Georgia Power pressing ahead with coal ash storage plan, slow rollout of clean energy

by Stanley Dunlap, Georgia Recorder [This article first appeared in the Georgia Recorder, republished with permission]
Could 30, 2022

The Georgia Public Service Fee is about to vote July 22 on Georgia Energy’s long run vitality plans for coal plant closings, photo voltaic vitality manufacturing, electrical automobile infrastructure and extra.

The state’s largest electrical energy supplier may have a possibility to request a remaining listening to subsequent month following a number of days of hearings that wrapped up on the finish of Could. The corporate defended its three-year 2022 Built-in Useful resource Plan as varied environmental, client advocacy and different vitality associated organizations delivered disparaging testimony earlier than state regulators.

Georgia Energy executives and workers had been questioned throughout hearings earlier within the spring, establishing a important 12 months for the way forward for vitality manufacturing. ‌After a vote on the plan in July, a charge case ‌will decide‌ ‌how‌ ‌a lot‌ the corporate’s clients ‌will‌ ‌pay‌ ‌for‌ ‌electrical energy‌ ‌over‌ ‌the‌‌ ‌‌subsequent‌‌ ‌‌three‌ ‌years. ‌Ratepayers with Georgia Energy aren’t more likely to study whether or not they’ll pay extra for the grossly overdue and over funds nuclear growth at Plant Vogtle till 2023.

After final week’s testimony, Bryan Jacob, director of photo voltaic for the Southern Alliance for Clear Vitality, stated that many organizations are hoping that Georgia Energy will make some adjustments earlier than the ultimate plan is permitted.

“The intervening events put actual compelling proof into the document that that the plan that the corporate has put ahead would find yourself locking us into extra fossil gas sources than crucial for for many years to come back,”

For years, a supply of competition for some environmental organizations has concerned Georgia Energy’s $9 billion plan for closing 11 coal fired-plants and sealing of poisonous coal ash waste in groundwater. Cleanup prices for coal ash have been tacked onto buyer’s month-to-month payments for years.

Final week, environmental advisor Mark Quarles of BBJ Group testified that the utility supplier’s plan to depart the coal ash in place as an alternative of transferring it to lined storage would violate federal atmosphere rules.

The‌ ‌utility supplier’s plan to deal with coal ash by leaving the ash in unlined pits at some websites is a course of opposed by a number of environmentalists preferring sending it to a lined landfill in order that the contaminated ash is faraway from contact‌ ‌with‌ ‌groundwater.

Georgia Energy argues the coal ash has not compromised consuming water requirements and intends to cap the coal ash in place the place a lot of it now’s collected in ponds close to the corporate’s legacy electrical energy crops. These plans have lately been thrown into query after federal environmental regulators pressed the state Environmental Safety Division to overview them.

Charline Whyte, senior marketing campaign consultant for the Sierra Membership’s Past Coal Marketing campaign in Georgia, known as out the utility firm for its timeline and strategies on retiring coal fired amenities, which helped earn the corporate a failing grade on the most recent Sierra Membership Report Card.

“Georgia Energy bought an F for air pollution as a result of it plans to burn coal past 2028, retailer poisonous coal ash in unlined pits, and depend on fracked fuel,” Whyte stated in a Could 17 assertion. “All of this stuff straight threaten the well being of the environment and our communities.”

A Georgia Energy legal professional responded that whereas revisions to federal rules are within the works, the corporate’s plan was already permitted in 2019 underneath customary thought of by the Georgia Environmental‌ ‌Safety‌ ‌Division .

The corporate’s timeline for closing their coal crops requires all however one to be shut down by 2028, and the whole phasing out of coal use by 2035.

Jill Kysor, an legal professional with the Southern Environmental Legislation Middle, which represented Georgia Interfaith Energy and Mild and Partnership for Southern Fairness, stated the middle helps Georgia Energy’s newest plans to take 12 coal-fired models, accounting for greater than 3,500 megawatts, by 2028.

The 2022 Built-in Useful resource Plan is a 20-year vitality roadmap that features a pledge to provide clear vitality sources designed to enhance air and water high quality.

The 2022 plan was developed after Georgia Energy officers performed an evaluation that included projections of future gas prices, environmental technique, and a laundry listing of different assessments as the corporate promotes extra vitality environment friendly ‌applications.

“The corporate additionally evaluates the cost-effectiveness of its producing sources given altering environmental rules and rising applied sciences and the way to finest add resilience to the electrical system,” Georgia Energy stated in an announcement.

However specialists at this week’s listening to additionally spent appreciable time selling adjustments they are saying would improve the feasibility of pure fuel, biomass, wind, and photo voltaic vitality suppliers to bid on sharing in Georgia Energy’s vitality grid to interchange the coal-fueled crops that shut down,

Southern Environmental Legislation Middle analysts had been amongst those that testified that some vitality producers had extra problem proving their viability primarily based on the necessities set forth within the request for bid proposals.

Jacob‌, with the Southern Alliance, ‌stated‌ ‌that‌ ‌in‌ ‌2019 there was a collective effort from the corporate, events, and the fee to discover a cost-effective long-term answer that might fulfill ratepayers.

Jacob stated he’s involved that the bidding requirements set over the previous few years may very well be dangerous in the event that they proceed to set the course.

“On the finish of this course of you’re not going to have the ability to guarantee ratepayers that they’re getting the perfect deal since you’re not gonna know for certain that the 75 megawatt tasks which might be on the market within the interconnection queue wouldn’t have been cheaper,” Jacob stated.

A key ingredient to look out for within the charge case is that if Georgia Energy proposes to extend the fastened cost for coal ash administration for purchasers, after the fee permitted incremental hikes as a part of the 2019 plan.

Jacob stated fastened charge will increase disproportionately have an effect on the poorest households, since extra prosperous households spend extra on vitality.

“It has a destructive influence on the economics of anyone who desires to place photo voltaic on their home or anyone that desires to spend money on vitality effectivity applications,” Jacob stated.

Solar energy will get renewed vitality

Georgia Energy is receiving some kudos for proposing a pilot program to help low-income communities with photo voltaic vitality. However photo voltaic vitality advocates say they’d wish to see a assure that underneath this system low-income communities will get monetary savings or on the very least not pay the identical quantity on their electrical energy payments.

The hearings featured varied organizations advocating for the PSC to develop the online metering program for photo voltaic powered rooftops after reaching its restrict of 5,000 clients.

The web metering program requires Georgia Energy to buy unused solar energy ‌ at ‌ ‌ the ‌ ‌ ‌identical‌ ‌value‌ ‌it‌ ‌expenses‌ ‌for‌ ‌‌electrical energy.

Even when the cap is elevated by a small quantity, it might stress folks into making a rash resolution on whether or not or not solar energy works finest for them at their houses, church buildings, or companies, Kysor stated.

“On the finish of the day, month-to-month internet metering makes rooftop photo voltaic far more reasonably priced, so it actually cracks open accessibility for on a regular basis Georgians– center earnings people, decrease earnings people, as a result of then they will finance their methods,” she stated .

Georgia Recorder is a part of States Newsroom, a community of reports bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Georgia Recorder maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor John McCosh for questions: information@georgiarecorder.com. Comply with Georgia Recorder on Fb and Twitter.