Connect with us

New Jersey

New Jersey's D.C. Democrats say Biden administration should not support new immigrant jail • New Jersey Monitor

Published

on

New Jersey's D.C. Democrats say Biden administration should not support new immigrant jail • New Jersey Monitor


Most of New Jersey’s congressional Democrats are urging the Department of Justice not to support a new immigrant detention center planned for Newark.

In separate letters asking federal justice officials to refrain from supporting prison company GEO Group’s plan to open the Newark immigrant jail, Sen. Cory Booker, a Democrat, and the state’s eight House Democrats cited President Biden’s prior comments criticizing private prisons.

Biden has said “no business should profit from the suffering of desperate people fleeing violence” and has condemned private prisons for not maintaining “the same levels of safety and security for people in the Federal criminal justice system or for correctional staff.”

“These same disparate and dangerous conditions still persist in privately operated immigration detention centers and the efforts to expand such a system must not be met with support from the federal government,” the House Democrats’ letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland reads.

Advertisement

Opening a new federal immigration jail in Newark would undermine the efforts of New Jerseyans and lawmakers who worked “tirelessly” to ensure no more immigration centers would open in the state, the June 6 letter adds.

Booker, meanwhile, sent a letter June 6 to Department of Homeland Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Patrick Lechleitner asking them to reconsider plans to work with GEO Group to open the Newark jail. GEO Group says in court filings that it plans to submit a proposal to ICE to turn Delaney Hall into an immigrant jail.

“A new contract would also serve as an insult to immigrant communities and advocates in New Jersey and around the country who have fought tirelessly to document the human rights abuses at private detention centers and repeatedly pushed the Administration to detain fewer people in more humane settings. I urge you to commit to not open new, privately-run immigration detention facilities in New Jersey,” Booker said.

Murphy signed a law in 2021 banning local governments and private companies from entering into contracts to detain immigrants. A federal judge deemed the law partially unconstitutional last year after CoreCivic — which runs an immigrant jail in Elizabeth — sued the state over the law, with the judge saying the state cannot bar the federal government from contracting with a private company to detain immigrants. The state has appealed.

Attorneys for the Department of Justice in legal filings in that case said it would be “catastrophic” if CoreCivic were forced to close its jail.

Advertisement

GEO Group has cited similar arguments in its lawsuit against Murphy.

The Elizabeth Detention Center is the last functioning immigrant detention center in New Jersey. A study from Detention Watch Network found that conditions in the jail have long been unsanitary and dangerous, alleging people incarcerated there lack access to air or sunlight, live in quarters infested with vermin, and face abusive treatment from staff members.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

New Jersey

Surprise 7 to 11 inches of snow hit these N.J. towns. Latest forecast.

Published

on

Surprise 7 to 11 inches of snow hit these N.J. towns. Latest forecast.


Up to another quarter-inch of rain is likely to fall by Friday evening across most of the state. Northwestern parts of the state will get another dusting of snow, while some higher elevation spots are expected to get a a few more inches.National Weather Service



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

New Jersey winemaker says drought helps the grapes, but he’s grateful for the rain this week

Published

on

New Jersey winemaker says drought helps the grapes, but he’s grateful for the rain this week


New Jersey winemaker says drought will make for better wine

Advertisement


New Jersey winemaker says drought will make for better wine

01:50

Advertisement

The much-anticipated rain finally made its way into the Philadelphia region this week.

For many gardens, nurseries and farms, the rain was needed.

But in Hammonton, New Jersey, Sharrott Winery says the drought wasn’t all that bad. 

Sprawling on 34 acres, 22 of those under vine, the owner of the South Jersey winery says the drought conditions actually helped their vines.

Owner and winemaker Larry Sharrott said in the spring, the rain helped their vines grow. 

Advertisement

Come August, the rain tapered off and the dry weather from there on out was used to their advantage. 

“For grapes, if it’s dry starting in August and then running through the entire harvest season, that’s really good,” Sharrott said. “It helps concentrate the juice basically, so especially with red wine it makes a much more robust red wine. They take on much nicer fruit flavors.” 

Sharrott said the team was also happy when it finally rained after the long stretch.

Wine for sale is seen at Sharrott Winery. A sign says Sharrott like carrot

CBS News Philadelphia

Advertisement


He said it was perfect timing because the vines could use a boost of hydration.

“But the fact that we have some rain now is really good for the vines because at this point they really need a good drink so they can begin shutting down for winter. We want them to be nice and hearty by the time we get the cold January and February temperatures,” he said 

And if you are looking on the bright side, too, Sharrott say they are looking forward to future wines. 

“We are going to have some great wines in a couple years when these come out of barrel,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Justice Department finds pattern of misconduct by Trenton Police

Published

on

Justice Department finds pattern of misconduct by Trenton Police


From Camden and Cherry Hill to Trenton and the Jersey Shore, what about life in New Jersey do you want WHYY News to cover? Let us know.

The Justice Department said Trenton’s police department have made arrests without legal basis, officers have escalated situations with aggression and used pepper spray unnecessarily.

The results of the yearlong investigation were contained in a 45-page report released Thursday morning during a virtual press conference with U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Philip Sellinger and Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

“The people of Trenton deserve nothing less than fair and constitutional policing,” Sellinger said. “When police stop someone in Trenton, our investigation found that all too often they violated the constitutional rights of those they stopped, sometimes with tragic consequences.”

Advertisement

Maati Sekmet Ra, co-founder of the Trenton Anti-Violence Coalition, said she is not surprised about the Justice Department’s findings.

“You cannot talk about violence that happens and occurs in a place like Trenton without talking about police violence,” she said. “Police have historically brutalized, harassed and now it’s proven that they’re violating the civil rights of folks who live in Trenton.”

Officers violate the 4th Amendment in 2 areas

The two main findings of the report are that Trenton officers use excessive force and conduct warrantless traffic stops, searches and arrests. Both violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

According to the report, officers reported using force in 815 incidents between March 2020 and December 2023. The majority of them involved physical force; pepper spray was used by officers 120 times. A firearm was used once.

In one incident mentioned during the press conference, a 64-year-old man died from respiratory failure after he was sprayed in the face with pepper spray. Officers went to the man’s house to arrest his son who was involved in an earlier domestic incident.

Advertisement

The man, who was not involved in the incident, met with officers outside his front door informing them they would not be allowed in his house without a warrant. As they waited for a supervisor to come to the scene, one of the officers escalated the conversation, taunting the father and son, according to the federal report.

The officer said the son was “talking like he was ‘retarded’ and asking if the father was ‘crazy,’” according to the report. The language the officer used according to the report is considered outdated and a slur toward people with mental disabilities.

As the father was about to re-enter his house, an officer threw him across the porch, against the railing and slammed him face down on the porch steps. As officers were arresting the father, another officer sprayed him in the face.

“The officer who escalated the encounter inaccurately reported that the father physically presented a ‘threat/attack’ to the officer,” the report stated. “He also claimed that he grabbed the father because he feared that a dog inside would come out—a factor that no other officer mentioned and that video footage discredited.”

The father died 18 days after the incident.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending