Connect with us

Connecticut

CT landlords join calls for lawmakers to incentivize housing

Published

on

CT landlords join calls for lawmakers to incentivize housing


Another group on Wednesday added its voice to the cohort clamoring for lawmakers to take action to push towns to make it easier to build more apartments: landlords.

At a press conference in Newington, the Connecticut Apartment Association asked lawmakers to take steps to increase the number of multi-family units in the state, especially near public transit, make the permitting process easier for builders and enact measures to help developers more easily turn commercial properties into apartments.

This is the start of a more public push than in years’ past by landlords to put their political weight behind housing development. Landlord groups have typically gotten support from Republican lawmakers and pro-business legislators.

“We are here to engage the discussion now because there’s no easy fix and the old approaches must change. This is what we’ve been talking about with legislative leaders and will continue to do so leading up to the January legislative session,” said apartment association member and New Haven landlord Dondré Roberts. “Our message is simple and direct: Connecticut needs to make it easier to develop and build multi-family housing affordably now.”

Advertisement

Connecticut’s housing crisis has been a problem for legislators for years. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Connecticut has a shortage of over 98,000 housing units that are affordable and available for low-income renters. 

State legislators have been pushing for housing reforms for the past couple of legislative sessions. Roberts said his group supports legislation like House Bill 5474, which passed last session and includes measures to provide incentives for middle housing development, require written notice of rent increases and develop ordinances for short-term rental properties, among other actions.

“Last year, H.B. 5474, which tackles the missing middle of duplexes, triplexes and housing that’s between single-family and multi-family communities like this one, is a great start and they need to keep going,” Roberts said.

Although members said they supported the bill, they did not testify publicly on it. The bill changed substantially between the public hearing and final votes, and members said Wednesday they’re working toward more support this session.

“It’s time,” Roberts said, of the need for more action. “Just as someone who lives in the state … it’s tough out there, especially when you are looking for housing that sometimes doesn’t exist for your budget.”

Advertisement

The landlords’ support may create tension within the coalition of people supporting zoning and land use changes. Typically, those in favor of zoning reform have aligned themselves with tenants’ rights groups.

But the apartment association has opposed bills pro-housing coalition members have supported and on Wednesday it called for lawmakers to stop focusing on landlord-tenant issues and get to what they called the root of the problem — the lack of housing.

“The legislature needs to turn away from the landlord-tenant battles like rent caps and forever leases that held us back last year,” Roberts said. “Those proposals were rejected. They took everyone’s eye off the ball, stalled progress, and they don’t add a single unit of housing.”

Lawmakers in past sessions have considered proposals to cap rent increases and to stop no-fault evictions, or evictions that occur when leases end. Neither proposal has gotten through the House or Senate.

Broadly, the apartment association members said they wanted to make it easier to build more housing of many types, including higher-density developments. They said lawmakers should explore methods such as tax incentives, among other solutions.

Advertisement

They pointed to data that shows the vast majority of Connecticut’s residential land is zoned for single-family housing and said that needs to change.

Landlords said they also wanted to see ways to make it easier to convert vacant commercial properties into apartments. The strategy has been used across the country in cities like Providence, where a shopping mall was transformed into apartments.

A major concern for the apartment association and other groups is the development process for housing around Connecticut. Kevin Santini, a principal at the family-owned property management and construction company Santini Homes, said developers struggle in Connecticut because of the extensive permitting process.

“If you go into a piece of land that isn’t zoned for multi-family, it’s very daunting and very unattractive to go in and try to go through the processes that you need to go through,” Santini said.

He emphasizes the need for predictability with infrastructure. 

Advertisement

“You can’t make the process take two to three years, especially if you’re rezoning a parcel by that time,” Santini said. “It’s years and it’s hundreds of thousands of dollars if not seven figures.”

Roberts said the group supports incentive-based solutions rather than mandates for towns. That issue is one of the biggest debates in the conversation about zoning reform and housing development in Connecticut.

Top lawmakers and housing experts have said leaving control in the hands of local government isn’t working. But Gov. Ned Lamont and many opponents of statewide zoning reform have argued for incentive-based, locally driven solutions.

Santini said the responsibility for building the housing will lie with developers.

“To make positive changes, politics can’t be involved,” Santini said. “And I know that’s crazy to say, and maybe even naive, but we have to do what’s best for the state of Connecticut, and we have to put our agendas aside. And right now, the state needs us. The state needs builders.”

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Lamont signs law in Norwich to stop pay to contractors violating wages

Published

on

Lamont signs law in Norwich to stop pay to contractors violating wages


Connecticut is taking a step to make sure workers are paid fairly.

On June 30, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Public Act 26-17, which enables the State Comptroller to issue a stop work order and withhold state funds to contractors that are not properly paying their employees.

The bill was signed on the construction site for Greeneville Elementary School, which is one of the four new elementary schools being built in Norwich. The State of Connecticut is reimbursing the city for 80% of the project, and the law applies to “any place where the state is making a payment,” Lamont said.

Advertisement

Wage theft can take many forms

It matters because wage theft can take many forms, from money taken from base pay, to money not given in benefits, Kimberly Glassman, director of compliance and government affairs for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478, said.

Local 478 also has a presence in the Norwich school building project, with 10 to 20 union members working at each site daily, Glassman said.

What do state leaders think of the Greeneville site’s progress?

Lamont is impressed with how quickly the work is going.

Advertisement

“They told me that the walls went up in the last two weeks, so a lot of progress is happening,” he said.

During the bill signing, Norwich Mayor Swarnjit Singh touted the importance of using union labor and the value of project labor agreements.

“We are on time and on budget,” he said.

After the bill signing, Singh said its possible the Greeneville School building could be complete as soon as the first quarter of 2027, he said.

Advertisement

“They’re not wasting any time,” Singh said.

State Rep. Derrel Wilson attended the original Greeneville School as a kid, and still lives in Greeneville. He was credited as being one of the driving forces for getting the workers bill passed.

“It’s exciting seeing this revitalization for our neighborhood, seeing active construction and watching individuals rebuild our community,” Wilson said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

US Supreme Court to consider challenge to Connecticut assault weapons ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court to consider challenge to Connecticut assault weapons ban


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday it will take up an appeal challenging bans on the AR-15 and other semi-automatic firearms, including the ban in Connecticut and in the Chicago area.

Similar bans are in place in about a dozen states. The case is expected to be heard in the fall.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said the state’s assault weapons ban is lawful and that his office is prepared to fight the challenge in court.

“Connecticut’s assault weapon ban is lawful, lifesaving, and broadly supported. The gun lobby has flooded the courts in states across the country to get an assault weapons case up to this Supreme Court. We are prepared for this fight, and we are going to go in with everything we’ve got to keep these weapons of war off our streets, out of our schools, and away from our families,” said Attorney General Tong.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

CT poised to invest again in childcare, pay down pension debt

Published

on

CT poised to invest again in childcare, pay down pension debt


Having racked up its ninth hefty budget surplus in a row, Connecticut is poised to expand a record investment in affordable childcare while taking another big chunk out of its legacy pension debt.

The $27.2 billion state budget for the fiscal year that closes Tuesday is on pace for a $412 million operating surplus — all of it earmarked by legislators and Gov. Ned Lamont for a special endowment for early childhood education.

A special savings program outside the formal budget should capture another $1.3 billion in income and business tax receipts. Most of that, roughly $1 billion to $1.1 billion, will go toward shrinking the state’s pension debt. The rest will boost Connecticut’s emergency reserve or “rainy day fund” to almost $4.5 billion — 18% of annual operating expenses, the maximum allowed by law.

Advertisement

“Making Connecticut more affordable means making it easier for families to live, work and raise children here,” Lamont wrote in a statement. “High-quality early childhood education gives children the strongest possible start in life while helping parents pursue careers, grow their incomes and contribute to our economy.”

Connecticut’s early childhood commissioner, Elena Trueworth, added in the statement that “This endowment represents a transformational commitment to Connecticut’s youngest children and the families who depend on high-quality early childhood education.”

Eligible families are expected to begin receiving no-cost childcare or partial assistance subsidized by the endowment starting in the 2027-28 fiscal year.

Saving for childcare was challenging this past year

The governor and his fellow Democrats in the legislature’s majority launched the Early Childhood Education Endowment with $300 million in June 2025. With a goal of adding thousands of affordable childcare program slots by 2030, officials dedicated future operating surpluses toward this effort. Separately, the special savings program outside the formal budget would remain focused on reducing pension debt.

That strategy hit a snag earlier this year.

Advertisement

While officials planned for another $300 million-plus operating surplus, rising Medicaid and fringe benefit costs — and smaller-than-anticipated corporation tax receipts — wiped out the entire projected fiscal cushion.

Lamont and lawmakers responded by raiding the off-budget savings program, moving hundreds of millions of dollars into the General Fund. That transfer, coupled with a last-minute surge in tax receipts, created the $412 million surplus now headed into the childcare endowment.

“We’re making a smart, long-term investment that will lower costs for families, strengthen our workforce, and ensure this support is available for generations to come,” Lamont said. “This is exactly why we have managed the state’s finances responsibly, so that when we have the opportunity to make transformational investments, we can do so without raising taxes or compromising our long-term fiscal stability.”

Officials dedicated $11 billion in surplus since 2020 to pay pension debt

Even with those adjustments to the off-budget program, the administration estimates Connecticut will still have saved $1 billion to $1.1 billion to deposit into its pension funds for state employees and municipal teachers. A final tally won’t be known until the comptroller’s office completes its formal audit of the last budget cycle in September.

Once that’s done, officials will have dedicated a total of about $11 billion from special savings to reduce pension debt since 2020.

Advertisement

Still, analysts project the state won’t have eliminated all unfunded pension liabilities before the 2040s.

Connecticut entered this fiscal year with more than $33 billion in unfunded pension obligations, according to analysts, and the state remains one of the most indebted per capita in the nation.

Most of that debt stems from inadequate saving by legislatures and governors for more than seven decades between 1939 and 2010, according to a 2015 report prepared for the state by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. By not saving properly, the state government severely restricted the potential investment earnings, forfeiting billions of dollars across seven decades.

As a result, mandatory pension contributions continue to place heavy pressure on state finances, drawing resources away from other programs and services.

Watershed debate on CT savings program expected next term

Meanwhile, Lamont’s critics say the savings program he embraces is too aggressive.

Advertisement

Between operating surpluses and off-budget savings programs, Connecticut has left an average of $1.8 billion unspent — roughly 8% of the General Fund — since new budget caps were enacted in 2017. By comparison, the two prior decades of state budgets produced an average annual savings of 0.1% of the General Fund.

In other words, critics say, the new system is forcing a single generation to retire a pension debt problem created by three — and that education, health care, municipal aid and other core programs are suffering as a result.

Many of Lamont’s fellow Democrats in the legislature — including state Rep. Josh Elliott of Hamden, who is challenging the governor for the party’s gubernatorial nomination — say Connecticut could retire debt at a more modest pace and invest far more in programs and direct aid to cities and towns.

The Republican gubernatorial nominee, state Sen. Ryan Fazio of Greenwich, called earlier this year for the state to reduce savings efforts in order to dramatically expand tax cuts for Connecticut’s middle class.

Legislative leaders from both parties have said they expect a debate over state government’s savings habits to dominate the next General Assembly term, which covers the 2027 and 2028 sessions.

Advertisement

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/30/ct-to-invest-surplus-in-childcare-pay-down-pension-debt/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1172734&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/30/ct-to-invest-surplus-in-childcare-pay-down-pension-debt/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending