News
What we know about what happened in the White House the night of the 2020 election
Conservative Republican election legal professional Ben Ginsberg stated there was “by no means” an occasion during which a court docket discovered that Trump’s marketing campaign’s fraud claims had been credible.
“There was by no means that occasion. In all of the the instances that had been introduced in — and I checked out greater than 60 that embody greater than 180 counts. And no, the easy truth is that the Trump marketing campaign didn’t make its case,” he informed the committee.
Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California stated the choose committee has recognized 62 post-election lawsuits filed by the Trump marketing campaign and his allies between Nov. 4, 2020, and Jan. 6, 2021. Lofgren stated these instances resulted in 61 losses and “solely a single victory which really did not have an effect on the result for both candidate.”
Requested what he thinks of the claims that Trump was not given a possibility to supply proof that they had voter fraud and whether or not they had their day in court docket, Ginsberg stated, “They did have their day in court docket. About half of these instances that you talked about had been dismissed at the procedural stage for an absence of standing, the correct folks did not carry the case, or there wasn’t ample proof and it bought dismissed on a movement to dismiss.”
“However within the different, there have been discussions of the deserves that had been contained within the complaints. And in no occasion did a court docket discover that the costs of fraud had been actual. And it is also value noting that even when the Trump marketing campaign complained that it didn’t have its day in court docket, there had been post-election opinions in every of the six battleground states that might have made a distinction,” he informed the committee. He went on to record record examples, together with the hand recount in Georgia.
“In every a type of cases, there was no credible proof of fraud produced by the Trump marketing campaign or his supporters,” he added.
Extra on the witness: Ginsberg is taken into account a number one Republican professional on election fraud and performed a essential position within the Florida recount case when then-candidate George W. Bush defeated then-Vice President Al Gore.
Even earlier than the election, Ginsberg was vocal in regards to the weak spot of the previous President’s claims. In a September 2020 essay, Ginsberg criticized the assertions as missing proof and “unsustainable.”
The listening to on Monday morning was set to deal with how Trump questioned the election course of extensively, figuring out their assertions wouldn’t change the result, committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney, a Republican of Wyoming, stated final week.
She stated the committee will try to point out how “Trump engaged in an enormous effort to unfold false and fraudulent data” although “Trump and his advisors knew that he had, actually, misplaced the election.”
CNN’s Jamie Gangel contributed reporting to this put up.