Connect with us

Northeast

Karen Read and John O'Keefe: Inside evolution of Boston murder mystery since July mistrial

Published

on

Karen Read and John O'Keefe: Inside evolution of Boston murder mystery since July mistrial

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Karen Read, the woman accused of killing her Boston cop boyfriend during a January nor’easter, is set to go on trial for a second time this week after her first prosecution ended with a hung jury.

Read, 45, is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene of a deadly accident in connection with John O’Keefe’s death on Jan. 29, 2022. He was 46 and found in the snow outside another police officer’s house hours after a group of people went there for an after-party to cap off a night out drinking.

Advertisement

She was originally charged with manslaughter – typical in a deadly hit-and-run case – but authorities later tacked on the murder charge.

KAREN READ UPDATE: FIRED LEAD INVESTIGATOR ON WITNESS LIST FOR 2ND TRIAL IN BOSTON COP JOHN O’KEEFE’S DEATH

Karen Read and John O’Keefe are shown in an undated family photo. Read is accused of fatally striking him with her SUV after a night of drinking, but her defense has argued she is being framed by a group of his former police colleagues. (Courtesy of Karen Read)

Through her first trial and in multiple media interviews afterward, she maintained her innocence and claimed someone else killed O’Keefe.

HAVE A NEWS TIP? CLICK HERE

Advertisement

Joseph Giacalone, a former NYPD sergeant and a criminal justice professor at Penn State-Lehigh Valley, told Fox News Digital he thinks prosecutors will have a hard time getting a conviction after the first case fell apart.

The first trial saw allegations of a police cover-up, the arrest of an online blogger accused of intimidating witnesses, the firing of the lead investigator and lingering questions about how O’Keefe died.

The Waterfall Bar and Grille is shown in Canton, Mass., on March 29, 2025. This is where Karen Read, John O’Keefe, Jennifer McCabe and friends visited before O’Keefe’s death in January 2022. (Richard Beetham for Fox News Digital)

KAREN READ’S 2ND MURDER TRIAL SET TO START IN DEATH OF BOYFRIEND COP: WHAT TO KNOW

Prosecutors allege that Read backed into him with her Lexus SUV, then drove away, leaving him to die in the snowstorm.

Advertisement

An autopsy found the cause of his death to be blunt-force trauma to the head and hypothermia. O’Keefe had skull fractures, brain bleeding, swollen black eyes and cuts to his right arm, but the forensic pathologist held off on calling it a homicide, leaving the manner of death undetermined.

Dr. Daniel Wolfe, an expert witness, testified that the damage to the rear end of Read’s vehicle was not consistent with striking a human head or arm. Prosecutors are seeking to have his testimony precluded the second time around.

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

Karen Read stands in the doorway as she waits to leave Norfolk Superior Court.  (John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

His name remained on a 150-person witness list unveiled Monday, along with that of Michael Proctor, the former lead investigator who was fired from the Massachusetts State Police this month.

Advertisement

GO HERE FOR FULL COVERAGE OF THE 2ND KAREN READ TRIAL

Read the witness list: Mobile users click here

The following is a timeline of key events in the case:

Jan. 28, 2022

Read and O’Keefe went out in Canton, Massachusetts, a suburb of Boston about 15 miles from the city.

Although text messages introduced at trial show they had argued that morning, they went out together around 9 p.m. at C.F. McCarthy’s, an Irish bar. Around 11, they met friends and acquaintances at the Waterfall Bar and Grille. The bar closed at midnight.

Advertisement

JUROR IN KAREN MISTRIAL JOINS HER DEFENSE TEAM FOR RETRIAL

C.F. McCarthy’s in Canton, Mass. (Richard Beetham for Fox News Digital )

Jan. 29, 2022

Then-Boston Police Officer Brian Albert invited a group of people to his house on Fairview Road for an after-party when the bar wrapped up service. This could be the last time O’Keefe was seen alive in public.

JUROR IN KAREN MISTRIAL JOINS HER DEFENSE TEAM FOR RETRIAL

Early hours of Jan. 29

Advertisement
  • 12 a.m.: O’Keefe and Read are invited over to Albert’s house and given directions. But witnesses have testified they never came inside.
  • 12:37 a.m.: Read allegedly leaves a voicemail with an expletive for O’Keefe, saying, “John, I … hate you.” She was later accused of hitting him at about 24 mph after backing up 60 feet in her vehicle.
  • 2:27 a.m.: Jennifer McCabe allegedly looks up on Google how long it takes to die in the cold. She later testified that she did the search at Read’s request.
  • 6 a.m.: Read returns to the Alberts’ home with McCabe and another person, and they call 911 from outside, where O’Keefe was found dead, according to a synopsis from CourtTV, which streamed the first trial.
  • 6:23 a.m.: McCabe uses her phone to search for information on dying in the cold for a second time.

SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER

Karen Read appears in Norfolk County Superior Court for a pre-trial hearing. She is charged with fatally running over her boyfriend, John O’Keefe, whose arm is shown with scratches and cuts on a poster in court. (John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Feb. 2, 2022

Read was arrested on hit-and-run and manslaughter charges.

June 9, 2022

A superseding indictment accused Read of second-degree murder.

GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB

Judge Beverly Cannone presides over jury selection during the Karen Read trial at Norfolk County Superior Court, Thursday, April 18, 2024, in Dedham, Mass. (David McGlynn/New York Post via AP, Pool)

Advertisement

April 16, 2024 to July 1

Read’s first trial stretched on for weeks and ended with a hung jury. Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial.

Prosecutors accused Read of a drunken hit-and-run. Her defense argued that O’Keefe had been attacked inside the home and suffered injuries to his arm caused by a dog before being carried outside and left in the storm.

Officer John O’Keefe (Boston Police Department)

March 19, 2025

After a months-long internal investigation into the lewd text messages he sent about Read in the initial investigation, Proctor was fired from the Massachusetts State Police after a 12-year career.

March 31 

On the eve of jury selection for Read’s second trial, Cannone released several impactful rulings on the case.

Advertisement

She rejected the defense’s attempt to have a former FBI agent testify about failures to meet police protocol with the initial investigation and limited the scope of arguments the defense would be allowed to raise regarding potential third-party culprits, including Albert and ATF Agent Brian Higgins, both of whom were present at both the Waterfall bar and Albert’s house the night O’Keefe died.

ATF Agent Brian Higgins speaks at the Karen Read murder trial at Norfolk Superior Court, May 28, 2024, in Dedham, Mass. (Stuart Cahill/Boston Herald via AP/Pool)

The witness list also revealed Proctor would take the stand, even after his firing, and so would Aidan Kearney, a local blogger and prominent Read supporter who has been accused of witness intimidation.

April 1

Jury selection in Read’s second trial kicked off in Dedham, Massachusetts.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine could face $50M in penalties from federal food assistance policy changes

Published

on

Maine could face M in penalties from federal food assistance policy changes


Maine could face up to $50 million in penalties next year due to errors in its payments for federal food benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Newly released data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture find that Maine’s error rate last year was nearly 11%, the bulk of which were overpayments. That’s in line with the U.S. average. But starting in October of next year, states with error rates above 6% must cover a portion of the SNAP benefits.

Anna Korsen, executive director of Full Plates, Full Potential, said the overpayments aren’t fraud — they’re human error. She said this new cost-shifting policy enacted last year under the Trump administration further complicates the SNAP application process.

“Instead, we could make this program more accessible and more efficient,” Korsen said. “And that would reduce the number of errors and also ensure that Mainers who are eligible for SNAP have access to it.”

Advertisement

She’s urging Congress to delay or reverse the policy under the farm bill that’s currently under consideration.

Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services said it’s taking steps to reduce the error rate, including modernizing its systems and hiring an additional 40 eligibility specialists.

This story appears through a media partnership with Maine Public.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Who will take care of our older and disabled people? – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Who will take care of our older and disabled people? – The Boston Globe


Write to us at startingpoint@globe.com. To subscribe, sign up here.


I’ve been writing for years about immigrants filling jobs that Americans don’t want. Haitians in particular have stepped into the void where the work is hard and the pay is low – cleaning, groundskeeping, preparing food, caring for elderly and developmentally disabled people.

When an influx of migrants flooded into the United States a few years ago, a number of savvy Massachusetts employers opened their doors to them. Thrive Support and Advocacy, a developmental disabilities provider in Marlborough, hired 41 newly arrived Haitians, filling all its full-time direct-care jobs for the first time in a decade.

With the Supreme Court last week siding with the Trump administration’s attempts to end Temporary Protected Status for Syrians and Haitians as part of its continued immigration crackdown, Massachusetts stands to lose 10,000 Haitian TPS holders in the workforce. A decision on Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship, which grants automatic citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil, is expected today.

Advertisement

But it isn’t just a numbers game. Employers continually cite Haitian migrants’ loyalty, hard work, and devotion to the people they’re helping — many of them elderly. Not to mention the ripple effects of losing these valued employees as the aging population skyrockets.

“At some point, many people will be rehab patients,” Adam Scott, CEO of Hebrew SeniorLife told me. “At some point, many people will be long-term care patients. And this impacts all of them.”

When the TPS ruling is implemented, 10,000 Massachusetts residents will be out of a job and expected to leave the country. But many of them have nowhere to go. A pharmacy tech I’ve been talking to over the past few months knew this day was coming, and she has a detailed plan in place that will allow her 14-year-old US-born son, who has autism, to stay. But she has no plan for herself. She can’t go back to Haiti, where she was kidnapped by gangs as a teenager. So she’s hoping to keep working until her employer tells her she has to go.

To where, though, she doesn’t know.

Advertisement

Read: Who will care for the elderly and developmentally disabled?

Also: More than 100 Venezuelans deported from the United States just hours before the deadly earthquakes are missing. Seven children were among the group, which was taken to a hotel that was destroyed in the quake. (AP)


🧩 6 Across: Bookstore category | ☀️ 88° Hotter Wed.


Paraguay players celebrate with goalkeeper Orlando Gill, right, after winning their World Cup match against Germany.Charles Krupa/AP Photo/Charles Krupa

World Cup: Can the US soccer team beat a European national team for the first time in 11 matches and make it into the Group of 16? We’ll know tomorrow night. In a thrilling upset, Paraguay sent four-time champion Germany home at Foxborough.

Five in a row: Don’t get too excited yet, but the Red Sox followed their four-game sweep of the Yankees with a 6-3 victory over the Nationals last night. They were led by Wilton Contreras, who has been struggling with the news of the deadly earthquakes in his native Venezuela.

Advertisement

Cannabis rollback: If Mass. voters repeal marijuana legalization, would that put you in danger of being arrested? We answer your questions here.

Heat wave: An Extreme Heat Watch has been declared for Wednesday through the Fourth of July. Here’s how hot it will get.

Wellesley killing: The 24-year-old man charged with fatally stabbing his father had suffered serious mental health issues and battled “to contain his demons,” family friends say.

Hiya, neighbor! Cambridge wants to build “social housing.” What is it?

What now? More people are surviving cancer than ever before. Now health providers are helping people navigate the next step.

Advertisement

Duck Boat accident: Questions about equipment quality and decision-making are being raised about the accident Saturday that injured 11 people when the craft flipped in East Cambridge.

Beaches, shellfish areas closed: A sewer line break in Haverhill dumped millions of gallons of wasterwater into the Merrimack River.

He’s No. 1: Yes, but what made AJ Dybantsa the NBA’s top pick? He’s the exact type of player NBA teams are looking for.


By David Beard

Taylor Ortega and Dan Levy in “Big Mistakes.”Spencer Pazer/Netflix/Spencer Pazer/Netflix © 2025

📺 Best TV so far: A whip-smart Italian import. A New England horror comedy. A gay Lutheran minister and his sister stumble across a criminal. Check out our faves.

🏰 Home of the Week: Hail, Victorian! Brookline’s regal Webber-Bouve Mansion has hit the market for $4.3 million. Take a peek. Plus, see the 1976 home for sale that has a Revolutionary War touch.

Advertisement

🍕 Riverside eats: Years in the making, the $24 million Esplanade pavilion project with a café nears the finish line.

🎻 Music as a focusing tool: The jury is out on whether music helps you study or work better or takes away focus, However, instrumental music may help more than those jumping lyrical workout tunes. (The Conversation)

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Tartan adventure: A Globe reporter went to Scotland to find family history, Highland culture — and a wee dram of whisky.


Thanks for reading Starting Point.

This newsletter was edited by David Beard and produced by Ryan Orlecki.

Advertisement

❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at startingpoint@globe.com.

✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can sign up for your own copy.

📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.


Katie Johnston can be reached at katie.johnston@globe.com. Follow her @ktkjohnston.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Declassified Pentagon UFO files detail mysterious 1947 incident in New Hampshire

Published

on

Declassified Pentagon UFO files detail mysterious 1947 incident in New Hampshire


The Pentagon released over a hundred newly declassified files related to UFOs (now officially referred to as Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or UAP) last month, including a handful of pages and memos about mysterious, flaming metal fragments that landed in a field in West Rindge, New Hampshire, in 1947, and the classified investigation that followed.

This is the story NHPR has pieced together from the incident summary sheet and official communications and memos from the Boston FBI Field Office to the director of the FBI.

A porchside discovery

Advertisement

At 3 p.m. on July 7, 1947, retiree Charles. N. Tasker was sitting on Earl Whitehead’s porch in West Rindge when he observed “little curls of smoke, which on inspection disclosed small burned spots about one and one half inches in diameter on the green lawn,” according to a now-declassified report from the FBI.

Nearby, on Route 202, “several little blazes had started” in the long dry grass on both sides of the road, creating a circle about 200 feet in diameter that seemed to be caused by small metallic fragments.

Tasker called the local fire department to extinguish the small fires while a fellow observer, a “Mr. Appel,” gave the metallic fragments to researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to study, where Dr. John W. Bunker, dean of the graduate school, led the research team and reported the findings to the Boston FBI field office.

Route 202 as it runs through the town of Rindge, N.H. (Mara Hoplamazian/NHPR)

The examination

Advertisement

The first step in studying the metallic fragments was to identify what they were made of. Using a spectrograph, which studies light waves to determine the material composition of objects, scientists at MIT found the metallic fragments were ordinary iron that had been “subjected to terrific heat,” which caused scales to form and thus created cast iron.

Where did the iron fragments come from?

Given that Tasker found the metal pieces in the grass about 700 feet from a railroad track, the researchers hypothesized that the fragments could be from the liner in a smoke stack or some other part of a steam engine. However, further testing ruled out that theory.

If not a train . . . then a plane?

Advertisement

One metallurgist at MIT speculated that the fragments could be the lining from a jet turbo plane.

But another scientist was unsure that the fragments were from an airplane, because if the fragments came from something at high altitude, most of the heat would have left by the time they reached the ground, meaning they wouldn’t be able to start the fires in the grass that Tasker observed.

And yet, if the iron fragments had originally been part of a larger object that fell a great height, this large iron object could have retained enough heat to start a fire, and probably would have smashed into smaller pieces upon striking the ground.

The scientists attempted to reconstruct this hypothetical larger object from the metallic fragments, finding they had most likely been part of one hollow cylinder that was 8 inches in diameter, 3/16th inches thick, and made using machinery.

Professor J. Francis Reintjes, an assistant professor in electrical engineering at MIT, (referred to as “Rentges” in the reports), thought the metallic fragments looked similar to the lining of V-2 missiles he had observed in New Mexico.

Advertisement

In the late 1940s, the U.S. had been adapting and testing the V-2 missiles designed by Nazi Germany in World War II to study space and the Earth’s atmosphere. The MIT scientists thought that cast iron cylinders of that size had been used during that research. However, the theory wasn’t definitive enough to “conclude to the exclusion of all other possibilities,” according to the final memo written to the director of the FBI.

A point for intelligent life beyond Earth?

Even 80 years ago, extraterrestrial theories floated around.

The American UFO craze had begun on June 24, 1947, when the first “flying saucer” observation was made in the Pacific Northwest. By June 25, the press had picked up an amateur pilot’s report of some “unidentified flying object” that was then referred to as both a “flying saucer” and “flying disk.”

Advertisement

The incident report in West Rindge is from just a few weeks later in July, with the memos to the director of the FBI from later that month. In those memos, there are several handwritten notes, with “FLYING DISCS” written on both of them.

An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)

But how does this theory hold up today?

“I think it’s great that these documents came out; I don’t know if they are the smoking gun that we wanted them to be,” said Michael Panicello, the New England regional director of the Mutual UFO Network.

Panicello, like the scientist Reintjes at MIT, wondered if the metal was space debris from the V-2 rocket research happening in New Mexico.

But Panicello said this doesn’t make him rule out that the fragments could be a sign of extraterrestrial life.

“I’m not trying to be a debunker. I’m definitely not. I believe in aliens,” Panicello said. “But . . . it’s kind of hard to jump right to the UFO alien connection when you can’t truly rule out man-made objects.”

Advertisement

Fragments of a rocket?

At least one scientist thinks it is unlikely the fragments came from man-made rockets or objects launched into space, simply because of the material of which they are made.

“There would be very little reason to make any sort of space object out of iron because its strength to weight ratio just is not as good as something like aluminum, which is practically what all spacecraft are primarily made out of these days,” said James Clemmons, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of New Hampshire.

Clemmons also found it peculiar that these metal fragments were made of cast iron, as it is not considered very strong.

Advertisement

“To me, cast iron is a very crude thing, and the idea that crude things go into space purposefully is also kind of odd,” Clemmons said.

The V-2 launches took place at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. Jenn Jett, a Museum Specialist at the White Sands Missile Range Museum in New Mexico, said via email that “V-2s being launched at White Sands typically landed within the White Sands boundary within a distance of 100 miles,” with the rare exception of landings in other parts of New Mexico and Juarez, Mexico.

Considering New Hampshire is over 2,000 miles from New Mexico, it would appear there is no way for any rocket debris to get anywhere close.

Furthermore, V-2 rockets were made primarily of steel. While steel’s main ingredient is in fact iron, the initial scientists determined the metal to be made of cast iron, which Clemmons said is very different.

“I would expect that the MIT scientists could distinguish between steel and iron,” Clemmons said.

Advertisement

So if these metal fragments are not from the classified V-2 rockets, nor from the nearby railroad, what could they be?

Might it be a meteorite?

According to NASA, more than 50,000 meteorites have been found on Earth. While most meteorites are stony, metal meteorites made of iron do make it down to the ground on occasion.

However, Richard Binzel, a professor of planetary science at MIT, said the written accounts were “not consistent with meteorites.”

Advertisement

“[Meteorites] do not arrive ‘hot’ when they land and would not spark a fire,” Binzel said. “While there are iron meteorites, their metal composition is distinctive, and the early analysis would have immediately declared the fragments as meteorites.”

An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Where are the fragments now?

The final memo to the director of the FBI in the recently released files stated that “unless advised to the contrary by August 15, 1947, the Boston Office will destroy these specimens. In the interim they will be transmitted to the Bureau on specific Bureau instructions.”

NHPR contacted the Boston Field Office of the FBI to confirm whether the metal fragments had been destroyed. In response, the Boston Field Office said, “At this point in time, we haven’t been able to locate any records responsive to your request.”

This isn’t New Hampshire’s only potential counter with extraterrestrials. In 1961, Portsmouth residents Betty and Barney Hill famously had one of the first alleged UFO abduction encounters in the country, and Exeter has an annual UFO festival revolving around a famed 1965 incident nearby.

Advertisement

As for the mystery metal from West Rindge, theories about rocket debris and meteorites have come up short of solid evidence. For now, no one can conclusively determine the origins of the cast-iron fragments near Route 202. This unidentified anomalous phenomenon remains a mystery left unsolved.


This story is a production of the New England News Collaborative. It was originally published by New Hampshire Public Radio.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending