Connect with us

Sports

We know more about quarterbacks’ arms than ever. Can NFL teams take advantage?

Published

on

We know more about quarterbacks’ arms than ever. Can NFL teams take advantage?

When Buffalo Bills star Josh Allen comes across YouTube clips of himself throwing passes for the University of Wyoming, he swears he doesn’t recognize that guy.

“It’s night and day in terms of the type of thrower I am,” Allen said this summer. “Where I held the ball, where I released the ball — it looks like a different guy. It’s kind of gross to look at sometimes. But I don’t think it’s as gross anymore.”

Allen, like many other NFL quarterbacks, spends time each offseason tweaking details of his throwing motion, “just trying to be as efficient as possible,” he said. And efficiency is the specialty of biomechanics experts such as Chris Hess, the founder of the 3D motion analysis company Biometrek.

A quarterback is a “rotational athlete,” one who rotates the body in order to throw, swing or hit. Hess and other specialists in the private sector specifically focus on the kinetic sequence, the transfer of energy during that rotation from the base of the body up through the arm.

An efficient thrower’s accuracy increases, biomechanists say, because his energy travels in the correct sequence: from legs to pelvis to torso to arm, with each reaching peak rotational velocity as the next begins. More efficient throwers also put less stress on their arms over time because the body properly produces and transfers the energy required to throw.

Advertisement

“Accuracy isn’t voodoo,” Hess likes to say, “it’s biomechanical science.”

Allen has worked with Hess and his motion-capture software since 2020 and believes this has helped make him a more accurate, controlled thrower. There is some evidence to support this. Allen’s completion percentage jumped from 52.8 and 58.8 in 2018 and 2019 to 69.2 percent in 2020 and has not dipped below 63 percent since (even while playing through a partially torn ulnar collateral ligament in his right elbow in 2022).

A rising number of NFL quarterbacks rely on independent professionals like Hess to incorporate biomechanics and its corresponding technology into their offseason training. Young stars like Allen, C.J. Stroud, Caleb Williams, Anthony Richardson and Brock Purdy have consulted with Hess to gather vast pools of data that tell them everything about how efficiently or inefficiently they throw using motion-capture technology.

After collecting and interpreting the data, Hess collaborates with physical therapists such as Dr. Tom Gormley to help them make body adjustments while private quarterbacks coaches such as Will Hewlett, Jordan Palmer and Adam Dedeaux fine-tune mechanics and technique. They develop injury prevention and recovery plans, pre-throw and post-throw routines and more — all with the hope of maximizing a quarterback’s arm, the tool that can make or break his career.

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

Building the perfect NFL QB: Meet the mysterious private coaches on the cutting edge

“It’s the most important position in all of sports, so you’re constantly evolving, trying to find ways to get mental reps, physical reps, without overdoing it,” said Bills GM Brandon Beane. “There is so much invested in that position that you are always looking for any area to improve to give your guys even the slightest advantage.”


Each spring, Hess travels the country to put quarterbacks through his motion capture programming at the request of their private coaches and occasionally NFL teams. His pack-and-go equipment, which uses high-resolution cameras to track movement rather than attaching sensors to the player, builds a perimeter of the cameras on a field like a super-sized imitation of a quarterback’s pocket.

The quarterback executes a range of spot throws from inside that pocket to establish a baseline. Once the system is calibrated, Hess has quarterbacks throw to receivers running a variety of routes. The quarterback can bootleg in and out of the perimeter of cameras, as the testing aims to simulate as many football movements as possible.

Streams of data emerge as the quarterback’s movement is translated by a computer into speed and energy outputs from every part of his body at each millisecond of every throw. Hess organizes the data into digestible pieces, including graphs and a visual display of the quarterback’s body as he throws — a skeleton frame with flashing colors that represent his energy transfer.

Advertisement

Hess and the physical therapists and private quarterbacks coaches he works with aren’t looking for massive issues. They emphasize the tiniest of adjustments that, over time, build the most efficient throwing motions possible.

“If you’re calling me, you’re ready for some granular information,” Hess said.

(Chris Hess / Biometrek)

For example, if a right-handed quarterback’s right leg extends even by a small degree before the pelvis starts to rotate — an issue common among throwers — that creates more forward momentum, not rotational momentum. Over time, such a movement puts more stress on the arm because the quarterback makes up for a lack of rotational energy by producing more effort with his shoulder/arm and tends to have less “feel” in his throw, which can turn into inaccuracy.

Once identified by Hess, the team of private specialists can introduce small, repetitive drills and exercises to correct the issue over weeks and months of offseason training.

Advertisement

“In 2020, when we first started working together, (Allen) felt like he had to rip every ball as hard as possible to get it to go where it was,” said Hess. “Whenever he had to throw something intermediate or short … he was kind of trying to de-accelerate his arm to slow the ball down to get touch. And it just made it so inconsistent.

“We gave him the information and helped him understand how to become rotational. Once he knew that, now Josh can speed up and slow down the ball with his body — the hand is just out there guiding the ball.”

Much of the science informing Hess and others comes from over a decade of research and application of biomechanics in baseball and golf.

“Baseball is pretty much light years ahead of the NFL as far as the ability to integrate sports science and also be data-driven,” said Dr. Emily Ferree, a physical therapist, biomechanist and movement specialist who consults for Major League Baseball teams, private quarterback coaches and NFL and college football players.

Advertisement

Baseball was an early investor in biomechanical application. There are dozens of “arms” in a given MLB team’s farm system, so huge amounts of data can be collected and studied each year, and technology and methods advance quickly as a result. The sport is even built to help keep that data clean. Pitchers may use different types of throws, but the ball is always thrown a specific distance from a specific spot on the field.

“There is a very repeatable, very controllable movement that you can test and measure (in a lab) that is almost identical to the performance environment,” Ferree said.

A quarterback can go into a play with a specific plan for his throw, but anything can happen after the snap to change that plan. What are his body and arm doing when he is scrambling away from pressure or suddenly opting to throw a sidearm pass while on the move in order to thread the ball between two defenders?

“There are so many things that happen in an NFL game that change the way the quarterback moves that it’s hard to do a singular throwing evaluation,” said Ferree. “That doesn’t mean that I don’t think it’s worth it. It gives us their baseline movement pattern — this is how your arm works, this is how it connects to your torso, this is how you generally transfer energy from your lower extremities to your upper extremities, this is how efficient you are, this is how (in)-efficient you are.”

Biomechanics-specific motion capture technology has proven useful in injury prevention and recovery. Ferree often sees quarterbacks try to “protect their elbow” as they return to throwing after a significant arm surgery (such as the UCL repair Purdy underwent in 2023, when he worked with Gormley and Hewlett throughout the recovery process). Their rotation changes — which has a ripple effect on the rest of their body.

Advertisement

“They just really aren’t efficient in their throwing motion,” Ferree said, “Motion capture in the rehab process can be huge because it allows you to track their arm path and basically tailor their throwing program to make sure they’re coming back as efficiently and as well as possible.”

The technology can also help quantify fatigue. Biomechanics experts can now see exactly when a thrower begins to wear down because they can measure micro changes in their transfer of energy. From there, experts can plan the quarterback’s ideal workload through the course of a practice week.

(Chris Hess / Biometrek)

Many NFL strength and conditioning and medical staffs collaborate with quarterbacks using data gathered from private offseason specialists to formulate an overall plan for injury recovery, arm maintenance and workload management. But the investment in sports science, medical and conditioning staffs and technology varies among the 32 organizations.

Some owners are simply willing to spend more money in that area than others. Plus, the NFL can be a hard environment for experimenting with new data and technology — some teams feel there is not enough time or comfort to try new things while maintaining care for a 90-man offseason roster and 53-man in-season roster.

Advertisement

Some quarterbacks want more than teams can offer — or simply feel more comfortable working with specialists where they can receive niche programming. At times, there have been highly publicized rifts between a quarterback and his independent coaches on one side and the organization on the other (think Tom Brady and Alex Guerrero chafing against Bill Belichick in the mid-2010s) that have given owners pause when working with the private sector.

Bridging the gap between those specialists and an NFL team requires balance. NFL teams have to look at the entire roster when choosing which technologies they champion and which experts they employ. Certain quarterback-specific practices, for example, are of no use to the rest of the players on the roster. A sports performance director, and ultimately a team’s owner, decides whether an investment is worth it or not.

A team could hire a quarterback-focused biomechanist and invest in its own motion capture technology, similar to the model of many MLB teams, but what other role would that person hold in an NFL building? The work done by private specialists includes making tiny adjustments to how a player throws and his workload to maximize arm strength and preserve its health. Would that bump up against the work of NFL team’s quarterbacks coach? It might not matter — quarterbacks coaches in some buildings are more focused on game planning and play installation during the season and less on actual player development.

Scoop City Newsletter
Scoop City Newsletter

Free, daily NFL updates direct to your inbox.

Advertisement

Free, daily NFL updates direct to your inbox.

Sign UpBuy Scoop City Newsletter

Turnover also works against the full implementation of biomechanical data and training methods. Gathering enough data to turn into useful applications can take years. A lack of continuity at head coach and in the front office can sometimes mean the same in a team’s athletic training and sports medicine departments.

Some teams outsource biomechanical work, especially for quarterbacks. In that case communication with the quarterback about the data gathered from his offseason training — and an understanding of how to apply it from late July to February, when the player is with the team — is crucial.

“We are in an unprecedented time with this steep curve of technology coming out so fast — more than we probably can ingest it, to be honest,” said Tyler Williams, the Minnesota Vikings’ VP of player health and performance. “That gets a little dangerous. You’re trying to figure out, ‘How do we filter out the noise’?”

Under Williams, the Vikings test certain technologies throughout the year, accumulating data in as real a football environment as possible and studying the results over a long time. The team puts accelerometers in its practice footballs to measure changes in velocity, rotation and distance. They match those changes with movement trackers that assess energy output and stress on the body and parse this in combination with motion capture software and practice film.

The idea is to see what patterns might emerge regarding how players expend energy, the effect of certain movements and drills on the body and more.

Advertisement

“You’re pairing biomechanical (study), motion capture, different variables. It gives you a way further granular picture of how the quarterback moves (and) what makes them successful,” Williams said.

“You’re building a picture with puzzle pieces. In 1985, we were using the little kid puzzles that had eight pieces. … Eventually, with mobile motion capture, accelerometers, on-field player tracking from RFID technologies, force plate technologies — all of these different types of entities — we can measure the athlete (with), now we’re probably playing with a picture that is like, a 500-piece puzzle.”


Rams QB Matthew Stafford flips a sidearm pass during the playoffs last season in Detroit. (David Reginek / USA Today)

Like the Vikings, the Rams’ sports science department — once led by Williams and now by Trent Frey, who spent the last six years in a similar role with the NHL’s Los Angeles Kings — places sensors in the practice footballs. The Rams also collect movement tracking data for the entire roster and can quantify energy output per movement, which helps when building workload management plans for players.

Frey and the Rams’ medical and strength and conditioning staff then work with coaches to script out practices and weight room periods. The idea is to get every player as individualized a plan as possible while keeping a team atmosphere intact. The quarterback will not have the same weight training and injury prevention programming as a receiver, who will not have the same programming as a defensive end and so on.

It wasn’t so long ago, said Rams director of strength and conditioning Justin Lovett, that NFL quarterbacks protested getting pulled off of “the main lift” (the group weight training session) in the interest of more specialized training.

Advertisement

“There was a little bit of a culture shock,” Lovett said. “The coaches and the quarterbacks would say, ‘I need my guys to see us work.’ … Sometimes that would cut at the grit or the culture that your head coach is trying to establish.”

Lovett wants to blend the months of independent offseason training and biomechanics work into a much tighter NFL ramp-up period in the spring. “It’s really accessing that network and then carrying where they left off,” he said.

When Hess works with quarterbacks, he runs them through a final motion capture session right before OTAs, and the player’s team receives the results. From there, Gormley or another specialist can explain what adjustments he and the player’s private coach made, what warmup and recovery exercises they implemented — and show exactly why using Hess’ data.

With the Rams, Gormley went a step further. Lovett hosted him for two days this spring at their practice facility in Thousand Oaks, Calif., to talk to the strength and conditioning and sports performance staff about biomechanics and the physical application of available technology.

Lovett believes the private sector has gotten so advanced that it can give an open-minded team an edge in building out its quarterback’s in-season training plan. External specialists and the quarterbacks they work with in the offseason have more information about a thrower’s arm than ever before.

Advertisement

As investments into the position increase by millions each year, figuring out how to best tap into that information year-round might be NFL teams’ next advantage.

(Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; photos: Robin Alam / ISI Photos, Brian Rothmuller / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Sports

A new board game mocks Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for ‘foul baiting.’ He wants it destroyed

Published

on

A new board game mocks Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for ‘foul baiting.’ He wants it destroyed

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander apparently isn’t amused by a new board game that pokes fun at the Oklahoma City Thunder star’s reputation for garnering foul calls at the hint of contact by an opposing player.

Last week, a lawyer representing the two-time reigning NBA MVP sent a cease-and-desist letter to sports prediction market and fantasy sports company Underdog that includes a demand for the destruction of all copies of the cheeky and extremely limited-edition game Unethical Hoops.

Done in the style of the children’s classic Operation, Unethical Hoops requires players to use tweezers to pull objects from tiny holes, with the slightest touch of a metal border setting off a buzzer indicating failure.

Instead of pretending to be doctors attempting to remove body parts from a patient, however, Unethical Hoops players act as members of an opposing basketball team trying to take the ball from a cartoon character who very much resembles Gilgeous-Alexander.

In this game, the buzzer represents the whistle of a foul-calling referee.

Advertisement

“Shai has made hoops all about foul baiting and now you’re stuck guarding him in Underdog’s new board game,” a description reads on the game’s website. “Don’t get baited. Steal the ball without getting whistled.”

In a letter dated May 22, attorney Eric Fishman of ArentFox Schiff LLP demanded that Underdog “immediately and permanently cease and desist from any and all use of Mr. Gilgeous-Alexander’s NIL in any and all media, including but not limited to your website (including the Unethical Hoops Website)… and any physical goods including but not limited to the board game advertised on the Unethical Hoops Website.”

The notice also calls for Underdog to “immediately destroy all physical goods or advertisements that use Mr. Gilgeous-Alexander’s NIL, including but not limited to the board game advertised on the Unethical Hoops Website,” as well as a promise never to use the star player’s name, image or likeness without his permission.

Fishman did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Times.

According to the Unethical Hoops website, which remains active more than a week after the date on the cease-and-desist order, only 100 copies of the game were made, to be given away to Underdog users. The giveaway ended as scheduled on Friday.

Advertisement

Underdog declined to comment on the matter other than to point out that the company has pulled comical stunts at the expense of members of the sports world.

“We’ve poked fun at Knicks and Lakers fans, the Red Sox owners, the Mets and more,” a spokesperson said via email. “We like to have some fun with whatever is in the sports fan zeitgeist.”

Gilgeous-Alexander is a four-time All-Star who led the league in scoring last season (2,484 points) and was second in scoring this season (2,117). He led the Thunder to their first NBA title last year and has them back in the Western Conference finals this year (the decisive Game 7 against the San Antonio Spurs is Saturday in Oklahoma City).

While one of the NBA’s biggest stars, Gilgeous-Alexander is often criticized for the number of favorable foul calls he receives — he has ranked second or third in the league for number of free throw attempts per game in each of the last four seasons and is currently second among all players in the 2026 playoffs with 9.8 a game — and the lengths he appears to go to in order to receive them.

After Game 2 against the Spurs, one NBA fan account on X wrote, “Shai flopped on every single shot attempt” and posted a video that showed seven such examples (Gilgeous-Alexander actually attempted 24 shots that night). The post has been viewed 22.7 million times.

Advertisement

Earlier this week, prior to Game 6 of the conference finals, another fan account on X posted a video “ranking all 44 times SGA fell on the floor while shooting during the 2026 playoffs from least to most egregious.” That post has been viewed 1.3 million times.

As the cartoon likeness of Gilgeous-Alexander states in the Unethical Hoops ad, “so much as breathe on me, I’m getting the call.”

The real-life SGA was asked during a TV interview after Game 3 in San Antonio about the “flopper!” chants that rained down on him at Frost Bank Center.

“It’s part of the game,” he said. “It’s nothing. I’ve been dealing with it for a long time. I don’t really hear it. I’m focused on what’s going on on the court.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

Spurs blow out Thunder, force Game 7 as Victor Wembanyama leads the way with 28-point double-double

Published

on

Spurs blow out Thunder, force Game 7 as Victor Wembanyama leads the way with 28-point double-double

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Western Conference Finals will come down to a Game 7 after the San Antonio Spurs routed the Oklahoma City Thunder, 118-91, in Game 6 on Thursday night.

Advertisement

Game 7 heads back to Oklahoma City, where the winner will face the New York Knicks in the NBA Finals after New York swept the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference Finals.

With their backs against the wall, the Spurs did what was necessary on their home court and then some. And it was their phenom, Victor Wembanyama, leading the way.

Victor Wembanyama of the San Antonio Spurs reacts during the first half against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game Six of the NBA Western Conference Finals at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, on May 28, 2026. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

The 7-foot-4 big man led the Spurs with 28 points on 10-of-21 shooting, including four three-pointers made, while notching a double-double with 10 rebounds, two assists, two steals and three blocks.

Advertisement

This was the performance head coach Mitch Johnson and the rest of the team needed from Wembanyama, and he was up for the challenge as the Thunder were looking to make it back-to-back NBA Finals appearances.

Instead, the Thunder’s three-point shooting woes returned in San Antonio, much like they did in Game 4 of this series. They took a whopping 40 threes, but only cashed in 10 of them, finishing 25% from beyond the arc on the night.

SPURS SNAP THUNDER’S PLAYOFF WIN STREAK BEHIND VICTORY WEMBANYAMA’S INCREDIBLE GAME 1 PERFORMANCE

As a team, the Thunder shot just 37%, and MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is among the culprits for the poor shooting night. He had just 15 points, going 6-of-18 from the field and 0-of-5 from three-point land. Lu Dort was also ice cold from three, going just 1-of-9 and 2-of-11 for the game.

Meanwhile, San Antonio was getting more than just “Wemby” contributions, especially from rookie Dylan Harper, who played a vital role in the blowout off the bench.

Advertisement

Dylan Harper of the San Antonio Spurs looks on during the first quarter against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 6 of the NBA Western Conference Finals at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, on May 28, 2026. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Harper was quite efficient when he had the ball in his hands, going 6-of-9 from the field for 18 points, while tallying six rebounds and four assists in his pivotal 22 minutes off the pine.

And in the starting five, Stephon Castle was getting to the rim like he’s supposed to, scoring 17 points while dishing out nine assists for the Spurs. Devin Vassell also hit four of his seven three-point shots for 12 points, while Julian Champagnie poured in 10 more with six rebounds, two assists, one steal and two blocks on the other end of the hardwood.

The Spurs saw 12 different players contribute on the scoreboard in this contest, some of whom made their way into the game when the Thunder conceded and already started to focus on Game 7. And that swing came in the third quarter, when the Spurs outscored the Thunder, 32-13, and started to run away with this must-win game for their franchise.

San Antonio Spurs forward Victor Wembanyama shoots against the Oklahoma City Thunder in the first half of Game 6 in the Western Conference finals NBA playoffs in San Antonio on May 28, 2026. (David J. Phillip/AP)

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Now, folks, it all comes down to the ever-suspenseful Game 7, where the Thunder will hope one last home game will give them the juice to push their way into the Finals.

But the Spurs are hoping to recreate 1999 by earning a matchup with the Knicks in the NBA Finals.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

High school softball: Playoff scores and schedule

Published

on

High school softball: Playoff scores and schedule

SOUTHERN SECTION FINALS

At Bill Barber Park, Irvine

Thursday’s Results

DIVISION 7

Edgewood 4, Ramona Convent 1

Advertisement

DIVISION 6

Irvine 15, Arroyo 2

Friday’s Schedule

DIVISION 1

La Mirada vs. JSerra, 7 p.m.

Advertisement

DIVISION 2

Whittier Christian vs. Mater Dei, 4 p.m.

Saturday’s Schedule

DIVISION 3

Riverside Prep vs. Great Oak, 7 p.m.

Advertisement

DIVISION 4

Mission Viejo at Oxnard, 4 p.m.

DIVISION 5

Grace vs. Northwood, 10 a.m.

DIVISION 8

Advertisement

Arroyo Valley vs. San Bernardino, 1 p.m.

CITY SECTION FINALS

FRIDAY’S SCHEDULE

At Legacy

OPEN DIVISION

Advertisement

#1 Granada Hills vs. #2 Carson, 6:30 p.m.

DIVISION III

#5 South East vs. #15 Reseda, 4 p.m.

SATURDAY’S SCHEDULE

At Birmingham

Advertisement

DIVISION I

#1 Venice vs. #6 Eagle Rock, 2 p.m.

DIVISION II

#1 L.A. Marshall vs. #6 Arleta, 11 a.m.

DIVISION IV

Advertisement

#4 Huntington Park vs. #14 Franklin, 11:30 a.m.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending