Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

They are the cream of the American East Conference crop, so it’s only fitting that the top-ranked UMBC Retrievers face the No. 2 Vermont Catamounts for the right to go to the NCAA Tournament.
 
Their previous two matchups this season have been rockfights, so my Vermont vs. UMBC predictions and college basketball picks for Saturday, March 14 is calling for more defense to keep the score Under the total.

Advertisement

Vermont vs UMBC prediction

Vermont vs UMBC best bet

Vermont vs UMBC best bet: Under 137 (-110)

The Under has gone 7-2-1 in the last 10 head-to-heads, and the beat should go on.
 
UMBC has ripped off 11 wins in a row and hasn’t lost since a 64-55 L against Vermont on January 29.
 
The Catamounts have eight wins in their last nine, with the only blemish against the Retrievers in a 75-62 drubbing on Feb 19.
 
These are the top-scoring defenses in America East: UMBC allows 67.3 points per game, with Vermont at 68.4.
 
The Retrievers haven’t let an opponent touch 70 points in 13 straight, and the Catamounts just once in the last nine.

Advertisement

Vermont vs UMBC same-game parlay

Yes, UMBC has been cruising, going 10-1-0 ATS in the last 11 games, failing to cover just once in a game against Albany.
 
But Vermont has owned this head-to-head, taking eight of the last 10 matchups straight up. They’re the last team to beat UMBC, and have the defensive chops to win in a slugfest.

Vermont vs UMBC SGP

Vermont vs UMBC odds

• Spread: Vermont +3 | UMBC -3

• Moneyline: Vermont +125 | UMBC -167

• Over/Under: Over 137 | Under 137

Vermont vs UMBC betting trend to know

Each of Vermont’s last six games have produced a total of 137 or fewer points. Find more college basketball betting trends for Vermont vs. UMBC.

How to watch Vermont vs UMBC

Vermont vs UMBC key injuries

Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change.
Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

Advertisement

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Attorneys and volunteers with the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project used to go into Vermont’s prisons and meet with every immigration detainee, using their phones and computers for language interpretation, according to Jill Martin Diaz, executive director of the organization.

But they say that access changed this fall after Jon Murad took over as interim commissioner of the Vermont Department of Corrections. Since then, attorneys with the organization said the department has made it harder to meet and work with their clients, citing language barriers and lack of meeting space.

Murad denies those claims and says he has merely enforced policies that predate his time as commissioner, cutting off practices that shouldn’t have been allowed under his predecessor.

Federal immigration authorities use Vermont prisons to hold often more than a dozen immigration detainees at a time per a contract agreement with the federal government. Though detainees can be held in any Vermont prison, they’re most commonly brought to two facilities: Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in South Burlington and Northwest State Correctional Facility in St. Albans Town.

As President Donald Trump has ramped up his mass deportation campaign, federal immigration authorities often swiftly shuffle people they detain around the country. And the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project has been the main organization routinely providing legal services to all immigration detainees in Vermont.

“I think it’s really important to capitalize on this opportunity that Vermont can be where we disrupt this arrest-to-deportation pipeline that is happening across this country,” said Hillary Rich, an attorney at the Vermont chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The issue has raised the eyebrows of legislators focused on the state’s prison system and prompted them to write the Corrections Department a memo directing its officials to develop a memorandum of understanding with the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project to guarantee cooperation between the organization and the department.

Attorneys raise alarms

To Martin Diaz, the Corrections Department’s current treatment of VAAP attorneys is a stark contrast to the department’s previous stance.

In July, under former Commissioner Nick Deml, the department agreed to let VAAP lawyers have a designated biweekly meeting time and place within the two state prisons where the majority of immigration detainees are held, according to Martin Diaz. Deml did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

Some immigrant activist groups, like Migrant Justice, connect people in their community to legal services, but VAAP is the only organization that routinely goes into Vermont prisons to meet with detainees without counsel, according to Martin Diaz.

Over the summer, the department allowed a handful of VAAP attorneys to bring in a team of trained volunteer lawyers, who were able to bring in their phones and computers, Martin Diaz said. And the department would provide in advance each detainee’s alien registration number, which federal immigration authorities use to identify someone.

In a designated room, the group from VAAP would offer legal services to people detained by federal immigration authorities and use their personal devices to provide language interpretation during their meetings, Martin Diaz said.

During that time, VAAP attorneys were able to meet with 100% of clients at each prison, Martin Diaz said.

Then in August, Murad, a former Burlington Police chief, took the helm of the Corrections Department. That’s when VAAP employees said their access to clients and their cooperation with the department took a turn.

Martin Diaz said that in September the department stopped providing the organization’s attorneys with detainees’ alien registration numbers. In their meetings with detainees, attorneys started to hear complaints that they weren’t receiving medical care or communication from prison staff that was translated into their language, they said.

VAAP attorneys got in touch with one man who was held in solitary confinement because he broke a prison rule. But the rules of the prison were never explained to him in his language, Martin Diaz said.

“He was in solitary and he didn’t know why,” Martin Diaz said.

Murad said he was not aware of the case Martin Diaz described.

In late October, attorneys from the organization were suddenly told they couldn’t bring their devices or volunteer paralegals with them inside the prison, according to Martin Diaz. Instead, their lawyers were given one landline they had to share, they said.

“We’re all sharing this one phone line now that’s a landline and the calls drop repeatedly, like it’s poor service,” they said.

Martin Diaz said with limited staff and interpretation resources, VAAP attorneys have only been able to meet with 25% of detainees. “We’re just really concerned about the irreparable harm that could befall our most vulnerable community members,” they said.

Martin Diaz said in some instances, VAAP lawyers and volunteers have been turned away from prisons. Murad said he was unsure of specific instances in which VAAP employees weren’t allowed to enter facilities. But he said it was possible they might be turned away for safety reasons, including medical emergencies or a prison lockdown.

VAAP employees shouldn’t have been allowed to bring in their own devices under the former commissioner— and department policy prohibits the practice, Murad said.

“That’s an example of a place where we were deviating from our own policies in a way that compromised our security,” he said.

The department has made improvements to language access after hearing complaints, Murad said. In January, the department did an internal evaluation of interpretation services in the two prisons where immigration detainees are usually held, he said.

“We found that there were some inconsistencies,” Murad said.

And to address the issue, the department has begun issuing tablets that provide interpretation services, he said, and attorneys can use those tablets regardless of who their client is.

Martin Diaz said that despite department efforts, VAAP employees still encounter clients who lack language access.

On Friday, VAAP attorneys met with a woman who only spoke Haitian Creole, Martin Diaz said. Since being held in Vermont, the woman had not encountered a single person who communicated with her in her language, they said.

Amanda Wheeler, the governor’s press secretary, said Gov. Phil Scott stands by his decision to permanently appoint Murad as commissioner on Feb. 26.

“In his time as interim commissioner and now as commissioner, he’s worked with his team at the various correctional facilities to ensure long standing policies (that predate him) were being followed consistently,” Wheeler said in an email.

“DOC has worked closely with VAAP and as recently as a week ago received positive feedback from the organization about the operational coordination improvements DOC has made and is continuing to make,” Wheeler said.

‘We want to see DOC course correct’

Rich has worked closely with VAAP — and is concerned that immigrants’ rights are being violated. Regardless of immigration status, detainees are entitled to medical care, access to language interpretation and access to counsel, Rich said.

“I think too often there’s this misunderstanding that we’re talking about special treatment when really what we’re talking about is equitable treatment,” she added

Murad said the department was providing equitable treatment by allowing attorneys to access tablets with interpretation services.

In July, with Scott’s support, the state renewed its contract with the federal government to hold immigration detainees in Vermont prisons. Scott said he thought immigration detainees were best served in Vermont compared to elsewhere.

But Rich said she sees a contradiction between the department’s practices and Scott’s past claims.

“We want to see DOC course correct and prove that these contracts weren’t just a capitulation to the Trump administration,” Rich said.

For people fleeing persecution in their home country, it’s crucial to have access to legal counsel, according to Rich. “Having a lawyer can literally be a matter of life or death,” she said.

After hearing from employees at the ACLU and VAAP, the Vermont Human Rights Commission began investigating discrimination in Vermont’s prisons, according to Rich and Martin Diaz. The commission declined to comment on the investigation.

In the Statehouse, lobbyists with both the ACLU and VAAP have urged lawmakers to take action and put pressure on the department to make changes. Martin Diaz said their organization has had to take time away from the work of their attorneys to try to remediate issues with the department.

With bipartisan support, representatives in the House Corrections and Institutions Committee decided to write Murad a memo, obtained by VTDigger, outlining the committee’s concerns and a directive for change.

During meetings at the Statehouse, the committee heard testimony “describing barriers that impede legal access,” according to the memo.

“Given the urgency of access to counsel within the current federal landscape, the Committee finds informal problem-solving insufficient. Formal structure, accountability, and enforceable standards are now required,” the memo reads.

The memo lists the committee’s concerns including cancelled or disrupted legal appointments, inadequate access to translation services and inconsistent implementation of department policy across facilities.

The committee directed the department to write a formal memorandum of understanding with VAAP that would guarantee reliable legal access, translation services, confidential spaces for attorney meetings and uniform implementation across facilities.

Murad said that after the committee sent the memo, its leaders decided to pull it back. “It’s not something that we’re addressing right now,” Murad said.

“We’ve taken it back temporarily,” said Rep. Alice Emmons, D-Springfield, the committee chair.

Lawyers with legislative counsel, who draft bills in the Statehouse, told Emmons that Scott’s administration took issue with the memo, Emmons said, though she didn’t know why.

“I sent an email out to the committee explaining we’re pulling it back. There need to be more conversations as we go forward here,” Emmons said.

___

This story was originally published by VTDigger and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Meanwhile, new details emerged about the day-long skirmish, which included a lengthy standoff outside a residence in South Burlington, the detention of three undocumented immigrants, none of whom were the original target, and the use of pepper spray and flashbang devices for crowd control.

Local and state police said the incident began around 7:30 a.m. Wednesday, when US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents sought to detain a man they believed to be Deyvi Daniel Corona-Sanchez, a Mexican citizen who had previously been deported and subsequently charged with driving under the influence in Vermont.

Federal officials pursued a car they believed Corona-Sanchez was driving in a busy neighborhood of South Burlington. The driver crashed into multiple vehicles, including two driven by federal agents, and then escaped on foot. Authorities surrounded a nearby house into which they said the driver had fled.

Occupants refused to let federal agents into the house without a warrant and, with assistance from the advocacy group Migrant Justice, summoned supporters to block the doors. Over the course of the day, the crowd swelled to more than 200 people singing and chanting as more law enforcement officers arrived.

Just after 5 p.m., an unidentified federal agent told the crowd a federal judge had issued a criminal arrest warrant for Corona-Sanchez and ordered them to disperse. Vermont state troopers wearing tactical gear cleared a path through the protesters, allowing federal agents to enter the house — and leave a short time later with three people.

Protesters sought to prevent federal agents and police from departing by blocking their vehicles while officers wrestled some protesters to the ground, pepper-sprayed them, and deployed flashbangs. At least three protesters were cited for criminal trespass, according to Vermont State Police.

On Thursday, the US attorney in Vermont said the three people detained inside the house did not include Corona-Sanchez. And, according to Rachel Elliott, a spokesperson for Migrant Justice, Corona-Sanchez no longer owned the car, was not driving it on Wednesday, nor was inside the house raided by agents.

Rather, Elliott said, the occupants included two women from Ecuador, one man from Honduras, and two minors. She said the man, Christian Jerez-Andrade, was among the passengers in the car, along with one of the minors, a 17-year-old boy. According to Elliott, the driver of the car, whom she did not identify, never entered the house. The other minor, a young girl, was spirited out of the house Wednesday afternoon, before the protest escalated.

Jerez-Andrade and the two women were being held in Vermont prisons Thursday. Their attorneys filed petitions in court seeking to keep them in Vermont, and federal judges granted their requests later that day.

Elliott described a harrowing scene inside the house. She said the 17-year-old “watched armed officers chase people through the home.” At one point, she said, a federal agent tripped and accidentally discharged their service weapon.

ICE did not respond to a request for comment.

Top officials in the state blasted federal agents for initiating the raid and confronting protesters, all while failing to achieve their initial objective of detaining Corona-Sanchez.

“President Trump’s domestic army, ICE, came into Vermont yesterday from out of state and, as is virtually always the case, acted in an irresponsible, reckless and unprofessional manner,” said Senators Bernie Sanders and Peter Welch, as well as Representative Becca Balint, in a statement.

Governor Phil Scott, a Republican who has long distanced himself from the Trump administration, called the incident “totally unnecessary,” and said the actions of federal law enforcement “further demonstrates a lack of training, coordination, leadership, and outdated tactics which put both peaceful protesters and Vermont law enforcement in a difficult situation.”

He thanked local and State Police, but he criticized “those there to agitate,” an apparent reference to protesters, some of whom threw water bottles and other objects at police vehicles.

Sarah George, the county prosecutor, called for the US attorney’s office to investigate the conduct of federal agents, a sentiment echoed by other officials.

One statewide officeholder, Treasurer Mike Pieciak — a Democrat viewed as a potential challenger to Scott — went a step further, calling for an independent investigation of both federal and state law enforcement.

“Who made the decision and why was the decision made for the State Police to get involved in an immigration enforcement matter?” he said in an interview.

State and local police agencies in Vermont are required to follow Fair and Impartial Policing policies, which limit the extent to which they can cooperate with federal authorities on immigration matters. Pieciak questioned whether Vermont State Police might have run afoul of those policies when they pushed through the crowd so ICE agents could reach the house.

“It seems like the State Police were providing the pathway, providing the opportunity for ICE agents to get into the house and conduct their search or try to execute on their arrest warrant,” he said. “And without the State Police, that would not have happened.”

But Vermont Public Safety Commissioner Jennifer Morrison, who oversees the State Police, took issue with the notion her officers facilitated the arrests.

“We did not help ICE get into the house,” she said. Rather, state troopers “created a safe corridor” through which federal agents could move, she said, “and make their way to the door, where they handled the operation exclusively.”

Morrison said her agency made the assessment, based on similar protests throughout the country, that without its involvement, federal agents were more likely to use “techniques . . . that could have harmed Vermonters.”

Lia Ernst, legal director for the ACLU of Vermont, said she was skeptical local and State Police were focused on keeping protesters safe and protecting the First Amendment.

“When they’re gearing up in masks and tactical gear, that doesn’t feel to me like an agency preparing to do those things,” Ernst said, calling for a “full and thorough” investigation.

At least one local officer was already facing scrutiny Thursday.

Burlington Mayor Emma Mulvaney-Stanak, whose police department assisted at Wednesday’s incident, said the city was reviewing the actions of a Burlington officer “who has been accused of using excessive force against protesters.”

She appeared to be referring to an officer pictured in a video circulating on social media who grabbed a woman by the arm, swung her around, and slammed her to the curb. The woman, Gwendolyn Heaghney, 33, of Winooski, said she had been trying to remove a mask from a fellow protester who was being led away by police in order to help him breathe.

“It was just like crazy whiplash,” she said Thursday as she sought treatment at a local hospital. “I’ve never really been in a physical fight, but he grabbed my arm, twisted it, and my whole body went with him.”

Heaghney said she hoped to see “something other than milquetoast” statements from politicians and police.

“I want to see some accountability,” she said.

Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.