A traffic citation issued to a woman who said she was accused of holding a phone in a hand she does not have has been dismissed.

Court records show the citation was dismissed at the request of the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office deputy who issued it. A court hearing had been scheduled for Tuesday, but was canceled after the case was dropped.

The citation, issued Feb. 11 along North Dixie Highway in Lake Worth Beach, accused the driver of violating Florida’s wireless communications while driving law. The case drew widespread attention after the woman posted video of the traffic stop on TikTok, where she questioned the deputy’s claim that he saw a device in her “right hand.” She said she does not have a right hand.

EARLIER STORY IS BELOW

A Lake Worth Beach traffic stop is gaining attention online after a woman was cited for using a wireless communications device while driving, but video of the encounter is now sparking debate over how Florida’s distracted driving law is enforced.

The citation, issued by a deputy with the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office on February 11 around 8:04 a.m. along North Dixie Highway, lists the charge as “Wireless Comm. Device/Handheld While Driving – First Offense” under Florida Statute 316.305(3)(a), with a civil penalty of $116.

In a video posted to TikTok that has since gone viral, the driver records the stop and questions the deputy’s observation. The citation indicates the deputy observed a handheld device while she was traveling northbound on North Dixie Highway.

During the stop, the deputy is heard stating he saw the device in her “right hand.” The woman says she does not have a right hand and plans to challenge the citation in court. She has also requested body camera footage from PBSO. CBS12 has submitted a public records request for that footage as well.

What Florida law actually says

Florida’s Wireless Communications While Driving Law has been in effect since 2013 and was strengthened in 2019, making texting while driving a primary offense, meaning drivers can be pulled over solely for that violation.

Under the 2025 Florida Statutes, drivers may not manually type or enter letters, numbers, or symbols into a wireless communications device while operating a vehicle for non-voice communication, such as texting, emailing, or instant messaging.

However, the law includes several exceptions. Drivers are allowed to use a device for navigation or GPS purposes, receive safety-related alerts, report emergencies, and engage in voice communication that does not require manual typing.

“The statute’s actually really explicit,” Donahue said. “It says you have to be engaged in manually typing letters or numbers into the device.”

In other words, simply holding a phone is not automatically illegal under current Florida law outside of certain zones. The statute focuses on manually typing, entering multiple letters or numbers, or sending and receiving data while operating a vehicle.

Additionally, handheld use of a wireless device is specifically prohibited in designated school crossings, school zones, and active work zones. Attorney Ted Hollander with the Ticket Clinic says that distinction is key.

“Whether she’s holding it in her right hand or her left hand, it really doesn’t matter,” Hollander said. “If you are not in a school zone or a construction zone, you are allowed to hold a cell phone.”

Hollander noted that on this citation, neither a school zone nor construction zone box is checked.

“The fact that neither one is checked off tells me that this did not occur in one of those zones,” he said.

Enforcement and burden of proof

Hollander says it’s common for drivers to pay citations without questioning them — even in cases where the ticket may not hold up in court.

“So a lot of times people pay tickets that shouldn’t be paid, and this could have been one of those examples,” he said. “But luckily this lady seems to be standing up for herself.”

Donahue says enforcement can be challenging.

“It’s really difficult for the officer to prove that unless they visually see it or have it on their cameras,” he said. “That’s one of the reasons why you pretty much never see this infraction enforced.”

Donahue said that in his experience practicing traffic law in Palm Beach County, texting-while-driving citations are rare.

If a driver contests the ticket, the case would go before a traffic magistrate or judge. As a first offense, the violation is a non-moving civil traffic infraction punishable by a fine. A second offense within five years could carry points on a driver’s license.

Donahue notes that even though the statute is narrowly written, drivers should still exercise caution.

“You don’t want to be in a position where you have to prove your innocence,” he said. “Although the law is not that strict, you really need to treat it almost like it is.”

The woman says she has requested a hearing date and plans to fight the citation in court. PBSO has not yet responded to CBS12’s request for body camera footage or comment on the stop.

As the case moves forward, the viral video is reigniting discussion about distracted driving laws and how clearly they are understood by both drivers and officers.

If you need help with the Public File, call (407) 291-6000

At WKMG, we are committed to informing and delighting our audience. In our commitment to covering our communities with innovation and excellence, we incorporate Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to enhance our news gathering, reporting, and presentation processes. Read our article to see how we are using Artificial Intelligence.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out a long-shot lawsuit in which Florida sought to sue California and Washington for allegedly allowing people who entered the country illegally to obtain commercial truck driver’s licenses.

Subscribe to read this story ad-free

Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.

Advertisement

Florida’s claim was filed in the aftermath of a high-profile crash in the state last year in which a truck driven by an Indian man, Harjinder Singh, was involved in an accident that left three people dead. The state, which says Singh did not have legal status in the United States, alleges he was wrongly issued licenses in both California and Washington. Singh faces criminal charges over the incident.

The court denied the state’s appeal without comment.

Tune in to Here’s the Scoop’s special Supreme Court Edition, where Senior Legal Correspondent Laura Jarrett goes deep on major cases.

Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a separate opinion saying he would have heard the case. He was joined by fellow conservative Justice Samuel Alito.

“This court declines to even hear Florida’s claims, even though it has nowhere else to bring them,” Thomas wrote.

The unusual case saw Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Republican, file a claim directly at the Supreme Court instead of a lower state or federal court. The court can sometimes intervene in such disputes between states, but it rarely does so.

The lawsuit alleged that the Democratic-led states’ “open defiance” of federal immigration laws has led them to flout federal safety regulations. This has resulted in drivers obtaining licenses without “proper training or the ability to read road signs.” Those drivers cross state lines and are therefore threatening the safety of people in Florida and other states, the lawsuit says. Iowa and 16 other states filed a brief backing Florida.

Lawyers for California and Washington argued in response that there was no basis for the Supreme Court to take up the issue.

Washington Attorney General Nicholas Brown wrote in his brief that the lawsuit was a “political stunt, not a real claim,” noting that Uthmeier announced he was filing it during an appearance on conservative Fox News host Sean Hannity’s show.

Uthmeier, who is currently running for a full term after being appointed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year, has frequently leaned in on divisive conservative causes.

The Florida crash sparked a new political fight over illegal immigration as the Trump administration implements a hard-line immigration policy. In the aftermath of the incident, the administration threatened to cut off federal funds from California, Washington and New Mexico if they did not implement English language requirements for commercial drivers.