One lucky Southern Californian is the state’s newest lottery winner after numbers for the $464 million Mega Millions jackpot were drawn Friday night.

The winning numbers were 22, 38, 48, 51, 61 and the Megaball number was 5. The Megaplier was 3X.

One SoCal ticket matched five numbers and will take home $1,016,356. The winning ticket was sold at Pavilions Place supermarket located at 21181 Newport Coast Drive in Newport Beach.

However, that ticket was not the grand prize winner as no one was able to match all six numbers to claim the $464 million jackpot.

The jackpot will increase to an estimated $498 million for next Tuesday night’s drawing on Aug. 20.

The odds of winning a Mega Millions jackpot is about 1 in 302.6 million.

USA Mega, which tracks Mega Millions statistics, says the most common Mega Millions numbers are 10, 3, 17, 14 and 46 for the first five numbers. The most common Mega ball number is 11.

Mega Millions is played in 45 states and the District of Columbia. Tickets are $2 and there are a total of nine ways to win a prize. Drawings are held every Tuesday and Friday at 8 p.m.

If your electric bill this month was sky high, it wasn’t just scorching summer heat that was to blame, and you’re NOT alone. Many Southern California Edison customers are feeling the heat living with the TOU pricing system: That’s ‘Time of Use.’ 

Put into effect in 2020 and 2021, TOU pricing is exactly what it says: You pay different rates for your electricity depending on the time of day you are using it. As SCE puts it, it costs more to produce and deliver electricity during different times of day, so this is supposed to provide “an incentive for customers to shift electricity use away from more expensive peak hours.” 

SCE admits rates will generally be higher during summer weekday afternoons. If you run the AC, work at home, do laundry during those hours, you are paying MORE than if you wait and do those things during later or off-peak hours. 

We asked SCE for specific data on what the TOU pricing has done to people’s bills. 

It didn’t provide that info. Anecdotally, this user (I am an SCE customer) has seen the afternoon TOU bill get much larger, especially with two kids home during the hot southern California summer. 

While working on this story, we received email after email from KTLA viewers: 

Linda Lynch, a KTLA viewer in the Antelope Valley, was shocked to see that her electric bill skyrocketed to $900 this month, hundreds MORE than usual. Linda writes that she can barely afford food, never mind electricity.

We should point out that the Antelope Valley in Southern California saw excessive heat warnings issued for stretches of days this month. The warnings are issued when heat is forecast to be extreme and often come with an advisory to keep cool and only go out if necessary. 

And Linda wasn’t the ONLY one who emailed. 

Carla Chang writes, “Hello! Please look into whyyyyyy Edison is charging so much for electricity. People are receiving $600-$1000 bills.” 

Sarah Clifford sent us her bill which was $1128 this month alone, and Sara says that’s the “discounted rate.” Sarah says she keeps her thermostat at 78 degrees whenever possible. 

Melissa Avalos says, “There has been a rise in our electricity bills that is beyond this earth. We went from paying $86 dollars a month to $400 dollars a month and don’t even run our air at night. Something needs to be done as we are seniors and barely making enough to cover this increase.” 

Not all of this may be due to TOU pricing, although at least some of these are SCE customers on TOU rates. After all, it has been a record-breaking hot summer. But many are asking—IS THIS FAIR?

People use electricity when they need it. People pay their electric bills. Why should people be penalized because they need to use electricity in the middle of the afternoon?

We put the question to KTLA consumer expert David Lazarus.

“Time of use pricing for power might strike some as unfair,” Lazarus said. “After all, energy is energy. Why should the price change at different times of the day? In fact, it’s a pricing system that makes good economic sense, rewarding consumers for responsible use of resources.” 

Lazarus acknowledges that may be little consolation for people getting their bills this month. 

When TOU pricing was first put into effect, customers were transitioned into TOU pricing unless they OPTED OUT. Edison points out that if you ARE seeing bills skyrocket with TOU pricing—you CAN still use the rate plan comparison and see if something called a “tiered rate plan” is better. 

Under a tiered rate plan, the bill you pay is based on the TOTAL amount of energy you use, regardless of WHEN you use it. Rate Plan Comparison | Rates | Your Home (sce.com). SCE also points out that there are potential discounts for those who qualify and are having trouble paying their bills.

No matter WHICH plan you use, Laz says he’s not surprised customers—especially in lower income brackets—are feeling the squeeze.

“Consumer advocates correctly warn that lower-income households could face higher bills if utilities boost prices during intervals of high demand,” he said. “It’s the same issue ride-share companies ran into when they introduced ‘surge pricing’ – higher fares during times of high demand. Consumers viewed that as a money grab. It’s a perception utilities need to avoid” 

Gabriela Ornelas, SCE spokesperson, tells KTLA, “The greatest impact we see on monthly bills is overall energy use, regardless of the rate plan.” She says there IS help available, “We know high electric bills can be hard. We have resources for customers and tips to help save on summer bills.”

Those resources and tips can be found here: https://energized.edison.com/stories/tips-for-customers-to-save-on-summer-bills.

On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a new proposal that would require oil refineries to keep a minimum supply of fuel reserves in hopes of avoiding future supply shortages and price hikes for consumers.

The governor’s plan would direct the California Energy Commission to require petroleum refiners to follow the new guidelines. The governor hopes the proposal will help keep supply and prices stable even when refineries undergo maintenance.

Penalties would be imposed on refiners who fail to follow the new guidelines.

According to Newsom, scheduled maintenance periods at oil refineries resulted in low supply and high prices for consumers. If the proposal had been in effect in 2023, Californians would’ve saved upwards of $650 million in gas costs.

“Price spikes at the pump are profit spikes for Big Oil. Refiners should be required to plan ahead and backfill supplies to keep prices stable instead of playing games to earn even more profits. By making refiners act responsibly and maintain a gas reserve, Californians would save money at the pump every year,” Newsom said in a statement.

Newsom also pointed out that Australia, Japan and the European Union have passed similar regulations.

However, not everyone is on board with the proposed plan. Representatives of California’s oil industry said in a statement that Newsom’s claims that oil refineries intentionally planned maintenance during busy driving seasons are “purposely misleading” and show an utter lack of understanding about their industry.

“To impose new operational mandates on energy producers based on such falsehoods is regulatory malpractice, and ignores the logistical challenges and costs associated with such a plan.  When this administration is ready to have a serious discussion about the facts and the policies this state has imposed that affect consumer costs, we will be there,” Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president and CEO of the Western States Petroleum Association, said in a statement.

California lawmakers would have to approve the proposal before it can be officially implemented. The current legislative session ends on Aug. 31.

For years, Newsom has been at odds with oil companies. He has often alluded to the fact that oil companies are the reason gas prices are high in California.