Connect with us

Virginia

No. 7 Virginia Tech tops No. 8 NC State 21-12 in ACC showdown

Published

on

No. 7 Virginia Tech tops No. 8 NC State 21-12 in ACC showdown


In a match that will define the ACC race, No. 7 Virginia Tech and No. 8 NC State renew their rivalry. The Hokies and Wolfpack have combined to win the last 13 conference titles, and the two teams have finished both first and second in eight of those 13 tournaments.

🤼 MORE COLLEGE WRESTLING 🤼

Here’s a preview of all 10 matches that will take place in Reynolds Coliseum on Friday.

125 pounds: No. 3 Eddie Ventresca vs. No. 5 Vincent Robinson or Brad Yokum

The 125-pound bout between Eddie Ventresca and Vincent Robinson could decide the dual. Ventresca hasn’t lost since the new year and has won nine straight matches, while Robinson is 10-2 after defending his national title. Robinson’s last loss came against Stanford’s Nico Provo, 4-1 in sudden victory on Jan. 16.

Advertisement

Ventresca got the better of Robinson with a 4-1 decision at the National Duals in November. He’s 3-0 against the Wolfpack sophomore in his career as well, also beating him in last year’s dual and at the ACC Championships by identical 4-1 scores, with the latter coming in sudden victory.

A win for Robinson would set up the Wolfpack for success and put him on track toward winning his first ACC title.

133 pounds: No. 7 Aaron Seidel vs. No. 33 Zach Redding or Troy Hohman

Virginia Tech true freshman Aaron Seidel is a perfect 12-0 this season and has been dominant, entering Friday off a major decision win against No. 8 Tyler Knox. His entry into the lineup has infused new energy into the Hokies, and he’s on a path to chase an NCAA title himself. Zach Redding or Troy Hohman will have a tough task holding Seidel to just a decision, let alone beating the freshman.

Advertisement

OTHER HOKIE NEWS: How 133-pound alum turned recruiting coordinator Sam LatonaĀ found a home in Blacksburg with the Hokies

Redding is 6-6 on the year after transferring from Iowa State last season. His best wins have come against No.  25 Julian Farber of Northern Iowa and No. 19 Ethan Oakley of North Carolina. While his experience could aid him, Seidel is on too much of a hot streak and will be heavily favored against the veteran Wolfpack wrestler.

141 pounds: No. 17 Tom Crook vs. No. 13 Ryan Jack

Virginia Tech’s Tom Crook and NC State’s Ryan Jack both enter Friday off losses: Crook dropped a 6-5 decision to Stanford’s Jack Consiglio and Jack lost 2-1 to North Carolina’s Luke Simcox. Both athletes could compete for a podium spot on their best day, and the result of this match could have significant conference and national seeding implications.

Jack picked up an 8-4 decision win over Crook at the National Duals in his best performance of the season. He was one of only three NC State athletes to win during the last dual with the Hokies. The wrestler who rebounds best from last week’s matches will give his team the upper hand.

149 pounds: No. 9 Collin Gaj vs. No. 5 Koy Buesgens

The 149-pound battle between Collin Gaj and Koy Buesgens is an important one ahead of the national tournament. Gaj is one of two freshmen ranked in the top 10 of the ACC and has won his last eight matches, including a victory over No. 11 Aden Valencia. Buesgens is 17-1 this season with three top-10 wins.

Buesgens earned a tight 4-1 decision at the National Duals and is favored again, though a previous one-takedown match means anything can happen. This match is NC State’s chance to keep itself in the dual and create momentum heading into the second half.

157 pounds: No. 16 Ethen Miller vs. Luca Felix or Brogan Tucker

Maryland transfer Ethen Miller started his season with the Hokies in late December and has quickly and quietly picked up eight wins, including one over No. 17 Dylan Evans of Pittsburgh.

NC State’s Luca Felix, meanwhile, lost at 157 pounds to Laird Root of North Carolina last weekend. His teammate Brogan Tucker lost by tech fall to Stanford’s No. 10 Daniel Cardenas earlier this month. Virginia Tech will be favored against either NC State option.

Advertisement

This match is an opportunity for Miller to earn bonus points for Virginia Tech and put the Hokies in an advantageous position heading into 165 and 174, where Tech has a slight edge at the former and could face challenges at the latter.

165 pounds: No. 12 Ryan Burton or Mac Church vs. No. 13 Will Denny

In a battle of two great freshmen, Virginia Tech’s Ryan Burton and NC State’s Will Denny meet in an important bout at 165 pounds. Burton earned his first career ACC win with a decision over EJ Parco of Stanford last week, and Denny has won 10 straight matches. Both have impressive records, with Denny boasting a 12-2 rĆ©sumĆ© and Burton competing in 24 matches to a 19-5 record. Their consistency and reps at this stage will make them dangerous come March and beyond.

Burton beat Denny 15-7 in November, but both wrestlers have improved substantially since their first meeting in Tulsa. Virginia Tech also has the option of rolling out Mac Church, a sophomore NCAA qualifier who won the Appalachian Open, in place of Burton. While Burton’s record against Denny suggests he’ll get the nod again, Tech’s depth here reflects the talent head coach Tony Robie is building in Blacksburg.

174 pounds: No. 31 Sergio Desiante vs. No. 6 Matty Singleton

NC State’s Matty Singleton enters the 174-pound match as a favorite with a 12-1 record and five straight wins. His lone loss came against Ohio State’s Carson Kharchla, 8-4, at the National Duals. He’ll meet Sergio Desiante on Friday. Desiante started the year slow but has won 10 of his last 12 matches. The pair met at the National Duals, where Singleton earned a 7-1 decision. Last season, Singleton earned three wins over former Hokie All-American Lennox Wolak — a streak against Virginia Tech he’ll need to continue if he wants to help NC State stay in this contest.

184 pounds: No. 32 Jaden Bullock vs. Don Cates

A match that could go either way, the 184-pound bout features Michigan transfer Jaden Bullock of Virginia Tech against sixth-year wrestler Don Cates of NC State. Neither athlete has finished on the podium in their career, and both could be battling for NCAA qualifying spots come March. Cates needs the win more, entering with a 6-7 record. Bullock is 12-10 after winning the Appalachian Open and has previously reached the Round of 16.

Advertisement

Cates kept the bout close last time, dropping a 4-1 decision to Bullock. If he reverses that result, he could push Bullock out of the rankings. But national implications will be secondary on Friday — it’s all about the rivalry.

197 pounds: No. 16 Sonny Sasso vs. No. 25 Patrick Brophy or Cason Howle

Virginia Tech’s Sonny Sasso enters Reynolds Coliseum having lost his two ACC dual matches this season to Pittsburgh’s No. 8 Mac Stout and No. 14 Angelo Posada. He’ll be favored in this bout, though, against NC State’s No. 25 Patrick Brophy, who also lost to Posada but enters Friday off a win over Robert Platt.

Brophy began his season in late December and has amassed a 5-2 record as a member of the Wolfpack after spending his first three years at The Citadel and qualifying for the national tournament last year. He’s tough and made headlines last season when he beat Oklahoma State’s Luke Surber, but Sasso is gritty, too. The Hokie brings a 15-5 record into this bout, including a win over All-American Joey Novak and a 12-6 victory over Brophy in their last meeting. If NC State can flip this match, the Wolfpack put themselves in a strong position heading into heavyweight. If Sasso proves too much, Brophy must avoid giving up bonus points.

285 pounds: No. 16 Jimmy Mullen vs. No. 2 Isaac Trumble

Isaac Trumble is a title threat. Ranked No. 2 in the country, he enters Friday’s dual with a perfect 9-0 record, including a win over Ohio State’s No. 3 Nick Feldman. The All-American will face Jimmy Mullen, who has won 11 of his 12 matches since the National Duals. The match is an opportunity for Mullen to make a statement in the heavyweight division, but Trumble has been dominant with four falls and two tech falls and is unlikely to waver.

During the meeting in Tulsa, Mullen beat NC State reserve Everest Ouellette by tech fall. Trumble and Mullen met in last season’s dual as well, with Trumble winning 5-3. Trumble was also the hero for the Wolfpack against Virginia earlier this month, pinning Brenan Morgan to lift the Pack over the Cavaliers. If the dual comes down to heavyweight, NC State will rely on its anchor for another clutch performance.

Advertisement





Source link

Virginia

4 indicted in Virginia double homicide; second victim ID’d as grandmother of 6

Published

on

4 indicted in Virginia double homicide; second victim ID’d as grandmother of 6


CAROLINE COUNTY, Va. — A Caroline County grand jury has indicted four people on first-degree murder charges in connection with a double homicide after DNA evidence identified the second victim as Helen Marie Pullen Banks, a grandmother of six.

The same four suspects charged in the murder of 18-year-old Jayden McComber have now been indicted in the death of Banks, who was living in the Richmond area at the time she went missing. Investigators linked the two homicides early in the investigation through forensic evidence.

Caroline County Sheriff Scott Moser said investigators “have been working around the clock” for a break in the case “not only for the community, but for the victims as well.”

The medical examiner’s office in Richmond used DNA to identify the 56-year-old Banks after her remains were found in poor condition. Investigators confirmed her identity on July 7.

Advertisement

Banks, originally from Culpeper, had been living in the Richmond area where she was in rehab at the time she went missing, according to her family. She had a connection to at least one of the four suspects, according to Moser.

The four suspects — Devonti Gregory Pettaway, 20, of Chesterfield; Kennady Jade Lambert, 18, of Hopewell; Rashad Antonio Mayfield, 23, of Glen Allen; and Jaden Lamont Phillips, 19, of Richmond — now face charges of first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, and conspiracy to commit murder in connection with Banks’ death. The charges represent an upgrade from the second-degree murder charges the four originally faced in McComber’s death.

WATCH: Brother of suspect charged in murder of Hopewell teen Jayden McComber speaks out

Brother of suspect charged in murder of Hopewell teen Jayden McComber speaks out

Advertisement

Chief Deputy Travis Nutter outlined what investigators believe is the motive in McComber’s murder.

“We believe robbery to be the motive of the incident that happened with Jayden that ultimately led to his murder,” Nutter said.

As for the motive in Banks’ death, Nutter said investigators have not yet established one.

“There is no evidence to show that there was any sort of argument or disagreement between Ms. Banks or the four charged,” Nutter said.

Advertisement

Banks was a mother of five and grandmother of six. Moser said she had no known ties to Caroline County, and that her body, like McComber’s, appeared to have been brought there from another jurisdiction.

WATCH: Neighbor reacts as suspects arrested after 2 bodies found in Caroline County

Neighbor reacts as suspects arrested after 2 bodies found in Caroline County

Advertisement

McComber’s body was found in late March in a marshy area of Byrds Mill Pond near Sparta, near the Caroline and King and Queen County line. Banks’ remains were discovered about five miles away off Bagby Road. Investigators linked the two cases early on, in part because McComber’s AirTag had pinged about a mile and a half from where Banks’ remains were found.

Moser said the case has shaken the Sparta community but stressed that investigators moved quickly and that residents should feel reassured.

“Without a doubt this is a tremendous blow to the community,” Moser said. “When you come to this county and you do these types of crimes, we’re going to do everything we can to catch you… [We] are not used to these types of crimes being committed in Caroline.”

Moser credited a broad coalition of agencies for bringing the case to this point, including Commonwealth’s Attorney Ben Heidt, the medical examiner’s office, the U.S. Marshals Service and the broader community.

“Everyone has pulled together in a time of crisis; that’s what we do well here in Caroline,” Moser said. “We’ve had a lot of support from the community, a lot of information that’s been helpful in this investigation and that’s what community is all about.”

Advertisement
    • Eat It, Virginia! with Scott and Robey

    This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy. To learn more about how we use AI in our newsroom, click here.

    Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia’s voided special election cost $11.6 million

Published

on

Virginia’s voided special election cost .6 million


We now know how much it cost Virginia to hold an election that didn’t count: $11.6 million.

Of that, the state will pick up $4.99 million, leaving localities to pay the balance of $6.6 million for the April 21 special election on redistricting that the Virginia Supreme Court later ruled was placed on the ballot unconstitutionally.

The numbers come from the Department of Elections, after Cardinal News filed a Virginia Freedom of Information Act request to find out the cost of the election.

Advertisement

I contacted localities small, medium and large and none said they’d have a particular problem paying their share. All said they’d already budgeted for primary elections that they expected in June. With the push to redraw Virginia’s congressional lines, those June primaries were bumped to August, putting them in a new fiscal year, so the money set aside for the June primaries was used to cover the special election on a proposed constitutional amendment to allow redistricting.

Election costs

Total cost of April 21 special election: $11,636,147

What state will pay for: $4,999,738

What localities must cover: $6,636,147

Source: Virginia Department of Elections

Advertisement

The issue some localities face now is that the Aug. 4 primary becomes an unexpected expense, although all said they’d figure out a way to pay for it. ā€œWe always budget for extra elections, so I think we will have money to cover this,ā€ said Buckingham County administrator Karl Carter by email. It cost $44,373 to run the special election in his county. Of that, the state will pay $9,019, leaving the county to cover $35,353. (Each locality submits its expenses and the state calculates a reimbursement rate based on that.)

Other local government officials had similar things to say. The cost of running elections — paying for poll workers is one of the main expenses — depends largely on how big a locality is. Elections cost more in bigger localities, but they also have bigger budgets.

In Virginia Beach, the election cost $750,533. The state will pay $265,509, leaving the city to cover $465,023. City spokesperson Ali Weatherton-Shook said the city would save enough money through unfilled vacancies to cover unexpected election expenses.

In Chesterfield County, the election cost $619,970. The state will pay $223,356, leaving the county to cover $396,613. ā€œChesterfield tries to plan ahead for these growing demands,ā€ said county spokesperson Stephen Bays. ā€œIn the county’s FY2027 budget, we added $630,000 to the Registrar’s budget to help fill the gap to cover the increasing costs of elections.ā€ Ā 

The most expensive locality was, not surprisingly, the state’s biggest: Fairfax County. It cost $1,545,781 to hold the election there. The state will pay $655,424, leaving the county to cover $910,356. ā€œWe allocated additional funds out of carryover to address not only the special election on the amendment but a number of special elections due to both elected officials winning other seats and elected officials that went into the administration,ā€ said county supervisor Pat Herrity, a Republican.

Advertisement

The closest I came to finding a locality that felt pinched by the election cost was Dickenson County. ā€œUnfortunately, moving the primary to August added a third election to our FY-27 budget, which was already very tight,ā€ said Dickenson County administrator Larry Barton by email. (The other two are the fall general election and presumed primaries next June for the 2027 local and legislative elections.) It cost $39,748 to run the special election in Dickenson. Of that, the state will cover $7,802, leaving Dickenson to pay $31,946.

While officials in other localities, though, said they’d have no problem paying the expense, they also pointed out the obvious: Money is finite. ā€œAny time you spend money it competes with critical services and/or increases the tax burden on our residents,ā€ said Herrity, the Fairfax County supervisor.

And some said they’d welcome additional state funding. ā€œLike many localities, Chesterfield would welcome additional state funding for special elections,ā€ said Bays, the county spokesperson. ā€œWhen state funding falls short, local dollars must fill the gap, leaving fewer resources for other priorities.ā€

The new state budget that the General Assembly just approved does include an additional $680,000 to help with the cost of three proposed constitutional amendments that will be on the November ballot, in addition to congressional elections and, in some places, local elections.

Since I’m writing this as an opinion column, I will go ahead and inject my opinion here: The Virginia Supreme Court could have avoided this. The court declined to rule on legal challenges to the special election before the vote, citing a 1912 court ruling involving a similar challenge to an upcoming constitutional amendment. In that case, the court held that it should only rule after the vote, on the grounds that passing a constitutional amendment is akin to passing a law — and just as a court won’t intervene until after the governor signs a bill, it shouldn’t intervene until after voters approve a constitutional amendment.

Advertisement

I’m not a legal scholar, but that seems sound reasoning except for one thing: When the Supreme Court let the disputed 1912 amendment vote go forward, it was part of an election that was going to happen anyway, the 1912 presidential election — so there was no additional expense incurred. In this case, the only reason the special election was happening — and so there was expense involved. The court’s adherence to that 1912 precedent cost Virginia $11,636,147.

Of course, some might also say that Virginia Democrats cost the taxpayers that amount by skirting the rules involved in placing an amendment on the ballot, although there was legal dispute over those rules. You’ll recall that the constitutional question turned on when an election legally begins. The constitution says that the legislature must pass an amendment twice, with an election in between. Democrats contended that passing the amendment the first time in a special session in late October satisfied that requirement, because it was ahead of the November general election. The court later ruled that, legally speaking, the election really began when early voting started in September, so Democrats had misread the legal calendar. Democrats could say that Republicans are ultimately to blame, because it was President Donald Trump and Texas Republicans who started the push to redraw congressional lines to ā€œfindā€ more Republican districts so Democratic-controlled states such as Virginia had no choice but to respond in kind to balance things out.

Whoever you choose to blame, we can now put a dollar figure to that attempt — 11.6 million of them.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

MEOC Organization hosts annual summer picnic for Southwest Virginia seniors

Published

on

MEOC Organization hosts annual summer picnic for Southwest Virginia seniors


About 100 seniors from across Southwest Virginia spent the day enjoying food, games and fellowship at the Mountain Empire Older Citizens Organization’s annual summer picnic.

The event was held at Bullitt Park in Big Stone Gap and brought together seniors from seven congregate senior sites across several Southwest Virginia counties.

Attendees enjoyed a cookout, played yard games, tried their luck at bingo and caught up with friends.

Organizers said events like the annual picnic give seniors a chance to enjoy activities they may not otherwise have the opportunity to experience.

Advertisement

“It’s exactly what the program is designed for,” MEOC Nutrition Director Kristen Rutherford said. “To add nutrition and education but also promote socialization and prevent loneliness for seniors. A big part of seniors’ lives is that they’re isolated a lot of times. I love it, especially the games that they’re playing. I love that because they’re getting exercise.”

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Organizers said the summer picnic is one of two major events they host each year, along with a Christmas celebration.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending