Massachusetts
Massachusetts ballot questions 2024: Question 5 on the tipped minimum wage – The Boston Globe
The ballot question would also allow tips to be pooled with workers who do not interact with customers directly, including cooks, bookkeepers, and other back-of-house staff.
A yes vote would raise the tipped minimum wage over five years with the first increase lifting the floor to $9.60 an hour next year. Employers that pay tipped workers at least the state minimum wage could then pool tips with all employees, if they choose. Massachusetts would become one of seven states without a tipped wage.
A no vote would keep the hourly tipped minimum wage at $6.75 — above the $2.13 federal minimum wage for tipped workers, but below the Massachusetts minimum wage of $15. Sharing tips with workers who do not talk to customers would not be permitted.
Who is backing each side?
One Fair Wage, an advocacy organization lobbying for higher tipped wages nationwide, brought the ballot question to Massachusetts after similar campaigns in Michigan and Washington D.C. They have supported the campaign largely alone, spending roughly $1 million, along with support from fewer than two dozen local progressive groups and some restaurant employees.
Campaigning against them is a cadre of restaurateurs and trade groups, including the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and Mass Restaurants United. They believe raising the tipped minimum wage would deal businesses, already struggling with rising costs and the post-pandemic recovery, a catastrophic blow. Many restaurant employees themselves oppose the measure out of fear that it would reduce the tips they receive.
What do those in favor say?
Proponents of Question 5 say that a $15 tipped minimum wage is a win for all. Eliminating the current system, they argue, would lessen financial instability for restaurant workers and save them from dependence upon customers’ generosity. And pooling tips with the entire workforce could be a boon for the lowest-paid employees.
Other places that implemented a higher minimum wage saw upticks in “restaurant job growth rates, small business growth rates, and tipping averages,” according to One Fair Wage. Research from Tufts University and University of Massachusetts Amherst has found that getting rid of the lower minimum wage for tipped workers, as the question suggests, actually raises wages overall for these workers — many of whom are low-income, women, or people of color.
“It’s time we end the injustice of the subminimum wage and create an industry that truly values and compensates its workers with dignity,” said Saru Jayaraman, president of One Fair Wage.
What do those opposed say?
The “No” camp fears that raising the tipped minimum wage will force restaurants to raise menu prices, or worse, close entirely.
Food and labor costs have risen astronomically since the pandemic began, pushing throngs of restaurants to the brink of survival. Many owners now believe the tipped wage measure would add to the burden. Should the question pass, businesses could pay an additional $18,000 in payroll per employee by 2029, according to calculations from Mass Restaurants United. (The UMass study found that business cost increases from the measure would be “modest.”)
And many restaurant staff worry the change would lead them to earn less money, too. Dozens told the Globe that American tipping culture is fraught already, and that customers would likely leave smaller tips if they knew workers’ wages were increasing. Some take issue, too, with One Fair Wage and believe the national group skirted the opinions of workers on the ground when debuting the measure in Massachusetts.
Opponents cite the history of the measure as proof. The Maine legislature restored the state’s lower minimum wage for tipped workers a year after it was eliminated in a similar ballot question, and the process of phasing out the tipped wage in D.C. has proven bumpy and shrank the size of the restaurant workforce.
Behind the battle for a $15 minimum wage
Hillary Clinton endorses raising minimum wage for tipped workers in Mass.
Voters will decide five ballot questions in November. Here’s a look at who is spending big for and against them.
Diti Kohli can be reached at diti.kohli@globe.com. Follow her @ditikohli_.
Massachusetts
Karen Read files lawsuit against Massachusetts State Police and Canton Police
(WJAR) — Karen Read has filed a lawsuit against the Massachusetts State Police Department and the Canton Police Department.
The Bristol County woman was acquitted last year of the murder of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe.
Her lawsuit accuses both departments of trying to conceal “an imbedded culture of bigotry, misogyny, systemic failures, and institutional rot at the very core of both organizations.”
Read weeps as the final verdict of not guilty of second-degree murder is read in Norfolk Superior Court, Wednesday, June 18, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)
The lawsuit blames the culture of both departments for violating her constitutional rights and caused her immense harm, according to the lawsuit.
The court documents mentions MSP Detective Michael Proctor and CPD Sergeant Sean Goode’s recorded messages as examples that they were “virulent bigots whose hatred for anyone and everyone different from themselves permeates their every actions.”
The lawsuit says the officers were not fit to hold their role and investigate a homicide investigation against Karen Read.
Those investigators and their colleagues conducted a “fundamentally conflicted and corrupt investigation” against her.
Read is seeking an award for her damages.
The full lawsuit can be read above.
Massachusetts
Mass. House votes to set new rules for DiZoglio’s audit
Twenty-eight lawmakers dissented Wednesday as the Massachusetts House voted to set new terms around what state Auditor Diana DiZoglio would be able to review in the legislative audit voters authorized her to carry out in 2024.
Almost all House Democrats voted for the measure, which also proposes to make more state government records accessible to the public. Three Democrats — Cambridge Rep. Mike Connolly, Attleboro Rep. Jim Hawkins and Fall River Rep. Alan Silvia — joined the body’s 25 Republicans in voting no.
Speaker Ron Mariano said the bill responds to an ongoing call from voters for more transparency out of Beacon Hill and provides a path forward in lieu of a what he called “politically motivated audit conducted in violation of the Constitution.”
Leaders of the House and Senate have resisted DiZoglio’s audit push, arguing that a probe by the auditor’s office would run afoul of the separation of powers laid out in the state Constitution, bringing the legislative branch under the review of a piece of the executive branch.
“We are not accountable to any constitutional officer,” said Rep. Mindy Domb, an Amherst Democrat. “We are only accountable to our constituents.”
Taunton Rep. Lisa Field, a Democrat in her first term, said she was among the 72% of Massachusetts voters who backed the audit ballot question in 2024.
“Due to legitimate concerns and questions about constitutional privileges and separation of powers, we have been stuck on this audit issue for more than a year,” Field said. “Let’s not be like Washington, D.C. and accept such gridlock — not about the audit and not about public records. Let’s not let perfect be the enemy of good progress.”
The House’s bill would authorize DiZoglio to review what it defines as the “administrative functions” of the Legislature, going back to the 2021 fiscal year. Those areas include the adoption of annual budgets, official audits of the House and Senate by independent firms, spending by both chambers, and the execution of any financial settlements with lawmakers and employees.
It would also newly apply the state’s public records law to the governor’s office, and create a process by which people could request and receive certain legislative files.
Massachusetts is currently the only state where the Legislature, governor and judiciary all claim to be exempt from the public records law.
Warren Republican Rep. Todd Smola described the process that led up to Wednesday’s vote as opaque in and of itself. Mariano last week said the House would take up what he called comprehensive transparency legislation, but did not say when or what, specifically, the bill would do.
The bill was circulated to members of the House Ways and Means Committee around 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, and committee members had a little over a half hour to vote on whether to advance it. Smola, the ranking Republican on the committee, said during that 34-minute window, “we had members on both sides of the political aisle that were calling each other back and forth to say, ‘Can you explain this portion to me?’”
“We are so much better than the process that has unfolded,” he said. “And for the sake of people that are asking us for transparency, that is not transparency. That’s the opposite of transparency.”
Rep. Michael Soter, a Bellingham Republican, said he was particularly concerned with a part of the bill that removes the courts from settling disputes between the auditor and the Legislature.
He said that by setting its own rules around an audit, the House would be “ensuring the auditor can only see exactly what we allow her to see and nothing more.”
It’s not clear yet if the Senate will pass the bill. Last week, state senators voted to turn over a limited set of documents to DiZoglio. The documents the Senate plans to provide mirror the records she would be allowed to review under the House bill.
Asked if he expected the Senate to agree to the legislation, Mariano on Tuesday said only, “I talked to the Senate.”
Massachusetts
French-Mediterranean Eatery Charts Opening In Boston
BOSTON, MA — An international restaurant group with locations across the globe is preparing to open its first Massachusetts restaurant this year.
LPM Restaurant & Bar, a French Riviera-inspired restaurant founded in London, is set to open on the second floor of the Four Seasons Hotel One Dalton Street in Back Bay, according to Four Seasons. The hotel lists the restaurant as “Opening Summer 2026,” while the Boston Business Journal reported the restaurant plans to open in September.
The Boston restaurant will mark LPM’s debut in the Northeast and its third U.S. outpost, following locations in Miami and Las Vegas, according to a Four Seasons announcement.
LPM, also known as La Petite Maison, was founded in London in 2007 and is known for French-Mediterranean food, Mediterranean ingredients and dining rooms influenced by Belle Époque design.
The business operates locations in London, Dubai, Miami, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Riyadh, Limassol, Doha, Mykonos, Kuwait, Boston, Maldives and Bangkok.
Four Seasons said LPM will take over the space that formerly housed One Dalton’s breakfast concept, One + One. The restaurant will join other dining options at the hotel, including Zuma and Trifecta.
See Also:
-
Louisiana2 minutes agoLouisiana among states selected to receive federal funding for rare earth projects
-
Maine9 minutes agoSix Maine food producers win Good Food Awards
-
Maryland12 minutes agoSpotted lanternflies are reemerging in Maryland. Here’s what to know.
-
Michigan17 minutes ago2 historic Michigan lighthouses to split $120K in preservation grants
-
Massachusetts24 minutes agoKaren Read files lawsuit against Massachusetts State Police and Canton Police
-
Minnesota27 minutes agoSchool bus company’s inspection history in question after kids hurt in Hamline University crash
-
Mississippi32 minutes agoFerris, West to discuss Mississippi folk artists at UM Museum – The Oxford Eagle
-
Missouri39 minutes ago
American Shaman agrees to suspend kratom sales in Missouri