Connect with us

Connecticut

Connecticut Board of Education recommends cell phone restrictions in public schools

Published

on

Connecticut Board of Education recommends cell phone restrictions in public schools



Ericka Henriquez

As public school students return to school in New Haven, they will be met with some new rules around their cell phone use. 

On Aug. 21, the Connecticut State Board of Education approved a new recommendation for Connecticut public schools: cell phones should not be used at all during the school day of elementary and middle school students, while cell phone use in high schools should be limited.

Advertisement

However, as students begin to get used to the new normal in schools, the opinions of students, educators, parents and medical professionals highlight just how complex reactions are to the cell phone ban. 

“I think to me as a parent and an educator, the recommendation sounds like it is aligned developmentally and it encourages social interaction, while also giving some flexibility at older ages,” Mira Debs GRD ’16, lecturer in the sociology department and director of undergraduate studies of the Education Studies Program, said. “However, I can’t speak for all parents or students, for there are various experiences that provide a different perspective to this recommendation.”

The scientific basis for the cellphone ban recommendation 

According to Xi Chen, professor of health policy at the School of Public Health, cell phones have led to reduced cognitive capacity, as students are now more likely to just use a readily available information source without relying on their cognitive abilities. Cell phones have also led to sleep deprivation as blue light from phones disrupts the normal circadian cycle, and social media has its litany of mental health consequences, from intense feelings of isolation and stress to self-harm.

However, when it comes to students, the dangers of cell phones listed above are only exacerbated and can impair the learning experience in the classroom. And even if they are not actively using it but can see their phone, they can still get distracted, according to Ada Fenick, professor of pediatrics at the School of Medicine. 

Advertisement

“So if you’re feeling like you’re constantly having to look at your phone, your attention span for your schoolwork is definitely lowered because you’re constantly going back to check,” Fenick told the News.

Cell phones have also been shown to increase cyberbullying in school, which is associated with feelings of depression and self-harm, according to Fenick. This is especially true when cyberbullying can now be done at a distance by anyone and posts on social media can be permanent. 

Additionally, outside the classroom, cell phones have been shown to reduce the social-emotional skills of students. According to Chen, students are more likely to develop social isolation as they spend more time on the screen and do not learn how to talk to their peers, which has a variety of negative effects.

“We know that face-to-face communication between children is best because human society is built on face-to-face interaction,” Chen said. “But cell phones and online communication crowd out their valuable time to engage with their peer students. There’s even some evidence that brain development can be affected as the important skills of communication and creativity aren’t engaged.”

According to Debs, the COVID-19 pandemic provided the opportunity for students to have unlimited access to their cell phones because they were home all the time. Coming back to school made the issues of cell phones in the classroom that much clearer to educators. 

Advertisement

Bullying, lack of communication skills and reduced attention span are not anything new in schools, but cell phones exacerbate these issues. According to some teachers, the lack of cell phones has created great changes in the classroom.

“The reports that have come out from schools that have implemented a ban is that it makes teachers’ work so much easier. They feel like they have more positive interactions with students, creating a very positive impact on the school climate overall,” Debs told the News.

Community reactions for and against phone restrictions

Some New Haven students, however, are skeptical about how cell phone restrictions would be effectively implemented and wonder how restrictions could still prioritize students’ rights.

Jonaily Colón, a junior at New Haven’s High School in the Community, or HSC, serves as a student representative on the New Haven Board of Education. She says she is comfortable with cell phones being restricted, agreeing they can stifle engagement in the classroom, but feels students should be able to access them when they need to, especially to communicate with family or manage emergency situations. 

Advertisement

“In case of a Code Red or anything like that, say we have our phone in a Yondr pouch, you can’t text anyone,” she said.

In August, the New Haven Independent reported that Barnard Environmental Magnet School and Troup School are spearheading the use of Yondr pouches, magnetic lockboxes that prevent cell phone usage inside a designated “phone-free space.”

Colón hasn’t yet witnessed any effort to restrict cell phone use in HSC, but her peers have heard about the Yondr pouches from students at other schools. Colón understands that a teacher’s reprimand is often not enough to discourage students from using phones, but her peers have objections to forcible restriction. She imagines that an enforced cell phone regulation would provoke major complaints about students’ right to their own property.

“A lot of people are like, ‘They’re not taking my phone away from me,’” Colón recalled. “‘I bought it and I’m going to use it.’”

According to Seth Zimmerman, a member of the Connecticut Board of Education and professor at the School of Management, the issue of parent-student communication during school is a salient one. 

Advertisement

He believes that as schools and districts implement cell phone restrictions, they also have a role to play in addressing parents’ concerns about how to reach their children.

District leaders who have successfully implemented these policies talk about how it was important to be sure that parents knew how to get in touch with their kids without calling or texting their cell phones, usually by calling the school office,” Zimmerman wrote in an email to the News. “It’s of course also important for schools to make sure they have procedures in place that work. When a parent calls the school office, someone has to pick up the phone.”

Cell phone ban may miss bigger issues

Other New Haven Public Schools students believe that cell phone usage is just one of a host of problems that interfere with student engagement.

John Carlos Musser, a senior at Wilbur Cross High School and another student representative on the New Haven Board of Education, explained that infrastructure, mental health and staffing issues are part of the reason students are so inclined to turn to distractions. He thinks policymakers should focus on addressing those issues while they discourage cell phone use.

Advertisement

According to Musser, the library and music wing at Wilbur Cross have been shut down due to mold, and the ceiling of a classroom caved in during his sophomore year. Over the course of his first three years of high school, six of his teachers have gone on leave or formally left the school, leaving substitute teachers to lead classrooms.

“I feel like there’s a constant theme where we put a lot of blame on students,” Musser said. “We blame students for lack of engagement by going on their phones. But I think there’s other things institutionally that need to be faced and money needs to be spent on, rather than pouches.”

Musser agreed that a cell phone ban would be appropriate for elementary and middle school students, but highlighted the ways technology can also benefit students’ learning, especially in high school settings.

He noted that, because of dwindling support from the COVID-era Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund, some students are losing access to school-provided computers.

“The way our assignments are given now, a lot of it is dependent on technology,” Musser said. “And for some kids, the only form of technology they have, because COVID relief money is no longer coming around and they’re not receiving computers, is their phone.”

Advertisement

Connecticut is among 14 states that have recommended or enforced cell phone bans in their public schools.





Source link

Connecticut

Opinion: Measles is lethal. CT hasn’t forgotten

Published

on

Opinion: Measles is lethal. CT hasn’t forgotten


There is a generation of American parents who knew exactly what measles meant. They had watched many children disappear, either for short periods of hospitalization or longer periods of more serious illness; too often, they never returned. They lined their children up for the vaccine in 1963 without hesitation. Measles was documented as “eliminated” from the United States in 2000.

We have spent the decades since forgetting what they knew.

On April 27, Gov. Ned Lamont signed Public Act 26-3 into law. Among its provisions, the legislation explicitly bars Connecticut’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to claim exemptions from school immunization requirements. That decision was the right one, and the contrast with what two other states are doing at this very moment makes clear exactly why.

Advertisement

Measles is not a childhood inconvenience. It is a highly contagious, potentially fatal infection, with children under five at greatest risk. Before the vaccine became available, the United States recorded 3 to 4 million infections every year: tens of thousands of hospitalizations, 1,000 cases of encephalitis, and roughly 500 deaths annually, most of them children.

Measles still kills more than 100,000 people around the world each year, almost exclusively where vaccination rates are low. One infected person can pass the virus to as many as 18 others, and the virus can linger in the air for up to two hours after an infected person has left the room. Reaching the immunity threshold that stops transmission requires at least 95% of a community to be vaccinated – protecting not just those who got the shot, but newborns, immunocompromised individuals, those who might not attain immunity through vaccination, and children too young for the vaccine.

The national picture should alarm anyone paying attention. A Washington Post county-level analysis of 1,616 counties shows that before the pandemic, 48% of U.S. counties met that 95% threshold. After the pandemic, only 27% do. The United States has already recorded 1,893 measles cases this year, more than 80% of last year’s total, despite being well short of halfway through the year. Once a community loses protection, outbreaks are no longer hypothetical. They are inevitable.

For decades, Mississippi and West Virginia demonstrated that this was preventable. Both states maintained medical-exemption-only vaccine policies and consistently posted some of the highest childhood vaccination rates in the nation. Mississippi’s MMR coverage reached 99.1%. West Virginia’s sat at 98.3% as recently as 2023–24, with an exemption rate of just 0.1%.

Both states have changed course. In April 2023, a federal court order required Mississippi to begin allowing religious exemptions; coverage dropped to 97.5% and is trending downward. In January 2025, West Virginia’s governor signed an executive order opening the same door. The question is not whether rates will fall. It is how fast.

Advertisement

Connecticut has moved in the right direction. After the state eliminated religious exemptions from school vaccine requirements in 2021, its non-medical exemption rate collapsed from 4.1% to 0.3% within a single school year. Public Act 26-3 reinforces that achievement by closing the legal door that the ongoing Spillane v. Lamont litigation has kept ajar. The argument for strong immunization policy is not ideological. It is mathematical. Measles requires 95% community vaccination to stay contained. When outbreaks begin, it is too late to vaccinate your way out quickly enough to protect children already exposed.

The urgency is not abstract. This summer, the FIFA World Cup will bring hundreds of thousands of international visitors to venues across the region, including MetLife Stadium in New Jersey and Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts. Travelers from countries with lower vaccination rates will move through our airports, our transit systems, and our communities. In states where vaccination rates are falling, a single infected traveler in an under-vaccinated community is all it takes to start an outbreak. Public Act 26-3 ensures Connecticut will not be among them. Unless the Spillane v. Lamont litigation undoes what the legislature built.

Policymakers in Mississippi and West Virginia still have time to follow Connecticut’s lead. The disease they are risking is not theoretical. The only question is whether legislators will act before the outbreak or explain to parents afterward why they did not.

Frane Marusic is a junior at Yale College and a Global Health Scholar. Howard P. Forman, M.D., M.B.A. is a professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Economics, Management, and Public Health at Yale University and a practicing physician.

 

Advertisement

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/09/measles-is-lethal-connecticut-hasnt-forgotten-frane/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1169555&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/09/measles-is-lethal-connecticut-hasnt-forgotten-frane/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Kids Count conveys mixed picture of how children fare in CT

Published

on

Kids Count conveys mixed picture of how children fare in CT


Connecticut moved up in a national ranking that uses data to rate how well children are doing state-to-state, moving from eighth to seventh place.

The 2026 Kids Count is compiled by the Annie E. Casey Foundation and state partners like Connecticut Voices for Children and uses 16 indicators in four different categories to assess how well kids are doing — economically and scholastically, as members of families and communities, as well as their physical health.

The dataset, which analyzes 2024 data, rated Connecticut highly in education and health, ranking third and fourth respectively. But Connecticut continues to place closer to the middle of the pack in the categories of economic well-being and family and community, at 20th and 18th in the nation.

Advertisement

Overall, New Hampshire ranked first in the nation while Mississippi came in last.

“Behind every number in this report is a child who is either hungry or fed, housed or homeless, progressing academically or falling behind. No state is consistently getting this right,” said Lisa M. Lawson, president and CEO of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. “The Data Book challenges us to follow the evidence and do what delivers results.”

Connecticut’s 2024 data was measured against numbers from 2019. While most measures didn’t see a significant change, there were some small shifts. That included a slight increase in the number of low birth weight babies, from 7.8% to 8.1%, and more teens not in school and not working — from 4 to 5%. Despite Connecticut’s strong educational ranking, the numbers in that area also slid back — 40% of pre-K aged kids were not in school, compared to a previous measurement of 35%; more fourth-graders were not proficient in reading, up to 64% from 60%; and more eighth-graders were not proficient in math, 68% compared to 61%.

“Connecticut’s overall high ranking is something to be proud of but evidence we are not doing enough — we must engage in big, bold policy changes that advance economic security for all families, not just the privileged and lucky few,” said Emily Byrne, executive director of Connecticut Voices for Children. “The data show both the impact of investments that support children and families and the consequences of longstanding status quo budgets that don’t address equity and opportunity.”

Byrne said that Connecticut has a “moral responsibility” to support families by strengthening the social safety net and investing in policies that benefit all children.

Advertisement

This year, the Kids Count report includes an overall numerical score between 0 and 1000. Connecticut scored 708 — well above the national average of 547. But Connecticut’s score also dropped compared to how the Annie E. Casey Foundation rated it during 2019, when it was rated 727. The Foundation said that 2019 was chosen as a basis of comparison because it represents how kids were faring pre-COVID. The numerical ranking is intended to help make more visible how states are improving or declining on metrics independent of how they rank against other states.

By those scores, kids fared worse in 2024 than they did in 2019, with much of this decline driven by education. Connecticut’s educational data improved in only one metric between 2019 and 2024: slightly more high school students are graduating on time. And, despite its mediocre ranking on economic outcomes, Connecticut’s metrics improved in three of four economic categories, with fewer children living in poverty, fewer children whose parents lack secure employment and fewer children living in households with a high housing cost burden compared to 2019 figures.

Data on the decreasing share of young children not in school is notable as Connecticut embarks on an ambitious plan to fund early childhood education for low-income families with an endowment. Under that plan, which Gov. Ned Lamont has said is central to his legacy, families making less than $100,000 per year would pay nothing for pre-K, while families making more than that would contribute up to 7% of their household income.

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/08/kids-count-conveys-mixed-picture-of-how-children-fare-in-ct/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1170879&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/08/kids-count-conveys-mixed-picture-of-how-children-fare-in-ct/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Popular Hartford Food Hall Decked Out For World Cup

Published

on

Popular Hartford Food Hall Decked Out For World Cup


HARTFORD, CT — A popular culinary destination in Connecticut’s capital city says it will be the place to be to watch the biggest sporting event on the planet.

Parkville Market in Hartford will kick off its “Summer of Soccer” celebration June 11 with a watch party for the Mexico-South Africa match, launching a series of soccer-themed events planned throughout the summer.

The Hartford food hall will broadcast matches both inside the venue and on its outdoor patio.

Organizers said opening-day activities will include face painting, custom T-shirt making, giveaways and a 360-degree photo booth.

Advertisement

Parkville Market’s 22 food vendors, which feature cuisines from around the world, are expected to be a central part of the experience as visitors gather to watch international soccer matches.

In addition to match broadcasts, visitors can use the venue’s new mini soccer pitch outside.

Organizers encouraged guests to bring their own soccer balls and play during events.

“Soccer is the world’s game, and Parkville Market is where the world comes together,” said Carlos Mouta, owner and CEO of Parkville Market. “And let’s go Portugal!”

Special event activations are planned for June 11, June 27 and the tournament final on July 19, according to organizers.

Advertisement

Located at 1400 Park St. in Hartford, Parkville Market is Connecticut’s first and largest food hall. The venue includes 22 restaurants, three bars, private event spaces and outdoor dining areas.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending