Connect with us

North Carolina

Over 300 Volunteers Rebuild N.C. Houses, a Community Center Destroyed by Hurricane Helene: ‘They’re Helping Us Restore Our Lives’

Published

on

Over 300 Volunteers Rebuild N.C. Houses, a Community Center Destroyed by Hurricane Helene: ‘They’re Helping Us Restore Our Lives’


NEED TO KNOW

  • Around 300 volunteers assisted a North Carolina community after the area was devastated by Hurricane Helene in September 2024
  • The Home Depot Foundation was joined by the Appalachia Service Project, 365 Connect and ToolBank Disaster Services to rebuild houses and a community center that were destroyed in Asheville
  • “They’re helping us restore our lives. … It’s something I’ll never forget,” Michael Christopher Maria, an Army veteran, said

A North Carolina community received a helpful assist — months after the area was devastated by Hurricane Helene in September 2024.

On Tuesday, June 24, around 300 volunteers from The Home Depot Foundation were joined by the Appalachia Service Project, 365 Connect and ToolBank Disaster Services to rebuild houses and a community center that were destroyed in Asheville by the flooding from the massive storm.

The volunteers gathered to complete the work and renovations at the Asheville Buncombe Community Christian Ministry (ABCCM) Center, according to a press release obtained by PEOPLE. The non-profit addresses “poverty, hunger and homelessness” and offers “access to healthcare for underserved populations,” per its website.

Together, the organizations installed kitchen appliances in the facility’s new food distribution center, updated offices and therapy rooms and built custom murals, and they also framed walls for around 15 to 20 future homes.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Advertisement
Volunteers in Ashville.

The Home Depot Foundation


John Richard Talbot Jr., who served with the Marine Corps, said the help provided by the volunteers was greatly appreciated.

“I feel very thankful and happy … that they’re helping us so much,” he said.

The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now!

Advertisement

Michael Christopher Maria, an Army veteran, added that the work done by The Home Depot Foundation and the other groups was “totally amazing.”

“I’m blown away by what I’m seeing,” he continued. “They’re helping us restore our lives. … It’s something I’ll never forget.”

Volunteers in Ashville.

The Home Depot Foundation


Helene was a Category 4 storm when it made landfall late at night near Perry, Fla., on Thursday, Sept. 26.

Advertisement

Over 200 people died due to the natural disaster throughout several states across the southern part of the U.S.

The PEOPLE App is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more!

Since Hurricane Helene hit the area last year, The Home Depot Foundation has packed thousands of disaster relief kits.

The group has also so far committed $8.5 million to disaster relief efforts in 2025, and The Home Depot Foundation continues to support communities nationwide that are still reeling from natural disasters.



Source link

Advertisement

North Carolina

SIGN: Pass Duke’s Rescue Act to Protect Dogs and Cats in North Carolina

Published

on

SIGN: Pass Duke’s Rescue Act to Protect Dogs and Cats in North Carolina


235 Signatures Collected

PETITION TARGET: North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall and Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger

A pit bull named Duke, who spent the first four years of his life chained outside in Windsor, North Carolina, was found emaciated, anemic, suffering from heartworm disease, and living in filth, according to local news. Chained nearby were several other neglected dogs and the skeletal remains of his sister, Minnie, who reportedly died of starvation.

Following the discovery of Minnie’s death, all the dogs on the property were rescued—but many dogs aren’t so lucky.

Advertisement

To help prevent tragic cases like this, North Carolina lawmakers introduced Duke’s Rescue Act, which would prohibit outdoor tethering of animal companions in extreme weather, establish minimum care standards for dogs and cats, and give authorities clearer direction and better tools to help animals left without the care they need.

If enacted, those who violate the law would face a Class 3 misdemeanor for a first offense and a Class 2 misdemeanor for any subsequent offense. It would also provide funding for public education, so guardians responsible for dogs and cats can understand the basic care the law would require.

The suffering Duke, Minnie, and the other dogs on that property allegedly endured should never have been allowed to happen. No dog or cat should be left without food, clean water, proper shelter, or veterinary care — or left chained for years, forced to watch a companion die in front of them.

Sign our petition urging North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall and Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger to help advance Duke’s Rescue Act so North Carolina can pass clear minimum care standards for dogs and cats.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Saving homes or beaches? NC faces tough call on seawall ban

Published

on

Saving homes or beaches? NC faces tough call on seawall ban



A new report says placing hardened structures along the N.C. oceanfront could help with chronic erosion woes. But they come with plenty of risk.

North Carolina’s love-hate relationship with hardened structures along the oceanfront is heating up.

Advertisement

From the Outer Banks in the north to Ocean Isle Beach in the south, many portions of North Carolina’s 320 miles of oceanfront are dealing with erosion woes that are threatening homes, infrastructure and coastal economies.

Coastal officials have long complained that the state’s ban, although softened in recent years, on hardened structures along the oceanfront like seawalls and jetties leaves them with few options beyond expensive beach nourishment to deal with the shifting sands.

Environmentalists and others say the ban protects the natural beauty and feel of North Carolina’s beaches while reinforcing that there are simply some places that we shouldn’t be developing. They also note that hardened structures often do little but move the erosion woes to other parts of the beachfront.

In June 2026, the N.C. Coastal Resources Commission’s Science Panel released its draft report on the effects of hardened structures on the coast. The report, while not taking sides on the state’s four-decade-long ban on permanent structures along the beachfront, is meant to provide guidance for regulators and policymakers as they debate the emotionally charged issue.

Advertisement

How did we get here?

North Carolina’s existing rules on oceanfront construction are largely based on using a 30-year setback rule. The thinking was that a 30-year window of sand and dunes in front of a structure would give homeowners and local communities a chance to come up with a long-term solution if the ocean started encroaching on oceanfront properties.

But structures these days often last longer than 30 years, and the environmental conditions of the 1970s aren’t the same as those the coast is facing today.

Storms are bigger and more powerful than those of last century thanks to climate change, and sea-level rise is increasing. Sea level is expected to rise by a foot or more by 2050 from today’s levels, amplifying the impacts of tidal flooding and storms that aren’t even tropical in nature.

Advertisement

As environmental conditions grow more challenging, oceanfront homes are tumbling into the water. In Rodanthe and Buxton on the Outer Banks, more than 30 homes have collapsed since 2020. Closer to Wilmington, sandbags now line stretches of beachfront in North Topsail Beach, Figure Eight Island and Ocean Isle Beach, offering the last line of protection for million-dollar homes.

‘Maintain a cautious approach’

With pressure mounting on officials to come up with some solutions to disappearing beaches, the science panel was asked to look into shoreline management, both in N.C. and other states, and examine the pros and cons of different measures − particularly the use of oceanfront hardened structures.

“Recent erosion impacts in several North Carolina oceanfront communities have brought shoreline management issues back to the forefront, prompting questions about whether alternatives to beach nourishment should be considered to address chronic erosion,” states the report.

Advertisement

But the science panel makes it crystal clear that hardening the shoreline to prevent the natural movement of beaches and dunes landward will likely lead to, first, a narrower and then likely a disappearing beach in front of the structure. Groins and jetties, while helping the beach adjacent to them, also end up “starving” beach areas downdrift of the structures. The volunteer panel, however, also noted that securing the shoreline could offer coastal communities an economic lifeline.

“The panel therefore recommends that North Carolina maintain a cautious approach to any expansion of the use of hardened structures and that any major reconsideration of the state’s oceanfront management policies include a broad and comprehensive assessment of the physical, ecological, recreational, and economic consequences of expanded use, including consideration of who will likely benefit and who will likely suffer adverse effects, prior to policy modification,” the report states.

Legislators getting involved

As erosion threatens more oceanfront properties, infrastructure, and the coast’s vital tourism industry, legislators are taking notice and proposing solutions.

A bill working its way though the N.C. General Assembly could permanently change the face of the state’s coast. Senate Bill 1009, would lift the state ban on hardened structures, including seawalls, jetties and terminal groins, low-slung structures built perpendicular to the shoreline that helps trap sand in areas of high erosion, such as near inlets.

Advertisement

Proponents of the legislation say times along the coast have changed, and state policy needs to match the new realities that residents, visitors and local officials are dealing with along the oceanfront.

While current rules push beach communities to favor nourishment, enhanced dune systems, and other “natural” approaches to shoreline management, some say more permanent and immediate solutions are sometimes required.

Beach nourishment isn’t cheap, with even small projects costing millions, and can be a regulatory challenge if you have to find compatible beach sand that is often in short supply. In places like the Outer Banks, officials have said trying to maintain more than 80 miles of beachfront simply isn’t feasible under current rules and regulations. And to be truly effective, nourishments have to be repeated every few years due to natural erosion and storm-related events − heaping more pressure on state and local budgets that already face a lot of funding priorities.

Environmentalists and coastal advocates say installing hardened structures to control erosion means picking winners and losers along the oceanfront, since they will end up taking sand from other parts of the beachfront. There also can be environmental impacts, such as the loss of habitat and beaches for nesting sea turtles and shorebirds.

Advertisement

Greg “Rudi” Rudolph, a member of the science panel, said there’s no “magic bullet” for North Carolina’s oceanfront erosion issues, with each possible solution carrying pros and cons. He also said many of the shoreline management tools need to be done in conjunction with each other to offer a truly effective long-term solution, such as a groin and periodic nourishment.

“There are trade-offs, there are benefits, and there are costs,” Rudolph said. “That’s what makes this so challenging.”

Reporter Gareth McGrath can be reached at GMcGrath@usatodayco.com or @GarethMcGrathSN on X/Twitter. This story was produced with financial support from Journalism Funding Partners. The USA TODAY Network maintains full editorial control of the work. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

Severe thunderstorm warning expires in central NC areas

Published

on

Severe thunderstorm warning expires in central NC areas


RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — The National Weather Service issued several severe thunderstorm warnings for various areas of central North Carolina on Sunday afternoon.

The final warning was allowed to expire at 4:45 p.m. for Northwestern Harnett County, Northeastern Lee County, Southwestern Wake County, and Southeastern Chatham County, according to the National Weather Service office in Raleigh.

Forecasters said the warning was triggered by a severe thunderstorm east of Sanford, moving east at 10 mph.

The warning said the main threats from the storm are 60 mph wind gusts and nickel-sized hail.

Advertisement

Scroll below for the latest central North Carolina weather warnings and advisories:



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending