Connect with us

New Jersey

Harris or Trump: North Jersey voters share who is their choice

Published

on

Harris or Trump: North Jersey voters share who is their choice



Trump or Harris? How will various ethnic groups in North Jersey vote on election day?

play

Rhona Vega was planning to vote for President Joe Biden for another four-year term when she heard the news that he would step aside and had endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to be the Democratic Party nominee for president. Vega said it was easy for her to accept the switch and she plans to vote for Harris, and she believes she will win.

Advertisement

“Folks are just fed up with nonsense,” said Vega, a Black woman from Teaneck married to a Latino man. “We need to get back to focusing on making sure this country is running correctly. That we’re thinking of everyone … we’re not dividing the country.”

Ronald Lin, a Taiwanese American who resides in Franklin Lakes, said he voted for Republican Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election and plans to do so again on Election Day.

“I always voted for a candidate who made the most sense,” Lin said. “Most of the people who support Donald Trump, they like him because of his policies because they align with common sense.”

Is it possible that Trump will do better with voters from various ethnic groups in New Jersey on Election Day than in the 2020 presidential election?

Could Harris get more votes in various ethnic groups than Biden did in the Garden State four years ago?

Advertisement

As of Tuesday, both Harris and Trump had vice presidential running mates. Harris on Tuesday morning announced Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her VP choice. Trump’s running mate is Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance.

NorthJersey.com spoke to some voters from different ethnic backgrounds across North Jersey about why they would vote for either Harris or Trump.

By the numbers

The results of the 2020 presidential election in New Jersey showed that 71% of the total voters were white, 11% Black, 11% Latino, 3% Asian and 3% other. They were based on estimates from the VoteCast survey conducted for the Associated Press by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago the week before the 2020 election.

Advertisement

Trump captured 49% of the white vote and Biden received 50%. The former president got only 12% of the Black vote, while the current president took 86% of the Black vote. Trump did better with Latinos and Asians, at 27% and 23% respectively, but Biden still got the lion’s share of votes from both groups, with 72% Latino and 76% Asian.

Michael Unger, an associate professor of political science at Ramapo College, said Harris could be more appealing to Black and Asian voters as well as Latinos in New Jersey, not only because of her biracial background, but — especially among an Asian electorate — due to Rep. Andy Kim’s run for the Senate seat vacated by Bob Menendez after his conviction in July for accepting bribes.

“My guess would be that there could be an increase in turnout because of having an Asian American near the top of the ticket, which is very different from an indicted senator,” Unger said.

He said Republicans like Trump could appeal to Black, Latino and Asian voters in the coming election because members of those ethnic groups are not monoliths at the polls.

“There are different ideological strains or different ideological leanings among some members of these groups, and on social issues, say with African Americans, there’s more social conservatism,” Unger said.

Advertisement

Ronald Lin

Ronald Lin was destined to be a Republican. He was named after then-President Ronald Reagan by his parents, who were recent immigrants from Taiwan. Being part of the GOP stayed with him: He named his first child after Donald Trump and ran for office (but lost) on the Republican ticket for a seat on the Bergen County Board of Commissioners in 2021.

Lin, 42, said he is choosing to vote for Trump not based on how he appeals to him as an Asian American voter but based on Trump’s previous experience in the White House and what Lin said is his personality.

“I think a lot of people like Donald Trump because he’s a very likable guy and projects strength, as we all saw when he was almost assassinated,” Lin said. “Most people would probably have been ducking, but he stood up and pumped his fist and told the crowd to fight.”

Lin said he thought East Asians, such as those from Taiwan, would be more likely to vote for Trump, but South Asians, such as those from India, would vote for Harris. Trump appeals to conservative Asian Americans, because, Lin said, Trump believes in family values and law and order. However, he could see Harris affecting Trump’s vote total among Asians in New Jersey.

Advertisement

“Kamala Harris being on the presidential ticket and her ethnicity might put a dent to it,” Lin said. “There’s a large Indian American population in New Jersey that I suspect will probably overwhelmingly support Kamala Harris. So I think that might deflate the numbers a bit for Trump.”

Rhona Vega

Rhona Vega sees Kamala Harris getting more votes in Asian, Black and Latino communities in New Jersey than Joe Biden because of her record as a senator and as vice president.

“As a politician, the work she has done in all communities, I think it’s a no-brainer,” Vega said. “I think she will get more support than she probably ever thought she would get, and I think that’s beautiful.”

Vega, 59, said she is “proud of the enthusiasm” about Harris being the Democratic presidential nominee. She saw the enthusiasm firsthand on July 21 after Biden’s announcement, when she took part in a Zoom call that evening organized by the collective Win with Black Women, attended by over 44,000 Black women coming together with the goal of electing Harris as the first woman president and the first Black female and South Asian one. In the three hours of the call, more than $1.6 million was raised.

Advertisement

Vega said she also hopes that her fellow African Americans will channel their enthusiasm into getting to the voting booth in November, recalling Trump’s comments during the June 27 presidential debate in Atlanta when he referred falsely to immigrants taking jobs from Black workers.

“My husband was watching it, and I happened to walk in at that moment when he was saying, ‘Black jobs.’ I thought, ‘What in the world?’,” Vega said. “As Black people, as humans, we have one Black job, and that is to vote.”

Milan Patel

Milan Patel is a Montclair resident who lives with his wife, who is Jewish, and their two children. Patel, 50, born to Indian immigrant parents, said he would vote for Harris. He was energized yet nervous about her entrance into the presidential race because he didn’t have a lot of confidence in Biden’s serving another term if reelected.

“I would say a mixture of relief and maybe a little bit of anxiety, panic and excitement mixed together,” Patel said as he remembered how poorly she performed during her previous presidential run, in 2020.

Advertisement

But Patel is more open to her as a presidential candidate this time.

“When I have seen Harris speak recently, she seems to have really gained confidence and a much different tone in her speaking style and in her communication style, which was one of my concerns,” Patel said. “She was more polished than she was four years ago.”

Patel said he hopes to see Harris elected, as it would be an opportunity not only to see the first president of Indian heritage in his lifetime but also for his children to see a woman of Indian heritage as a president of the United States.

“I think it is inspiring and would make a good role model for them as well. It would show how far Asians have come in a relatively short time in this country,” Patel said.

Ricardo Kaulessar covers race, immigration, and culture for NorthJersey.com. For unlimited access to the most important news from your local community, please subscribe or activate your digital account today.

Advertisement

Email: kaulessar@northjersey.com

Twitter: @ricardokaul



Source link

New Jersey

Is ICE giving up on Roxbury detention center? NJ leaders laud report

Published

on

Is ICE giving up on Roxbury detention center? NJ leaders laud report


play

  • State leaders were celebrating a New York Times report that federal officials are considering ending plans for ICE dentention center in Morris County.

Federal officials are considering abandoning plans for a controversial immigration detention facility in Roxbury, New Jersey, according to a June 18 report by The New York Times, prompting local leaders and state officials to declare a victory after months of legal and political opposition.

The proposed facility, a warehouse property purchased to serve as an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center, faced intense criticism from local residents, environmental advocates and elected officials who argued the site was unsuitable for housing detainees.

Advertisement

In a joint statement issued Thursday, Gov. Mikie Sherrill and Attorney General Jennifer Davenport said the Department of Homeland Security appeared to be backing away from the project following legal challenges that halted development.

“Today the New York Times is reporting that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is backing down on its mass detention center in Roxbury,” the statement said. “That is a big win for public safety, for the township of Roxbury, and for New Jersey.”

According to the Times report, the Roxbury facility is one of seven ICE is planning to dispense with by transferring ownership to other federal agencies or selling them. 

Opponents argued the warehouse was designed as a logistics facility and lacked the infrastructure necessary to support a large detention center. They also raised concerns about the potential strain on local water and sewage systems and the impact on environmentally sensitive land surrounding the site.

Advertisement

State officials said they joined Roxbury Township in court to challenge the project, contending that federal plans violated local regulations and posed risks to the community.

“DHS’s plans were always illegal,” the statement said. “The Roxbury warehouse is a logistics center fit for packages, not thousands of people.”

Rep. Rob Menendez said in a statement on Thursday: “We are working to confirm reporting that ICE is abandoning its Roxbury warehouse plans, but if true, this would be big news. From day one, we have fought to stop this facility, bringing together thousands of New Jerseyans in opposition. Now we are on the cusp of an important win for our state.” 

The detention center was expected to become part of the federal government’s broader immigration enforcement and detention network. However, the project became a flashpoint in New Jersey, drawing opposition from both local officials and residents concerned about public safety, environmental impacts and the facility’s compatibility with surrounding land uses.

Advertisement

Federal officials have not publicly confirmed whether the property will be sold or formally removed from consideration. The Department of Homeland Security has not commented on the reported change in plans.

Opponents vowed to continue monitoring the situation until the project is officially terminated.

“This isn’t a partisan issue,” the statement said. “We’re grateful for our partnership with the Roxbury community as we keep DHS’s feet to the fire to ensure this facility is never opened.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

NJ rabbi faces lawsuit for sexual assault after giving financial aid | The Jerusalem Post

Published

on

NJ rabbi faces lawsuit for sexual assault after giving financial aid | The Jerusalem Post


A rabbi in Ocean County is being sued by a woman who claims he sexually assaulted her when she came to him for financial help, then defamed her on a website and in fliers he posted near her children’s school.

Avraham Appel, of Jackson, abused his position as a trusted community leader to sexually assault and exploit the woman, an Israeli immigrant who came to him as a single mother struggling to pay bills, according to the lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of Ocean County.

Appel is a prominent rabbi and Rosh Kollel, or head of a Jewish institute for advanced Talmudic study, who is based in Lakewood and Jackson, according to court papers filed January 5.

Appel did not respond to calls to his home and cellphone seeking comment on the lawsuit.

Advertisement

The woman claims she confided in one of her children’s schoolteachers in early 2020 that she was in significant financial distress and having trouble paying for daycare.

A NEW Jersey police car stands guard on November 1, 2017, in Paterson, New Jersey. (credit: EDUARDO MUNOZ ALVAREZ/AFP via Getty Images)

The teacher suggested she contact Appel, according to the suit.

In February 2020, Appel arranged to meet with the woman at a local Starbucks.

“During that meeting, Appel presented himself to (the woman) as a rabbi, mentor, advisor, and friend whom (the woman) could trust, confide in, and depend on,” the lawsuit states.

Appel, who had experience in real estate, allegedly offered the woman an opportunity to solicit investments on his behalf and to “draw,” or advance, money against future commissions.

Advertisement

Rabbi issues payments to woman after alleged sexual assault

In June and July 2022, Appel issued six payments to the woman, totaling $20,000 and characterized as advances or loans. He also provided the woman with “financial assistance” so she could buy groceries and pay medical expenses and water bills, according to the suit.

The lawsuit claims most of the money was meant to buy the woman’s silence after he attacked her on June 1, 2022.

The suit alleges Appel visited the woman while she was alone at home and sexually assaulted her as she pleaded for him to stop.

“Appel was abusive and unrelenting. The more (the woman) pled for mercy, the more aggressive Appel became,” the suit alleges.

Before leaving her home, he allegedly ordered her to delete Ring camera footage that showed him arriving.

Advertisement

In the months after the assault, Appel “forced himself upon” the woman and took sexual advantage of her on other occasions, the suit claims.

Appel also allegedly bombarded the woman with demands for sexual acts and sent her a barrage of text and WhatsApp messages containing crude and graphic sexual content.

“I want to squeeze your breasts,” one text allegedly said. In another, he sent the woman a photo of his penis, the suit alleges.

In July 2024, the woman met with another rabbi and shared evidence of the sexual assault and “other incidents involving Appel,” the suit claims.

Woman offered $50,000 for therapy after sexual assault

Appel later contacted his attorney and the two offered the woman $50,000 to cover her future therapy expenses.

Advertisement

The money would be available only if the woman signed a release of any claims related to the assault and agreed to keep all incidents between them confidential, according to the suit.

The woman refused to accept the money or sign the agreement, the suit says.

Appel then launched a campaign to destroy the woman “personally and professionally,” according to the lawsuit.

On December 15, 2025, the woman became aware of a website with her photos that claimed she was “a danger to all Jews,” and warned the public to stay away from her, according to the complaint.

The website disclosed the woman’s address, claimed she stole money, and characterized her as a “thief.”

Advertisement

Moreover, Appel and possibly others posted signs smearing the woman. The signs were posted at public locations throughout the community, including the school her two children attended, the suit alleges.

The lawsuit claims sexual assault, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and conspiracy.

The complaint also alleges Appel breached his duty as a rabbi to conduct himself with loyalty and in good faith.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Shooting investigation underway at South Jersey residential complex, source says

Published

on

Shooting investigation underway at South Jersey residential complex, source says


A shooting investigation in Camden County has prompted a large police response, according to a source.

Léelo en español aquí

The shooting unfolded in the area of Locust Court in Winslow Township in the evening of June 17.

SkyForce10 was over the scene of what looked like a residential complex as several police cars were visible lining the streets.

Advertisement

Police tape appeared to be blocking off the area as officers looked at a sedan that appeared to have crashed into another car.

No word yet on what led to the shooting or if anyone was hurt.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending