Connect with us

Science

Supreme Court casts doubt on Biden’s vaccine rule for the workplace

Published

on

Supreme Court casts doubt on Biden’s vaccine rule for the workplace

The Supreme Courtroom’s conservative majority solid doubt Friday on President Biden’s plan to require that almost all American workers be vaccinated for COVID-19 or endure weekly coronavirus testing.

The justices, having agreed to weigh in on the partisan divide over vaccines, heard from attorneys representing 27 Republican-led states, who argued the Democratic administration had overstepped its authority.

Of their feedback and questions, justices sounded break up alongside the identical strains, with the three Democratic appointees expressing robust assist for Biden’s plan whereas the six Republican appointees voiced regular skepticism.

Advertisement

The conservatives are cautious of latest and far-reaching federal rules, and so they questioned the notion that Congress had or would authorize strict office guidelines for two-thirds of the nation’s employees.

In sharp distinction, the liberal justices mentioned they had been astonished the excessive courtroom would possibly block a requirement for many employees to be vaccinated in opposition to a virus that has killed greater than 800,000 Individuals.

Justice Elena Kagan famous that federal regulation licensed the Labor Division to undertake emergency guidelines to guard workers from a grave hazard.

“Why isn’t this essential to abate a grave danger?” she requested. “That is by far the best public well being hazard that this nation has confronted within the final century. We all know that one of the simplest ways to forestall unfold is for folks to get vaccinated.”

There “had been three-quarters of 1,000,000 new instances yesterday” and hospitals are filling up once more, mentioned Justice Stephen G. Breyer. He mentioned it might be “unbelievable” for the courtroom to say it might “be within the public curiosity to cease these vaccinations.”

Advertisement

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who has been handled for diabetes since she was a baby, was not within the courtroom however participated from her workplace by cellphone. She insisted that the Biden rule not be described as a “vaccine mandate,” because it provides workers a alternative on whether or not to be vaccinated or endure weekly testing.

Not one of the conservative justices spoke in protection of Biden’s guidelines. As an alternative, they characterised them as an overreach.

“That is one thing the federal authorities has by no means finished earlier than,” mentioned Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. He mentioned states have broad authority to set guidelines for public well being and security, however federal authority is proscribed. He famous that the courtroom had turned down a number of challenges to state legal guidelines that required workers to be vaccinated.

“It’s not our function to determine public well being questions, however it’s our essential job to determine who ought to determine these questions,” mentioned Justice Neil M. Gorsuch. “Right here our alternative on the one hand is a federal company and however the Congress of the US and state governments.”

“Why isn’t this a significant query that, subsequently, belongs to the folks’s representatives of the states and within the halls of Congress?” he requested. “Congress had a yr to behave on the query of vaccine mandates” and has not handed such a measure, he famous.

Advertisement

Solicitor Gen. Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, mentioned in response: “We predict that Congress has already acted right here in passing [the law] to authorize OSHA [the Occupational Safety and Health Administration] to take this type of particular motion in response to an emergency state of affairs. COVID-19 is a good hazard. It’s a bodily dangerous agent, and the company discovered that these measures are important to guard employees.”

Whereas many of the justices hinted they might block Biden’s rule affecting employers with greater than 100 workers, they sounded intently break up on the second rule — additionally earlier than the courtroom — affecting hospitals and nursing amenities. That rule, based mostly on the Medicare Act, says all employees in amenities that serve aged and sick sufferers should be vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19.

Roberts mentioned that rule was intently tied to healthcare and might be justified in an emergency. However a number of of the extra conservative justices steered they may vote to dam that rule as effectively.

It’s not clear how the courtroom will proceed. The justices might problem a short-term administrative keep to place the principles on maintain whereas they determine the 2 instances.

Biden proposed the 2 guidelines within the fall after it grew to become clear {that a} vital proportion of workers had been refusing to simply accept the vaccines that might defend them and sluggish the unfold of the coronavirus. However Republican state attorneys common sued to dam the measures, and have been joined by an array of enterprise teams and conservative organizations.

Advertisement

Within the first case heard Friday, the courtroom will determine whether or not the administration can require employers with 100 or extra employees to make sure that workers are both vaccinated or endure weekly exams for the coronavirus. This rule is predicated on the Occupational Security and Well being Act of 1970, which supplies the Labor Division the authority to problem an “emergency non permanent normal” to guard “workers [who] are uncovered to grave hazard from publicity to substances or brokers decided to be poisonous or bodily dangerous or from new hazards.”

The administration says the virus is a brand new hazard that represents a grave hazard.

The Republican attorneys argue that the virus just isn’t a distinctly “occupational” hazard. OSHA “might solely regulate work-related risks,” and the virus spreads all over the place, Ohio Atty. Gen. Dave Yost mentioned in a quick filed this week together with the opposite 26 Republican states.

Legal professionals for companies additionally mentioned firms would lose very important employees if a vaccination mandate had been implement.

When Biden first proposed the rule, the White Home mentioned it may have an effect on 84 million employees nationwide. Conservative judges rapidly put the rule on maintain, however the Ohio-based sixth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals lifted these orders on Dec. 17 in a 2-1 choice, and mentioned the rule might take impact.

Advertisement

That set the stage for the excessive courtroom to take up the problem on a fast-track foundation. The lead case is Nationwide Federation of Unbiased Enterprise vs. Division of Labor, Occupational Security and Well being Administration.

Within the second set of instances, the courtroom will determine whether or not hospitals, nursing houses and different amenities that serve Medicare and Medicaid sufferers should require their workers to be vaccinated.

This requirement is predicated on Medicare and Medicaid guidelines that say amenities receiving federal funds should meet the requirements that federal well being officers decide are “obligatory within the curiosity of the well being and security” of their aged and sick sufferers.

Prelogar informed the courtroom this vaccine rule has the “almost common assist” of main medical and public well being organizations. She additionally famous it consists of exemptions for medical and spiritual causes. The White Home mentioned this rule may have an effect on 17 million employees.

However Republican state attorneys common sued and received rulings from judges appointed by former President Trump in Missouri, Louisiana and Texas, which put the rule on maintain in 25 states the place hospitals in rural areas feared they might lose workers if vaccinations had been required.

Advertisement

The case earlier than the courtroom is Biden vs. Missouri.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

Published

on

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.

The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.

The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.

Advertisement

The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.

After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.

As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.

Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.

The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.

Advertisement

Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.

Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.

The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.

Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.

While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.

Advertisement

Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.

Continue Reading

Science

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

Published

on

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.

“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”

Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.

Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.

The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.

Advertisement

That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.

In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.

“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”

Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).

The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.

Advertisement

For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.

Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.

“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.

Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.

There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.

Advertisement

“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.

Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.

“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”

That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.

Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.

Advertisement

“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”

Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.

“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”

On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”

“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.

Advertisement

Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.

The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.

“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.

“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”

That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.

Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.

“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”

Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.

“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.

Advertisement

The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”

“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”

Continue Reading

Science

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

Published

on

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending