West Virginia
What I Think About The Coal Rush Game
Welcome back to your weekly column where we can rationally and irrationally discuss the state of affairs of the West Virginia Mountaineers football program. Last night was one of the bigger games in a season where big games are going to happen and the program needs to take three or four steps forward. It is Neal Brown’s best team in his six years at the helm of this program and he is blessed with a dual-threat quarterback who is fast and slippery enough to make plays appear out of thin air; he has a senior, capable offensive line that grades out as one of the best units in the country; two very capable and very different running backs and supposedly had a very good transfer portal class. All in all, we aren’t judging this game and this tenure on one outcome or one play, we are judging it on the culmination of six years and the words spoken by the head coach
We’re coming off a 9-4 (season), I look at most of the preseason Top 25 (lists), we’re not in it,” Brown said. “With a team that finished strong last year, that returns a lot of production, that has one of the most-dynamic players in all of college football in (quarterback) Garrett Greene … and we’re picked seventh in the league. And we’re not in most of these preseason Top 25s.
Let’s talk about it.
Iowa State
This was a good game and Iowa State is a good team. They are a smart, talented, well-coached team that does everything you want in your program. They have smart quarterbacks who can make throws and pick up yards when needed. They have tough running backs. Matt Campbell has concocted a defensive scheme that forces you to use the entire field and earn your points.
Losing to Iowa State is not losing to Iowa State from 2012-2017. Iowa State is a good team. Matt Campbell is a good coach. This year Iowa State was 5-0 entering Morgantown and there were questions about just how good they were, “who have they played?” were the questions asked. Maybe those questions are still asked because who have they played and beaten but this game was different. Morgantown. At Night. COAL RUSH. IT was supposed to be harder and in some rights, it was a hard game for the Cyclones. West Virginia got the ball and the lead early. Iowa State misses a field goal and that fickle mistress of momentum was all with the Mountaineers.
Then came the passes. Then came the miscues. Then came the playing right into Iowa State’s hand. Bad snaps. Bad reads. Bad throws. Miscues on the defensive side. All the things that happen all the time to teams that are coached by Brown. It came unraveled in a way that is familiar and haunting and tiresome. So tiresome.
Losing to Iowa State wasn’t on any one person and in reality losing as an unranked team to a highly ranked visitor shouldn’t cause fans to be angry in droves, because the game was good, we were in the ball game competitively for 50 minutes before we made too many mistakes, but those mistakes are always happening and always a reason why WVU can’t overcome itself. The rakes returned.
Brandon Yates
According to Brown, Yates had a hand issue that contributed to the bad snaps and while Brown contemplated changing centers but Yates is their starting center and in their opinion their best guy so no change was made. Probably should have been.
Whether we should have or shouldn’t have, that’s probably up for discussion. Brandon had played so well. He’s our starting center…. he’s clearly our best option….
Garrett Greene
I feel for Greene. At this point, he is who he is, which is a one-two read guy and then scramble and teams know this and have a certain type of defense they play. They have to carry a single or double spy to contain Greene and they have to stop the run. This should, in theory, open up the pass but Greene does struggle with the intermediary passing game, specifically the crossing routes and timing routes of the position. He is generally good on the deeper routes so teams play a deeep safety and double or triple the deep receiver and take their chances on the inter-middle throws. It worked well for this game as Iowa State as the Cyclones held Greene to 18/32 for 200 yards and picked him off twice.
What Iowa State did well was get ahead and force Greene to have to play a game he isn’t comfortable playing, threading the needle against 7-8 coverage and having no real room to run. Greene is capable of making those plays in those situations and when West Virginia gets in that situation they can’t overcome themselves.
The Neal Brown Tenure
I wanted to talk about this but felt that I needed to talk about the game first and to be honest, I felt nothing. It was what it was. I thought we’d lose, I thought we would do some dumb stuff that cost us and in general I didn’t really expect us to win or be competitive or do anything worth noting.
Neal Brown is now 3-16 versus Top 25 teams but where is Brown in relation to the past coaches. Let’s look. Just to remind you I did all of this research years ago. Those who are doing it now can just quote me since I did it SEVEN YEARS AGO. (Still ahead of the curve on this stuff!)
Since I wrote that, Dana would go 4-4 and finish with a 10-21 record against Top 25 teams.
Nehlen – 27%
Rodriguez – 46%
Stewart – 50%
Holgorsen – 32%
Brown – 15%
To match Nehlen, Brown would have to win 3 straight Top 25 matchups. To match Dana, he would need to win 5 straight. To match Rodriguez he would need to win 10 straight. To match Stewart he would have to win 14 straight.
At this point we know that big games and Neal Brown don’t mix. He has never beaten a team that finished ranked. He has been ranked one week in his entire tenure and that was in the coaches poll at 25. Not in the AP. In the coaches poll where GAs fill out the ballot and coaches game the system to make their team better week to week.
Next week will be much of the same and as the seat warmer overheats and gets hot, West Virginia will go to Arizona and make a statement and get back to 4-4. Then a loss to Cincy, but a bounce-back against Baylor and UCF, sitting at 6-5 and a loss to Texas Tech to finish the year.
Nothing changes. Nothing gets better. Nothing moves. Dear West Virginia administration do the merciful thing. Do the right thing. Make the call that needs to be made. Right now fans are not apathetic, they are not mad, they are DONE. Fans are choosing to go pick pumpkins with their wives, paint the boat, mow the yard, help their in-laws, do homework, they are actively choosing NOT to watch your product. They don’t want to be a part of this anymore because they worry that you are going to tell us at 7-5 this was fine. The team sold out multiple games. Season tickets were sold and lots of people came to games so everything is ok. Its not ok. We’re tired. There is no joy with this team. There is no fun with this team. There is nothing to tell me that next week will be better. There is nothing to tell me that I should believe. My money isn’t going to the football team anymore. Why should the fans of this team spend money when every time they do they get reminded of why they shouldn’t? You have to do better. WE have this conversation every week. If we were dating, my friends would tell me to just break up with you by now. Your friends would be asking “why are you with him if you fight all the time”? You know how that relationship goes, you stay, you try, you promise and then finally one of you acts like an adult and does the mercy killing and you both realize how much better you are now that you aren’t shackled to the dead weight you had. Dear Wren, Dear Gee, Dear Athletic Department, end this madness and let’s start over. This isn’t working and we need to be single for a while.
West Virginia
Community Catalyst Grant applications are open through West Virginia First Foundation through June 30 – WV MetroNews
The West Virginia First Foundation, which was established to use drug lawsuit settlement money to try to alleviate problems related to addiction, reported having access to $378.5 million in financial resources and noted that more than $34 million in grants have been awarded since the organization’s start.
The West Virginia First Foundation met for a few minutes Thursday at Ascend West Virginia in Charleston. The meeting was also available for view through streaming.
Executive Director Jonathan Board highlighted the launch of the Community Catalyst Grant application and a statewide needs assessment intended to identify service gaps.
Designed as a three-year, outcomes-driven investment, the program will support projects focused on public safety response, day report centers and generational prevention efforts. The program opened for applications on June 1 and remains open through June 30.
“We’re very encouraged by the interest and engagement so far,” Board said.
The board also approved a $4 million funding request for the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute. The project is focused on expanding access to innovative addiction treatment and recovery support tools while building the technology and infrastructure needed to support implementation across West Virginia.
Additional details about the project and funding agreement are to be released in the coming weeks following the completion of final documentation. West Virginia First Foundation and Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute plan to issue a joint announcement once the agreement process is complete.
“They’ve gone through a very rigorous process for the correct funding,” Board said. “Their team has presented an opportunity to fund a project that will build technology, training and support systems of care needed to expand access to an innovative addiction treatment approach throughout the state of West Virginia, and really beyond.”
The West Virginia First Foundation is a non-profit organization established in 2023 to manage and distribute 72.5% of the state’s opioid settlement funds, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. The organization is aimed at combatting the addiction crisis through grants and regional projects.
The next regular meeting of the Foundation’s Board of Directors is scheduled for Sept. 17 although it’s subject to change.
West Virginia
What UNC Head Coach Scott Forbes Said About West Virginia
West Virginia may have come up empty-handed in two tries against North Carolina in the College World Series, but they earned the respect of their head coach, Scott Forbes, who was incredibly complimentary of the Mountaineers following Wednesday’s game.
“I want to congratulate West Virginia. A heck of a team, a heck of a run,” he opened his postgame press conference with. “They are very well coached. They just play the game the right way. It’s a credit to their coaching staff. They come at you a lot of ways. A lot of speed, deep pitching staff, so we really had to work in those two games to beat them. I’ve been in their shoes, and I know what that feels like, and it’s a stinker. But man, they got a lot to be proud of, and they should be extremely proud of how they represented their university.”
The culture at WVU is as strong as it gets
Multiple times this season, West Virginia looked like they were well on their way to a loss and were rewarded with a win because they never stopped playing hard. Everyone thinks of the two games against Kentucky in the Morgantown Regional, and rightfully so, but they also came back to win after trailing by eight against UCF and after trailing by five to BYU.
For a moment, there was a belief that the magical moment was going to come again during Wednesday’s game against Forbes’ Tar Heels. With two outs in the 7th and trailing 12-1, Armani Guzman busted his tail down the first base line to beat out a grounder to short. It ultimately led to a five-run inning for the Mountaineers, all of a sudden turning a laugher into a semi-interesting game. Gavin Kelly hit a solo home run in the 8th to make it a five-run deficit, and in the ninth, Ben Lumsden just missed a three-run shot that would have really put pressure on North Carolina, even with two outs.
To have your team still playing hard when trailing by 11 with their season likely about to come to an end, it says a lot about the character of this group, but also how deeply ingrained the culture is at WVU. There’s a reason this program has turned the corner over the last 14 or so years and is continuing to trend up. They’ve had the right people in place leading it.
Follow
West Virginia
Proposed 107.5-mile transmission line could leave W.Va. ratepayers on hook for $440M-$900M
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (WCHS) — A 107.5-mile transmission line project has been proposed, the MidAtlantic Resiliency Link, which would cut through parts of West Virginia to ultimately help power Virginia’s data center hub since there is not enough generation locally to serve them.
“Virginia gets the power and West Virginia gets the towers,” Del Chris Anders said. “What they did is they look west and said, hey, we’ll just use West Virginia but we’ll get this power and we’ll run this big extension cord. I’m all for exporting power from West Virginia. We are a power production state, but I’m not going to do so out of the wallets of West Virginians and allowing their property to be taken.”
During the 2026 legislative session, lawmakers put a bill on the table which was aimed at giving the state access to utilize these lines, but nothing made it to the finish line.
“We said, ‘Okay, if you’re going to run them through, you have to drop substations in West Virginia and by the way, West Virginia ratepayers will only pay for the amount of energy that stays within our state,’” Anders said.
A second line is also up for discussion. Valley Link Transmission hasn’t finalized any routes yet, but it would consist of 260 miles of transmission line and would add two substations between Frederick County, Maryland, and Putnam County.
With both of these lines, the main concern surrounding the proposals is who exactly is expected to foot the bill and whether or not it will ultimately fall back on West Virginia ratepayers.
“We’re going to be on the hook for anywhere between $440 million to over $900 million on both lines,” Anders said.
Lawmakers said those price tags continue to increase.
“At least for the MARL line, they went back to the grid operator, PJM, and said, ‘It’s going to cost significantly more money than it originally thought. Those estimates of the cost to West Virginia ratepayers are only going to go up,’” Del. Evan Hansen said.
These projects have gained bipartisan opposition. This is all beginning when representatives for these energy companies brought these proposals to lawmakers in January, noting that these lines would strengthen the entire grid.
But many lawmakers were not convinced, asking why they should support it if West Virginia has no direct benefit.
“It would increase our electric rates and private property owners might be faced with giving up their land or having their property values decline,” Hansen said.
It’s not only state officials voicing opposition. Public hearings have been held in the northern counties where community members shared their concerns with these projects that could go right through their backyards.
“We did hear from construction workers and electrical workers about the jobs, but otherwise it was uniformly against the construction of the project,” Hansen said.
An evidentiary hearing for MARL’s permit application will be held by the Public Service Commission on Oct. 26.
-
New York55 minutes agoVideo: Knicks Fans Celebrate With Ticker-Tape Parade
-
Los Angeles, Ca1 hour agoArmed, dangerous CHP pursuit suspect tied to double homicide in Pomona
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoFirst responders honored after rescuing 12 people from capsized sailboats near Belle Isle
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoOakland man faces hate crime charges for Castro District attack
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoAt least 4 injured after vehicle drives into Dallas crowd, driver arrested
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoMiami Central students prepare for life changing trip to Zimbabwe amid funding challenges
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoGiannis to Boston is a possibility. Should the Knicks be worried?
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoDenver Public Schools’ decline in enrollment continues to reshape district