
“It was awesome,” Vesia said. “It was a very heartwarming moment.”
Moving.
Touching.
And, under baseball’s rules, illegal.
Who knew, really, until this week? Three pitchers from the San Francisco Giants wrote the name of a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps and, amid an uproar, Major League Baseball said it had warned the players that “writing of any kind, with any message” on any playing apparel is not permitted. The issue, the league said in a statement, was not what they wrote on their caps but simply that they wrote on them at all.
Said MLB in the statement: “We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members.”
To its credit, the league did not enforce the rule when Vesia’s number started appearing on caps in the World Series. But, if you’re going to draw a line on enforcement, where should you draw it?
In San Francisco, the actions of the Giants’ pitchers were widely condemned.
“They were in for a rude awakening with the response, and it wasn’t just from the gay community,” Giants broadcaster and former pitcher Mike Krukow told KNBR, the team’s flagship radio station. “It was from the Northern California community that supports the gay community.”
In response to media inquiries, and as first reported by Outsports, MLB confirmed it had warned the three players. I asked the league whether warnings had been issued in two other instances in which players had written on their caps, including Clayton Kershaw last year writing the same Bible verse on his Pride Night cap that the Giants’ pitchers wrote this year. MLB declined to comment.
“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen told me, “and now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me.”
Treinen said league officials had told him the rule is strictly enforced.
“I straight up asked Clayton last year, ‘Did they call you when you put that on your hat?’” Treinen said. “He said, ‘No.’”
The Pride caps feature team logos decorated in the colors of the rainbow, a symbol long associated with the gay community. In the Bible verse cited by the pitchers (Genesis 9:12-16), the rainbow represents “the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures.”
That the league would warn players against writing a Bible verse on their caps ignited a wave of conservative outrage, from Vice President JD Vance to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.
Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley fired off a letter to MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, alleging apparent discrimination “against baseball players who profess their Christian faith” and threatening the league’s antitrust exemption. Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon said on national television that players might be able to file a claim for employment discrimination.
That is complete nonsense. This is what you want: When employees raise an issue to their employer, the employer listens and addresses their concerns.
In 2023, the year after five Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear rainbow logos for Pride Night, Manfred said the league would no longer compel players to do so.
“We have told teams, in terms of actual uniforms, hats, bases that we don’t think putting logos on them is a good idea just because of the desire to protect players: not putting them in a position of doing something that may make them uncomfortable because of their personal views,” Manfred said then.
Teammates congratulate Freddie Freeman after his walk-off home run gave the Dodgers a 1-0 win on June 5, when the Dodgers held their annual Pride Night. Blake Treinen, the winning pitcher that night, elected to wear his regular Dodgers cap instead of the Pride version.
(Katelyn Mulcahy / Getty Images)
Manfred said the Pride Night celebrations could go on, however a team wished to stage them — or not, in the case of the Texas Rangers, the only one of the 30 MLB teams that declines to hold a Pride Night. And the league still sells Pride gear on its website for all teams, including the Rangers.
In the cases of the Giants and Dodgers, MLB grandfathered each team’s long-running use of a rainbow logo on the cap, with this accommodation to players: If you don’t feel comfortable wearing the Pride cap, just wear your regular cap.
That is what Treinen and outfielder Alex Call did when the Dodgers celebrated Pride Night. That is also what a fourth Giants pitcher did.
“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen said. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”
To Treinen, the decision over whether to wear a Pride cap is not about passing judgment on anyone else but about what he sees as the push “to force something on people that you know that is controversial to their faith — and, in fact, straight up against their faith.”
He expressed his support for the Giants pitchers.
“Kudos to those men over there who are standing strong in their faith,” he said. “It’s a sad thing to corner someone and try to make them feel bad about their convictions.”
I respect Treinen for explaining his viewpoint. To me, wearing a Pride cap for one night does not diminish your faith at all. It might sharpen your convictions. More important, it signals a welcome to everyone in the community that buys the tickets and broadcast subscriptions that help pay your salary.
“I think a few people made it about themselves and not about the community,” San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie told the Bay Area Reporter.
We always proclaim the life lessons of sports. One of them: Sometimes you have to put the team’s interests ahead of your own.
Sports
2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round.
El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.
This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002.
With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026.
Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000.
Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.
This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.
Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination
Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)
Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).
Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:
1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD
What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.
-
Arizona2 minutes agoNew tractors help University of Arizona modernize farming in Yuma
-
Arkansas10 minutes agoAuthorities report 2 Tulsa residents found dead in Arkansas from apparent murder-suicide
-
California12 minutes ago
2 Northern California universities made U.S. News ‘Best Global’ list
-
Colorado17 minutes agoPikes Peak or Bust Parade canceled by organizers
-
Connecticut24 minutes agoPerson hospitalized in Westport crash that briefly closed I-95, officials say
-
Delaware27 minutes agoAll lanes open after I-69 closure in Delaware County
-
Florida32 minutes agoPilot program aims to build $200K homes in Central Florida to help low-income families buy, not rent
-
Georgia39 minutes agoGeorgia farmers on alert as New World Screwworm confirmed in Texas, New Mexico