• Around the country, Democrats have been backing away from talking about climate change.
• Whitehouse seems like the only Democrat remaining that’s still trying.
• It’s worth it to keep trying, he said, because the risks are so high and, he thinks politically, it’s actually “a winning issue that my party has just gotten wrong and overlooked.”

On Aug. 7, 2025, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse gave his 300th “Time to Wake Up” speech about the dangers of climate change.

“It’s hard, given our peril, not to feel a bitter sense of failure about where we are,” he said. 

Since then, he’s given at least seven more of these speeches. This session alone, he’s sponsored more than 30 bills on environmental protection. And he warns about the dangers of climate change almost every day on his social media channels.

Climate change has long been a priority of the left. But lately, Whitehouse seems like the only Democrat remaining who’s still trying.

“The Democrats have been running away from this issue,” said J. Timmons Roberts, a professor of environmental studies at Brown University. 

He’s not sure why they’re backing away. Maybe they are preoccupied with other issues, he said, such as the Iran war and immigrants’ rights. Or maybe they think that Democrats should stop talking about climate – a group Whitehouse calls “climate hushers.”

This group includes Matthew Huber, a professor of geography at Syracuse University, who argued in an opinion piece for The New York Times that climate change fuels polarization and that Democrats should stop talking about it in order to win back the working class.

But Whitehouse has taken to social media to address this line of thinking, saying in posts that it’s wrong “about pretty much everything.”

In a recent interview for Political Scene, he said it’s worth it to keep trying because the risks are so high. And he thinks that, politically, it’s actually “a winning issue that my party has just gotten wrong and overlooked.”

Do people care about climate change? 

Addressing climate change under the Trump administration is “brutal,” Roberts said.

PAWTUCKET – Sunday afternoon brought a breakthrough for Braden Lynch, the first boys tennis state singles champion from Lincoln in 38 years. 

The sophomore was impressive throughout on the hardcourts at Slater Park, taking care of Bishop Hendricken standout Luca Testa in straight sets. 

Lynch never appeared anything but comfortable under the warm sunshine and in front of the crowd gathered outside the fence, posting a 6-3, 6-2 triumph in 75 minutes. He became the first member of the Lions to lift the trophy since Tom Evans did the honors in 1988 and just the third sophomore to claim the crown in the last two decades. 

“I’m proud to do it for my school,” Lynch said. “I’m proud to do it for myself. Proud to do it for my coaches, for my family – I’m just very proud right now.” 

David Levy and Liam Levy took even less time to become the first boys doubles champions from East Greenwich, racing to a 6-4, 6-0 victory over the La Salle tandem of Gavin Britt and Connor Cavanagh. That match wrapped up while Lynch was taking full command against Testa, using multiple breaks of serve in the second set to build what turned out to be an insurmountable lead. 

“Luca’s obviously a great player, so I knew I was going to have to play pretty much at my best if I was going to beat him,” Lynch said. “I ended up playing pretty well.  

“I thought my forehand was able to dictate, and I was very happy with how I served throughout the match. I was able to keep that in mind.”

Lynch held at love to take the opening set and closed the match with what became a familiar sequence by the end of this one. He approached the net behind a forehand down the line and put away an overhead smash to clinch it. Lynch lived up to his No. 1 seed in the process and delivered on his own expectations entering the season. 

“I definitely did think I could,” Lynch said. “That was in my mind from the start of the year – to be able to do this. It’s great to see it come to life.”

Testa needed three sets to eliminate North Kingstown’s Will Michaud in the quarterfinals before dropping just three games in his semifinal meeting with Barrington’s Gabe Anderson. Lynch traveled the more difficult path, beating South Kingstown’s Jonah Plonsky in straight sets in the quarterfinals before matching up with La Salle’s Andrew Smith in the semifinals. Lynch dropped the opening set to the defending champion before rallying to a 4-6, 6-4, 6-4 victory. 

“It definitely gave me a whole bunch of confidence,” Lynch said. “He’s obviously a great player with a huge serve. He has a huge wingspan. He’s hard to pass.  

“I felt that I was able to play super well in that match, and that definitely gave me some confidence going into this one.” 

Lynch was immediately penciled in as Lincoln’s top singles player as a freshman and lost to Smith in the quarterfinals. His offseason work included time in the gym and some sessions with a mental skills coach to sharpen his focus. Lynch joined Kyle Burke (South Kingstown, 2007) and Max Schmidhauser (Classical, 2018) among recent second-year winners of this event. 

“It was a ton of work, to be honest,” Lynch said. “A lot of time on court. A lot of work in the gym, speed – pretty much doing everything you could think of to better my game.”  

Levy and Levy were surprise finalists in 2024 as the No. 2 doubles team for the Avengers. Thet fell to Gabe Anderson and Bryce Kupperman in straight sets, as the Barrington duo put an end to a storybook run. Levy and Levy authored a different finish this time thanks to their steady play both from the baseline and at the net. 

It had been more than 40 years since two brothers teamed up to win a doubles championship in the state. Gordie Ernst and Bobby Ernst were the last to do it from Cranston East, capturing three straight from 1983-85. The tournament format has since changed – Gordie Ernst was also a four-time state singles champion, and doubles entries are now based on the team ladder rather than a selection off the roster. 

bkoch@providencejournal.com 

On X: @BillKoch25

I was diagnosed with anorexia when I was 17 years old. My extreme fear of gaining weight instilled a steely resolve to overexercise and pick at meals – no matter how hungry I felt. Eventually, I got too thin to be healthy.

My doctor recommended residential treatment. Only one local residential treatment center specialized in eating disorders. My mother and I toured the center, which was designed to be a warm, home-like environment, rather than a clinical ward. At that time, it accepted only women and girls, and I recall feeling relieved that I would be among people like myself, struggling with similar fears, fighting the same urges.

Then we learned our insurance wouldn’t cover it.

Instead, I was approved for four weeks at a generalized, institutional residential treatment center, where teens with a wide range of conditions – addiction, self-harm and behavioral issues – were treated together. There was no specialized care for eating disorders. No individualized treatment. I attended AA and NA meetings that weren’t relevant to my illness and did my best to make the most of them.

I stabilized and began eating again – not because the care was right, but because I was desperate to go home. After discharge, insurance covered four weeks of step-down care and outpatient therapy.