Connect with us

News

Ukraine to sign critical minerals deal ‘in the very short term’, US claims

Published

on

Ukraine to sign critical minerals deal ‘in the very short term’, US claims

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

US national security adviser Mike Waltz has said Ukraine will sign a critical minerals deal with Washington in “the very short term”, even as Kyiv says several key points must still be agreed.

“Under Trump, this war will end and it will end soon,” Waltz told an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Maryland on Friday. “He is the president of peace.”

Donald Trump called Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week in an opening bid to end the conflict. He then dispatched senior US officials to meet Russian officials in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday but Zelenskyy was not invited.

Advertisement

Trump, who this week falsely claimed that Zelenskyy had started the war, raised the stakes further on Friday by saying that the Ukrainian president did not need to be involved in negotiations to bring it to an end. He also labelled Zelenskyy a “dictator” in a social media post.

“I don’t think he’s very important to be at meetings, to be honest with you,” the President said. “When Zelenskyy said, oh, he wasn’t invited to a meeting, I mean, it wasn’t a priority because he did such a bad job in negotiating so far.”

Ukraine has asked for security guarantees from the US, as well as Europe, to ensure that any peace deal is lasting and just, and will deter Russia from using an armistice to rest and re-arm, allowing it to resume its invasion.

Waltz said Zelenskyy wanted to develop critical minerals with US investment and claimed the Ukrainian leader would agree to a deal with Washington, although he did not provide details of the terms.

Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

Zelenskyy last week rejected a proposal presented by US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent during a visit to Kyiv, saying it was not in Ukraine’s best interest as written.

Advertisement

The deal proposed that the US would take ownership of about 50 per cent of the rights to Ukraine’s rare earth and critical minerals in exchange for past military assistance, and did not contain any offers of future assistance.

Senior Ukrainian officials who viewed the proposal told the FT that Bessent demanded that Zelenskyy sign the deal in his presence.

The officials said they had spent the past week drawing up a counterproposal, which they discussed with the US special envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, in Kyiv on Thursday and Friday.

Mike Waltz speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)
Mike Waltz speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) © AFP via Getty Images

Zelenskyy said in an address on Thursday evening after his first meeting with Kellogg that he had “proposed the fastest and most constructive way to achieve results”.

“Ukraine is ready for a strong and truly effective agreement with the US president on investments and security,” he added.

“We’ve never said that we don’t want to sign [the deal],” a senior Ukrainian official said. “They don’t understand that the draft text can’t violate our constitution and, actually, we are helping Trump to make a real deal.” 

Advertisement

The official added that Kyiv was trying to negotiate a “strong deal​ which doesn’t violate our laws and constitution and which guarantees the investments and security”. 

Officials with knowledge of the ongoing negotiations said that the US had presented an improved proposal but that the two sides were still working on several points.

Zelenskyy’s rejection of the original US deal and the subsequent war of words between him and Trump over the past week has raised concerns about the strategic partnership between the two nations and future American assistance, upon which Ukraine greatly relies to fend off Russia’s attacks.

“We want to be productive with the Americans, it’s not our choice to argue,” the Ukrainian official said. 

Waltz on Friday told his audience of conservatives outside Washington that the US had “an obligation” to the American taxpayer “to recoup the hundreds of billions of dollars that have been invested in this war”, drawing applause from the crowd.

Advertisement

He added that Europe was “often” paid back for its contributions to Ukraine, so the US should be too.

“Here’s the bottom line, President Zelenskyy is going to sign that deal, and you will see that in the very short term,” said Waltz. “And that is good for Ukraine. What better could you have for Ukraine than to be in an economic partnership with the United States? . . . What better could you have for Ukraine to stop the killing?”

Waltz also portrayed Trump as a peacemaker. “He’s going to end the war in Europe. He is going to end the wars in the Middle East. He is going to reinvest the United States and our leadership in our own hemisphere, from the Arctic to the border to Panama,” he said.

“By the end of this all, we’re going to have the Nobel Peace Prize sitting next to the name of Donald J Trump,” he added.

Cartography by Steven Bernard

Advertisement

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending