Connect with us

Connecticut

Predicting the WNBA semifinals: A Finals rematch, a lot of chalk and MVPs go head to head

Published

on

Predicting the WNBA semifinals: A Finals rematch, a lot of chalk and MVPs go head to head


Surprises in the first round of the 2024 WNBA playoffs? Try sweeps. The top four seeds each advanced to what should be two blockbuster semifinal series, which tip off Sunday.

What the first round lacked in drama with four 2-0 sweeps, the semifinals could have in abundance. The No. 1 seed New York Liberty will face the No. 4 Las Vegas Aces (3 p.m. ET, ABC) in a rematch of last season’s WNBA Finals. That matchup was set on Tuesday.

On Wednesday, the No. 3 seed Connecticut Sun advanced to the WNBA semifinals for the sixth consecutive season by eliminating the Indiana Fever.

Then Napheesa Collier scored a WNBA playoff record-tying 42 points as the No. 2 seed Minnesota Lynx knocked out the Phoenix Mercury in what could be the last game of Mercury legend Diana Taurasi’s career.

Both semifinal matchups are between teams that have won WNBA titles and teams that haven’t. The Aces are the two-time defending champions, while New York is 0-5 in its past attempts playing for the championship.

Advertisement

The Lynx have won four titles — they came during a seven-season stretch when Minnesota made the Finals six times. The Sun have played in the Finals four times, most recently in 2022, but never won.

Four of the top-five finishers in MVP voting will be competing in the semifinals: unanimous winner A’ja Wilson of Las Vegas, second-place finisher Collier, New York’s Breanna Stewart (third) and Connecticut’s Alyssa Thomas (fifth).

Let’s look at the matchups for the best-of-five semifinals.

Regular-season series: New York won 3-0

How they got here: New York swept Atlanta in the first round, getting 36 points from Sabrina Ionescu in the clinching win Tuesday. Las Vegas swept Seattle behind big performances from A’ja Wilson (24 points, 13 rebounds), Kelsey Plum (29 points) and Chelsea Gray (9 assists).

Advertisement

How they match up: Wilson vs. Stewart is the marquee matchup. The two superstars have dazzled in the playoffs dating to when Stewart played in Seattle, and they have five MVP awards between them. Wilson has been otherworldly all season, averaging a career-high and WNBA-record 26.9 points and 11.9 rebounds per game during the regular season. Stewart averaged 20.4 PPG and 8.5 RPG. Not every superstar matchup yields opportunities for the team’s top players to guard each other, but Wilson and Stewart will, even if it’s not on every possession.

Outside of Stewart and Wilson, there are intriguing matchups all over the floor. New York went with a bigger lineup against Atlanta, starting rookie Leonie Fiebich in place of veteran Courtney Vandersloot. The lineup gave the Liberty additional size and length on the perimeter. At 6-foot-4, Fiebich is quick enough to stick with Jackie Young or Gray, and her length can disrupt perimeter passing lanes.

The big question for Vegas is who will guard Jonquel Jones and Stewart? Wilson can guard one of them, but she can’t guard both. Aces coach Becky Hammon has said that the fifth spot in the Aces lineup depends on the matchup. Kiah Stokes started both games against Seattle and has the most familiarity with the current Aces lineup, brings enough size to hang with Jones, but is a liability offensively. Other options on the Vegas bench, however, do not exactly solve this issue. Las Vegas definitely has a disadvantage in the frontcourt — outside of Wilson, of course — but can the Aces absorb that disparity and make up for it in the backcourt? The answer to that question might determine the outcome of the series.

What will most impact the series? Jones averaged 19.7 points and 11 rebounds in the Liberty’s three games against the Aces this season, five points and two rebounds above her regular-season totals. In the first regular-season meeting, Jones had 34 points. In the second, she had 17 rebounds. In the third — the one when Wilson didn’t play — Jones had 15 points and 8 boards. If she can string together a few explosive games, it could be the difference. Jones is an MVP too. If she plays like that version of herself, Las Vegas could be in trouble.

Advertisement

New York will advance if: Fiebich and Jones win their respective matchups. New York’s lineup presents unique challenges for Las Vegas. Young, who is an elite defender, cannot guard Ionescu and Fiebich. Plum gives up size to every guard. Gray isn’t 6-foot-4. But someone has to guard Fiebich. In the frontcourt, someone must guard Jones. If the Liberty can execute and leverage those mismatches, New York will be returning to the Finals for another shot at the franchise’s first title.

Las Vegas will advance if: Its backcourt plays at the level it’s capable of on both ends of the floor. Wilson has proved all season that she will show up at an elite level, but the Aces haven’t had consistent guard play. Hammon has referred to Plum, Gray and Young as the Aces’ “separation factors.” When that trio hits shots and successfully pressures on the perimeter, Las Vegas is very difficult to beat. — Katie Barnes

Who will win the series?

Andrea Adelson: Aces in 5
Katie Barnes: Aces in 5
Charlie Creme: Liberty in 4
Sean Hurd: Aces in 5
Myron Medcalf: Aces in 5
Kevin Pelton: Liberty in 5
Alexa Philippou: Liberty in 5
Michael Voepel: Aces in 5

Regular-season series: Connecticut won 2-1

Advertisement

How they got here: The Sun swept No. 6 seed Indiana 2-0 in the first round, led by veterans Alyssa Thomas and DeWanna Bonner. Thomas, who had a triple-double in the first game, finished the series with a combined 31 points, 26 assists and 15 rebounds. Bonner had a combined 37 points and 14 rebounds. And Marina Mabrey, obtained via trade in July, had a combined 44 points and 9 assists. The Lynx got No. 7 seed Phoenix’s best effort, but Minnesota — Collier especially — was just too good. She had 38 points in the opener, and light-heartedly chastised herself for missing two free throws in Wednesday’s 101-88 victory.

Admittedly, one more free throw and she would have had the playoff scoring record with 43 points. But she was 14 of 20 from the field and 12 of 14 from the line. “I was just taking what the defense gave me, what my teammates were giving me,” Collier said in a master class of understatement.

How they match up: These were the best two teams in the league in defensive rating during the regular season: the Sun at 94.1 and the Lynx at 94.8. They were also the best at defending the 3-point line: Minnesota held its opponents to 30.1% shooting and Connecticut limited theirs to 31.3%.

All three of the regular-season games were close. Connecticut won the first in overtime 83-82 on May 23. The Sun also won the second 78-73 on July 4. Minnesota got its 78-76 victory on Sept. 17.

Both teams have experienced coaches, too: Cheryl Reeve guided the Lynx to all four of their titles and the Sun’s Stephanie White was an assistant when Indiana won its title in 2012 and head coach when the Fever were last in the WNBA Finals in 2015. Indiana lost to Reeve and the Lynx that year in five games. White left the WNBA after 2016 to coach collegiately at Vanderbilt, but returned last year with the Sun.

Advertisement

What will most impact the series? It might sound simplistic, but which defense will be the best? When both are so good, that is strength vs. strength.

The teams’ offensive rating is also nearly identical: The Lynx were fourth at 102.8 and the Sun fifth at 102.3.

In the first round, Collier proved unguardable, so what plan will the Sun have for her? Collier had 31 points in the first matchup this season with the Sun and 25 in the third. In the second game she was held to 9.

Thomas, 32, and Bonner, 37, are two of the most experienced players in the league when it comes to the playoffs, and they seem to be once again rising to the occasion at the biggest times.

If all three of those players are performing well, who else will step up? Mabrey was terrific in the first-round series for the Sun. Another Notre Dame grad, Kayla McBride, was a strong performer for Minnesota.

Advertisement

Minnesota will advance if: The Lynx are able to move the ball anywhere near as well against Connecticut as they did against Phoenix. Obviously, the Mercury are not as good as the Sun defensively. But it was still impressive how well the Lynx shared the ball in that series: They had 30 assists and 10 turnovers in Game 1 and 28 and 7 in Game 2.

We know both these teams are solid defensively. But Minnesota also led the WNBA in assists during the regular season at 23.0 per game. If the Lynx can attack the Sun with that kind of precision, they will win the series.

Connecticut will advance if: The Sun are able to slow down Collier — we won’t say stop, because that’s not going to happen — and if they beat the Lynx at their own game by limiting them from the 3-point line. The Fever shot 26.7% from 3-point range in Wednesday’s loss to the Sun and 21.4% in Sunday’s loss. That was a big part of why the Fever couldn’t get their offense going as well as they had through the end of the regular season. The Sun defensively make everything hard, and they are as physical as any team in the league.

Who will win the series?

Andrea Adelson: Sun in 5
Katie Barnes: Lynx in 4
Charlie Creme: Lynx in 4
Sean Hurd: Lynx in 5
Myron Medcalf: Lynx in 5
Kevin Pelton: Lynx in 5
Alexa Philippou: Lynx in 5
Michael Voepel: Lynx in 5

Advertisement





Source link

Connecticut

Opinion: Measles is lethal. CT hasn’t forgotten

Published

on

Opinion: Measles is lethal. CT hasn’t forgotten


There is a generation of American parents who knew exactly what measles meant. They had watched many children disappear, either for short periods of hospitalization or longer periods of more serious illness; too often, they never returned. They lined their children up for the vaccine in 1963 without hesitation. Measles was documented as “eliminated” from the United States in 2000.

We have spent the decades since forgetting what they knew.

On April 27, Gov. Ned Lamont signed Public Act 26-3 into law. Among its provisions, the legislation explicitly bars Connecticut’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to claim exemptions from school immunization requirements. That decision was the right one, and the contrast with what two other states are doing at this very moment makes clear exactly why.

Advertisement

Measles is not a childhood inconvenience. It is a highly contagious, potentially fatal infection, with children under five at greatest risk. Before the vaccine became available, the United States recorded 3 to 4 million infections every year: tens of thousands of hospitalizations, 1,000 cases of encephalitis, and roughly 500 deaths annually, most of them children.

Measles still kills more than 100,000 people around the world each year, almost exclusively where vaccination rates are low. One infected person can pass the virus to as many as 18 others, and the virus can linger in the air for up to two hours after an infected person has left the room. Reaching the immunity threshold that stops transmission requires at least 95% of a community to be vaccinated – protecting not just those who got the shot, but newborns, immunocompromised individuals, those who might not attain immunity through vaccination, and children too young for the vaccine.

The national picture should alarm anyone paying attention. A Washington Post county-level analysis of 1,616 counties shows that before the pandemic, 48% of U.S. counties met that 95% threshold. After the pandemic, only 27% do. The United States has already recorded 1,893 measles cases this year, more than 80% of last year’s total, despite being well short of halfway through the year. Once a community loses protection, outbreaks are no longer hypothetical. They are inevitable.

For decades, Mississippi and West Virginia demonstrated that this was preventable. Both states maintained medical-exemption-only vaccine policies and consistently posted some of the highest childhood vaccination rates in the nation. Mississippi’s MMR coverage reached 99.1%. West Virginia’s sat at 98.3% as recently as 2023–24, with an exemption rate of just 0.1%.

Both states have changed course. In April 2023, a federal court order required Mississippi to begin allowing religious exemptions; coverage dropped to 97.5% and is trending downward. In January 2025, West Virginia’s governor signed an executive order opening the same door. The question is not whether rates will fall. It is how fast.

Advertisement

Connecticut has moved in the right direction. After the state eliminated religious exemptions from school vaccine requirements in 2021, its non-medical exemption rate collapsed from 4.1% to 0.3% within a single school year. Public Act 26-3 reinforces that achievement by closing the legal door that the ongoing Spillane v. Lamont litigation has kept ajar. The argument for strong immunization policy is not ideological. It is mathematical. Measles requires 95% community vaccination to stay contained. When outbreaks begin, it is too late to vaccinate your way out quickly enough to protect children already exposed.

The urgency is not abstract. This summer, the FIFA World Cup will bring hundreds of thousands of international visitors to venues across the region, including MetLife Stadium in New Jersey and Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts. Travelers from countries with lower vaccination rates will move through our airports, our transit systems, and our communities. In states where vaccination rates are falling, a single infected traveler in an under-vaccinated community is all it takes to start an outbreak. Public Act 26-3 ensures Connecticut will not be among them. Unless the Spillane v. Lamont litigation undoes what the legislature built.

Policymakers in Mississippi and West Virginia still have time to follow Connecticut’s lead. The disease they are risking is not theoretical. The only question is whether legislators will act before the outbreak or explain to parents afterward why they did not.

Frane Marusic is a junior at Yale College and a Global Health Scholar. Howard P. Forman, M.D., M.B.A. is a professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Economics, Management, and Public Health at Yale University and a practicing physician.

 

Advertisement

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/09/measles-is-lethal-connecticut-hasnt-forgotten-frane/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1169555&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/09/measles-is-lethal-connecticut-hasnt-forgotten-frane/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Kids Count conveys mixed picture of how children fare in CT

Published

on

Kids Count conveys mixed picture of how children fare in CT


Connecticut moved up in a national ranking that uses data to rate how well children are doing state-to-state, moving from eighth to seventh place.

The 2026 Kids Count is compiled by the Annie E. Casey Foundation and state partners like Connecticut Voices for Children and uses 16 indicators in four different categories to assess how well kids are doing — economically and scholastically, as members of families and communities, as well as their physical health.

The dataset, which analyzes 2024 data, rated Connecticut highly in education and health, ranking third and fourth respectively. But Connecticut continues to place closer to the middle of the pack in the categories of economic well-being and family and community, at 20th and 18th in the nation.

Advertisement

Overall, New Hampshire ranked first in the nation while Mississippi came in last.

“Behind every number in this report is a child who is either hungry or fed, housed or homeless, progressing academically or falling behind. No state is consistently getting this right,” said Lisa M. Lawson, president and CEO of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. “The Data Book challenges us to follow the evidence and do what delivers results.”

Connecticut’s 2024 data was measured against numbers from 2019. While most measures didn’t see a significant change, there were some small shifts. That included a slight increase in the number of low birth weight babies, from 7.8% to 8.1%, and more teens not in school and not working — from 4 to 5%. Despite Connecticut’s strong educational ranking, the numbers in that area also slid back — 40% of pre-K aged kids were not in school, compared to a previous measurement of 35%; more fourth-graders were not proficient in reading, up to 64% from 60%; and more eighth-graders were not proficient in math, 68% compared to 61%.

“Connecticut’s overall high ranking is something to be proud of but evidence we are not doing enough — we must engage in big, bold policy changes that advance economic security for all families, not just the privileged and lucky few,” said Emily Byrne, executive director of Connecticut Voices for Children. “The data show both the impact of investments that support children and families and the consequences of longstanding status quo budgets that don’t address equity and opportunity.”

Byrne said that Connecticut has a “moral responsibility” to support families by strengthening the social safety net and investing in policies that benefit all children.

Advertisement

This year, the Kids Count report includes an overall numerical score between 0 and 1000. Connecticut scored 708 — well above the national average of 547. But Connecticut’s score also dropped compared to how the Annie E. Casey Foundation rated it during 2019, when it was rated 727. The Foundation said that 2019 was chosen as a basis of comparison because it represents how kids were faring pre-COVID. The numerical ranking is intended to help make more visible how states are improving or declining on metrics independent of how they rank against other states.

By those scores, kids fared worse in 2024 than they did in 2019, with much of this decline driven by education. Connecticut’s educational data improved in only one metric between 2019 and 2024: slightly more high school students are graduating on time. And, despite its mediocre ranking on economic outcomes, Connecticut’s metrics improved in three of four economic categories, with fewer children living in poverty, fewer children whose parents lack secure employment and fewer children living in households with a high housing cost burden compared to 2019 figures.

Data on the decreasing share of young children not in school is notable as Connecticut embarks on an ambitious plan to fund early childhood education for low-income families with an endowment. Under that plan, which Gov. Ned Lamont has said is central to his legacy, families making less than $100,000 per year would pay nothing for pre-K, while families making more than that would contribute up to 7% of their household income.

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/08/kids-count-conveys-mixed-picture-of-how-children-fare-in-ct/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1170879&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/08/kids-count-conveys-mixed-picture-of-how-children-fare-in-ct/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Popular Hartford Food Hall Decked Out For World Cup

Published

on

Popular Hartford Food Hall Decked Out For World Cup


HARTFORD, CT — A popular culinary destination in Connecticut’s capital city says it will be the place to be to watch the biggest sporting event on the planet.

Parkville Market in Hartford will kick off its “Summer of Soccer” celebration June 11 with a watch party for the Mexico-South Africa match, launching a series of soccer-themed events planned throughout the summer.

The Hartford food hall will broadcast matches both inside the venue and on its outdoor patio.

Organizers said opening-day activities will include face painting, custom T-shirt making, giveaways and a 360-degree photo booth.

Advertisement

Parkville Market’s 22 food vendors, which feature cuisines from around the world, are expected to be a central part of the experience as visitors gather to watch international soccer matches.

In addition to match broadcasts, visitors can use the venue’s new mini soccer pitch outside.

Organizers encouraged guests to bring their own soccer balls and play during events.

“Soccer is the world’s game, and Parkville Market is where the world comes together,” said Carlos Mouta, owner and CEO of Parkville Market. “And let’s go Portugal!”

Special event activations are planned for June 11, June 27 and the tournament final on July 19, according to organizers.

Advertisement

Located at 1400 Park St. in Hartford, Parkville Market is Connecticut’s first and largest food hall. The venue includes 22 restaurants, three bars, private event spaces and outdoor dining areas.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending