Louisiana
Why a voting rights advocate says AG Murrill could be tanking Louisiana’s redistricting case • Louisiana Illuminator

The U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t set a date for when it will hear the challenge against Louisiana’s majority-Black 6th Congressional District as an illegal racial gerrymander, but one invested onlooker has made it clear where she stands on the case in the meantime.
In doing so, she claims Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, who’s defending the map, is content to lose the case because it will lead to the removal of the state’s second majority-Black district in Congress.
It’s an allegation Murrill firmly refutes, despite having strenuously defended a prior map in federal court that had just one majority-Black district.
Marina Jenkins, executive director for the National Redistricting Foundation, told reporters last week her group’s “friend of the court” brief (as an outside party to the case) filed Dec. 26 calls on the Supreme Court to keep the current map in place.
Her organization, which is aligned with the Democratic Party, maintains politics, not race, factored into the crafting of the new 6th District. Specifically, Louisiana’s Republican leaders decided who would be sacrificed among their GOP congressional incumbents, she said.
Also, Jenkins suggested that Murrill’s heart might not be in the task of defending the current map.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Even though Louisiana wants the court to keep the current map in place, she said Murrill and state Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga are trying to undermine the portion of the federal Voting Rights Act that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, Section 2.
“The state of Louisiana has presented outlandish arguments intending to undermine precedent on Section 2 claims, going as far as to say that the state has no obligation to comply with federal law and vote dilution claims,” she said, referencing prior cases when Murrill stood behind maps that watered down Black voting strength.
Murrill firmly rejected Jenkins’ claims Thursday when reached by the Illuminator.
“We absolutely disagree with everything that she said,” the attorney general said in an email from her spokesman. “We have vigorously defended this map, and we look forward to continuing to defend the map at the United States Supreme Court.”
Louisiana filed its own brief Dec. 19 that explains why it supports the map, Murrill said.
“Our brief urges the Supreme Court to uphold [the map] and provide clarity to states that, like Louisiana, are forced into endless litigation every time a new census requires redistricting,” the attorney general wrote.
Projections show Gov. Jeff Landry’s tax overhaul will erase next year’s budget deficit in Louisiana
A group of non-Black 6th District voters sued in February to throw out the new version of the 6th District state lawmakers had approved the month before. A federal district judge ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor, and the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeal upheld that decision.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal but gave its OK to use its boundaries for the Nov. 5 election. State Sen. Cleo Fields, D-Baton Rouge, won his way back to Congress in that race, having previously represented the 4th District from 1993-97. Coincidentally, the federal courts rejected that version of the 4th District because it was deemed an illegal racial gerrymander.
This is not the first time Murrill and the National Redistricting Foundation have crossed paths.
The group, founded in 2017, filed one of its very first lawsuits a year later against Louisiana for its congressional map that had just one majority-Black district out of its six U.S. House seats. The case timed out with the 2020 Census, which required a new round of congressional reapportionment anyway.
The foundation, with the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund leading the way, successfully challenged a congressional map approved in 2022 – one that’s Murrill job to defend as attorney general – with just one majority-Black U.S. House seat in Louisiana. Before that decision could be appealed, its fate became clear in 2023 when the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Alabama’s congressional map that also shorted the state’s Black population.
At the time, legal analysts said the case for a second Black congressional district in Louisiana was even stronger than Alabama’s. So when Republican Gov. Jeff Landry took office in January, he and Murrill conceded the court fight over the 2022 map, and state lawmakers then convened for a special session to update the lines for the 6th District.
When state legislators were given options in January, the NAACP and NRF backed a bill that created a more compact majority-Black seat out of the 5th District anchored in Northeast Louisiana and held by U.S. Rep. Julia Letlow, R-Start. The GOP-dominated Legislature instead chose to create a 6th District that stretches awkwardly between Baton Rouge and Northwest Louisiana, largely keeping intact Letlow’s district and the 4th District U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Shreveport, represents
Jenkins was asked why her organization is now defending the new 6th District rather than suing to revive the revised 5th District it originally supported. She said it’s more important for justices to issue a ruling that ends a federal court pattern of “moving the goalposts” on the Voting Rights Act.
“This has been sort of a nonstop attack against enforcement of voting rights, protections for voters of color,” she said.
Republican attorneys general in other states have followed Louisiana’s redistricting court saga closely. Fourteen of them filed an amicus brief in a separate NAACP LDF lawsuit that argues state lawmakers underrepresented Black voters when they redrew districts for the Louisiana House of Representatives.
Murrill defended the Louisiana House map and didn’t join her Republican peers in the brief.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorney Jared Evans said at the time the stakes in that case extend well beyond Louisiana.
“They know that if Section 2 is upheld, there are a lot of states that need to have additional … Black districts in their [state] house maps, but also in the congressional map, in the state school board maps and all of the other political boundaries,” Evans said.
Lawmakers ponder ‘tort reform’ rebrand to fix car insurance crisis in Louisiana
Jenkins highlighted another common thread between Louisiana and other states where Republicans have fought to constrain Black voting strength. The outside law firm Murrill has hired to assist the state in its defense, Holtzman Vogel, also defended what Jenkins called “egregious gerrymanders” in political maps for North Carolina and Ohio.
Drew Ensign, the Holtzman Vogel attorney working on Louisiana’s case, previously worked with Landry and Murrill when they led 24 states in a challenge of the Biden administration’s rejection of Trump-era immigration policy.
Jenkins argues further that race and politics are intertwined. While drawing district lines based on racial makeup is illegal, she noted lawmakers are allowed to take politics into account — making the existing 6th District legally sound.
She contends that the Republican-led Louisiana Legislature and Landry steered the redistricting process to sacrifice Congressman Garret Graves, R-Baton Rouge from the 6th District.
Graves had fallen out of favor with Landry after choosing to back business lobbyist and longtime friend Stephen Waguespack in the 2023 governor’s race. He had also lost support from Louisiana’s hardcore GOP sect who viewed Graves as insufficiently supportive of Rep. Steve Scalise’s failed bid for U.S. House speaker.
“The Legislature had multiple pathways to create a … compliant map, but testimony from legislators showed that the boundaries of the new district were designed with political interests top of mind, specifically the uniquely partisan goal of favoring one incumbent,” Jenkins said, referring to Letlow.
With Republicans now in control of Congress, the outcome of this case isn’t likely to affect whatever momentum the incoming Trump administration builds for at least a couple of years. But if historical election patterns hold true and Democrats attain House control in the 2027 midterms, Louisiana’s two majority-Black seats might be key to that swing.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Louisiana
Louisiana teachers will get $2,250 permanent pay raises under new law, if voters approve

Louisiana voters will return to the polls to decide whether to approve a constitutional amendment that would permanently raise teacher salaries by $2,250 and support staff salaries by $1,125 under a pair of bills that received final passage in the Legislature on Thursday.
House Bill 466 by Rep. Josh Carlson, R-Lafayette, and HB 473 by Rep. Julie Emerson, R-Carencro, will ask voters to approve eliminating multiple constitutionally protected education trust funds in favor of giving raises to Louisiana teachers, who make roughly $5,000 less on average than educators in other southern states and about $15,000 less than the national average, according to data from the Southern Regional Education Board. If voters approve the amendment, teachers will receive the raises in the 2026-27 school year.
The raises are slightly higher than the $2,000 and $1,000 pay bumps the bills originally proposed. The Louisiana House of Representatives unanimously approved the additional increase Thursday. Both pieces of legislation now head to the governor’s desk for his signature.
“I brought this bill on behalf of our teachers,” Carlson said in a statement. “We wanted to ensure that we did all we could to provide a permanent pay raise.”
The bills, which repackage part of a constitutional amendment championed by Gov. Jeff Landry that voters shot down earlier this year, are the state’s latest effort to increase educators’ compensation. Lawmakers failed several times in recent years to increase their pay, opting instead for one-time stipends three years in a row. If signed into law, the bills will turn the stipend amount teachers currently receive into a slightly larger permanent pay increase.
Emerson’s bill eliminates three trust funds that funnel millions annually toward state K-12 education initiatives, including early childhood education, student testing help and efforts to improve struggling schools. Instead, the trust funds would be used to pay off longstanding debts related to Louisiana’s teacher retirement system, which is expected to save school districts $2 billion in interest payments. Carlson’s bill mandates that school systems use the savings to give teachers raises.
The bill also requires the state to step in to subsidize the full cost of the raises for districts that do not realize enough savings to do so on their own. It will also cover the estimated $16.7 million to give raises to teachers and staff at charter schools that don’t pay into the retirement system.
The state will have to spend around $250,000 to fund the raises in the roughly seven districts that are expected to come up short in their savings, according to cost estimates for Carlson’s bill. Other districts are expected to have nearly $36 million left over after providing the raises, which the legislation says can be put toward a limited number of uses, including giving teachers additional pay bumps.
If the governor signs the bills into law, Louisiana voters will then need to approve changing the state constitution to eliminate the trust funds. Lawmakers say that vote will likely not happen until April 2026.
The state’s largest teachers union supports the raises but has expressed concerns about funding them through debt-payment savings.
Louisiana Federation of Teachers President Larry Carter told lawmakers last month that it would be better to include the pay increases in the state’s school-funding formula to prevent the money from being funneled toward different uses down the road.
Educators “cannot rely on good intentions alone,” he said, adding that “we want to get some guarantees.”
Louisiana
CVS tells customers it will be forced to close its doors in Louisiana because of HB 358, lawmakers call bluff

BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) – On June 11, many CVS customers woke up to a text from the pharmacy chain that said it would have to close its locations in Louisiana because of HB 358, which passed both the House and Senate. That bill would force CVS Health to stop operating CVS Caremark, alongside other pharmacies that own Pharmaceutical Benefit Managers (PBMs) in Louisiana.
“If you choose to be a PBM, you can still be a PBM but you cannot be a PBM and a pharmacy,” Rep. Dustin Miller proclaimed on the House floor. His bill would do just that, separating what he says is a conflict of interest in the pharmaceutical industry.
A PBM is essentially a middleman between pharmacies, insurance companies, and drug manufacturers that works to set drug prices. PBMs make their profits by spread pricing, or through the difference between what they bill insurance companies and the rebate to the pharmacy.
Oftentimes, these PBMs are owned by the pharmacies that they work with, even though they work across the industry. Lawmakers allege this drives business away from independent pharmacies and strangles small business.
“They set the rates and the reimbursement for the pharmacies; we are just telling them if that is your core responsibility, you can keep that as your core responsibility,” Miller said. “We don’t want you to also go open a pharmacy and steer people to you and compete against other pharmacies.”
Many House lawmakers took to the floor to call out CVS for what they said are scare tactics. The text and emails claimed sent by CVS claimed lawmakers were trying to get CVS to shut down its businesses.
“No, we’re not you liars,” Baton Rouge Republican Rep. Dixon McMakin said. “Quit being liars, quit using scare tactics.”
But Rep. Edmond Jordan said everyone needs to take a chill pill.
“Independent pharmacies aren’t going to close tomorrow, in fact, they are doing better than they have in several years,” Jordan said. “If CVS decides to leave, hopefully, we have people there to make up that difference.”
House Bill 358 now heads to the governor’s desk for final signature. Governor Landry has said online that he supports the new regulations.
Click here to report a typo. Please include the headline.
Click here to subscribe to our WAFB 9 News daily digest and breaking news alerts delivered straight to your email inbox.
Copyright 2025 WAFB. All rights reserved.
Louisiana
Federal cuts halt landmark status for Louisiana plantation that teaches slavery’s history

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
-
West6 days ago
Battle over Space Command HQ location heats up as lawmakers press new Air Force secretary
-
Alaska1 week ago
Interior Plans to Rescind Drilling Ban in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve
-
Politics1 week ago
Red state tops annual Heritage Foundation scorecard for strongest election integrity: 'Hard to cheat'
-
World1 week ago
Two suspected Ugandan rebels killed in Kampala explosion
-
Technology6 days ago
iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Sinners’ on VOD, Ryan Coogler's ambitious vampire epic set in the segregated South of the 1930s
-
News1 week ago
Stabilizing 'operations,' the National Weather Service hires again after Trump cuts
-
World1 week ago
EU-Ukraine trade reset: What comes after tariff-free access expires?