Connect with us

South-Carolina

Ecuadorians vote in referendum to approve toughening fight against gangs

Published

on

Ecuadorians vote in referendum to approve toughening fight against gangs


QUITO, Ecuador — Ecuador’s fledgling president got a resounding victory Sunday in a referendum that he touted as a way to crack down on criminal gangs behind a spiraling wave of violence.

An official quick count showed that Ecuadorians overwhelmingly voted “yes” to all nine questions focused on tightening security measures, rejecting only two more controversial economic proposals.

The quick count was announced by the head of the Electoral National Council, Diana Atamaint. It confirmed a private exit poll released hours before that indicated a resounding victory and sign of support for President Daniel Noboa, the scion of a wealthy banana exporting family.

Among the measures approved are President Noboa’s call to deploy the army in the fight against the gangs, to loosen obstacles for extraditing accused criminals and to lengthen prison sentences for convicted drug traffickers.

Advertisement

Ecuador was traditionally one of South America’s most peaceful countries, but it has been rocked in recent years by a wave of violence, much of it spilling over from neighboring Colombia, the world’s largest producer of cocaine. Last year, the country’s homicide rate shot up to 40 deaths per 100,000 people, one of the highest in the region.

President Daniel Noboa arrives to vote in a referendum to endorse new security measures to crackdown on criminal gangs responsible for increasing violence, in Olon, Ecuador, Sunday, April 21, 2024.

Noboa has rallied popular support by confronting the gangs head on. That task became more urgent in January when masked gunmen, some on orders from imprisoned drug traffickers, terrorized residents and took control of a television station while it was live on the air in an unprecedented show of force.

Following the rampage, the 36-year-old president decreed an “internal armed conflict,” enabling him to use emergency powers to deploy the army in pursuit of about 20 gangs now classified as “terrorists.”

The referendum, in which more than 13 million Ecuadorians were called to vote, contained measures to extend those powers and put them on firmer legal ground.

Advertisement

For some analysts, the Ecuadorian leader must show results to live up to people’s support.

“This gives him some vigor,” said Andrea Endara, analyst and professor at Casa Grande University. But “if the president does not begin to take actions to demonstrate that having voted ‘yes’ brings results to reduce insecurity, this support will quickly be diluted.”

Some of the measures approved imply changes to Ecuador’s constitution, but because they were previously endorsed by the Constitutional Court, Noboa only needs to publish them in the official gazette to go into effect. Some of those initiatives are the ones related to the use of the army and extradition.

For the changes that require changing some general laws, the president will have to send a reform proposal to the Assembly, which will have 60 days to process them.

Noboa, ahead of the final tally, celebrated the results. “We’ve defended the country,” he said in a message posted on social media. “Now we will have more tools to fight against the delinquent and restore peace to Ecuador’s families.”

Advertisement

Noboa’s law and order rhetoric recalls the policies of El Salvador’s wildly popular president, Nayib Bukele, a fellow millennial, and could give him a boost politically as he prepares to run for reelection next year.

Noboa, is serving the final 18 months of a presidential term left vacant when fellow conservative Guillermo Lasso resigned amid a congressional investigation into allegations of corruption. Noboa was elected following a shortened but bloody campaign that saw one of his top rivals brazenly assassinated while campaigning.

“We can’t live in fear of leaving our homes,” Leonor Sandoval, a 39-year-old homemaker, said after voting for all 11 of the proposals.

Copyright 2024 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

Advertisement





Source link

South-Carolina

Here’s when, where you can vote in South Carolina 2026 primary election

Published

on

Here’s when, where you can vote in South Carolina 2026 primary election


play

  • South Carolina’s primary election will take place on June 9, with early voting running from May 26 to June 5.
  • Voters will decide on party nominees for numerous races, including governor, U.S. House, and one U.S. Senate seat.
  • A photo ID is required to vote, and polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on election day.
  • If no candidate receives over 50% of the vote in a race, a runoff election will be held on June 23.

South Carolina voters will head to the polls in less than a week to vote in the 2026 primary election, which determines candidates moving on to the general election in November.

This year’s primary election will happen on June 9. South Carolina registered voters will be able to choose a Republican or a Democratic ballot, and their votes will decide the party’s candidate nominees for election day on Nov. 3.

Advertisement

When are SC polls open for 2026 primary election?

Early voting for the primaries run from May 26 to June 5, and the polls are open from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Mondays through Fridays. Primary election day is June 9, and the polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. A runoff election will happen on June 23 if no candidate running in each race gets more than 50% of the vote.

Where do I vote and what do I need to take?

Voters can find their polling place and sample ballots on the South Carolina State Election Commission’s website. A sample ballot shows which races and candidates will appear on a voter’s election day ballot.

South Carolinians will also need to bring a photo ID to the poll, which can include a South Carolina driver’s license, a state department of motor vehicles ID card, a federal military ID or a U.S. passport.

Advertisement

Which offices are on the ballot?

South Carolina will elect several high-profile seats this year, including governor, the U.S. House of Representatives, and one seat in the U.S. Senate. All seats in the South Carolina House of Representatives and five seats in the Greenville County Council are also up for election this year.

Spartanburg County will elect three county council seats and the chairman position. Seven seats in the Anderson County Council are up for election this year, but only five seats have contested primaries.

South Carolina attorney general, state treasurer, secretary of state, comptroller general, education secretary and agriculture commission are also up for election.

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

The 3 Democrats vying for SC governor’s seat take jabs at each other in SCETV debate

Published

on

The 3 Democrats vying for SC governor’s seat take jabs at each other in SCETV debate


COLUMBIA — Three candidates seeking to become South Carolina’s first Democratic governor in more than two decades squared off in fiery rebuttals on live television June 3.

State Rep. Jermaine Johnson, attorney Mullins McLeod and businessman Billy Webster debated for an hour during SCETV’s Democratic gubernatorial square-off where McLeod attacked the other two candidates almost every chance he got to speak.

It was the second SCETV debate this week and all three candidates participated, compared with the Republican debate June 1 where only half the six candidates appeared.

Nearly every question, McLeod exceeded his allotted time, often using his messaging to attack his opponents.

Advertisement

Democrats face long odds in the November general election. The Palmetto State has not elected a Democratic governor in more than a quarter-century, and the party’s prospects have diminished in recent election cycles.

But the three candidates on the debate stage made it known they’re not afraid of the challenge.

“In this state there are at least 1.1 million people who are willing to vote for a Democrat and a Black person statewide,” Johnson said on his odds of winning, referencing the number of people who voted for Jaime Harrison in 2020 against Republican U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham.

And while it wasn’t mentioned during the debate, Democratic early voter turnout has reached historic levels this election cycle. On the first day of early voting, Democratic primary voters outnumbered Republicans more than four-to-one, about 46,000 to 10,000. Early voting will end June 5.

While the three candidates largely agreed on broader policy like Medicaid and abortion access, they did have some key differences in opinions on issues like gambling and even how to work with the legislature.

Advertisement

Where candidates agreed

The three men largely agreed there are major issues that need to be addressed in the state’s health care systems, but went about addressing them in different ways.

Medicaid expansion was something all three candidates broadly agreed on, specifically tied to ensuring the state decreases the rise in infant mortality rates. All three believed there is corruption in the government.

All candidates had issues with data centers. McLeod labeled himself as the only anti-data center candidate, while Johnson boasted about his Statehouse experience in introducing a moratorium to stop data centers from coming into the state. Webster poked at flaws surrounding promises of transparency associated with the projects and the environmental hazards the centers bring.

Both Webster and Johnson went after Republicans who have campaigned on getting rid of the state income tax, saying it was unrealistic for the state to do so.

“We cannot eliminate the state income tax and even have a state that is recognizable in 10 years,” Webster said.

Advertisement

Where they disagreed

There were some stark disagreements, including how to go about working with the legislature. Johnson and Webster reflected on their time working across the aisle with Republicans while McLeod said bipartisanship is not the answer.

“More politics is not the answer. Bipartisanship is not the answer” McLeod said. “You know what’s been missing? The truth, the light … servant leaders who are willing to stand for the people of South Carolina.”

Public education was another area the candidates differed. Webster said there needs to be less regulations and restrictions on South Carolina teachers so that they are not so weighed down by requirements. Johnson proposed adding universal pre-K and McLeod said he wanted to pay teachers $85,000-$100,000 per year.

Candidates also had different answers on gambling. Johnson reflected on personal experiences where he saw gambling bring havoc to his family, but said the opening of casinos in South Carolina could be possible with great oversight. Webster said he didn’t have enough knowledge on the topic but could see the benefits that casinos could bring in the form of jobs in counties like Orangeburg if given proper regulation. McLeod said gambling causes problems and was against the opening of casinos.

Surprises

Much of the campaign attacks from Democratic candidates have been directed at Republicans, not necessarily each other. But the night was different.

Advertisement

Multiple times during the debate, McLeod went over his allotted time to try to attack Johnson or Webster. Both candidates repeated the same response in return, sometimes laughing, saying they had no idea what McLeod was talking about.

McLeod continued to reference both Webster and Johnson as being part of the corruption in South Carolina that he could “shine a light” on. He referred to himself as a servant more than six times.

“If you’re going to be on the stage and run for governor, you better start checking your facts,” Webster said to McLeod.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

WATCH: Gov. McMaster signs bill protecting SC police animals

Published

on

WATCH: Gov. McMaster signs bill protecting SC police animals


COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – A ceremonial bill signing was held We Wednesday for a new law that enhances penalties for harming police animals in South Carolina.

H.3034 – also known as Fargo’s, Hyco’s, Rico’s, Coba’s, Wick’s, Mikka’s, and Bumi’s Law – was passed and ratified by state lawmakers in May.

The bill is named after seven police K-9’s lost in recent years acros South Carolina.

Gov. Henry McMaster later signed the bill into law, with it going into effect on May 15.

Advertisement

The law makes killing or severely injuring a police animal, such as a K-9 or horse, punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

It also states that anyone convicted of that crime must pay back the full cost of the animal – including buying a new one, training and any veterinarian bills. The law also makes it a crime to fire at a police vehicle if an animal is inside.

Police are also required by law to keep detailed records when a K-9 bites or causes injury.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.

Copyright 2026 WIS. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending