Connect with us

Dallas, TX

Convicted SMU Stalker Sues Dallas County For 183-Day Jail Overstay

Published

on

Convicted SMU Stalker Sues Dallas County For 183-Day Jail Overstay


Lew Sterrett Dallas County jail

Mark Graham

For 183 days at the beginning of 2024, Ian Smith sat in a locked jail cell in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, sure that he should by then be freed. 

Advertisement

According to a lawsuit filed earlier this month by Smith, a combination of clerical errors and failures by Dallas County officials in charge of the jail processing system led to Smith’s overincarceration by half a year, a violation of his constitutional rights under the Fourth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The filing states that the overserved time was due to a district clerk’s miscalculation of time already served, resulting in a “320-day error” that took months to correct. 

Smith’s attorneys claim that “even the most cursory review” of the records would have shown the “glaring discrepancy” between the clerk’s calculation and the time Smith had already served, but no such review process exists within Dallas County. The Dallas County District Attorney’s office declined to comment on the lawsuit. 

“[Mr. Smith] suffered concrete and devastating injuries — including profound humiliation, shame, fright, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life — for which he seeks full recovery,” the lawsuit states. “For 183 days, Mr. Smith was deprived of his freedom, his ability to earn a living, and his participation in daily life — all because Dallas County could not be bothered to verify a simple calculation.”

Smith, originally from Plano, has been convicted multiple times of charges related to stalking female SMU students. He was most recently arrested in July 2025, according to a university bulletin, in connection with online threats made against the university. 

In 2023, Smith was convicted of obstruction/retaliation, a third-degree felony, for threatening to harm a woman. After pleading guilty, Smith was sentenced to two years’ incarceration. At that time, he had already served 540 days of jail time that was to be shaved off the sentence, the lawsuit states, which should have seen him released by Sept. 13, 2023. 

Advertisement

Instead, Smith remained in custody until March 13, 2024. After officials recognized the issue, it took nine additional days for Smith to be released. 

While Smith has since gone on to reoffend, attorney Jim Spangler cautions against using that as a reason to be ambivalent about his client’s overserved time. The case represents a fundamental breakdown pervading the Dallas County justice system, he said. 

“When people are held for months past their due date, that undoes all that work that the criminal justice system is supposed to do,” Spangler told the Observer. “It’s unfair, and it’s unjust. The system has gone through the process to try and make it as fair and just as possible; it’s listened to all the voices, and they’ve come to an outcome in this case that everyone agreed to. And the fact that he had to do more time is fundamentally unfair.” 

A Not Uncommon Problem

The filing references several former public defenders who have documented a pattern of keeping inmates too long in the Dallas County Jail, and Spangler said he believes overserved time occurs more frequently in Dallas County than in “any other county in the state.” 

There is no state law that punishes municipalities for overdetentions. Additionally, no state agency officially tracks the number of Texans who overserve their sentences annually, but the issue has been reported in Dallas County for years. In 2023, the Observer found that a shift to the court management software Odyssey — which Smith’s lawsuit repeatedly cites as one of the factors contributing to his overdetainment — was causing inmates to overstay their sentences by days or weeks. 

Advertisement

According to the Texas Tribune, Dallas County has settled three lawsuits in the last two years filed by inmates who accused the county of failing to release them on time. The settlements have cost Dallas County nearly $250,000, money meant to compensate for missed job interviews or evictions that can result when a person is held in jail longer than planned. 

The Tribune article references at least one other individual, a woman arrested for misdemeanor drug possession and violating parole in December, who intends to sue Dallas County for the 49 extra days that she was kept in jail this year. 

To completely blame Dallas County’s processing system, Odyssey, for overserved time would be to scapegoat a recently-introduced software for a decades-old problem, said Spangler. County officials approved the program in April 2022, and it went into effect in May 2023, meaning the miscalculation of Smith’s time served occurred before the county installed the software. According to the lawsuit, one former public defender admitted to knowing of “at least 30” cases of over-detention before the Odyssey system’s implementation.

At the core of the issue is a failure to properly train district clerks in calculating time served, something that “they have a responsibility to get right,” as the sole determinants of when a person walks free, Spangler said. Additionally, “the county has failed to put proper checks in place” to prevent the issue, despite knowing it occurs.

A software-specific issue is that Odyssey is used by the courts but it is not integrated with the jail system. This can result in clerks failing to see time that may have been served in other counties, and prevents electronic communication between the justice and enforcement agencies. According to the lawsuit, as of fall 2025, district clerks were required to “print the information” from Odyssey “onto paper, then physically deliver it” to the sheriff’s office. 

Advertisement

According to the Texas Tribune, Dallas County is expected to be one of the first testing grounds for a new Texas Department of Criminal Justice program that formalizes communication between courts and jails, which may help prevent future overdetentions. 

“People know when they’re supposed to get out. They are counting down the days and when they don’t [get released on time], it is just an extremely stressful situation,” said Spangler. “It’s really challenging time to do, especially when you think you’re supposed to be out and when you have people calling on your behalf. In [Smith’s] case, he even had an attorney ultimately working on his case. But a clerical error is just holding you in jail for months. It’s just one of those things that is really hard.”



Source link

Advertisement

Dallas, TX

Biggest Question Nobody Is Asking About Dallas Cowboys & How They Answer It

Published

on

Biggest Question Nobody Is Asking About Dallas Cowboys & How They Answer It


The Dallas Cowboys took a step in the right direction this offseason when it comes to their defense.

After sporting the league’s worst defense in 2025 and missing the playoffs as a result of it, Dallas made significant moves at every level of the defense.

Perhaps the most important change was the team firing Matt Eberflus and hiring Christian Parker, who will oversee the revamped unit as a first-year defensive coordinator.

Advertisement

Speaking of Parker, he’s the source of the biggest question nobody is asking ahead of training camp.

How will Christian Parker perform in first season as defensive coordinator?

Advertisement

Dallas Cowboys cornerback Caleb Downs and defensive coordinator Christian Parker. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Advertisement

The early reviews for Parker have been very promising and show that he no doubt has the dedication necessary to turn things around in Dallas.

Based on what we have heard from players and coaches and what we’ve seen at spring practices, Parker is clearly a hard worker and is hands on with his players, something the Cowboys’ defenders appreciate.

“I feel like that’s when you learn fully what the coach means,” Caleb Downs said. “To be able to get hands on and be able to do the drill with you, I feel like that’s a real positive.”

“I can’t get the guy to leave the building,” head coach Brian Schottenheimer said of Parker. “I kind of see myself as a grinder… I’m always out before he is and I’m like, ‘Dude.’ He just loves it, man.

Advertisement

Parker is also very popular with his players, as Schottenheimer noted when he told reporters that Parker “literally has a line of guys” waiting outside his office to talk to him on a daily basis. That’s important to note because it means guys are willing to go the extra mile for their coach and that will only help Dallas’ defense improve.

Advertisement

While these are all great signs that the Cowboys have the right man for the job, none of them guarantee Parker will be a successful defensive coordinator, especially in Year 1.

After all, we’ve seen promising coaches fail at a bigger role time and time again over the years. At the very least, first-time play-callers like Parker can struggle as they adjust to the new job.

The good news is, Parker has learned from some of the best in the business during his coaching career and few first-year coaches are better prepared than he will be.

How Cowboys can answer the question

Advertisement

Dallas Cowboys defensive coordinator Christian Parker. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Parker is yet another wild card for Dallas’ defense, which already has no shortage of them in the slew of new faces the unit will be sporting in 2026.

Advertisement

Taking a more general view, we simply don’t know how all of these new pieces will fit together.

Advertisement

And, truth be told, we really won’t know how things will shake out until the Cowboys take the field in the regular season, and it could be several weeks until we can confidently determine if Parker is doing a good job and if the Cowboys’ defense is fixed.

Until then, all Cowboys fans can do is hope.

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Cowboys news: Dak Prescott embraces high expectations in Dallas

Published

on

Cowboys news: Dak Prescott embraces high expectations in Dallas


The Dallas Cowboys are heading into training camp with a tight end competition that deserves more attention than it’s getting. While it’s already identified as a meaningful camp battle, I don’t think we’re talking about the implications enough. After all, how it turns out will say a lot about the past and present of the team.

You see, tight end Luke Schoonmaker, the Cowboys’ 2023 second-round pick, is fighting for the No. 2 spot at tight end behind Jake Ferguson and potentially for his 53-man roster spot entirely. The outcome of this battle will reveal a lot about the harsh reality of the 2023 draft class and potentially, of a new way of doing things in Dallas. Let’s break it all down.

Schoonmaker’s production speaks for itself

It’s hard to believe, but Schoonmaker is entering his fourth year with the Cowboys. Over 51 games, he has 49 receptions. That’s under one catch per game for a player Dallas drafted believing he could compete with Ferguson for the starting job back in 2023. No bueno.

Advertisement

Schoonmaker was always a traits-based prospect who never fully developed. As of today, the best way to describe his play is that he doesn’t do one thing at an above-average level. He’s a decent blocker (I’d even say below average) and a decent pass catcher (again, below average). He doesn’t stand out in any phase of the game, and that’s a problem when the competition is gaining ground.

Brevyn Spann-Ford and Michael Trigg are coming for those snaps

Take Brevyn Spann-Ford, who is competing for the No. 2 tight end role. We still need to see more from him as a pass catcher, but Spann-Ford can flat-out block in the run game. He consistently shows up on film, and the Cowboys were comfortable enough to let him take on defensive tackles in their blocking scheme rather than just sealing backside defensive ends. That’s unusual for a tight end and speaks to his physicality. Right now, I’d say Spann-Ford is the clear frontrunner for the No. 2 spot behind Ferguson.

That pushes Schoonmaker into a battle for the No. 3 tight end spot, which may be the last roster spot available at the position. Dallas began the 2025 season with only three tight ends on its 53-man roster, and I have no reason to believe 2026 will be different.

The name to watch there is undrafted rookie Michael Trigg. Trigg has his own battle to fight. He needs to prove that the off-the-field concerns that followed him through multiple college programs and suspensions are behind him. If he does that, the Cowboys will have something different in Trigg: a big-bodied target who can develop as a pass catcher without needing to be attached to the offensive line. He has the physicality and the tools to evolve as a blocker, too, as long as he’s willing to get his hands dirty.

Advertisement

If Trigg has a strong training camp, Schoonmaker could end up without a roster spot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Dallas seafood wholesaler fined $250K for false salmon labeling

Published

on

Dallas seafood wholesaler fined 0K for false salmon labeling


A Dallas seafood wholesaler has been ordered to pay a $250,000 fine after admitting it falsely labeled the country of origin of salmon, federal prosecutors announced on Friday.

Seafood Supply Co. fined

Advertisement

What we know:

Seafood Supply Co. was sentenced in federal court after pleading guilty in March to two counts of violating the Lacey Act, a federal law that prohibits trafficking in falsely labeled fish, wildlife and plants.

According to court records, the company falsely identified Chilean salmon as originating from Scotland or other European countries between January 2020 and February 2022. Prosecutors said the mislabeling allowed the company to market less expensive Chilean salmon as higher-value European product.

Advertisement

Understanding the Lacey Act

Photo: Two rare orange lobsters were found in the same shipment to Whitney's Seafood Market in Hudson, Florida.

Dig deeper:

The Lacey Act requires accurate labeling of imported fish and other wildlife products. 

Advertisement

Federal officials say the law helps protect consumers and ensures fair competition in the marketplace by preventing companies from misrepresenting the origin of seafood products.

What’s next:

Advertisement

The investigation was conducted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Law Enforcement as part of Operation Upstream Diligence, a federal initiative targeting seafood fraud and illegal trade.

The case was prosecuted by the Justice Department’s Environmental Crimes Section with assistance from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas.

The Source: Information in this article was provided by the Department of Justice.

Advertisement

Crime and Public SafetyDallasFood and DrinkWorldTexas



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending