Connect with us

Washington, D.C

New DC area laws go into effect Jan. 1, 2024: minimum wage increases, plastic bag bans, health care

Published

on

New DC area laws go into effect Jan. 1, 2024: minimum wage increases, plastic bag bans, health care


New year – new laws.

Beginning January 1, 2024, several new laws went into effect across the Washington, D.C. area.

Advertisement

While there are no significant new laws in the District itself, several in Maryland and Virginia will cause notable change throughout the metro region.

NEW MARYLAND LAWS 2024

MINIMUM WAGES

Maryland has raised minimum wages for workers to $15 an hour. The Fair Wage Act of 2023 was signed into law by Maryland Governor Wes Moore in April of last year. The new law will increase wages for approximately 163,000 workers.

Advertisement

PLASTIC BAG BANS

Advertisement

Businesses in Prince George’s and Anne Arundel counties, and in Frederick, Maryland, will no longer be permitted to provide single-use plastic bags at the point of sale. Customers are encouraged to bring reusable bags with them to shop.

The ban was enacted to help protect local waterways and marine life, reduce plastic pollution and litter, and promote reusable bags. Several other areas of Maryland, like Baltimore County, already have plastic bag bans in place.

Advertisement

READ MORE: New plastic bag fee heading to Prince George’s County

Advertisement

TRANS HEALTH EQUITY ACT

Maryland’s Medicaid program is now required to cover medically necessary gender-affirming care without discrimination.

According to the legislation posted online, “the Maryland Medical Assistance Program to provide gender-affirming treatment in a nondiscriminatory manner; requiring that the gender-affirming treatment be assessed according to nondiscriminatory criteria that are consistent with current clinical standards; prohibiting the issuance of an adverse benefit determination related to gender-affirming treatment unless a certain experienced health care provider has reviewed and confirmed the appropriateness of the determination; etc.”

Advertisement

NEW VIRGINIA LAWS 2024

COUNSELING COMPACT

The legislation authorizes Virginia to become a signatory to the Counseling Compact, which allows eligible licensed professional counselors to practice in other Compact member states – as long as they are licensed in at least one of the member states. Virginia is the 20th state to join the Counseling Compact.

Advertisement

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER PANELS

The new law aims to ensure a smoother transition and continuity of care for patients.

Advertisement

Insurance carriers must now inform policyholders if their current healthcare provider, or one they’ve seen in the past six months, is no longer part of the carrier’s network.

If your healthcare provider is removed from the insurance network, you have the right to continue receiving care from them for at least 90 days after their removal.

READ MORE: New Virginia laws going into effect on January 1, 2024
 

Advertisement



Source link

Washington, D.C

Federal court says troops can stay in D.C., and hints at prolonged deployment

Published

on

Federal court says troops can stay in D.C., and hints at prolonged deployment


Members of the National Guard patrol along Constitution Ave. on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images North America


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Heather Diehl/Getty Images North America

National Guard troops can remain in Washington, D.C. while a panel of judges examines whether the deployment ordered by President Trump is legal, according to a Federal Appeals Court for Washington, D.C. ruling.

More than 2,000 troops have been deployed in the city since August, both from the District and at least 11 Republican-led states. Hundreds more were added after a targeted attack on National Guard troops killed one and wounded another last month, both of whom were from West Virginia.

Advertisement

The decision Wednesday upends a lower court order that troops be removed from the city.

President Trump’s deployment in Washington is the most robust long-running operation so far, in what has become a pattern of military deployments to help with policing in Democratic-led cities around the country.

Several other smaller deployments are tied up in legal battles — including Trump’s deployment to Chicago which is at the Supreme Court awaiting an emergency decision.

In today’s ruling the judges wrote that Washington, D.C.’s unique federal status allows President Trump to largely control the deployment of troops in the city. They also said the Trump administration is likely to win the overall case, which would see the deployment remain until at least the end of February 2026.

But the judges also raised serious doubts about the lawfulness of deployments of other cities. In particular, the deployment of out-of-state Guard to another state without the consent of that state’s governor — as the administration has tried to do in both Oregon and Illinois.

Advertisement

The opinion called such a move “constitutionally troubling to our federal system of government.”

Troops have left Los Angeles

Today’s decision comes days after a different federal appeals court ruled that troops had to leave Los Angeles on Monday.

The Ninth Circuit ruled late Friday night to uphold a ruling by a federal judge in California to end Trump’s deployment. Trump seized control of the California National Guard in June amid protests in the city and sent more than 4,000 troops there, against Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wishes.

That number had since dropped to around 100, but the administration had sought to extend the federalization of the state’s Guard several times, most recently until February, saying it was still necessary.

Advertisement

The decision from the Ninth Circuit effectively blocked the administration from using those remaining National Guard troops in Los Angeles — but it did not force control of the troops to return to the state, leaving them under federal control for now.

All troops have left their stations in the city, according to two sources familiar with the matter who are not authorized to talk publicly. A military official who was not authorized to discuss details of a deployment publicly told NPR that the troops have been moved to a military facility in the area and are conducting training exercises.

NPR’s Tom Bowman contributed to this report from Washington.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC leaders considering transit options for new RFK Stadium

Published

on

DC leaders considering transit options for new RFK Stadium


The Commanders are set to build a new stadium in D.C., and the debate over how fans will get to and from games is happening right now. On Wednesday, city leaders will join Metro and the Washington Commanders to talk stadium transit.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

D.C. Police Chief manipulated crime data; new House Oversight report

Published

on

D.C. Police Chief manipulated crime data; new House Oversight report


A new report from the House Oversight Committee alleges former D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith pressured officers to manipulate crime data. The committee released the report on Sunday, less than a week after Smith announced she was stepping down.

You’re lulling people into this false sense of security. They might go places they wouldn’t ordinarily go. They might do things they wouldn’t ordinarily do,” said Betsy Brantner Smith, spokesperson for the National Police Association.

Included in the report were transcribed interviews with the commanders of all seven D.C. patrol districts and the former commander currently on suspended leave. One was asked, “Over the last few years, has there been any internal pressure to simply bring down crime statistics?” Their response, “Yes, I mean extremethere’s always been pressure to keep crime down, but the focus on statistics… has come in with this current administration.”

Every single person who lives, works, or visits the District of Columbia deserves a safe city, yet it’s now clear the American people were deliberately kept in the dark about the true crime rates in our nation’s capital,” House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) said in a statement.

“They are going to have to regain the public trust. Again, this is a huge integrity issue,” Brantner Smith said.

Among the reports findings, Smith’s alleged pressured campaign against staff led to inaccurate crime data. Smith punished or removed officers for reporting accurate crime numbers. Smith fostered a toxic culture and President Trump’s federal law enforcement surge in D.C. is working.

Advertisement

While Smith has not yet publicly responded to the report, she’s previously denied allegations of manipulating crime data, saying the investigation did not play a factor into her decision to step down at the end of the year.

My decision was not factored into anything with respect to, other than the fact that it’s time. I’ve had 28 years in law enforcement. I’ve had some time to think with my family,” Smith said earlier this month.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser also released a statement Monday, writing in part that “the interim report betrays its bias from the outset, admitting that it was rushed to release.”

According to crime stats from the Metropolitan Police Department, since the federal law enforcement surge started in August, total violent crime is down 26%. Homicides are down 12% and carjackings 37%.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending