Connect with us

Maine

Maine School Superintendents Association supports changes to sports policies

Published

on

Maine School Superintendents Association supports changes to sports policies


AUGUSTA — The Maine School Superintendents Association supports a bill that would change state law to prohibit transgender girls from competing in girls’ sports.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Elizabeth Caruso, R-Caratunk, would require sports teams to be designated as male, female, or coed, and would prohibit students who are biologically male from competing in girls’ sports.

Support for LD 1337 clashes with the steps taken in support of the Maine Human Rights Act by the Maine Principals’ Association, the group that oversees high school sports, but aligns with executive orders signed by President Donald J. Trump that prohibits transgender girls from participating in girls’ sports.

Transgender students in Maine can play sports on the team that aligns with their gender identity under the Maine Human Rights Act.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Maine School Superintendents Association said the organization is not ready to comment on its position on the bill, despite listing its support on its website. The association, which represents superintendents across Maine, publicly posts its positions on legislative bills.

“There are several other bills in the Legislature on this very sensitive issue that the MSSA Legislative Committee does not support,” Robbie Feinberg, association spokesperson said. “We are currently developing our testimony on all of these measures, and we also understand that there will be more bills coming later on in the legislative session. Until we see and have considered all of these bills, we are not prepared to share our testimony on this one LD.”

The Maine School Superintendents Association and the Maine School Boards Association are housed under the Maine School Management Association. The Maine School Management Association provides sample policies for school districts and can help school boards in the process to hire a superintendent.

It differs from the Maine Principals’ Association, which represents the state’s principals and oversees and regulates high school sports.

The Maine Principals’ Association has defended its position in following the Maine Human Rights Act, a state law that grants civil liberties on race, gender, religion, and other areas, to all Mainers; and has received national heat from the groups’ refusal to sign a resolution agreement that aligns with the Trump administration’s executive order to prohibit transgender girls from participating in girl’s sports.

Advertisement

Maine schools receive 10.7% of their overall funding — about $250 million — from the federal government to support Title I, which supplements state and local funding for low-achieving children, especially in high-poverty schools; school lunches; and special education. It is unclear if any federal funding is in jeopardy because of the decision by the MPA and Maine Department of Education to not sign the Trump administration’s agreement.

Jared M. Bornstein, an attorney at Preti Flaherty and a spokesperson for the Maine Principals’ Association, said that the association is currently complying with the law and Maine Human Rights Act.

“We encourage stakeholders and decision makers in the statehouse to have the debate about what the law and our policy will be moving forward. MPA is neutral on all current pending legislation and will testify in an information providing neither for nor against position,” the association spokesperson said. 

A document on the association’s website says that the superintendents association met on April 1 to discuss the round of bills that included LD 1337.

Meeting minutes from February show the association’s executive committee met with Pender Makin, commissioner of the Maine Department of Education, who reminded the association that Maine schools follow state law, not federal law, specifically when referring to the Title IX executive order made by the Trump administration.

Advertisement

Makin stated the same position when several Maine schools faced a federal injunction last year over the Biden administration’s updated Title IX policies that included a policy for protection against discrimination over gender identity.

The Kennebec regional legislative representative for the Maine Schools Superintendent Association did not respond for a comment on the matter.

This story will be updated.



Source link

Advertisement

Maine

Maine’s abrupt plan to cut $400M in construction projects roils the industry

Published

on

Maine’s abrupt plan to cut 0M in construction projects roils the industry


When BDN shines a light, policymakers act. Make a gift to help our reporters keep Maine’s leaders informed. Make a donation now. 

This story will be updated.

The Maine Department of Transportation is moving to slash up to $400 million in projects from its agenda, a shocking and abrupt cutback that is rattling the state’s construction industry at the start of building season.

Roughly $50 million across six pavement projects have already been delayed, according to a memo exclusively obtained by the Bangor Daily News. The agency plans to cut or delay another $150 million in bridge, highway, intersection and multimodal projects later this month. A further $200 million or more in cuts are planned in the next three-year work plan.

Advertisement

Those figures were outlined by Transportation Commissioner Dale Doughty in the May 18 memo to Gov. Janet Mills that has since circulated widely in the transportation sector, which has been getting drip-by-drip details on the wide scope of the cuts over the past three weeks.

It comes at the beginning of the state’s relatively narrow construction season. Companies have hired workers and ordered materials for projects they expected to begin this summer. The severity of the transportation budget problems was not raised to lawmakers during the 2026 legislative session.

Kelly Flagg, executive director of the Associated General Contractors of Maine, called the shortfall “deeply troubling” in a statement.

“We stand ready to work with policymakers, stakeholders, and industry partners to identify both immediate and long-term solutions,” Flagg said. “Maine cannot afford to fall further behind.”

Insiders saw this first.
This story was broken in Maine Politics Insider, the BDN’s daily premium newsletter for the most ardent political news followers. If you are a new BDN subscriber, you can sign up here. Current subscribers can contact our customer service team to upgrade.

The cuts stem from a structural funding gap of at least $130 million in the state’s current work plan, according to Doughty’s memo. Losses are magnified because state money from the gas tax and other revenue sources is matched by federal funds. Lawmakers have long grappled with politically difficult long-term problems with the state’s transportation budget.

Advertisement

A Mills spokesperson said Wednesday morning that the administration was working on a response to questions from the BDN. The department says it needs roughly $240 million more in state capital funding annually to maintain the existing system, and that anything less than $200 million will erode it over time.

Doughty’s memo the only near-term solution is a series of bonds beginning as soon as possible. Lawmakers would have to return to Augusta to authorize that if one is going to appear on the November ballot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Owen McCarthy offers Maine Republicans real change

Published

on

Opinion: Owen McCarthy offers Maine Republicans real change


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Michael Capeci is the former chairman of the Bangor GOP.

Let’s be honest about Maine’s current state.

For many families, the cost of living has become unsustainable. Housing is out of reach for many young people. Energy bills keep rising. Many small businesses are struggling under taxes and regulations that make it harder to grow. Rural hospitals are under strain and despite years of increased state spending, the results are not showing up in people’s daily lives.

Advertisement

Concurrently, Maine continues to lose young workers to other states. That is not a statistic, it is a warning sign.

To me, the question in this Republican primary for governor is not about slogans. It is whether we continue with a political approach that has failed to reverse these trends, or whether we nominate someone with new ideas. I think that someone is Owen McCarthy.

Owen is not a political insider. He is an entrepreneur from Patten, a small town where opportunity is not assumed, it is built. He grew up in a working-class family, became the first in his family to graduate from college graduating from the University of Maine, and founded MedRhythms, a healthcare technology company focused on neurological treatment.

He didn’t just talk about opportunity. He built it. That distinction matters, because Maine’s problem is not a lack of debate it is a lack of results. We have seen the trajectory: higher costs, slower growth, and a steady outmigration of young workers. I believe Owen McCarthy represents a break from that pattern.

His Maine 2040 plan focuses on creating 50,000 new jobs in sectors where Maine has real advantages — maritime and defense, advanced forest products, and life sciences. These are export-driven industries tied directly to Maine’s workforce, geography, and institutions. What sets Owen apart is not only what he proposes, but how he approaches governing.

Advertisement

He prioritizes modernizing permitting so projects do not stall. He supports using technology to reduce costs and increase efficiency. He focuses on making it easier to build, hire, and expand in Maine.

That same practical mindset extends to healthcare. Expanding telehealth, strengthening EMS systems, improving provider flexibility, and shifting toward earlier intervention are not abstract reforms. They are system upgrades designed to improve access while controlling costs.

Maine voters consistently respond to competence. They reward candidates who understand problems and present plans to solve them. I believe they are tired of rhetoric that does not translate into results, and skeptical of politics that prioritizes messaging over execution.

Owen’s approach is grounded in solving the issues that shape daily life — affordability, healthcare access, job creation, and government efficiency. That is not just policy positioning. It is a governing model that speaks directly to voters.

Some will point to his lack of political experience. But I believe Maine’s core problems are not the result of insufficient political experience; they are the result of policies that have failed to deliver measurable improvement. Experience inside a broken system, by itself, is not a solution.

Advertisement

If Republicans want to win, this primary must be taken seriously. From my perspective, it is not about choosing a nominee for governor who can energize the base. It is about selecting someone who can compete in a broader electorate that is frustrated and looking for change.

That requires a candidate who can speak beyond the base, not by abandoning principles, but by demonstrating competence and a credible plan to address Maine’s challenges. I believe Owen McCarthy offers that combination. He represents a shift away from managed decline and toward economic execution.

This is not just another primary. It is a decision about whether Republicans position themselves to win Maine or whether they remain trapped in a cycle of repeating the same strategies and expecting different outcomes.

If Republicans want to compete for Maine’s future, they cannot afford to nominate a candidate who only motivates part of the electorate. They need someone who expands it.

I believe Owen McCarthy is that candidate.

Advertisement

And if the goal is to win Maine, then the choice should be unmistakable



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Stalwart 7 in Varsity Maine baseball poll

Published

on

Stalwart 7 in Varsity Maine baseball poll


Gorham shortstop Miles Brenner throws to first during the Rams’ 8-0 win over the Cheverus on May 5 in Gorham. (Derek Davis/Staff Photographer)

The only notable change in the top-seven of the Varsity Maine baseball poll is that Gorham now has eight first-place votes, two more than last week. The order of the seven teams is identical. In fact, the only change in the top-seven over the past three polls is the swap at the top after Gorham’s win over South Portland on May 19.

Furthermore, Gorham, South Portland, Oxford Hills, Cheverus, Bangor, Mt. Ararat and Fryeburg have been ranked in the top seven for four straight weeks, and six of those squads have been among the top seven in every poll this spring.

Meanwhile, Scarborough is ranked for the first time since May 5, and Ellsworth and Thornton swapped spots.

Advertisement

The Varsity Maine baseball poll is based on games played before June 2, 2026. The top 10 teams are voted on by the Varsity Maine staff, with first-place votes in parentheses, followed by total points.

1. Gorham (8) 89
2. South Portland 79
3. Oxford Hills (1) 75
4. Cheverus 55
5. Bangor 42
6. Mt. Ararat 41
7. Fryeburg Academy 30
8. Ellsworth 27
9. Thornton Academy 25
10. Scarborough 12

Also receiving votes: Washington Academy 8, Monmouth Academy 4, Cony 4, Leavitt 2, Falmouth 2.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending