Connect with us

News

US journalist Evan Gershkovich released in Russia prisoner swap

Published

on

US journalist Evan Gershkovich released in Russia prisoner swap

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Russia, the US and a series of other countries exchanged 26 prisoners including the Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich on Thursday in the largest swap since the cold war, according to Turkish security officials.

Thursday’s exchange in Ankara involving seven countries was the culmination of many months of painstaking diplomacy after president Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine plunged US-Russia relations to their lowest level in decades. The talks also drew in Germany, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, and Belarus.

Russia agreed to release 16 prisoners including Gershkovich, who had been convicted on spying charges, and Paul Whelan, a former US marine serving a sentence for espionage, as well as other individuals including prominent political prisoner Ilya Yashin, the Turkish officials said.

Advertisement

In return, a total of 10 people, including two children, were transferred to Russia, including Vadim Krasikov, a hitman convicted of a murder in broad daylight in Berlin in 2021, they said.

This is a developing story

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Trump’s comments about Harris’ race kicks off a new – yet familiar – chapter in the 2024 presidential campaign | CNN Politics

Published

on

Trump’s comments about Harris’ race kicks off a new – yet familiar – chapter in the 2024 presidential campaign | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

Meet the new Donald Trump, same as the old Donald Trump.

The former president’s rant about likely Democratic nominee Kamala Harris’ racial identity, headlined by the false and offensive claim that the first Black woman elected vice president “happened to turn Black” only recently, as an act of political expedience, kicked off a fresh yet disturbingly familiar chapter in this increasingly bitter presidential campaign.

Not three weeks ago, Trump and some hopeful allies suggested that his narrow escape from a would-be assassin’s bullet would set about a renaissance in the 78-year-old’s worldview. In his scripted remarks at the Republican convention a few days later, Trump declared, “The discord and division in our society must be healed.” That high-minded rhetoric lasted a few minutes. Ditching the teleprompter and diving back into his typical fare, the GOP nominee delivered a historically long and often petty acceptance speech.

Wednesday’s interview-turned-confrontation with reporters at a convention of Black journalists in Chicago made perfectly clear that nothing has changed. Alongside his comments about Harris, Trump berated one of the journalists onstage, ABC News senior congressional correspondent Rachel Scott, and belittled his own running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, saying his pick was unlikely to “have any impact” on the election.

Advertisement

After President Joe Biden announced, 10 days earlier, that he would stand down and effectively pass the Democratic nomination to Harris, Trump’s rivals – and some of his supporters – wondered aloud how a man with a history of making racist and sexist remarks would handle running against a Black woman.

His appearances Wednesday made that answer clear.

Trump’s social media posts and remarks at a Wednesday night rally in central Pennsylvania, where the crowd roared in anger at the mention of Obama, doubled down on his comments from Chicago.

“Crazy Kamala is saying she’s Indian, not Black. This is a big deal. Stone cold phony. She uses everybody, including her racial identity!” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Alina Habba, a Trump lawyer who introduced him in Harrisburg, gave another, unsavory taste of what’s to come.

Advertisement

“Unlike you, Kamala,” she said, boisterously mispronouncing the vice president’s name. “I know who my roots are and where I come from.”

The questions for the coming days and weeks are more fraught. What will Trump – a leader of the racist “birther” conspiracy movement against former President Barack Obama and someone who saw “very fine people” among the neo-Nazis and White supremacists who marched on Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017 – say or do if Harris maintains or even accelerates the momentum driving her candidacy.

Harris – the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother who was raised in Oakland and attended a historically Black university – would be the first woman, the first woman of color, the first Black woman and the first Indian American elected president if she triumphs in November.

She first responded to Trump’s remarks with a blistering statement from her spokesman, who described the episode as “a taste of the chaos and division that has been a hallmark of Trump’s MAGA rallies this entire campaign.”

The candidate, addressing a historically Black sorority event in Houston hours after Trump comments on the panel, ticked off her usual talking points from the top. Then, with a wry smile, she pivoted to her highly anticipated rejoinder.

Advertisement

“This afternoon,” she said, pausing to let the buzz heighten, “Donald Trump spoke at the annual meeting of the National Association of Black Journalists and it was the same old show, the divisiveness and the disrespect. Let me just say, the American people deserve better.”

She continued, “The American people deserve a leader who tells the truth. A leader who does not respond with hostility and anger when confronted with the facts. We deserve a leader who understands that our differences do not divide us. They are an essential source of our strength.”

Moments later, Harris was back on message, warning of a “full-on attack on hard fought hard won fundamental freedoms and rights” by Trump-aligned Republicans, who have danced around questions but not uniformly rejected a federal abortion ban. (Trump has said the decision, per the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, should be made by the states.)

Harris speaks more – and more comfortably – about abortion rights than Biden before her. With 96 days until the election, she is poised to press Democrats’ advantage on that issue and, if Wednesday night’s remarks were any indication, mostly leave Trump to his own devices.

Other Democrats, including Harris’ husband, the second gentleman Doug Emhoff, offered harsher verdicts. Trump’s remarks, he told donors in Maine Wednesday, put on display “a worse version of an already horrible person.”

Advertisement

But he also cautioned against focusing too narrowly on the former president’s words.

“We can’t get distracted by Hannibal Lecter,” Emhoff said of Trump, according to the Washington Post. “Even the insults hurled at myself and my wife … that’s to distract us and get us talking about that.”

Harris supporters, led by a handful of potential running mates, praised the tone and content of her response.

“This guy (Trump) is a homophobe, a xenophobe, he’s a racist and misogynist. But here was just a perfect example of it for the American public to see,” Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker told CNN’s Anderson Cooper late Wednesday. Harris “doesn’t need to take him on directly. The rest of us can see it for ourselves and we’re going to talk about it.”

Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, one of the leading contenders to be her vice presidential pick, told reporters on Capitol Hill that Trump’s comments in Chicago were those ”of a desperate, scared old man who is, over the last week, especially, is having his butt kicked by an experienced prosecutor.”

Advertisement

“He’s done this before, he’s not going to change,” Kelly said of Trump. “Pretty obvious to me why he’s doing this.”

Meanwhile, Vance, less than two weeks after officially becoming the GOP vice presidential nominee, defended his new boss, telling supporters at a rally in Arizona that Harris is a “phony” who “caters to whatever audience is in front of her.”

“President Trump showed up and took some tough questions (at the NABJ event),” Vance said. “The press, however, treated him the same way they have since he came down that escalator in 2015. They were rude. They cut him off. And they didn’t want to hear – much less report – the truth.”

To that point, the ultimately abbreviated interview was broadcast live, and the questions posed to Trump were lean, direct and fairly simple. His reaction – his attack on Harris – was largely unprompted and strayed from the reporters’ line of questioning. Trump went where he went by choice, on his own.

Like Vance, Trump-friendly Republicans on Capitol Hill blamed the media.

Advertisement

Asked for his take, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio held up a screenshot of an Associated Press article headlined, “California’s Kamala Harris becomes first Indian-American US senator,” before insisting he’s heard Harris identify “multiple times” as Indian-American, not as Black.

“I don’t care what someone’s background is,” Rubio added. “I care about the fact that she’s a leftist.”

Others, while stopping short of condemning Trump’s lie, sought to nudge him in a similar direction.

North Dakota Sen. Kevin Cramer took a different tack, dismissing Trump’s remarks as “satire,” but also suggesting  it was “not wise” politically to raise the issue.

“It was President Biden who referenced her racial identity when he nominated her,” Cramer said. “I mean, that was said, that’s the reason. He promised he’s gonna have a woman of color.”

Advertisement

Biden pledged to choose a woman as his running mate in 2020, not a woman of color. But that, of course, is what he did. Whether Trump can channel his disdain for Harris into other, less noxious lines of attack is, just a few months out from the voting, an open question. How voters react is a better, more important one.

Continue Reading

News

Rolls-Royce to reinstate dividend for first time since pandemic

Published

on

Rolls-Royce to reinstate dividend for first time since pandemic

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Rolls-Royce has raised its profit forecast and plans to pay a dividend for the first time since the pandemic as chief executive Tufan Erginbilgiç’s efforts to restore the UK engineering group’s fortunes pay off.

Shareholders in the FTSE 100 company, whose engines power civil aircraft, submarines and military jets, last received a payout in 2020, shortly before the pandemic.

Announcing its first-half results on Thursday, Rolls-Royce said it would resume payouts at its full-year results. Payments will start at a 30 per cent payout ratio of underlying profit and then shift to a ratio of between 30 per cent and 40 per cent a year.

Advertisement

Shares in Rolls-Royce surged 10 per cent in early trading after the announcement, taking their gains this year to over 60 per cent.

Since taking over as chief executive in early 2023, Erginbilgiç has focused on rebuilding the group’s balance sheet and improving its profitability.

Rolls-Royce is also benefiting from the rebound in international travel as the company makes most of its money maintaining and servicing its engines when they are flying.

Alongside the resumption of the dividend, Rolls-Royce increased its forecast for underlying operating profit this year to between £2.1bn and £2.3bn. It is targeting free cash flow of between £2.1bn and £2.2bn, higher than its previous guidance of £1.7bn to £1.9bn.

The company is “expanding the earnings and cash potential of the business in a challenging supply chain environment, which we are proactively managing”, Erginbilgiç said on Thursday.

Advertisement

Revenues in the first six months of the year rose to £8.1bn, up from £6.9bn a year ago. Underlying operating profit surged to £1.15bn from £673mn.

Despite the strong results, Erginbilgiç warned that the supply chain environment remained difficult. The industry has struggled with a shortage of skilled labour and key components coming out of the pandemic, which has hampered plans by Airbus and Boeing to ramp up production of aircraft.

Erginbilgiç said he expected the supply chain challenges to last for another 18 to 24 months.

Continue Reading

News

We the People: Gun Rights : Throughline

Published

on

We the People: Gun Rights : Throughline

Marc Piscotty/Getty Images

Second Amendment activist protest in support of gun ownership.

Marc Piscotty/Getty Images

The Second Amendment. In April 1938, an Oklahoma bank robber was arrested for carrying an unregistered sawed-off shotgun across state lines. The robber, Jack Miller, put forward a novel defense: that a law banning him from carrying that gun violated his Second Amendment rights. For most of U.S. history, the Second Amendment was one of the sleepier ones. It rarely showed up in court, and was almost never used to challenge laws. Jack Miller’s case changed that. And it set off a chain of events that would fundamentally change how U.S. law deals with guns. Today on Throughline’s We the People: How the second amendment came out of the shadows. (Originally ran as The Right to Bear Arms)

Advertisement

Guest:

Joseph Blocher, Professor of Law at Duke University Law School and co-author of The Positive Second Amendment: Rights, Regulation and the Future of Heller

To access bonus episodes and listen to Throughline sponsor-free, subscribe to Throughline+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/throughline.

Continue Reading

Trending