Boston, MA
Patriots mailbag: Is Justin Fields an option at quarterback?
The NFL offseason is moving quickly, and under new leadership, the Patriots will need to make a decision at quarterback soon.
The NFL scouting combine is a week away, and in three weeks, the Patriots will be allowed to speak to impending free agents. The team must have a plan on how they’ll approach their biggest need at quarterback and whether they plan to add that player via free agency, a trade or the draft, before the new NFL year begins on March 13.
Let’s dive into some potential options in this week’s mailbag.
@ZackFitzNFL
Are the Patriots around in the Justin Fields talks?
I’ve been told not to rule out anything at quarterback. If the Patriots would rather take an offensive lineman, wide receiver or a player at another position at No. 3 overall (or trade down), then making a deal with the Bears for Justin Fields seemingly would be an option.
That being said, Fields’ team needs to decide on his fifth-year option this offseason. He’s proven he can be a starter, but he’s in the lower tier among NFL quarterbacks. The Patriots need someone better than that to compete now and in the future. It seems to make more sense to swing for the fences and take Caleb Williams, Drake Maye or Jayden Daniels.
An acquiring team would take on $3.2 million by trading for Fields, so he is a bargain. He ranked 23rd among 32 quarterbacks with a -0.009 expected points added (EPA) per play. He was 21st in PFF grade, 23rd in PFF passing grade and 23rd in QBR.
Fields experienced his best season in 2023, but he’s been in the NFL for three seasons now. How much more will or can he improve?
If Fields is the option, then the Patriots would need to decide between a wide receiver like Marvin Harrison Jr. or an offensive tackle like Joe Alt at No. 3 overall. They need both, but that’s not really an option.
@Deeep_Blue
How active are patriots going to be in the free agent market? Top targets?
They pretty much have to be active in free agency. Not to get too into the nitty gritty, but the Patriots need to spend 90% of the salary cap in cash over the next three seasons. They’re only set to spend $216.2 million in cash over that span. The 2024 salary cap is projected to be $240 million. Even if the cap didn’t rise in 2025 and 2026 (it will), the Patriots are only set to spend 30% of the cap in cash from 2024 to 2026.
So, they need to spend a lot of money over the next three offseasons, and they need better talent.
I’d start with trying to bring back safety Kyle Dugger and offensive lineman Mike Onwenu. From there, I’d try to add a top-flight wide receiver.
@KleaverBlock
Watching the impact that having a 1-2 combo (Mahomes/Kelce) can have, what’s the QB/Receiver combo you’d like after the offseason?
Williams and free-agent wide receiver Tee Higgins.
But Williams seems destined to go in the top two picks, and there’s no guarantee that Higgins will make it to free agency.
Maye and someone like Mike Evans would be more realistic and would still help.
@DomDoesNFL
Do we see a Gilly Lock reunion this offseason?
That depends on what Stephon Gilmore is looking for this offseason. If he wants to win, then New England isn’t the best place to do it. If he wants to earn top dollar, then maybe the Patriots would be a good destination.
@PatsSTH1969
Thoughts on the New Pats ponying up market value + Cash for Baker and taking the draft haul that will come after the Drake Maye and Jaylen Daniels Pro Days? If no Baker take 1 of the 2?
It makes the most sense for Baker Mayfield to return to the Buccaneers.
@boston_fan73
Welcome back, Doug. There has been some talk of the Pats trading down & drafting an OT or WR. If they don’t draft a QB at 3.
What draft classes are deeper for QB, WR, and OL, this year’s class, or next year’s?
Could this push them to take a QB at 3 regardless of player?
It’s too early to assess next year’s draft, but this year’s class has three quarterbacks, three wide receivers and three offensive tackles listed in the top 15 of The Athletic’s draft prospects. It’s tough to do better than that.
All three positions are pretty deep in this year’s class, as well.
@llsoxfans
No question, just hoping you’re doing okay given the circumstances. Good to see you on the Twittersphere. My thoughts remain with your family. I appreciate you!
Thank you. Very much appreciated.
@GoldEP_
Non patriot question will you be watching the ufl
I’ll be monitoring it. Not sure how much I’ll actually be watching, however.
@RickLawsonEP
Do the o-linemen we currently have n the roster fit the new offensive scheme? Based on the new scheme would you keep Onwenu?
The team is still working through whether the coaching changes alter what they look for in offensive linemen. I would still keep Onwenu. You can find a fit for him at guard or tackle.
@Curmudgeon_Mike
With Pats looking at 2-3 years before being relevant should they trade Judon? The “D” wasn’t terrible without him. And they could use more draft capital for the rebuild!
#MailDoug
I’ve mentioned this before, but something will need to be done with Matthew Judon this offseason. The Patriots borrowed from his 2024 salary to give him a raise last offseason. So, they either need to give him a real raise this offseason, an extension or move on from him.
Judon is a team leader, and the Patriots have money to spend. The best option would be to try to make something work to keep him.
Boston, MA
Two Things People Are Getting Wrong About Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Fit In Boston
While the veracity of the rumors involving Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Boston Celtics continue to be debated, there are a couple of very important people are missing about all of this should this trade come to pass.
Boston’s style of play will not change, and simply swapping Jaylen Brown for Antetokounmpo doesn’t change the trajectory of the team so significantly that Brad Stevens’ work will be done.
For some reason, there is a school of thought that acquiring Antetokounmpo, a noted non-shooter, would materially change Boston’s offensive strategy. It won’t. It doesn’t mean things won’t be a little different, but this notion that Antetokounmpo will force Mazzulla to scrap his approach and try something new is false.
The Bucks have routinely been in the top five in three-point attempts beginning in the 2018-19 season, Antetokounmpo’s first MVP run. Beginning in that season, they have ranked second, fourth, eighth, fifth, fourth, fifth, 18th, and 10th. The last two seasons when they dropped out of the top were coached by Doc Rivers.
According to PBPStats.com, Antetokounmpo has assisted on more three-pointers than two-pointers in each of the past two seasons, with a low of 209 three created in in the 2023 season, and a high of 290 created the following year. Over his career, he has assisted on 2,325 three-pointers. That’s almost as many as Jaylen Brown and Derrick White have made combined (2,437) over their entire careers.
It should be no surprise that Antetokounmpo is a three-point generating machine. His drives are massively effective, and they generally require a lot of defensive help. That opens up passing lanes to shooters, which Antetokounmpo finds regularly.
If anything, we could see Boston’s three-point volume go up. Brown’s closest season generating that kind of three-point volume was this past season when he created 196 over 71 games. By contrast, Antetokounmpo created 135 over 36 games. So anyone pushing for the Antetokounmpo trade thinking it will force Mazzulla’s hand to change strategies is sorely mistaken. “Mazzulla-ball” will probably take off under these circumstances.
Which brings us to the work Stevens will have to do once they theoretically acquire Antetokounmpo.
Giannis flirted with some volume three-point shooting a few years ago, averaging 4.7 attempts in 2020, his second MVP season, and 3.6 in each of the next two, but he’s a career 28.5% shooter from deep who peaked at 34.7% in his rookie season. Mazzulla is willing to go with one non-shooter on the floor, but generally not two.
So where does that leave Neemias Queta?
How would the Celtics build an offense with Queta, a non-shooter, and Antetokounmpo on the floor at the same time? The drives that Antetokounmpo is known for would be clogged with defenders who already know to build a wall to prevent him from getting to the rim. What worked in Milwaukee was playing Brook Lopez at center and having him stretch the floor. Boston doesn’t have that element right now. The closest thing they had to that, Nikola Vucevic, never got his footing in his short stint in Boston and seems to be done here.
A straight swap of Antetokounmpo and Brown will obviously upgrade a top 15 player to a top five player, but Brown led the NBA in two-point attempts per game last season with 16. At his peak, Antetokounmpo averaged 17 or 18 two-point attempts per game, but Brown’s three-point shooting does add an element of floor spacing that Antetokounmpo doesn’t. A straight swap of those two players creates a bit of a fit issue with the current starting center that would have to be addressed.
This also doesn’t solve Boston’s need for a third scorer and some punch off the bench. Stevens will still have to use his mid-level exception to find that no matter which of the two stars is in Boston to start the season.
We can debate whether Antetokounmpo or Brown make Boston more of a favorite next season, but that debate is leading people down some wrong paths. Giannis isn’t some cure for the three-point-heavy Celtics offense. In fact, it might be more appropriate to call him Gasoline Antetokounmpo for what he might do for the shooting volume. And any notion that everything is fixed with Antetokounmpo in the fold is wrong. Stevens will have to solve some fit issues and still address needs that exist today.
Follow
Boston, MA
Two Ex-Red Sox Are Suddenly Thriving Again After Leaving Boston
One thing that is fortunate about the 2026 Boston Red Sox is the fact that they have good starting pitching. Because if they didn’t, there would be even more negative noise around the organziation.
Boston’s rotation currently has Connelly Early, Payton Tolle, Sonny Gray, Ranger Suárez and No. 6 prospect Jake Bennett. Boston is missing Garrett Crochet right now and there’s no way to know when he will be able to get back into the mix for the club right now. The only thing that is clear is the fact that Crochet noted that it would be a surprise if he’s back before the All-Star break.
Still, even without Crochet, this is a very good rotation we’re talking about. The Red Sox have taken some heat all season to this point, especially about the club’s struggling offense. If the pitching was bad as well, Red Sox fans would revolt. This is especially the case because two polarizing former Red Sox hurlers are thriving elsewhere: Dustin May with the St. Louis Cardinals and Walker Buehler with the San Diego Padres.
Walker Buehler — San Diego Padres
Buehler was signed as a free agent before the 2025 season to be a finishing touch on what was supposed to be an elite rotation. It was supposed to be Crochet, Buehler, Brayan Bello, Lucas Giolito and then one of their in-house options for the last spot.
Injuries derailed the season for the rotation and it didn’t help that Buehler struggled in a Boston uniform. He made 23 appearances with Boston, including 22 starts, and had a 5.45 ERA before the Red Sox opted to cut ties and move on. This past offseason, he landed with the Padres on a minor league deal and has turned his career around. So far this season, he has a 4.14 ERA in 14 starts in a Padres uniform. On top of this, he has a 2.92 ERA over his last seven starts.
Dustin May — St. Louis Cardinals
May was an even more polarizing option for the Red Sox. Boston traded outfield prospect James Tibbs III (Boston’s then-No. 5 prospect) and fellow outfield prospect Zach Ehrhard (Boston’s then-No. 27 prospect) in exchange for May. He had a 4.85 ERA at the time in 19 appearances with the Los Angeles Dodgers, and yet the Red Sox opted to give up that haul. Then, May pitched in just six games in Boston and had a 5.40 ERA.
May signed with the Cardinals in free agency and now has a 3.75 ERA in 14 starts after a pitching a complete game shutout on Monday night against the Padres.
Follow
Boston, MA
Iraq fans celebrate on Boston Common before first World Cup match in 40 years
After 40 years away from the World Cup, Iraqi fans made their voices heard on the Boston Common Monday.
When Iraq faces Norway at Boston Stadium Tuesday, it will be the team’s first World Cup appearance since 1986.
Fans were out in full force on Boston Common on the eve of the match.
Mohammed Al-Falahi, an Iraqi journalist living in the U.S. and covering the team, said he believes it’s a great opportunity to show the world how much we all have in common.
“They play, they dance. That’s the Iraqi people, not what we saw on TV,” Al-Falahi said. “You think Iraqi just love life in war? Iraqi people love soccer.”
While every fan will acknowledge the challenges the world faces, they also look to the World Cup as a reminder of what it means to come together.
“You can forget about the politics. You can forget about all the trauma that’s happening back home,” one woman said.
-
Wisconsin5 minutes agoBREAKING: Wisconsin Flips Texas Tech Commit Brody Pfannenstiel
-
West Virginia12 minutes agoWhat channel is West Virginia-UNC baseball today? Time, TV for College World Series game
-
Wyoming15 minutes agoCasper City Council approves projects at Ford Wyoming Center, Fort Caspar campgrounds
-
Crypto20 minutes agoCryptocurrency banking, stablecoins regulation proposed – North Carolina – The Black Chronicle
-
Finance27 minutes agoKey Equipment Finance Adds Foley to Bank Channel Team in Chicago
-
Fitness30 minutes agoAn expert personal trainer says this practical exercise boosts core strength and upper-body stability more than planks
-
Movie Reviews45 minutes ago‘Find Your Friends’ Movie Review: Helena Howard Standout Performance Nearly Saves Shudder Misfire – Deepest Dream
-
World57 minutes agoVideo: Among Mexico’s World Cup Fans: Merlin the Duck