Connect with us

Connecticut

Judith Zackson is accused of bugging her then-husband’s bedroom while they slept separately inside the glamorous TV shrink’s $4 million Connecticut mansion when their marriage hit the rocks

Published

on

Judith Zackson is accused of bugging her then-husband’s bedroom while they slept separately inside the glamorous TV shrink’s  million Connecticut mansion when their marriage hit the rocks


A famous TV psychologist bugged her ex-husband’s room to allegedly extort money from his property developer boss, he claims.

Judith Zackson, who has appeared on CNN, CBS, and Fox News and is worth $4.4 million, split from her husband Brad Zackson in May 2022.

From 2020, as their marriage collapsed, they were living in separate rooms in their $4 million, six-bedroom, 7.5-bath, 6,727sqft mansion in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Brad only spotted the listening device in April 2022 when he saw a curious red light flashing in the bathroom ceiling. He filed for divorce within weeks.

Advertisement

Judith Zackson, who has appeared on CNN , CBS, and Fox News and is worth $4.4 million, split from her husband in May 2022

Her husband Brad Zackson only spotted the listening device in April 2022 when he saw a curious red light flashing in the bathroom ceiling. He filed for divorce within weeks

Her husband Brad Zackson only spotted the listening device in April 2022 when he saw a curious red light flashing in the bathroom ceiling. He filed for divorce within weeks

Judith admitted to the eavesdropping during divorce proceedings, which are still ongoing, and is accused of recording his business calls for up to two years.

Now Brad’s boss, Dynamic Star chief executive Gary Segal, claims in a lawsuit that Judith’s plan all along was to blackmail his property firm.

‘Dynamic Star and Ms Zackson have no financial relationship. Dynamic Star is fighting an ongoing vindictive, ugly campaign being waged by an ex-wife of a principal. We are confident court will see the truth,’ the company said. 

The complaint filed by Dynamic and Segal in Manhattan Supreme Court claimed Judith joked about getting ‘a big check from Uncle Gary’.

‘Dr Zackson cynically and secretly invaded Dynamic as a ploy in defense of a divorce action in Connecticut… in an attempt to extort money from Dynamic or Gary,’ it claimed.

Advertisement

Judith’s lawyer argued the claims were meritless and she only recorded Brad to ‘protect herself from her spouse’.

From 2020, as their marriage collapsed, they were living in separate rooms in their $4 million, six-bedroom, 7.5-bath, 6,727sqft mansion in Greenwich, Connecticut

From 2020, as their marriage collapsed, they were living in separate rooms in their $4 million, six-bedroom, 7.5-bath, 6,727sqft mansion in Greenwich, Connecticut

Judith admitted to the eavesdropping during divorce proceedings, which are still ongoing, and is accused of recording his business calls for up to two years

Judith admitted to the eavesdropping during divorce proceedings, which are still ongoing, and is accused of recording his business calls for up to two years

The lawsuit claimed Judith hid recording devices in Brad’s part of the mansion and recorded business calls in 2021 and 2022, and even put one in his car.

Dynamic is not seeking damages, just all copies of the recordings handed over to ‘remove the threat to its existence’.

‘Dr Zackson has been spying on Brad for years which means that Dr Zackson has been spying on [Dynamic] and its business affairs for years,’ the lawsuit claimed.

Judith is claimed to have eavesdropped on calls between Brad and other Dynamic executives and its lawyers, as well as New York City officials and prospective investors.

Advertisement

‘The scope of these transgressions is unknown. The number of recordings is unknown. The location of them is unknown. The disclosure or use of them is unknown,’ the lawsuit claimed.

‘Damages alone will not protect Dynamic. The business and real estate projects are or likely will be valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars, well beyond the ability of Dr Zackson to answer in money damages. 

‘There is no way to calculate the damage that she can cause to interpersonal relationships and business opportunities.’

Dynamic’s business includes the $2.5 billion Fordham Landing development in the Bronx, beside the Harlem River.

The lawsuit claimed Judith hid recording devices in Brad's part of the mansion and recorded business calls in 2021 and 2022, and even put one in his car

The lawsuit claimed Judith hid recording devices in Brad’s part of the mansion and recorded business calls in 2021 and 2022, and even put one in his car

Dynamic's business includes the $2.5 billion Fordham Landing development in the Bronx, beside the Harlem River

Dynamic’s business includes the $2.5 billion Fordham Landing development in the Bronx, beside the Harlem River

However, the company is strapped for cash as its properties are ‘underwater, and they could not refinance the debt due to the market’, according to a Connecticut Superior Court document.

Advertisement

The filing claimed Brad couldn’t afford to pay his legal fees as he was in $9 million debt, including $5.7 million to Segal, and hadn’t filed a tax return since 2012. 

Judith countered Dynamic’s claim by arguing she never planned to extort money from Segal – she just needed it as insurance against Brad.

Brad was caught with a gun the same month he filed for divorce, which was illegal due to his 1983 felony convictions of robbery and criminal possession of a weapon in Nassau County.

He was also arrested twice in 2022 for breaching a restraining order.

‘Mr Zackson has repeatedly violated a restraining order issued because of his abusive and threatening behavior, leading to two additional arrests,’ Judith’s lawyer told the New York Post.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

The oldest farm in CT was founded over 100 years before the country. Here’s where it is

Published

on

The oldest farm in CT was founded over 100 years before the country. Here’s where it is


play

In the middle of New England fall, there’s nothing better than heading to a local farm and picking up fresh apples, pumpkins and warm baked goods.

Advertisement

However, Connecticut is not only home to various good farms to visit, but also various historical farms. In fact, the state’s oldest farm is over 100 years older than the country itself. Established in the 1630s, Field View Farm is not only the state’s oldest farm, but also its oldest business.

Here’s a brief history of the oldest farm in Connecticut.

History of Field View Farm

According to the farm’s Facebook page, Field View Farm was founded in 1639 by Thomas Hine and his family, and it has stayed in the family for 12 generations since. In 1996, the farm suffered a huge fire, the damages from which took a state grant and years to repair.

Today, Field View still functions as a dairy farm and a farm machinery manufacturer, focusing mainly on dairy products like milk and ice cream. Visitors can check out the farm stand for fresh products or enjoy a sweet treat at the ice cream window.

Field View Farm is open daily from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., with the ice cream window open from April through October. The farm is located at 707 Derby Ave. in Orange.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Killingly Woman, 65, Accused Of Killing Canterbury Man: Police

Published

on

Killingly Woman, 65, Accused Of Killing Canterbury Man: Police


KILLINGLY, CT — Police on Wednesday identified both the man who was fatally shot Monday night and the woman accused of shooting him.

The victim, Andrew Michael Olson, 39, of Canterbury, was shot in the chest at a residence at 23 Pratt Rd., according to state police.

Police have arrested Michelle Yeagher, 65, of 23 Pratt Rd., Killingly, for the slaying.

Yeagher is charged with murder, carrying a dangerous weapon, risk of injury to a child, and first-degree reckless endangerment.

Advertisement

Police have not yet disclosed the relationship between the victim and the suspect, or any potential motive.

Yeagher remains in custody, held on a $1 million bond. She has been arraigned in Superior Court in Danielson. She has not yet entered a plea, and she is next due in court on Dec. 11, according to the state Judicial Branch website.

State police said they responded to Yeagher’s residence at 23 Pratt Rd. around 9:21 p.m. on Monday for a report of a shooting.

Troopers found the male victim suffering a single gunshot wound to the chest, according to state police. He was rushed to Day Kimball Hospital, where he was pronounced deceased, state police said.

State police arrested Yeagher at the residence.

Advertisement

The homicide investigation remains active and ongoing, according to police. The Eastern District Major Crime Squad is in charge of the investigation.

Read more:
State Police Probe Homicide In Killingly



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut voters face local ballot questions on infrastructure, leadership

Published

on

Connecticut voters face local ballot questions on infrastructure, leadership


(WFSB) – Voters across Connecticut will decide on local ballot questions on November 4th, including infrastructure spending, municipal leadership positions and policy changes that could impact their communities for years.

In Middletown, voters will consider two major spending proposals: $33 million for infrastructure improvements and $9.5 million for water and sewer upgrades.

“I think everybody has that responsibility if you want to be a good citizen. You should make your voice heard,” said Stephen Civitello, a Middletown voter.

Plainville voters will decide whether their town manager can keep their job if they choose to move out of town.

Advertisement

Manchester faces a similar question about their superintendent, along with two additional ballot items: whether the town should become a city and whether to spend $19.5 million on buildings and roads.

In Glastonbury, voters are split on whether to allow large artificial turf fields, excluding the current one at the high school. Campaign signs throughout the town reflect the division on the issue.

“I saw all the signs and I thought everyone seems to care a lot about this referendum and it’s for the turf,” said Maggie Dunn, a Glastonbury voter.

Dunn said she felt compelled to vote despite the smaller scale of local elections.

“So, I was like I can’t just yell about how everybody should go vote and then not go vote,” she said.

Advertisement

Civitello called voting a “civic duty.”

Local elections typically see lower turnout than state and federal races, but the issues directly affect residents’ daily lives through money, schools and infrastructure.

Some local ballot questions are decided by dozens of votes.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending