Judge: Oklahoma Turnpike Authority violated Open Meeting Act, ACCESS project contracts rendered invalid

The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority has misplaced the primary of a number of impending court docket choices relating to the 15-year, $5 billion ACCESS Oklahoma turnpike mission.

The lawsuit filed on behalf of over 200 central Oklahoma residents alleged the OTA willfully violated the state’s Open Assembly Act through the use of obscure language in its Jan. 25 and Feb. 22 public assembly agendas and paperwork main as much as the announcement of the ACCESS mission.

The ACCESS Oklahoma mission was introduced following the Feb. 22 OTA board assembly. The mission would assemble new turnpike extensions in Oklahoma and Cleveland Counties, a few of that are estimated to pressure over 600 householders out of their properties — although the OTA mentioned this quantity is nearer to 200.

The choice invalidates the ACCESS-related actions taken through the conferences in query, which quantities to about $69 million in engineering contracts for the mission. To get these contracts again, the OTA might want to redo the approval votes with the correct agenda necessities.

Cleveland County District Courtroom Decide Timothy Olsen wrote in his resolution that whereas the OTA knew the specifics of the ACCESS mission “in nice element,” the January and February assembly agendas contained nothing that referenced the plan as required by the Oklahoma Open Assembly Act.

“The agenda objects in query appear to be the other of what’s required by the OMA,” Olsen wrote. “No individual of atypical schooling and intelligence might know from the agendas that ACCESS Oklahoma was to be rolled out on the assembly and/and even that the brand new turnpikes had been being deliberate. The time period ‘sure turnpikes’ is so obscure that the usage of the time period in and of itself reveals an intent to deceive the citizenry of Oklahoma.”

Norman Metropolis Councilor Rarchar Tortorello spoke at a press convention Thursday night. His ward can be considerably impacted by the mission.

“This can pressure them to return and redo these conferences,” Tortorello mentioned. “And guess what? We are going to present up, and we are going to present remark.”

There are two different court docket choices which are anticipated to come back out this month — one from a lawsuit difficult the OTA’s interpretation of the regulation that authorizes a few of the mission’s routes, and one other wherein the state Supreme Courtroom will determine whether or not to validate bonds for the mission.

Opponents of the mission are additionally trying to the legislature to assist block the mission. This summer time, two legislative interim research periods had been held to clarify the construction of the OTA and the arguments of the present lawsuits.

Plaintiff legal professional Alexey Tarasov mentioned on the press convention there can be a legislative effort to switch the state’s eminent area legal guidelines.

“We’ve proposed a constitutional modification on eminent area whereby if a turnpike mission will get approved or is about to be constructed, that there must be a vote of the residents who reside in that space so {that a} majority would approve the mission,” Tarasov mentioned.

Reached for remark, the OTA offered an announcement:

“The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority has all the time endeavored to conduct its statutory mission to assemble, function, restore and preserve turnpike initiatives in an open and clear method. We respect the Courtroom’s resolution and can go about bringing new objects of enterprise, to appropriate what the Courtroom discovered to be poor, for the Authority Board’s consideration.”

StateImpact Oklahoma is a partnership of Oklahoma’s public radio stations which depends on contributions from readers and listeners to meet its mission of public service to Oklahoma and past. Donate on-line.