Connect with us

News

What we know about the charges against New York’s Attorney General Letitia James

Published

on

What we know about the charges against New York’s Attorney General Letitia James

Watch: How Letitia James ended up in Trump’s crosshairs

New York Attorney General Letitia James has been criminally indicted on federal bank fraud charges over a property she purchased in Virginia.

US President Donald Trump has pushed his officials to legally pursue James, among other political opponents of his.

James denies any wrongdoing, calling the case a “desperate weaponisation of our justice system”. A similar accusation was made against her by Trump and his allies when James won a civil fraud case against him in 2023.

Here is what we know about the case against James – and a recap of the one she led against Trump.

Advertisement

What has Letitia James been charged with?

The US Department of Justice (DoJ) says James has been charged with bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution.

The charges relate to James’s three-bedroom property in Norfolk, Virginia.

Prosecutors allege she secured a mortgage claiming the property as her secondary residence, while her primary residence was in Brooklyn, New York. Instead, she rented out the property to a family of three, according to court documents.

The prosecution alleges that James was required to occupy and use the property as her secondary residence, not as a rental investment property, in order to secure a favourable loan.

Advertisement

Prosecutors allege she saved $18,933 (£14,229) through this “misrepresentation”, including by securing a lower interest rate.

“No one is above the law,” US Department of Justice attorney Lindsey Halligan said in a statement.

James has previously said she made an error while filling out paperwork for the property, which was then corrected. She has called the charges “baseless” and has taken aim directly at Trump.

“He is forcing federal law enforcement agencies to do his bidding, all because I did my job as the New York State attorney general,” she said.

James’s attorney Abbe Lowell later said she would “fight these charges in every process allowed in the law”. Lowell added: “We are deeply concerned that this case is driven by President Trump’s desire for revenge.”

Advertisement

Who else is Trump pursuing – and what’s the background?

Legal action against James had been expected, after Trump named her in a list of political opponents he wanted his administration to legally pursue.

“We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility,” the president wrote last month in a Truth Social post.

“They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!)” he said of those opponents.

Former FBI director James Comey and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff were also mentioned in Trump’s post.

Advertisement

Within a few days, Mr Comey was charged with making false statements to lawmakers and obstructing a congressional proceeding. He has pleaded not guilty.

The bank fraud case against James was floated publicly in April, when a letter penned by the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) was obtained by US media. It said the FHFA had made a criminal referral to the justice department, alleging James had falsified her bank and property records.

Trump’s case hit a bump when the lawyer overseeing federal prosecutions in the Eastern District of Virginia, Erik Siebert, resigned in September.

Although Siebert did not provide a reason for quitting, Trump said he was “fired” after he said “we had no case” against James.

Trump appointed to the position his former personal lawyer Lindsey Halligan – who is accused by James of being “blindly loyal not to the law, but to the president”.

Advertisement

What happened in James’s case against Trump?

Getty Images Letitia James sitting on a wooden bench in court in focus, with Trump and his lawyer in the foreground out of focusGetty Images

Trump and James have stared each other down in court before.

James launched a civil fraud case against Trump and his company in 2022.

The court found the following year that Trump had been liable for overstating the value of his business assets to obtain favourable loans.

Throughout the trial, Trump denied wrongdoing and repeatedly referred to the case as a “witch hunt”.

Following a ruling ordering Trump to pay $500m (£375m), James said: “Today, we prove that no one is above the law. No matter how rich, powerful, or politically connected you are.”

Advertisement

But Trump appealed against the ruling, and in August 2025, a court threw out the $500m penalty against him, which the president called a “total victory”.

However, the same court upheld Trump’s fraud liability and did not throw out the non-financial penalties.

James’s office said it would appeal against the overturned penalty.

When did the feud between Trump and James begin?

Public scuffles between Trump and James stretch back to the 2018 contest for New York’s attorney general, which happened during Trump’s first term in the White House.

Advertisement

During her campaign to become the state’s top law enforcement officer, James called Trump an “illegitimate” president.

Trump was even mentioned during her victory speech on election night. “He [Trump] should know that we here in New York – and I, in particular – we are not scared of you,” she told cheering supporters.

James has also mocked Trump’s 1987 best-selling self-help book when describing his alleged fraud.

“Claiming that you have money that you do not have, does not amount to the Art of the Deal,” she said, referring to the book’s title. “It’s the art of the steal.”

The pair have sparred on social media for years, and Trump has responded to his opponent with name-calling.

Advertisement

News

What the Supreme Court did on the final day of its term

Published

on

What the Supreme Court did on the final day of its term

The U.S. Supreme Court

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The Supreme Court Tuesday upheld the long-established right of children born on U.S. soil to automatic American citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. In so doing, the court rejected President Trump’s most aggressive attempt to limit immigration in the United States.

Writing for the court majority, Chief Justice John Roberts traced birthright citizenship back to the founding of the nation. Just as the colonists demanded “the rights of Englishmen” more than 250 years ago, he said, Congress, after the Civil War, amended the Constitution to specify automatic citizenship for any child born on U.S. soil.

“Citizenship then and now was the right to have rights”—and the framers of the 14th amendment extended that promise to every free born person in this land. He concluded: “We keep that promise today.”

Advertisement

The vote was 6-to-3, depending on how you count it. Altogether, five justices signed on to the Roberts’ majority opinion. A sixth, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, agreed only that federal legislation enacted in the 1950s grants automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the lead dissent, a 91-page opus that agreed with Trump’s assertion that the 14th amendment only applied to former slaves and their descendants. The Thomas dissent added ominously that he “was not sure that “today’s opinion will stand the test of time.” The dissent was joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, with Justice Samuel Alito writing a separate dissent.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who, like Thomas is African American, responded to some of the themes in the Thomas dissent.

“Despite his longstanding endorsement of a colorblind society,” she wrote, “Justice Thomas now surprisingly suggests that the citizenship clause was a race-conscious remedial measure relating only to freed slaves.”

Cecillia Wang, legal director of the ACLU, who successfully argued the case at the Supreme Court, said President’s Trump failed attempt to limit birthright citizenship was transparent.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Rep. Tom Kean returns to Congress, says depression is why he went missing for months

Published

on

Rep. Tom Kean returns to Congress, says depression is why he went missing for months

Rep. Thomas Kean Jr., R-N.J., arrives at the U.S. Capitol with his wife Rhonda Kean on June 30.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

New Jersey Republican Thomas Kean Jr. said it was struggles with depression that kept him away from Congress for nearly four months with no explanation to his constituents.

Kean last voted on March 5th, missing numerous votes and other appearances on Capitol Hill since. In April, House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters he had spoken to Kean and that he was dealing with an undisclosed medical issue. Kean was not spotted until recently at his New Jersey home.

Speaking from the House floor on Tuesday, the second term lawmaker said he had checked into a hospital for testing several months ago after health concerns, and was subsequently diagnosed with depression.

Advertisement

“Talking about myself has never come naturally,” Kean said. “But I believe that I owe an explanation to the people of New Jersey’s seventh district, to my colleagues in this chamber and to the American people for my absence.”

Kean said he originally did not think his diagnosis would result in a long-term absence. Doctors recommended he remain in the hospital to address the illness, and it was his fastest route to recovery, he said.

“It is physical. It is emotional,” he said. “And until you experience it yourself, it is difficult to fully understand how powerful this illness could be.”

Kean said he miscalculated how long he would be away, estimating it would be a matter of weeks. However, he said like the roughly 48 million Americans who have battled the illness, he learned there is no timeline for recovery.

“I am grateful that I accepted help,” Kean said. “Today I stand before you healthier, stronger and excited to return to the work that I love.”

Advertisement

Kean’s absence proved a struggle for House Republicans, who contend with a razor thin majority to pass party priorities. For weeks, Kean and his office declined to share additional details on why he was away, feeding rumors and speculation and raising interest in a member known for his privacy.

Continue Reading

News

Michigan governor threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force

Published

on

Michigan governor threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force

Members of the National Guard stand in front of a large image of U.S. President Donald Trump that hangs from the the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building on May 18, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images North America

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a strongly worded letter to the head of Michigan’s National Guard, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer reiterated troops from her state are only to be used for operations surrounding America 250 celebrations in Washington, D.C., and not for President Trump’s long-running — and controversial — joint task force to fight crime. She said that she would pull her troops from the city if that is not the case, in the letter obtained by NPR.

“Please take all necessary measures to ensure the Michigan National Guard is only supporting the narrow and limited America 250 Mission and is in no way supporting the D.C. Safe and Beautiful Mission,” wrote Gov. Whitmer, referencing the official name for the federal task force.

Trump deployed hundreds of troops to Washington, D.C., in August of 2025, in what experts said was a stunning departure from governing norms. He said he did so to address rampant crime, despite declining crime rates at the time. The number of troops in the city has increased over time to more than 4,800 from Washington, D.C. and almost two dozen states, which until recently were exclusively Republican-led.

Advertisement

Michigan — which has 161 guard members currently in the city — is one of four Democratic-led states that sent members of their National Guard to D.C. in recent weeks, ahead of an influx of tourists for America 250 celebrations. North Carolina and Kentucky each sent one member of their guard, while Minnesota sent more than a hundred last week.

Kentucky confirmed to NPR Monday that it had recalled its one guard member over the weekend, after that member was “diverted to the task force by the federal government without the knowledge or consent of Gov. Beshear of the Kentucky Guard,” Scottie Ellis, a spokesperson for Gov. Beshear, wrote to NPR in an email.

When contacted by NPR, spokespeople for each respective Democratic governor’s office made it clear that their guard members were sent to help specifically with America 250, not for law enforcement purposes as part of the larger ongoing federal joint task force operation. All four states have been clear about their opposition to the Trump administration’s ongoing deployment of National Guard troops to D.C., filing an amicus brief in support of litigation challenging it as recently as May.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending