Connect with us

Connecticut

Connecticut Board of Education recommends cell phone restrictions in public schools

Published

on

Connecticut Board of Education recommends cell phone restrictions in public schools



Ericka Henriquez

As public school students return to school in New Haven, they will be met with some new rules around their cell phone use. 

On Aug. 21, the Connecticut State Board of Education approved a new recommendation for Connecticut public schools: cell phones should not be used at all during the school day of elementary and middle school students, while cell phone use in high schools should be limited.

Advertisement

However, as students begin to get used to the new normal in schools, the opinions of students, educators, parents and medical professionals highlight just how complex reactions are to the cell phone ban. 

“I think to me as a parent and an educator, the recommendation sounds like it is aligned developmentally and it encourages social interaction, while also giving some flexibility at older ages,” Mira Debs GRD ’16, lecturer in the sociology department and director of undergraduate studies of the Education Studies Program, said. “However, I can’t speak for all parents or students, for there are various experiences that provide a different perspective to this recommendation.”

The scientific basis for the cellphone ban recommendation 

According to Xi Chen, professor of health policy at the School of Public Health, cell phones have led to reduced cognitive capacity, as students are now more likely to just use a readily available information source without relying on their cognitive abilities. Cell phones have also led to sleep deprivation as blue light from phones disrupts the normal circadian cycle, and social media has its litany of mental health consequences, from intense feelings of isolation and stress to self-harm.

However, when it comes to students, the dangers of cell phones listed above are only exacerbated and can impair the learning experience in the classroom. And even if they are not actively using it but can see their phone, they can still get distracted, according to Ada Fenick, professor of pediatrics at the School of Medicine. 

Advertisement

“So if you’re feeling like you’re constantly having to look at your phone, your attention span for your schoolwork is definitely lowered because you’re constantly going back to check,” Fenick told the News.

Cell phones have also been shown to increase cyberbullying in school, which is associated with feelings of depression and self-harm, according to Fenick. This is especially true when cyberbullying can now be done at a distance by anyone and posts on social media can be permanent. 

Additionally, outside the classroom, cell phones have been shown to reduce the social-emotional skills of students. According to Chen, students are more likely to develop social isolation as they spend more time on the screen and do not learn how to talk to their peers, which has a variety of negative effects.

“We know that face-to-face communication between children is best because human society is built on face-to-face interaction,” Chen said. “But cell phones and online communication crowd out their valuable time to engage with their peer students. There’s even some evidence that brain development can be affected as the important skills of communication and creativity aren’t engaged.”

According to Debs, the COVID-19 pandemic provided the opportunity for students to have unlimited access to their cell phones because they were home all the time. Coming back to school made the issues of cell phones in the classroom that much clearer to educators. 

Advertisement

Bullying, lack of communication skills and reduced attention span are not anything new in schools, but cell phones exacerbate these issues. According to some teachers, the lack of cell phones has created great changes in the classroom.

“The reports that have come out from schools that have implemented a ban is that it makes teachers’ work so much easier. They feel like they have more positive interactions with students, creating a very positive impact on the school climate overall,” Debs told the News.

Community reactions for and against phone restrictions

Some New Haven students, however, are skeptical about how cell phone restrictions would be effectively implemented and wonder how restrictions could still prioritize students’ rights.

Jonaily Colón, a junior at New Haven’s High School in the Community, or HSC, serves as a student representative on the New Haven Board of Education. She says she is comfortable with cell phones being restricted, agreeing they can stifle engagement in the classroom, but feels students should be able to access them when they need to, especially to communicate with family or manage emergency situations. 

Advertisement

“In case of a Code Red or anything like that, say we have our phone in a Yondr pouch, you can’t text anyone,” she said.

In August, the New Haven Independent reported that Barnard Environmental Magnet School and Troup School are spearheading the use of Yondr pouches, magnetic lockboxes that prevent cell phone usage inside a designated “phone-free space.”

Colón hasn’t yet witnessed any effort to restrict cell phone use in HSC, but her peers have heard about the Yondr pouches from students at other schools. Colón understands that a teacher’s reprimand is often not enough to discourage students from using phones, but her peers have objections to forcible restriction. She imagines that an enforced cell phone regulation would provoke major complaints about students’ right to their own property.

“A lot of people are like, ‘They’re not taking my phone away from me,’” Colón recalled. “‘I bought it and I’m going to use it.’”

According to Seth Zimmerman, a member of the Connecticut Board of Education and professor at the School of Management, the issue of parent-student communication during school is a salient one. 

Advertisement

He believes that as schools and districts implement cell phone restrictions, they also have a role to play in addressing parents’ concerns about how to reach their children.

District leaders who have successfully implemented these policies talk about how it was important to be sure that parents knew how to get in touch with their kids without calling or texting their cell phones, usually by calling the school office,” Zimmerman wrote in an email to the News. “It’s of course also important for schools to make sure they have procedures in place that work. When a parent calls the school office, someone has to pick up the phone.”

Cell phone ban may miss bigger issues

Other New Haven Public Schools students believe that cell phone usage is just one of a host of problems that interfere with student engagement.

John Carlos Musser, a senior at Wilbur Cross High School and another student representative on the New Haven Board of Education, explained that infrastructure, mental health and staffing issues are part of the reason students are so inclined to turn to distractions. He thinks policymakers should focus on addressing those issues while they discourage cell phone use.

Advertisement

According to Musser, the library and music wing at Wilbur Cross have been shut down due to mold, and the ceiling of a classroom caved in during his sophomore year. Over the course of his first three years of high school, six of his teachers have gone on leave or formally left the school, leaving substitute teachers to lead classrooms.

“I feel like there’s a constant theme where we put a lot of blame on students,” Musser said. “We blame students for lack of engagement by going on their phones. But I think there’s other things institutionally that need to be faced and money needs to be spent on, rather than pouches.”

Musser agreed that a cell phone ban would be appropriate for elementary and middle school students, but highlighted the ways technology can also benefit students’ learning, especially in high school settings.

He noted that, because of dwindling support from the COVID-era Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund, some students are losing access to school-provided computers.

“The way our assignments are given now, a lot of it is dependent on technology,” Musser said. “And for some kids, the only form of technology they have, because COVID relief money is no longer coming around and they’re not receiving computers, is their phone.”

Advertisement

Connecticut is among 14 states that have recommended or enforced cell phone bans in their public schools.





Source link

Connecticut

Several beaches closed to swimming due to potential bacteria in the water

Published

on

Several beaches closed to swimming due to potential bacteria in the water


Several Connecticut swimming areas are closed due to the potential of bacteria in the water.

The heavy rain over the past few days is the reason for the concern.

Swimming is prohibited at the West Beach at Rocky Neck State Park, Sherwood Island State Park, Silver Sands State Park in Milford, and Chatfield Hollow State Park in Killingworth.

Water testing at those state parks will be redone on Wednesday with results back on Thursday.

Advertisement

Clinton has also suspended swimming and other water activities at its town beach until further notice. The beach remains open and all other amenities are available, according to the town.

There is no swimming allowed at all Stratford beaches until Friday, according to the Stratford Health Department.

The East Shore Health Department says beaches in East Haven, as well as Clark/Johnson Beach, Stony Creek, and Branford Point in Branford are also closed to swimming. Water samples are being taken on Wednesday and the results are expected on Thursday.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: A lifeline in CT’s childcare desert

Published

on

Opinion: A lifeline in CT’s childcare desert


​As Connecticut grapples with a persistent childcare crisis, parents are facing a perfect storm: years-long waitlists, skyrocketing tuition at corporate centers, and the grueling logistics of balancing a 9-to-5 with a rigid pickup schedule.

​But while the public debate often centers on expanding massive commercial childcare centers, a quiet, deeply rooted alternative is keeping Connecticut’s working families afloat. It is called family childcare —licensed, professional early childhood care operated out of a provider’s home.

​Far from a fallback plan, family childcare is increasingly the gold standard for parents seeking a blend of high-quality early education, financial sanity, and emotional peace of mind. For families navigating the Nutmeg State’s early childhood landscape, here is why choosing a home-based provider is a powerful, beneficial choice.

Advertisement

​A true “home away from home” environment

​For infants and young toddlers, the transition from a parent’s arms to a bustling commercial facility can be jarring. Large centers often feature bright fluorescent lights, high-density classrooms, and a rotating cast of staff members.

​Family childcare offers the exact opposite: a cozy, familiar home environment. Children learn, play, and nap in spaces that feel like an extension of their own living rooms. This familiar setting significantly lowers stress levels for young children, helping them feel secure enough to explore, socialise, and learn.

​Consistency of care (no staff turnover)

​One of the most disruptive aspects of modern commercial childcare is staff turnover. Because of industry-wide low wages, center teachers frequently move on, meaning a child might have three or four different primary caregivers in a single year.

​In a family childcare setting, the business owner is the teacher. Your child builds a deep, secure attachment to one consistent educator from infancy until they drop their backpacks off for kindergarten. This continuity of care is crucial for healthy emotional and neurological development in a child’s first 1,000 days.

​Mixed-age groupings mirror real life

​Unlike traditional centers that rigidly separate children by age into 12-month increments, family childcare homes naturally feature mixed-age groups. Infants, toddlers, and preschoolers interact throughout the day.

Advertisement

​This model offers profound developmental benefits:

  • For younger children: They learn language, social skills, and behavioral cues rapidly by watching and mimicking older peers.
  • For older children: They develop empathy, patience, and leadership skills by helping and looking out for the littler ones.
  • For siblings: Brothers and sisters can stay together in the same program, rather than being split up into different wings of a building.

​Unmatched flexibility for working class families

​Connecticut’s economy doesn’t just run on a traditional 9-to-5 schedule. Shift workers, healthcare professionals, first responders, and service industry employees are routinely left behind by corporate childcare centers that charge massive penalties if a parent is five minutes past a 5:30 p.m. closing time.

​Home-based providers understand the realities of working families. Because they operate independently, many offer more flexible drop-off and pick-up windows, and some accommodate non-traditional hours or part-time schedules that commercial centers reject.

​Financial sanity in a high-cost state

​Let’s talk numbers. Connecticut routinely ranks among the top ten most expensive states for childcare in the nation, with center-based infant care averaging well over $18,000 a year.

​Family childcare providers offer a much-needed financial breathing room. Because their overhead costs are lower —utilizing their own homes rather than renting commercial real estate— they are able to pass those savings on to parents. On average, family childcare in Connecticut costs 20% to 35% less than center-based care, without sacrificing licensing rigor, safety standards, or educational quality.

​The state standard: Licensed family childcare providers in Connecticut are strictly regulated by the Office of Early Childhood (OEC). They undergo background checks, regular home safety inspections, and must meet the exact same core health, safety, and CPR training requirements as large-scale centers.

Advertisement

​Elevating the profession

​For too long, outdated stereotypes dismissed home-based providers as “babysitters.” Today’s family childcare providers are micro-entrepreneurs, early childhood experts, and community anchors. Many hold degrees in early education, participate in Connecticut’s Sparkler developmental screening initiative, and build robust, play-based curriculums tailored to individual children rather than a corporate mandate.

​As state lawmakers debate how to build a more resilient care infrastructure, they must recognize that family childcare isn’t just an alternative —it is a cornerstone of the system. For Connecticut parents seeking community, affordability, and a nurturing environment where their child is truly known, the best choice might just be right down the street.

Michelle Gagliardi is leader of the CT Family Child Care Coalition.

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/07/08/a-lifeline-in-connecticuts-childcare-desert-why-family-childcare-is-the-right-choice-for-working-parents-michelle/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1169695&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/07/08/a-lifeline-in-connecticuts-childcare-desert-why-family-childcare-is-the-right-choice-for-working-parents-michelle/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Here’s How Much Rain Fell in Your Town

Published

on

Here’s How Much Rain Fell in Your Town


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – Rain totals across Connecticut from July 5–7 ranged from just over 1 inch in parts of northern and eastern Connecticut to nearly 6 inches in Fairfield County.

All eight Connecticut counties recorded at least 1 inch of rain during the period, with totals as high as 5.91 inches in Danbury and as low as 1.01 inches in Storrs.

Litchfield County

State leaders toured storm damage in Harwinton and Torrington Tuesday morning.

  • New Milford: 3.33 in.
  • Woodbury Center: 3.23 in.
  • South Kent: 1.80 in.
  • Norfolk: 1.74 in.
  • Bakersville: 1.66 in.
  • New Hartford Center: 1.66 in.
  • Warren: 1.54 in.
  • Canaan: 1.18 in.
  • Norfolk (CWOP): 1.15 in.

Hartford County

Road damage closed a portion of Prospect Avenue in West Hartford.

Power restoration was complicated in Bristol due to Monday’s rainfall.

Advertisement
  • Berlin: 1.93 in.
  • West Hartford: 1.73 in.
  • North Granby: 1.69 in.
  • Bristol: 1.68 in.
  • Suffield Depot: 1.63 in.
  • Canton: 1.60 in.
  • Farmington: 1.59 in.
  • Southington: 1.58 in.
  • Plainville: 1.55 in.
  • Salmon Brook: 1.46 in.
  • Kensington: 1.45 in.
  • Windsor Locks: 1.41 in.
  • Simsbury: 1.39 in.
  • Bradley Airport: 1.39 in.
  • Suffield: 1.38 in.
  • South Glastonbury: 1.38 in.
  • Hartford (1.8 mi. NW): 1.37 in.
  • Hartford-Brainard Airport: 1.36 in.
  • East Granby: 1.31 in.
  • New Britain: 1.25 in.
  • Vernon: 1.23 in.
  • Newington: 1.22 in.
  • East Granby (1.9 mi. N): 1.19 in.
  • Rocky Hill: 1.16 in.
  • Bloomfield: 1.15 in.
  • Wethersfield: 1.15 in.
  • West Simsbury: 1.14 in.
  • Manchester: 1.10 in.
  • Enfield: 1.05 in.
  • South Windsor: 1.02 in.

Tolland County

  • Amston: 1.75 in.
  • Ellington: 1.68 in.
  • Somers: 1.39 in.
  • Hebron: 1.35 in.
  • Willimantic (3.8 mi. SW): 1.28 in.
  • Columbia: 1.28 in.
  • Stafford: 1.23 in.
  • Tolland: 1.06 in.
  • Storrs: 1.01 in.

Windham County

  • Ashford: 1.97 in.
  • Moosup: 1.95 in.
  • Baltic: 1.28 in.
  • Sterling: 1.20 in.
  • Canterbury: 1.15 in.
  • Willimantic: 1.13 in.
  • Danielson: 1.12 in.
  • South Windham: 1.11 in.
  • Eastford: 1.07 in.
  • East Killingly: 1.04 in.

Fairfield County

  • Danbury: 5.91 in.
  • Newtown: 5.45 in.
  • Bethel: 5.36 in.
  • Ridgefield: 5.11 in.
  • Redding (1 mi. WNW): 5.07 in.
  • Brookfield: 4.28 in.
  • Stratford: 4.25 in.
  • Trumbull: 4.25 in.
  • Sandy Hook: 3.89 in.
  • Shelton: 3.86 in.
  • Bridgeport Airport: 3.78 in.
  • Stamford: 3.35 in.
  • New Canaan: 3.33 in.
  • Fairfield: 3.17 in.
  • Weston: 3.14 in.
  • Westport: 3.05 in.
  • Darien: 2.70 in.
  • Norwalk: 2.61 in.
  • Greenwich: 2.06 in.

New Haven County

West Haven utilized flood gates after the water level on Campbell Avenue reached 3 feet at the storm’s peak Monday.

  • Milford: 4.78 in.
  • Branford: 4.69 in.
  • Orange: 4.36 in.
  • Guilford: 4.20 in.
  • Southbury: 4.04 in.
  • Madison Center: 4.00 in.
  • New Haven Airport: 3.81 in.
  • Seymour: 3.63 in.
  • Ansonia: 3.55 in.
  • Hamden: 3.47 in.
  • Outer Island, Branford: 3.38 in.
  • Oxford: 3.29 in.
  • Woodbridge: 3.24 in.
  • Prospect: 3.10 in.
  • Waterbury Airport: 2.96 in.
  • Wallingford: 2.91 in.
  • Yalesville: 2.60 in.
  • Bethany: 2.44 in.
  • Meriden Airport: 1.96 in.

Middlesex County

  • Saybrook Manor: 3.61 in.
  • Clinton: 3.28 in.
  • Westbrook: 3.26 in.
  • Chester Center: 2.41 in.
  • Durham: 2.40 in.
  • Higganum: 2.01 in.
  • Moodus: 1.98 in.
  • Cromwell: 1.92 in.
  • Moodus (0.7 mi. SSW): 1.81 in.

New London County

  • Niantic: 3.63 in.
  • Old Lyme: 2.81 in.
  • Waterford: 2.57 in.
  • New London: 2.57 in.
  • East Lyme: 2.54 in.
  • Ledyard: 2.17 in.
  • Mystic: 2.13 in.
  • Salem: 2.01 in.
  • Groton: 2.00 in.
  • Pawcatuck: 1.95 in.
  • Oakdale: 1.90 in.
  • Preston: 1.86 in.
  • Norwich: 1.85 in.
  • Stonington: 1.80 in.
  • Colchester: 1.77 in.
  • Lyme: 1.67 in.
  • Griswold: 1.58 in.

Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending