Connect with us

News

Should Biden Step Aside or Stay In? What Prominent Democrats Are Saying

Published

on

Should Biden Step Aside or Stay In? What Prominent Democrats Are Saying

The angst among Democrats over President Biden’s debate performance is intensifying, with some party members starting to voice concern about his candidacy and some others urging him to withdraw. The situation is threatening to divide the party ahead of its national convention next month in Chicago, where Mr. Biden is scheduled to accept the Democratic nomination.

Said Biden should step aside

“I had hoped that the debate would provide some momentum to change that. It did not.”

Lloyd Doggett

Representative, Texas – July 2
Advertisement

“Another Democrat would have a better shot at beating Trump.”

Julián Castro

Former Housing and Urban Development secretary – July 2

“After deep reflection over these past few days, I strongly believe that our best path forward is Kamala Harris.”

Tim Ryan

Advertisement
Former Representative, Ohio – July 1

“I think the president should step aside and let the convention pick a new candidate.”

Tom Harkin

“The time is now for another Democratic candidate to take his place on the November ballot.”

Advertisement

Marianne Williamson

2024 Democratic presidential candidate – July 2

“It is absolutely not too late to pick a new candidate.”

R.T. Rybak

Former D.N.C. vice chair – June 30
Advertisement

“What he needs to do is shoulder the responsibility for keeping that seat — and part of that responsibility is to get out of this race.”

Raúl M. Grijalva

Representative, Arizona – July 3

Expressed concern

Advertisement

“We’re having a serious conversation about what to do.”

Jamie Raskin

Representative, Maryland – June 30*

“I think it is a legitimate question to say is this an episode or is this a condition?”

Nancy Pelosi

Advertisement
Representative, California – July 2

“We have strong people, not just the top of the ticket, but around the ticket, who can be strong surrogates.”

Jake Auchincloss

Representative, Massachusetts – July 3

“We have heard concerns from people who saw the president on Thursday night. I felt concerned and raised those concerns.”

Advertisement

Hillary Scholten

Representative, Michigan – July 1

“I really do criticize the campaign for a dismissive attitude towards people who are raising questions for discussion.”

Peter Welch

Advertisement

“Like a lot of people, I was pretty horrified.”

Sheldon Whitehouse

Senator, Rhode Island – July 1*

“It has to be his decision. We have to be honest with ourselves. It wasn’t just a horrible night.”

Mike Quigley

Advertisement
Representative, Illinois – July 2

“President Biden has got to go out there, and in a sustained basis, show he has the stamina and can do the job.”

Debbie Dingell

Representative, Michigan – July 3

“We all saw what we saw. You can’t undo that.”

Advertisement

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

Representative, Washington – July 2*

“In 2025, I believe Trump is going to be in the White House.”

Jared Golden

Representative, Maine – July 2
Advertisement

“The question is can he effectively prosecute the case against Trump.”

Greg Landsman

Representative, Ohio – July 2*

“If he is going to stay in, he needs to step up.”

Don Davis

Advertisement
Representative, North Carolina – July 2

“In order to respond to our constituents’ concerns, we need to demonstrate that the president is fit not just for the job, but for the campaign.”

Ann McLane Kuster

Representative, New Hampshire – July 3*

“This White House is going to have to be way less insular than they have been.”

Advertisement

Katie Porter

Representative, California – July 3

“I deeply respect President Biden and all the great things he has done for America, but I have grave concerns about his ability to defeat Donald Trump.”

Seth Moulton

Representative, Massachusetts – July 3
Advertisement

Expressed support

“I am proud to support Joe Biden as our nominee and I am behind him 100 percent in the fight to defeat Donald Trump.”

Gretchen Whitmer

Governor, Michigan – July 1
Advertisement

“Joe Biden is going to be our nominee, unless he decides otherwise.”

J. B. Pritzker

Governor, Illinois – July 2

“A setback is nothing more than a setup for a comeback.”

Hakeem Jeffries

Advertisement
Representative, New York – June 30

“I am confident that Joe Biden will keep America’s economy humming, create millions of jobs, and will fiercely protect Social Security, Medicare and our basic freedoms and democracy.”

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Representative, Florida – June 28

“The person to defeat Donald Trump is going to be the Joe Biden, Kamala Harris ticket.”

Advertisement

Robert Garcia

Representative, California – July 3*

“I’m with Joe Biden.”

Chuck Schumer

Advertisement

“The only Democrat who has ever beaten Donald Trump is Joe Biden. He is our candidate for November.”

Chris Coons

“I’ll do my best to get him elected.”

Bernie Sanders

Advertisement

“And I think the American people understand that this president has delivered. There’s a lot of folks supporting him.”

Tim Walz

“Joe Biden’s presidency has been among the most productive and successful in American history.”

Advertisement

Pete Buttigieg

Secretary of Transportation – June 28

“This ain’t the West Wing … we have had a process, millions voted for Joe Biden and we have our nominee!”

Jaime Harrison

Advertisement

“It’s a difference between a bad initial debate and a very bad presidency, which Donald Trump can claim.”

Jack Reed

“As the president himself has said, don’t compare him to the almighty, compare him to the alternative. And by that metric, the choice is abundantly clear in this race.”

Katie Hobbs

Advertisement

“President Biden has my full confidence as president and if he chooses to remain in the race, he’ll have my full support.”

John Hickenlooper

“The president has a great record to run on.”

Advertisement

Jason Crow

Representative, Colorado – June 28

“President Joe Biden is in it to win it, and all of us said we pledged our support to him.”

Kathy Hochul

Governor, New York – July 3
Advertisement

“Joe Biden’s had our back. Now it’s time to have his.”

Gavin Newsom

Governor, California – July 3

“I suspect people will need to see the president in person and on TV to be convinced he is up to it. He is.”

Josh Green

Advertisement

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending