Connect with us

West Virginia

Confessions of a former legislature fanboy – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Confessions of a former legislature fanboy – WV MetroNews


Back in January, I wrote a commentary in praise of the West Virginia Legislature. Here is what I said: “Let me confess now that I am a fan” of the Legislature. I went on to write about the importance of real people—not professional politicians—collectively making decisions they believe are in the best interests of their constituents and the state.

The regular session wrapped up at midnight last night and, looking back, I’m seriously questioning that fanboy stance. Here is why:

The legislature is in session too long, especially when there is a vacuum of substantive issues. That vacuum invites extended debate and arguments over bills that have questionable value.

This year’s void was filled with many culture war bills. One that stands out was the legislation that would hold librarians, museum curators and volunteers at those establishments criminally liable if they allowed minors to be exposed to material considered obscene.

Advertisement

No one logically supports giving obscene books to children, but I’m not aware of any instances where your local librarian is pushing porn on 9-year-olds. Thankfully, that bill failed to pass.

Another bill started as an avenue for science teachers to include intelligent design as a “theory” of creation. It was eventually watered down to say that teachers can answer any sort of student question about how the earth was formed, which I suspect they do anyway. That bill passed on the last day.

There was a lot of debate about the travel team bill. It would have allowed school student athletes to participate in travel team sports simultaneously. It failed, but for the life of me I cannot understand why West Virginia would need a law about such things.

I could go on.

According to the West Virginia Legislature website, lawmakers introduced 2,575 bills and 254 resolutions. Granted, most are never considered, but many are. That is a lot for a small state. Republicans have super majorities in both chambers.  Once upon a time the GOP was for smaller government, but two months of lawmaking with hundreds of bills feels like too much government.

Advertisement

Then there is the last-minute horse trading.  The House wanted a pay raise for teachers and public employees, but the Senate hesitated. The Senate wanted to change how the state’s unemployment program works, but the House was cautious. So on the last night, one was traded for the other and they both passed.

That’s good for teachers, staff and state workers who are low paid and facing higher health insurance costs, but it is unclear what the impact of the unemployment bill will be. That emerged from the Senate late and, according to Delegate Evan Worrell (R, Cabell), the bill had five iterations in the closing days of the session. Did lawmakers really understand the full impact of the bill that will affect thousands of laid off workers and tens of thousands of businesses?

I distinctly remember House Speaker Roger Hanshaw saying on Talkline the first day of the session that he wanted to pass legislation expanding childcare options in the state and make it more affordable. He said businesses that are coming here or are already here and growing want affordable and available childcare for their workforce. That would have been a practical next step for state government to encourage economic growth, but nothing passed.

I listened to the closing hours of the session Saturday night as the House debated the budget bill.  Members rose to repeatedly try to clarify what was and what was not in the proposed spending plan. Lawmakers literally had about 90 minutes to try to understand a massively complicated document detailing nearly $5 billion in spending of public dollars.

Inquisitive legislators were told not to worry; lawmakers will probably come back in special session in May (after the primary election) and fix what needs fixing. What? Two months to get a budget and the plan is to come back later and sort it all out?

Advertisement

I don’t want to be overly critical of the legislature because in my time there over the past two months I have come to know many lawmakers who are good and decent people who are carrying out what they believe to be the reason they were sent to Charleston.

But something feels off to me. I sense an increasing level of disfunction that may be linked to one-party rule and the nationalization of our politics. Perhaps this session was a one-off, and the 2024 election will serve to re-calibrate our governing body.

This former fan will be waiting to see.

 

 

Advertisement





Source link

West Virginia

Months of mudslinging is almost over – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Confessions of a former legislature fanboy – WV MetroNews


It’s almost over! 

That seems to be the dominant feeling swirling around the 2026 Republican Primary. 

Almost to a man (or woman), people I have spoken to about this primary have all expressed the same sentiment – they can’t wait until it is over. 

That is not that unusual to hear from the candidates, the media covering the election, or your average resident. Running for office is difficult. Campaigning can be exhausting. Meanwhile, voters have grown weary of the advertisements invading their social media, mailboxes, televisions, and radio. 

Advertisement

This is especially true this year, in what has become one of the most contentious and expensive primary elections anyone can remember. That is certainly true for a Republican Party that has had the majority in both chambers of the legislature since 2014. 

As of May 8, seven Political Action Committees had poured $4.97million into the legislative primary races. Most of that money came from PACs associated with Governor Patrick Morrisey and funded by out-of-state interests. 

Morrisey-associated PACs have spent nearly $3 million on legislative races, flooding voters with campaign material, often attacking their political opponents. 

The attacks being levied in the ads would lead you to believe West Virginia voters were at a crossroads, forced to pick between a staunch conservative and a radical liberal. One mailer that stood out informed me that this particular candidate “will have my back” when the radical left comes for my guns. 

Good to know. 

Advertisement

I just wish someone could tell me who the radical left is in West Virginia and where they are coming from. 

Many of the attack ads may be technically true, but lack any context or nuance and mislead the voters. Pointing out a candidate’s record, for instance, opposing Governor Morrisey’s $250 million tax cut plan, is certainly fair game. However, it misleads the voter when that same candidate voted in favor of a $150 million tax cut in the most recent legislative session and previously voted for the largest income tax cut in the state’s history. 

With that context, the voter gets a very different perspective of the candidate, a perspective that is purposefully omitted from campaign rhetoric. 

The purpose of the mailers and other campaign materials attacking candidates is to motivate supporters to go to the polls. Chris Stirewalt pointed out in a 2022 article he penned for the American Enterprise Institute that the political parties are “very much arranged around the idea of motivation over persuasion.” 

He continued to point out that the parties have created an atmosphere that “has pushed previously apathetic voters into action.” 

Advertisement

Will it work? 

It’s hard to say.

Recent polling by State Navigate looked at several key senate races and determined that most of them are neck and neck battles. 

Secretary of State Kris Warner reported that early voting totals were actually about 8 percent higher than early turnout for the last off-year primary in 2022. 

At least by this time Wednesday, it will all be over… for now. 

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

West Virginia

West Virginia delegate candidates in Wood County split on top issues, from manufacturing to health care rules

Published

on

West Virginia delegate candidates in Wood County split on top issues, from manufacturing to health care rules


PARKERSBURG, W.Va. (WTAP) – Candidates running for seats in the West Virginia House of Delegates in Wood County say their top priorities if elected range from job creation and workforce development to health care policy changes and infrastructure, as they make their case to voters ahead of the election.

Incumbent Delegate Vernon Criss, a Republican running in House District 12, said jobs would be his top focus, arguing Wood County has been left out of state efforts to attract manufacturing.

“It would be jobs,” Criss said. He pointed to what he described as $340 million available through a high-impact, jobs-related manufacturing fund for companies returning to West Virginia, saying the governor “has refused to use these dollars to help the county.” Criss also cited restoring highway funding and funding for drinking water and sewer projects as priorities.

Criss said he would also push for foster care legislation in the next session, noting the governor vetoed a foster care bill this year that he said would have helped families and relatives caring for children in the system.

Advertisement

In House District 13, Republican candidate Melissa McCrady said her leading priority is repealing the state’s certificate of need program, which she said restricts medical facilities and practices from opening in the state.

“The main issue that I would prioritize is the repeal of the certificate of need,” McCrady said, calling it a program that limits a “free market” approach to health care by requiring approvals before certain services can expand.

McCrady said she would also like to repeal the inventory tax on businesses, which she said makes West Virginia less attractive for economic growth. She also said she supports religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions for children and adults in response to future outbreaks.

On education, McCrady said she wants to give teachers and families more voice in Wood County and reduce what she called burdensome requirements and restrictions placed on classrooms. On jobs and cost of living, she said reducing taxes and regulations and allowing the market to develop would create more opportunity for residents.

Incumbent Delegate Scot Heckert, a Republican running in House District 13, said his top issues include “infrastructure, accountability” and school funding.

Advertisement

“Top issues right now is infrastructure, accountability, for the school funding,” Heckert said. He said policy changes depend in part on what he hears from residents, but added he believes the school aid formula should be reviewed and that traditional public schools, homeschooling and charter schools should be held to the same set of rules.

Heckert said the state needs to do more to support teachers and address long-term retirement funding costs. On jobs and workforce development, Heckert said building a workforce is essential and suggested the state should look at incentives and assistance programs to encourage employment.

Asked about transparency and accountability, Heckert said constituents can contact him directly.

“Any constituent of District 13 can call me anytime,” he said, adding, “You can’t have one without the other.”

Criss and McCrady also emphasized transparency as a priority. Criss said the budget process should remain open to the public, while McCrady said she wants to be accessible through office hours and multiple communication channels.

Advertisement

Candidate for House of Delegates district 12 Charles Hartzog was not available to be interviewed.

Voters in Wood County will choose their delegates in House Districts 12 and 13 in the upcoming election. Details on early voting and Election Day locations are available through the county clerk’s office.

Editor’s note: The video for this story will be added once it airs. Please check back for the updated video.

Copyright 2026 WTAP. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

Former PAAC House residents find hope and housing after sudden closure

Published

on

Former PAAC House residents find hope and housing after sudden closure


An abrupt closure at a Charleston recovery home last week left residents searching for a new place to stay, but members of the local recovery community stepped in to help keep many of them on track.

PAAC House closed its doors Friday after funding issues left employees unpaid for nearly a month, displacing 14 residents, many of whom were still in early sobriety.

For former resident John Boso, the closure came after weeks of uncertainty.

“Services started dropping off, we’d have less counseling, less things going on,” Boso said. “And then before we know it, it’s like, you’ve got to find somewhere else to go.”

Advertisement

Caroline Paxton, a founder of the nonprofit True Freedom, said the sudden disruption raised immediate concerns about residents’ stability.

“I think especially in early sobriety, that’s really stressful for anyone. And so our biggest concern was we want to make sure they were able to continue to stay sober and continue on this like recovery journey,” Paxton said.

Paxton and fellow True Freedom founder Michael Paxton said they already knew many of the men through the nonprofit’s meetings. When they learned the residents had just four days’ notice to find new housing, they began working to secure placements — a process that often involves applications, interviews and fees.

They connected with HopeWorks, a recently opened home, and worked to fast-track interviews the next day. HopeWorks Director Catherine Tyler said she fortunately had many beds open and their transition has been smooth so far.

“They’re doing great so far,” said Tyler. “They are already buddies from the PAAC House, and I think that’s going to be really good for them.”

Advertisement

Six of the men were able to stay together, something former residents said has been critical to their recovery.

“It’s awesome that we’re all together,” one resident said. “Brotherhood was the biggest thing we had going for us. That was the only thing we were sure of.”

The men said despite the sudden closure, due to securing placements they have been able to continue attending meetings and focusing on recovery.

Several residents said they feared the disruption could have pushed them backward in their recovery.

“I was hopeless thought I was going to go right back to the life I was living then bam Mike and Caroline to the rescue it was great,” Alden Smith said.

Advertisement

“I thought I had come all this way for nothing,” said Christian Taylor.

Michael Paxton said helping the men find stability has been worth every effort.

“Just to know these guys, know that they’re safe and they have a place they’re loved. You know, they still have another chance at life,” he said.

Those involved encouraged anyone struggling with addiction to reach out to True Freedom.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending